Size Dependent Competition in Centric Diatoms as a Function of Nitrogen and Silicon Availability
Paul D. van Ruth, Jian G. Qin, Alan J. Branford
DOI: 10.4236/ojms.2012.21005   PDF   HTML     4,285 Downloads   8,779 Views   Citations


Size dependent competition was examined in two marine centric diatoms, Coscinodiscus sp. and Thalassiosira rotula at various, and Si concentrations. The growth responses for both species to nutrient levels were evaluated using two forms of nitrogen (NH4 and NO3) and silicon in both monoculture and mixed culture conditions. Under single species culture, the impact of Si did not depend on N forms for both diatoms. The increase of NH4-N enhanced the growth of Coscinodiscus, but did not affect T. rotula. When NO3-N was the nitrogen source, cell densities of both species were significantly enhanced by increasing Si concentrations, but only T. rotula density was affected by increasing N concentration. When Coscinodiscus sp. and T. rotula grew in the same culture, Coscinodiscus sp. dominated in both N forms. The scale of the dominance of Coscinodiscus sp. over T. rotula increased with decreasing N and Si concentrations. In the competition experiment, when was the N source, both Coscinodiscus sp. and T. rotula were signifi- cantly affected by changes in N concentration, but only T. rotula was affected by Si. When NO3 was the N source, neither Coscinodiscus sp. nor T. rotula was affected by Si, but T. rotula was enhanced by N levels. Regardless the N form, the impact of Si on neither Coscinodiscus sp. nor T. rotula depended on N concentration. Our results indicate that large diatom species have a competitive advantage over small species, and both large and small species were sensitive to NH4-N limitation, but the small species was more sensitive to NO3-N limitation than the large species.

Share and Cite:

P. van Ruth, J. Qin and A. Branford, "Size Dependent Competition in Centric Diatoms as a Function of Nitrogen and Silicon Availability," Open Journal of Marine Science, Vol. 2 No. 1, 2012, pp. 33-42. doi: 10.4236/ojms.2012.21005.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.


[1] G. E. Hutchinson, “The Paradox of the Plankton,” Ameri- can Naturalist, Vol. 95, No. 882, 1961, pp. 137-145. doi:10.1086/282171
[2] D. A. Siegel, “Resource Competiton in a Discrete Envi- ronment: Why Are Phytoplankton Distribu-tions Paradoxi- cal?” Limnology and Oceanography, Vol. 43, No. 6, 1998, pp. 113-146. doi:10.4319/lo.1998.43.6.1133
[3] D. Tilman, “Resource Competition between Planktonic Algae: An Experimental and Theoretical Approach,” Eco- logy, Vol. 58, No. 26, 1977, pp. 338-348. doi:10.2307/1935608
[4] U. Sommer, “Are Marine Diatoms Favoured by High Si:N Ratios?” Marine Ecology Progress Series, Vol. 115, 1994, pp. 309-315. doi:10.3354/meps115309
[5] W. Stolte and R. Riegman, “A Model Approach for Size- Selective Competition of Marine Phytoplankton for Fluc- tuating Nitrate and Ammonium,” Journal of Phycology, Vol. 32, No. 5, 1996, pp. 732-740. doi:10.1111/j.0022-3646.1996.00732.x
[6] J. K. Egge and D. L. Aksnes, “Silicate as Regulating Nu- trient in Phytoplankton Competition,” Marine Ecology Progress Series, Vol. 83, 1992, pp. 281-289. doi:10.3354/meps083281
[7] C. W. Sullivan, “Diatom Min-eralization of Silicic Acid 1. Si(OH)4 Transport Characteristics in Navicula pelliculosa,” Journal of Phycology, Vol. 12, No. 4, 1976, pp. 390-396.
[8] M. A. Brzezinski, R. J. Olson and S. W. Chisholm, “Silicon Availability and Cell Cycle Progression in Marine Diatoms,” Marine Ecology Progress Series, Vol. 67, 1990, pp. 83-96. doi:10.3354/meps067083
[9] T. A. Probyn, “Nitrogen Uptake by Size Fractionated Phytoplankton Popula-tions in the Southern Benguela Up- welling System,” Marine Ecology Progress Series, Vol. 22, 1985, pp. 249-258. doi:10.3354/meps022249
[10] M. W. Lomas and P. M. Gilbert, “Interactions between Nitrate and Ammonium Uptake and As-simialtion: Comparison of Diatoms and Dinoflagellates at Dif-ferent Growth Temperatures,” Marine Biology, Vol. 133, No. 3, 1999, pp. 541-551. doi:10.1007/s002270050494
[11] M. A. Brzezinski, “Cell Cycle Effects on the Kinetics of Silicic Acid Uptake and Resource Competition among Diatoms,” Journal of Plankton Research, Vol. 14, No. 114, 1992, pp. 1511-1539. doi:10.1093/plankt/14.11.1511
[12] M. A. Brzezinski and D. J. Conley, “Silicon Deposition during the Cell Cycle of Thalas-siosira weisfloggi (Bacil- lariophyceae) Determined Using Dual Rhodamine123 and Propidium Iodide Staining,” Journal of Phycology, Vol. 30, No. 1, 1994, pp. 45-55. doi:10.1111/j.0022-3646.1994.00045.x
[13] B. J. Binder and S. W. Chisholm, “Changes in the Soluble Silicon Pool Size in the Marine Diatom Thalassiosira weisfloggi,” Marine Biology Letters, Vol. 1, 1980, pp. 205-212.
[14] W. Stolte and R. Riegman, “Effect of Phytoplankton Cell Size on Transient State Nitrate and Ammonium Uptake Kinetics,” Microbiology, Vol. 141, No. 5, 1995, pp. 1221-1229. doi:10.1099/13500872-141-5-1221
[15] W. Stolte, T. McCol-lin, A. A. M. Noordeloos and R. Rie- gman, “Effect of Nitrogen Source on the Size Distribution within Phytoplankton Popula-tions,” Journal of Experi- mental Marine Biology and Ecology, Vol. 184, No. 1, 1994, pp. 83-97. doi:10.1016/0022-0981(94)90167-8
[16] R. R. L. Guillard and J. H. Ryther, “Studies on Marine Diatoms 1. Cyclotella Nana and Hustedt and Detonula Confervacea Gran,” Canadian Journal of Microbiology, Vol. 8, No. 2, 1962, pp. 229-239. doi:10.1139/m62-029
[17] P. Diggle, “Analysis of Longitudi-nal Data,” Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1994.
[18] Q. Dortch, “Effect of Growth Conditions on Accumulation of Internal Nitrate, Ammonium Amino Acids and Protein in Three Marine Diatoms,” Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecol-ogy, Vol. 61, No. 3, 1982, pp. 243-264. doi:10.1016/0022-0981(82)90072-7
[19] U. Sommer, “Nitrate and Silicate Competition among Antarctic Phytoplankton,” Marine Biology, Vol. 91, No. 31, 1986, pp. 345-351. doi:10.1007/BF00428628
[20] W. G. Harrison, L. R. Harris and B. D. Irwin, “The Kinetics of Nitrogen Utilization in the Oceanic Mixed Layer: Nitate and Ammonuim Interactions at Nanomolar Concentrations,” Limnology and Oceanography, Vol. 41, No. 1, 1996, pp. 16-32. doi:10.4319/lo.1996.41.1.0016
[21] C. W. Sullivan, “Diatom Mineralization of Silicic Acid 2. Regulation of Si(OH)4 Trans-port Rates during the Cell Cycle of Navicula pelliculosa,” Journal of Phycology, Vol. 13, 1977, pp. 86-91.
[22] B. Booth and P. J. Harrison, “Effect of Silicate Limitation on Valve Morphology in Thalassiosira and Coscinodiscus sp. (Bacil-lariophyceae),” Journal of Phycology, Vol. 15, No. 3, 1979, pp. 326-329. doi:10.1111/j.1529-8817.1979.tb02647.x
[23] E. Paasche, “Silicon and the Ecology of Marine Planktonic Diatoms 1. Thalassiosira pseudonana (Cyclotella nana) Grown in Chemo-stat with Silicate as Limiting Nutrient,” Marine Biology, Vol. 19, No. 2, 1973, pp. 117- 126. doi:10.1007/BF00353582
[24] K. D. Bidle and F. Azam, “Ac-celerated Dissolution of Diatom Silica by Marine Bacterial Assemblages,” Nature, Vol. 397, 1999, pp. 508-512. doi:10.1038/17351

Copyright © 2020 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

Creative Commons License

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.