Predictive Factors of Renal Failure in COVID-19 Patients at the Anti-COVID Center in Lome, Togo

Abstract

Background: Angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 has been identified as the receptor that allows the entry of SarsCov2 into the human cell. Its expression in the kidney is 100 times higher than in the lung; thus, making the kidney an excellent target for SarsCov2 infection manifesting as renal failure (RF). The objective of this study was to determine the predictive factors of RF during COVID-19 in the Togolese context. Patients and Methods: This was a retrospective descriptive and analytical study conducted at the Lomé Anti-COVID Center including the records of patients hospitalized for COVID-19, of age ≥ 18 years and having performed a creatinemia. RF was defined by a GFR < 60 ml/min/1.73m2 calculated according to the MDRD formula. Patients were randomized into 2 groups according to GFR<60 or not. Statistical tests used were Pearson’s Chi-2 test or Fisher’s exact test for qualitative variables and Mann-Whitney test or Wilcoxon test for quantitative variables. The significance level was set at 0.05. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression was performed to search for associated factors. Results: 482 patients were selected for this study with a mean age of 58.02 years. Sixty-five percent of the patients were men, i.e., a sex ratio of 1.88. Fifty-two patients had RF, i.e., a frequency of 10.8%.There were 65% men (315 cases), for a sex ratio (M/F) of 1.88. Risk factors for renal failure in COVID-19 were age ≥ 65 years (ORa 2.42; CIa95% [1.17 - 4.95]; p = 0.016), anemia (ORa 2.49; CIa95% [1.21 - 5.26]; p = 0.015), moderate (ORa 13; CIa95% [2.30 - 2.44]; p = 0.017), severe (ORa 26.2; CIa95% [4.85 - 4.93]; p = 0.002) and critical (ORa 108; CIa95% [16.5 - 21.76]; p < 0.001) severity stages at admission. Conclusion: Renal failure would therefore be related to the severity of COVID-19 and is the most formidable factor, conditioning the course of the disease and the patient’s vital prognosis.

Share and Cite:

Sabi, K. , Amekoudi, Y. , Kotosso, A. , Blatome, L. , Dolaama, B. , Sabi, A. , Gbahbang, O. , Affo, L. and Noto-Kadou-Kaza, B. (2024) Predictive Factors of Renal Failure in COVID-19 Patients at the Anti-COVID Center in Lome, Togo. Open Journal of Nephrology, 14, 125-135. doi: 10.4236/ojneph.2024.142013.

1. Introduction

COVID-19 is a global pandemic caused by SarsCov2 (Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2) identified in China and is responsible for unexplained severe pneumonitis [1] [2] . As of June 30, 2022, this infectious disease has affected more than 550 million people worldwide and killed nearly 6,500,000 people. This has earned it the status of a Public Health Emergency of International Concern (PHEIC) by the WHO because of its high capacity for spread [3] . Angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) has been identified as the receptor that allows the entry of SarsCov2 into the human cell. Its expression in the kidney is 100 times higher than in the lung; thus, making the kidney an excellent target for SarsCov2 infection manifesting as renal failure (RF) [4] [5] . RF is the impairment of the emunctory function of the kidney, preventing the internal balance of the organism, either by a decrease in renal blood flow, or by damage to the renal tissue with filtration disorders, or by abnormalities in the excretion of the urine formed [6] . The incidence of renal failure varies from 0.5 to more than 20% in patients undergoing conventional hospitalization and from 14% - 35% in intensive care [7] .

However, in general, and particularly in Togo where there is no data concerning renal damage, the parameters that allow the prediction of renal evolution and prognosis when COVID-19 is discovered remain unknown, despite the high frequency of renal failure during this condition. Thus, it seemed necessary to us to conduct the present study whose objective is to determine the predictive factors of renal failure in COVID-19 patients at the Lomé Anti-COVID Center.

2. Patients and Method

This was a retrospective study with a descriptive and analytical aim covering the period from 21 March 2020 to 28 February 2021 (12 months) and focusing on the records of patients infected with SarsCov2 hospitalized at the Lomé Anti-COVID Center. Were included the records of patients of age ≥ 18 years, in whom the diagnosis of COVID-19 was made by PCR; having performed a minimum assessment made of creatinine. Not included in the study were the records of patients aged < 18 years and those with renal failure before admission. Data were collected from the hospitalization register and individual patient records. The parameters studied were socio-demographic, clinical, paraclinical, therapeutic and evolutionary. Renal failure was defined as glomerular filtration rate (GFR) < 60 ml/min/1.73m2 and was calculated using the simplified MDRD formula. Patients were randomized into 2 groups: 1 with GFR < 60 ml/min/1.73m2 and the other with GFR ≥ 60 ml/min/1.73m2.

Data were entered into an electronic xlsform deployed through the Kobo Toolbox platform, which is a national platform set up to contain all data on COVID-19-positive patients. The resulting database was analyzed with R 4.0.4 software (R Core Team, Vienna) in the RStudio 1.4 environment. A comparative analysis was performed between the two groups. Statistical tests used were Pearson’s Chi-2 test or Fisher’s exact test for qualitative variables and Mann-Whitney test or Wilcoxon test for quantitative variables. The significance level was set at 0.05. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression was performed to search for associated factors.From an ethical point of view, we obtained the agreement of the bioethics committee and the written consent of all patients included in the study for the use of their biomedical data. Patients were informed about the nature and objectives of the study. The confidentiality of the biomedical data collected was ensured by the anonymity of the survey forms.

3. Results

During the study period, of the 801 inpatients in COVID-19, 503 had achieved creatinine levels. And of the 503 patients, we retained 482 and excluded 21 (18 for age < 18 years and 3 for renal failure before COVID). 52 patients had renal failure, a frequency of 10.8% [CI95% 8.02% - 13.56%]. The mean age in the general population with creatinine was 45.72 ± 15.9 years (extremes 18 - 100 years). There were 65% men (315 cases), for a sex ratio (M/F) of 1.88.

3.1. Comparative Analysis

In comparative analysis, in terms of sociodemographic and clinical parameters, there was a statistically significant difference between the proportion of renal failure patients and non-renal failure patients (p < 0.05) according to age (p < 0.001), educational level (p = 0.027) hypertension (p < 0.001), diabetes (p = 0.002), dyspnea (p < 0.001), abdominal pain (p = 0.031), vomiting (p = 0.006), asthenia (p = 0.003), respiratory rate (p < 0.001), oxygen saturation (p < 0.001), and presence of signs of respiratory struggle (p = 0.005). The existence of renal failure was proportional to the severity of clinical signs on admission (p < 0.001) (Table 1).

Table 2 represents the comparison of biological variables. There was a statistically significant difference between the proportion of renal failure patients and non-renal failure patients (p < 0.05) based on hemoglobin (p < 0.001), leukocytes (p < 0.001), neutrophils (p < 0.001) and platelets (p = 0.006) but also sedimentation rate (p < 0.001), C-reactive protein (p = 0.006), kaliemia (p = 0.009) and chloremia (p = 0.009).

Regarding therapeutic parameters, there was a statistically significant difference between the proportion of renal failure patients and non-renal failure patients (p < 0.05) in case of admission to resuscitation (p < 0.001) and in case of

Table 1. Distribution by socio-demographic and clinical data.

Table 2. Distribution by biological data.

use: Oxygen therapy (p < 0.001), corticosteroids (p = 0.001), anticoagulants (p < 0.001), aminopenicillins (p = 0.007), cephalosporins (p = 0.006), quinolones (p = 0.004), and imidazoles (P = 0.024) (Table 3).

3.2. Predictive Factors for Renal Failure in COVID-19

In univariate analysis, the risk factors for developing renal failure on COVID-19 were: Age greater than or equal to 65 years (OR = 1.22; CI95% [1.13 - 1.32]; p < 0.001); history of hypertension (OR = 1.17; CI95% [1.10 - 1.24]; p < 0.001) and diabetes (OR = 1.12; CI95% [1.04 - 1.20]; p = 0.002); dyspnea (OR = 1.21; CI95% [1.14 - 1.29]; p < 0.001); vomiting (OR = 1.29; CI95% [1.11 - 1.50]; p < 0.001); respiratory rate > 30 (OR = 1.34; CI95% [1.26 - 1.44]; p < 0.001); pulse room air saturation < 92% (OR = 1.21; CI95% [1.11 - 1.33]; p < 0.001); existence of signs of respiratory struggle (OR = 1.25; CI95% [1.09 - 1.42]; p = 0.001); severitymoderate at the entrance (OR = 1.14; CI95% [1.05 - 1.23]; p = 0.002), severe (OR = 1.34, CI95% [1.24 - 1.45]; p < 0.001), and critical (OR = 1.73, CI95% [1.51 - 1.99]; p < 0.001) severity stages; anemia (OR = 1.13; CI95% [1.07 - 1.20]; p < 0.001); hyperleukocytosis (OR = 1.24; CI95% [1.16 - 1.34]; p < 0.001); elevated CRP (OR = 1.19; CI95% [1.05 - 1.35]; p = 0.006); accelerated sedimentation rate (OR = 1.14; CI95% [1.06 - 1.23]; p < 0.001); uremia > 0.4 g/l (OR = 1.83; CI95% [1.73 - 1.93]; p < 0.001) and hyperkalemia (OR = 1.42; CI95% [1.15 - 1.76]; p = 0.001). Universityeducation level (OR = 0.85; CI95% [0.76 - 0.96]; p = 0.007), secondary education level (OR = 0.83; CI95% [0.72 - 0.94]; p = 0.005), and primaryeducation level (OR = 0.81; CI95% [0.72 - 0.92]; p = 0.002) education levels were protective factors for renal failure.

In multivariate analysis, after adjustment for other factors in the original model, age greater than or equal to 65 years, moderate to critical admission severity, and anemia were associated with renal failure (Table 4).

Table 3. Distribution by treatment received.

Table 4. Multivariate analysis.

4. Discussion

In the literature [7] , the incidence of renal failure varies from 0.5 to over 20%. In our study, the incidence of RF during COVID-19 was 10.8%. See et al. (Singapore) [8] ; and Lin et al. (China) [9] reported a prevalence of 8.1% and 10.6% respectively. This result is therefore consistent with the data in the literature.

We had found in our series, as risk factors of renal disease during COVID-19: age ≥ 65 years with a risk of 2.42 times compared to those with age below 65 years; anemia with 2.49 times the risk of having renal failure associated with COVID-19; and finally, the moderate, severe, and critical stages of severity on admission with the risks of 13 times, 26.2 times, 108 times respectively. Usually, patients with renal failure during COVID-19 have oligo-anuria, anemia, hematuria and moderate to critical stage severity [10] [11] [12] . Comorbidities such as advanced age, hypertension and diabetes are common in patients with impaired renal function [13] . Our results therefore confirm the data in the literature. Indeed, renal failure correlates with high expression of ACE2 in the renal parenchyma (thus favoring direct access of the virus), the severe form of COVID-19, high C reactive protein (CRP) levels and anemia [14] . The main factor incriminated in the occurrence of renal failure duringSarsCov2 infection is the elevated expression of ACE2, the key receptor of this virus within the renal parenchyma [4] [5] . It may be promoted by other factors, such as hypovolemia (fever, diarrhea, diuretic), viral pneumonitis (hypoxemia, mechanical ventilation), viral heart disease (cardio-renal syndrome), nephrotoxic drugs (nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, iodinated contrast media, antibiotics, etc.) [15] . Cheng et al (China), using multivariate regression analysis, found that higher age, severe disease, and anemia were risk factors for renal failure [16] . Hirsch et al. (in the USA) found a significant association of renal failure with advanced age, severe infection, cardiovascular disease, hypertension, diabetes mellitus, black race, need for ventilation and vasopressor drugs [17] . In the series of Henry et al. (UK); age greater than or equal to 65 years, comorbidities, anemia, high neutrophil count and CRP value greater than 6 mg/L were significantly associated with the occurrence of renal failure [18] . In the general population, it is known that RF is more associated with advanced age since once SarsCov2 infected elderly patients, morbidity and mortality rates increased, probably implying a weakening of the immune system of elderly patients and aging of tissues thus leading to greater susceptibility to viral replication [9] .

Our results also showed that a severity of infection on admission ranging from moderate to critical to severe was a risk factor for renal failure during COVID-19. Indeed, one possible explanation is that COVID-19 can be complicated by acute respiratory distress syndrome and septic shock in severe cases, and the subsequent hypotension and vasoconstriction would contribute to the development of acute tubular necrosis, as evidenced by histological findings in renal tissues from patients with COVID-19 [16] . The relationship between anemia and renal failure during COVID-19 is not well elucidated. It is well known that renal failure may contribute to the development of anemia due to reduced erythropoietin production, increased risk of bleeding, and reduced red blood cell life span. Anemia has also been shown to be a risk factor for the development of renal failure in patients undergoing major surgery leading to increased mortality. However, it is not always clear whether the presence of anemia is simply a reflection of a comorbid disease that increases the risk of renal failure or a direct contributor to renal failure, e.g., due to anemia-induced hypoxia in the renal cortex. The kidney, particularly the proximal tubule, is known to be sensitive to ischemic damage. Using an animal model, Madu et al. (Nigeria) [19] showed a sustained reduction in renal cortical and medullary oxygenation in rats that were subjected. It should also be noted that anemia is the prerogative of black subjects with respect to the African diet. This would then constitute a favorable terrain for the development of renal failure once associated with the severe form of the infection.

This study, like most retrospective studies, was confronted with the lack of certain information in the patients’ medical records. The lack of a computerized system for the management of patients’ records was a difficulty in the search for records and in the traceability of patients. The absence of biological data such as 24-hour proteinuria, urine dipstick at a minimum, creatininemia and blood count in some patients, and cytology and pathological anatomy data useful for the diagnosis of certain kidney diseases was also a limitation. These difficulties could be a source of bias and thus limit these results, which could not then be generalized to the entire population of patients with COVID-19. However, our study is still of interest because, to our knowledge, it is the first study in Togo to provide data on the risk factors for the occurrence of RF in COVID-19.

5. Conclusion

We conducted a retrospective descriptive and analytical study over a period of one year at the Lomé Anti-COVID Center in which we performed comparative analysis and univariate and multivariate logistic regression to investigate the predictive factors for the occurrence of renal failure during COVID-19. At the end of this study, the risk factors for renal failure during COVID-19 were age ≥ 65; anemia; and moderate, severe, and critical stages of severity on admission. RF is the most formidable factor, conditioning the course of the disease and the patient’s vital prognosis. Therefore, it should be emphasized in the follow-up of patients with COVID-19. Our study could serve as the basis for a larger study on the efficacy of therapies in COVID-19 patients with renal failure, and enable better management of these patients in our setting.

Liste of Abreviations

SarsCov2 = Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2.

PHEIC = Public Health Emergency of International Concern.

ACE2= Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme 2.

RF= Renal Failure.

GFR = Glomerular Filtration Rate.

Author’s Contributions

· Kossi Akomola Sabi, Awéréou Kotosso, Yoan Makafui Amekoudi, conceived and wrote the first draft of the manuscript.

· Béfa Noto-Kadou-Kaza, Laune Odilon Blatome, Badomta Dolaama, supervised the manuscript.

· Ayodélé Jonathan Sabi, Oscar Gnirimi Gbahbang, Loutou Ahoub-Laye Affo, have collected the data.

· Both authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Availability of Data and Materials

The datasets used and/or analysed during the current study available from the author [Kossi Akomola Sabi, Nephrology and Hemodialysis Department of CHU Sylvanus Olympio, Lomé (Togo); Mail: kossi.sabi@gmail.com] on reasonable request.

Ethics Approval and Consent to Participate

This study was approved by “Comité de Bioéthique pour la Recherche enSanté (CBRS)” (Bioethics Committee for Health Research) from the Togo Ministry of Health (CBRS N°004/2020/CBRS). Written informed consent was provided by all participants prior to participation. All methods were carried out with relevant guidelines of Helsinki.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this paper.

References

[1] Lu, H., Stratton, C.W. and Tang, Y.-W. (2020) Outbreak of Pneumonia of Unknown Etiology in Wuhan, China: The Mystery and the Miracle. Journal of Medical Virology, 92, 401-402.
https://doi.org/10.1002/jmv.25678
[2] Al-Dmour, H., Masa’deh, R., Salman, A., Abuhashesh, M. and Al-Dmour, R. (2020) Influence of Social Media Platforms on Public Health Protection against the COVID-19 Pandemic via the Mediating Effects of Public Health Awareness and Behavioral Changes: Integrated Model. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 22, Article ID: 19996.
https://doi.org/10.2196/19996
[3] Guan, W., Ni, Z., Hu, Y., Hu, Y., Liang, W., Ou, C., et al. (2020) Clinical Characteristics of Coronavirus Disease 2019 in China. The New England Journal of Medicine, 382, 1708-1720.
https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa2002032
[4] Zhou, P., Yang, X., Wang, X., Hu, B., Zhang, L., Zhang, W., et al. (2020) A Pneumonia Outbreak Associated with a New Coronavirus of Probable Bat Origin. Nature, 579, 270-273.
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-020-2012-7
[5] Li, W., Moore, M.J., Vasilieva, N., Sui, J., Wong, S.K., Berne, M.A., et al. (2003) Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme 2 is a Functional Receptor for the SARS Coronavirus. Nature, 426, 450-454.
https://doi.org/10.1038/nature02145
[6] Guedon, J., Gontard, F., Durand, M., Gay, M. and Delamare, J. (1969) Renal Functions in Cyanogenic Congenital Cardiopathies. Study of Clearances and of Concentration-Dilution Ability. Journal of Urology and Nephrology (Paris), 75, 319-325.
[7] Yang, X., Yu, Y., Xu, J., Shu, H., Xia, J., Liu, H., et al. (2020) Clinical Course and Outcomes of Critically Ill Patients with SARS-CoV-2 Pneumonia in Wuhan, China: A Single-Centered, Retrospective, Observational Study. The Lancet Respiratory Medicine, 8, 475-481.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S2213-2600(20)30079-5
[8] See, Y.P., Young, B.E., Ang, L.W., Ooi, X.Y., Chan, C.P., Looi, W.L., et al. (2021) Risk Factors for Development of Acute Kidney Injury in COVID-19 Patients: A Retrospective Observational Cohort Study. Nephron, 145, 256-264.
https://doi.org/10.1159/000514064
[9] Lin, L., Wang, X., Ren, J., Sun, Y., Yu, R., Zheng, L., et al. (2020) Risk Factors and Prognosis for COVID-19-Induced Acute Kidney Injury: A Meta-Analysis. BMJ Open, 10, Article ID: 042573.
https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-042573
[10] Stoecklin, S.B., Rolland, P., Silue, Y., Mailles, A., Campese, C., Simondon, A., et al. (2020) First Cases of Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) in France: Surveillance, Investigations and Control Measures. Eurosurveillance, 25, Article ID: 2000094.
https://doi.org/10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2020.25.6.2000094
[11] Sohrabi, C., Alsafi, Z., O’Neill, N., Khan, M., Kerwan, A., Al-Jabir, A., et al. (2020) World Health Organization Declares Global Emergency: A Review of the 2019 Novel Coronavirus (COVID-19). International Journal of Surgery, 76, 71-76.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsu.2020.02.034
[12] Wu, Z. and McGoogan, J.M. (2020) Characteristics of and Important Lessons from the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Outbreak in China: Summary of a Report of 72 314 Cases from the Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention. JAMA, 323, 1239-1242.
https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2020.2648
[13] Sang, L., Chen, S., Zheng, X., Guan, W., Zhang, Z., Liang, W., et al. (2020) The Incidence, Risk Factors and Prognosis of Acute Kidney Injury in Severe and Critically Ill Patients with COVID-19 in Mainland China: A Retrospective Study. BMC Pulmonary Medicine, 20, 290.
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12890-020-01305-5
[14] Appel, R.G., Bleyer, A.J., Reavis, S. and Hansen, K.J. (1995) Renovascular Disease in Older Patients Beginning Renal Replacement Therapy. Kidney International, 48, 171-176.
https://doi.org/10.1038/ki.1995.281
[15] Beurton, A., Haudebourg, L., Simon-Tillaux, N., Demoule, A. and Dres, M. (2020) Limiting Positive End-Expiratory Pressure to Protect Renal Function in SARS-CoV-2 Critically Ill Patients. Journal of Critical Care, 59, 191-193.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrc.2020.07.008
[16] Cheng, Y., Luo, R., Wang, X., Wang, K., Zhang, N., Zhang, M., et al. (2020) The Incidence, Risk Factors, and Prognosis of Acute Kidney Injury in Adult Patients with Coronavirus Disease 2019. Clinical Journal of the American Society of Nephrology, 15, 1394-1402.
https://doi.org/10.2215/CJN.04650420
[17] Hirsch, J.S., Ng, J.H., Ross, D.W., Sharma, P., Shah, H.H., Barnett, R.L., et al. (2020) Acute Kidney Injury in Patients Hospitalized with COVID-19. Kidney International, 98, 209-218.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.kint.2020.05.006
[18] Henry, B.M., de Oliveira, M.H.S., Benoit, S., Plebani, M. and Lippi, G. (2020) Hematologic, Biochemical and Immune Biomarker Abnormalities Associated with Severe Illness and Mortality in Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19): A Meta-Analysis. Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine, 58, 1021-1028.
https://doi.org/10.1515/cclm-2020-0369
[19] Madu, A.J. and Ughasoro, M.D. (2017) Anaemia of Chronic Disease: An In-Depth Review. Medical Principles and Practice, 26, 1-9.
https://doi.org/10.1159/000452104

Copyright © 2024 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

Creative Commons License

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.