Contestability and Collateral in Credit Markets with Adverse Selection

DOI: 10.4236/tel.2012.21010   PDF   HTML     4,692 Downloads   8,259 Views  

Abstract

The work discusses a basic proposition in the theory of competition in markets with adverse selection. By working out the sequence of market transactions, we show that the effectiveness of collateral in avoiding equilibrium rationing depends on an assumption of uncontestability of the loan market. If contestability is restored to its proper place, the sepa- ration of borrower by means of sufficient collateral does not impede the emergence of credit rationing, which results from a coordination failure among risk-neutral banks. As a consequence, even in a risk-neutral environment with suitable endowments, the use of collateral in credit contracts could not be a socially efficient screening-device. Our conclu- sion on rationing does not stand in contrast with a general result from Gale.

Share and Cite:

G. Cesaroni, "Contestability and Collateral in Credit Markets with Adverse Selection," Theoretical Economics Letters, Vol. 2 No. 1, 2012, pp. 54-61. doi: 10.4236/tel.2012.21010.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

[1] H. Bester, “Screening vs. Rationing in Credit Markets with Imperfect Information,” American Economic Review, Vol. 75, No. 4, 1985, pp. 850-855
[2] J. E. Stiglitz and A. Weiss, “Credit Rationing in Markets with Asymmetric Information,” American Economic Review, Vol. 71, No. 3, 1981, pp. 393-410.
[3] H. Bester, “The Role of Collateral in Credit Markets with Imperfect Information,” European Economic Review, Vol. 31, No. 4, 1987, pp. 887-889. doi:10.1016/0014-2921(87)90005-5
[4] D. Besanko and A. V. Thakor, “Collateral and Rationing: Sorting Equilibria in Monopolistic and Competitive Credit Markets,” International Economic Review, Vol. 28, No. 3, 1987, pp. 671-689. doi:10.2307/2526573
[5] M. Hellwig, “Some Recent Developments in the Theory of Competition In Credit Markets with Adverse Selection,” European Economic Review, Vol. 31, No. 1-2, 1987, pp. 319-325. doi:10.1016/0014-2921(87)90046-8
[6] J. E. Stiglitz and A. Weiss, “Asymmetric Information in Credit Markets and its Implications for Macroeconomics,” Oxford Economic Papers, Vol. 44, No. 4, 1992, pp. 694-724.
[7] U. Schmidt-Mohr, “Rationing versus Collateralization in Competitive and Mo-nopolistic Credit Markets with Asymmetric Information,” European Economic Review, Vol. 41, No. 7, 1997, pp.1321-1342. doi:10.1016/S0014-2921(96)00006-2
[8] D. Gale, “Equilibria and Pareto Optima of Markets with Adverse Selection,” Economic Theory, Vol. 7, No. 2, 1996, pp. 207-235.
[9] M. Rothschild and J. E. Stiglitz, “Increasing Risk: I. A Definition,” Journal of Economic Theory, Vol. 2, No. 3, 1970, pp. 225-243. doi:10.1016/0022-0531(70)90038-4
[10] C. A. E. Goodhart, “Money, Information and Uncertainty,” Macmillan, London, 1989.
[11] X. Freixas and J. C. Rochet, “Microeconomics of Banking,” Mit Press, Cambridge, 1998.
[12] W. Keeton, “Equilibrium Credit Rationing,” Garland Press, New York, 1979.
[13] D. M. Jaffee and J. E. Stiglitz J. E, “Credit Rationing,” In: B. M. Friedman and F. Hahn, Eds., Handbook of Monetary Economics, North Holland, Amsterdam, 1990.
[14] W. Baumol, J. Panzar and R. Willig, “Contestable Markets and the Theory of Industry Structure,” Harcourt Brace Jovanovic, New York, 1982.
[15] Y. S. Chan and A. V. Tha-kor, “Collateral and Competitive Equilibria with Moral Hazard and Private Information,” Journal of Finance, Vol. 42, No. 2, 1987, pp. 345-363. doi:10.2307/2328256
[16] M. Rothschild and J. E. Stiglitz, “Equilibrium in Competitive Insurance Markets: An Essay on the Economics of Imperfect Information,” Quarterly Journal of Economics, Vol. 90, No. 4, 1976, pp. 629-649. doi:10.2307/1885326

  
comments powered by Disqus

Copyright © 2020 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

Creative Commons License

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.