Navigating Silence: A Comprehensive Review of Parental Roles in the Rehabilitation of Children with Hearing Loss

Abstract

This narrative literature review delves into the multifaceted realm of parental involvement in the rehabilitation of children with permanent hearing loss. While existing research has made strides in elucidating parental roles in this context, critical gaps persist, necessitating a comprehensive exploration to inform future endeavors. Our review synthesizes a wide array of studies, identifying these gaps and emphasizing the significance of addressing them. Themes emerging from the literature include the varying degrees of parental engagement, the impact of cultural and socio-economic factors, and the challenges faced by families navigating rehabilitation processes. The synthesis of this literature not only highlights the current state of knowledge but also provides a roadmap for future research efforts. By addressing these gaps, we aim to contribute to a more nuanced understanding of parental involvement in the rehabilitation of children with permanent hearing loss, ultimately fostering improved support systems and holistic care for affected families.

Share and Cite:

Hamanjila, K. , Thiruppathi, M. and Phiri, H. (2024) Navigating Silence: A Comprehensive Review of Parental Roles in the Rehabilitation of Children with Hearing Loss. Open Journal of Pediatrics, 14, 364-378. doi: 10.4236/ojped.2024.142036.

1. Introduction

The advent of early hearing screening programs has significantly improved the identification of hearing impairment in infants, leading to prompt interventions and support [1] . However, the challenges faced by children with permanent hearing loss extend beyond the initial diagnosis. The rehabilitation process requires a comprehensive and collaborative approach that involves various stakeholders, with parents playing a pivotal role in shaping the trajectory of their child’s journey towards effective communication and overall well-being [2] .

Understanding the intricate dynamics of parental involvement in the rehabilitation of children with permanent hearing loss is crucial for optimizing outcomes [3] . This narrative literature review aims to explore and synthesize existing research on the multifaceted roles parents play in supporting their children’s development in the context of hearing loss. The specific research questions guiding this review are:

1) What are the key dimensions of parental contributions to the rehabilitation of children with permanent hearing loss?

2) How do parental attitudes and coping mechanisms impact the rehabilitation outcomes for children with hearing impairment?

3) What is the efficacy of early intervention strategies employed by parents in the context of permanent hearing loss?

4) In what ways does technology augment communication for children with permanent hearing loss, and how do parents contribute to its effective utilization?

5) What are the challenges faced by families in diverse socio-cultural contexts in supporting children with permanent hearing loss?

The scope of this review extends beyond the traditional medical and therapeutic perspectives, emphasizing the importance of a holistic approach that recognizes the influence of familial environments on a child’s cognitive, emotional, and social development. As we explore various literature, we will uncover the various strategies and interventions employed by parents, professionals, and educators to create an inclusive and supportive environment for children with permanent hearing loss.

In navigating this narrative exploration, we will address key themes such as the impact of parental attitudes and coping mechanisms, the efficacy of early intervention strategies, the role of technology in augmenting communication, and the challenges faced by families in diverse socio-cultural contexts. By synthesizing these insights, we aim to provide a comprehensive overview of the existing knowledge base and identify gaps in the literature that warrant further investigation.

Ultimately, this narrative review aspires to not only contribute to the academic discourse surrounding the rehabilitation of children with permanent hearing loss but also to inform policy and practice by highlighting the indispensable role parents play in shaping the future of their children within the context of hearing impairment. Through an in-depth exploration of existing research, we strive to enhance our understanding of the intricate interplay between familial support and successful rehabilitation outcomes for these resilient young individuals.

2. Methodology

2.1. Literature Search Strategy

● Search Databases:

A comprehensive search was conducted across databases such as PubMed, PsycINFO, ERIC, and Google Scholar. These databases were selected due to their coverage of medical, psychological, and educational literature relevant to the topic.

● Keywords and Search Terms:

The search terms included combinations of “parental involvement,” “rehabilitation,” “children,” “permanent hearing loss,” and related terms. The search strategy evolved iteratively as insights from initial searches shaped subsequent exploration.

2.2. Study Selection Process

● Initial Screening:

Initial screening involved assessing titles and abstracts for relevance to the review’s focus. Automated tools, such as reference management software, were employed to streamline this process.

● Full-Text Assessment:

Full texts of selected articles were thoroughly assessed against predetermined inclusion criteria. In cases of ambiguity, consensus was reached through discussion among the research team.

● Inclusion and Exclusion Criteria:

This review considered peer-reviewed articles, books, and reports published in English from the past 10 years (2014-2024) with a few exceptions to ensure relevance and currency. Primary emphasis was placed on studies examining the role of parents in the rehabilitation of children (aged 0 - 18 years) with permanent hearing loss. Exclusion criteria encompassed unrelated topics, non-peer-reviewed sources, and publications in languages other than English.

2.3. Critical Appraisal of Studies

● Quality Assessment:

Each included study underwent a critical appraisal for methodological rigor. This process involved evaluating study design, sample size, data collection methods, and potential sources of bias.

● Bias Assessment:

A systematic approach was employed to assess potential biases within each study. Common biases, such as selection bias, measurement bias, and reporting bias, were considered during the appraisal.

● Study Validity:

The validity of each study’s findings was considered concerning the study’s design and methodology. Studies with robust methodologies and minimal biases were given more weight in the synthesis.

2.4. Data Extraction and Synthesis

● Data Extraction:

Pertinent information, including study objectives, methodologies, key findings, and participant demographics, was systematically extracted from each selected study.

● Synthesis Approach:

Thematic analysis was employed to identify and analyze patterns within the extracted data. Themes were derived through a systematic process of coding, categorization, and abstraction. Two independent researchers conducted the initial coding to enhance reliability.

● Process for Identifying Themes:

Initial codes were generated by systematically reviewing and categorizing relevant information from the selected studies.

These codes were then organized into potential themes based on shared patterns and recurring concepts.

Themes were refined through an iterative process of discussion and consensus among the research team, ensuring a comprehensive and nuanced representation of the data.

● Criteria for Theme Selection:

Themes were selected based on their relevance to the research questions and objectives.

Emphasis was placed on themes that recurred across multiple studies, highlighting their significance in the context of parental involvement in the rehabilitation of children with permanent hearing loss.

2.5. Ethical Considerations

● Ethical Review:

As this review involves the analysis of existing literature, no formal ethical review was conducted. All sources were obtained from publicly accessible databases and publications.

2.6. Limitations

● Methodological Limitations:

It is acknowledged that potential biases may arise from the exclusion of non-English publications and the emphasis on recent literature. To address this, future reviews could consider expanding the search to include relevant non-English sources. Additionally, the narrative synthesis approach may introduce subjectivity; efforts were made to mitigate this by employing a thematic analysis approach. However, readers should interpret findings with an awareness of these limitations.

3. Literature Review

Permanent hearing loss in children is a complex challenge that extends beyond the physiological aspect of impaired auditory function. The comprehensive rehabilitation of children with permanent hearing loss necessitates a holistic approach, acknowledging the critical role of parents in this cardinal process [1] [4] . Despite the overall excellent results in speech perception among cochlear implanted children, results are still heterogeneous with some implanted children being poor performers after unilateral and/or bilateral cochlear implantation. Possible explanations for the aforementioned dilemma are numerous but most notably is the importance of quality parent to child interaction for children’s language development [5] . Parents are critical providers for linguistic and social stimulation necessary for the child to develop their language [6] .

This literature review aims to synthesize existing knowledge on the subject, exploring the historical context, theoretical frameworks, and empirical evidence surrounding parental roles in the rehabilitation of children with permanent hearing loss.

4. Theoretical Framework: Social Capital Theory in Parental Involvement

This literature review adopts Social Capital Theory as the guiding framework to thoroughly explore the intricate dynamics of parental involvement in the rehabilitation of children with permanent hearing loss. Grounded in the works of Bourdieu, Coleman, and Putnam [7] [8] [9] , Social Capital Theory provides a comprehensive lens through which we can understand the influence of social networks and relationships on the support systems available to families navigating the challenges of hearing loss.

In the context of rehabilitation, Social Capital Theory postulates that the resources, information, and emotional support derived from social connections play a central role in shaping the outcomes for children with permanent hearing loss and their families. Parental involvement, in this theoretical framework, is viewed as a key factor in accessing and utilizing these social resources. The theory further allows for the examination of various forms of social capital, such as bonding, bridging, and linking social capital, and how these contribute to the overall rehabilitation process.

4.1. Integration into Literature Analysis

Applying this theoretical lens, the literature review aims to conduct an analysis of existing studies that explore the multifaceted role of parental involvement in the rehabilitation journey. It seeks to uncover how social networks, community connections, and shared experiences impact the well-being of both children and parents. Specifically, the review will delve into the ways in which parental involvement acts as a conduit for accessing and mobilizing social capital, thereby influencing rehabilitation outcomes.

Furthermore, the review will investigate how social capital may vary across diverse socio-economic and cultural contexts, shedding light on its role in shaping the effectiveness of rehabilitation programs and support systems. This exploration will contribute to a better understanding of the contextual factors that influence the interplay between parental involvement and the social capital available to families of children with permanent hearing loss.

4.2. Ecological Systems Perspective Integration

Integrating the ecological systems perspective [10] into the Social Capital Theory framework, this review will systematically examine the microsystem (family and rehabilitation services), mesosystem (interaction between family and professionals), exosystem (community resources), and macrosystem (cultural attitudes towards hearing loss). This holistic approach aims to provide a comprehensive understanding of the ecological influences on parental involvement throughout the rehabilitation process.

By employing Social Capital Theory as the overarching theoretical framework, this literature review aspires not only to synthesize and critically evaluate existing research but also to offer a profound and comprehensive understanding of the intricate dynamics shaping parental involvement in rehabilitation. The integration of Social Capital Theory into the analysis will enrich the theoretical contribution of the work and provide valuable insights into the underlying mechanisms driving successful rehabilitation outcomes for children with permanent hearing loss.

4.3. Background and Significance

The historical evolution of parental involvement in the rehabilitation of children with hearing loss reflects significant transformative shifts. Early perspectives frequently relegated parents to passive roles, with the responsibility for rehabilitation primarily entrusted to professionals [11] . During this era, parents were often seen as recipients of information and directives rather than active contributors to the therapeutic process [12] . This approach, rooted in a medical model of disability, positioned professionals as the primary decision-makers, while parents played a more subordinate role.

However, contemporary scholarship has ushered in a paradigm shift, recognizing the profound and multifaceted role that parents play in shaping a child’s developmental trajectory, particularly in the context of hearing loss [13] . The empowerment of parents has gained prominence as research underscores the positive impact of active parental involvement on the overall well-being and developmental outcomes of children with hearing loss [3] . This paradigmatic transition highlights the need for a comprehensive exploration of parental roles in the contemporary landscape of hearing loss rehabilitation.

In recent years, research has emphasized the importance of a family-centered approach that recognizes the family unit as an integral part of the rehabilitation process [14] [15] . The acknowledgment of parents as partners in the rehabilitation journey aligns with a socioecological perspective, recognizing the interconnectedness of individual, familial, and societal factors in shaping a child’s experience with hearing loss [10] .

This shift in understanding not only reflects a more inclusive and holistic approach but also has practical implications for intervention strategies. Family-centered models emphasize collaborative decision-making, recognizing the unique expertise that parents bring to the table regarding their child’s needs and capabilities [13] . As parental involvement becomes a cornerstone of contemporary rehabilitation practices, it becomes imperative to explore the various dimensions and intricacies of this evolving role.

The significance of this shift lies not only in its theoretical implications but also in its potential to enhance the effectiveness of interventions and support systems for children with hearing loss. It opens avenues for tailored and contextually relevant approaches that consider the diverse needs, strengths, and challenges within individual families [2] . Moreover, the recognition of parents as active agents in the rehabilitation process aligns with the broader movement towards patient-centered care and shared decision-making in healthcare contexts [15] .

In summary, the historical transformation of parental roles in the rehabilitation of children with hearing loss reflects a shift from passive recipients to active contributors. The contemporary recognition of parents as pivotal figures in shaping a child’s developmental trajectory underscores the need for a nuanced exploration of their roles within the evolving landscape of hearing loss rehabilitation practices.

4.4. Parental Involvement in Early Intervention

Early detection and diagnosis constitute the cornerstone of effective intervention strategies for children with hearing loss. Parents, positioned as primary caregivers, play a pivotal role not only in the emotional navigation following their child’s diagnosis but also in the crucial task of accessing timely rehabilitation services [16] [17] [18] .

Upon receiving a diagnosis of hearing loss in their child, parents often experience a range of emotional responses, from shock and disbelief to anxiety and concern about their child’s future [19] . Navigating this emotional terrain requires not only resilience on the part of parents but also a supportive framework provided by healthcare professionals and rehabilitation services. Wright et al. highlights the significance of recognizing and addressing the emotional needs of parents during this critical phase, emphasizing the potential long-term impact on the overall rehabilitation process [18] .

4.5. Communication and Language Development in Early Childhood Hearing Loss

During early childhood, a critical period (the first year of life) for language acquisition coincides with the imperative role parents play in facilitating communication for children with hearing loss [20] . Ching, highlights the significant contribution parents make to their child’s linguistic development, emphasizing the use of sign language, visual communication, and assistive technologies [21] . These methods serve as effective tools for bridging communication gaps and nurturing language skills. Sign language, known for its visual nature, strengthens parent-child connections, while visual communication strategies, including gestures and facial expressions, compensate for auditory limitations. Additionally, the integration of assistive technologies, such as cochlear implants and hearing aids, enhances a child’s ability to perceive auditory stimuli, with parental involvement being crucial for optimal usage [21] [22] [23] . This dynamic and tailored approach, guided by ongoing collaboration between parents and professionals, ensures a rich linguistic environment for children with hearing loss.

4.6. Emotional and Social Development in Children with Hearing Loss

Moving beyond linguistic competence, the emotional and social development of children with hearing loss is significantly influenced by positive parent-child interactions. Tsou et al. underscores the crucial role parents play in shaping various facets of their child’s emotional well-being [24] .

Parents act as essential facilitators in the development of peer relationships for children with hearing loss. Through active engagement and guidance, parents help their children navigate social interactions, fostering a sense of belonging within peer groups. This is crucial for the child’s overall well-rounded growth and resilience [25] .

Moreover, parents play a pivotal role in building and nurturing their child’s self-esteem. Positive parental support becomes foundational for developing a strong sense of self-worth and confidence, particularly as children with hearing loss navigate unique challenges in social contexts [26] .

The potential impact of hearing loss on emotional health underscores the importance of proactive parental involvement. Parents act as buffers, mitigating potential emotional challenges associated with hearing loss and addressing societal misconceptions or stigmas [27] .

In essence, the emotional and social development of children with hearing loss is intricately linked to the supportive role parents play in their lives. Through fostering peer relationships, building self-esteem, and addressing emotional challenges, parents become instrumental contributors to their child’s holistic development.

4.7. Challenges and Coping Strategies in Parental Involvement for Children with Hearing Loss

Parental involvement in the rehabilitation of children with hearing loss brings forth unique challenges in both educational and emotional domains [27] [28] [29] . It is important to understand these challenges, comprehend the emotional toll on parents, and explore effective coping strategies for an extensive understanding of parental roles in this context.

Navigating the educational landscape for children with hearing loss involves intricate processes such as managing Individualized Education Programs (IEPs), integrating assistive technologies, and advocating within the educational system. Continisio, underscores the potential for overwhelming stress among parents associated with these complexities [30] .

The emotional strain experienced by parents compounds these challenges. Parents often confront feelings of grief, loss, and concerns about their child’s future. Addressing these emotional dynamics becomes crucial for comprehensive support that extends beyond the academic sphere.

To effectively address these challenges, implementing coping strategies is paramount. Gunjawate et al. emphasize the importance of resilience-building interventions, fostering peer support networks, and providing accessible resources [28] . These initiatives empower parents with the knowledge and tools necessary to navigate the intricate challenges associated with their child’s hearing loss.

Consideration of the cultural and socioeconomic context is indispensable, as it significantly shapes the landscape of challenges. Socioeconomic disparities may impact access to specialized services, and cultural factors play an important role in influencing how parents perceive and respond to their child’s hearing loss. Recognizing these contextual factors is vital for crafting interventions that acknowledge and cater to the diverse experiences within this population [27] .

In summary, recognizing and understanding the challenges inherent in parental involvement for children with hearing loss is a crucial step. Exploring into the complexities of education, acknowledging emotional strains, and exploring effective coping strategies contribute not only to scholarly discussions but also to the practical development of supportive interventions, ultimately enhancing the overall well-being of both parents and children.

5. Cultural and Socioeconomic Influences on Parental Roles in Hearing Loss Rehabilitation

Recognizing the inherent diversity of experiences is paramount in comprehending how cultural and socioeconomic factors exert influence on parental roles within the realm of hearing loss rehabilitation. The interplay of diverse perspectives within distinct cultural contexts and the pronounced socioeconomic disparities in access to rehabilitation services underscore the need for tailored interventions that consider these multifaceted influences [31] .

5.1. Cultural Influences

Cultural backgrounds play a significant role in shaping attitudes and approaches toward hearing loss. Different cultural contexts may contribute to varying perspectives on disability, hearing impairment, and the roles and responsibilities of parents in the rehabilitation process. Understanding and respecting these cultural differences are fundamental in developing interventions that align with the beliefs and values of diverse communities [31] .

To delve deeper, an analysis of specific cultural factors influencing parental roles can be conducted. For instance, a detailed examination of how cultural attitudes toward disability impact parental perceptions of hearing loss, and how these attitudes may shape their involvement in rehabilitation efforts. Additionally, exploring cultural expectations regarding family dynamics and support structures can provide valuable insights into tailoring interventions to specific cultural contexts.

5.2. Socioeconomic Influences

Moreover, socioeconomic factors significantly impact the accessibility of rehabilitation services. Disparities in income, education, and geographic location can create barriers to timely and comprehensive interventions. Binos et al. emphasize the need for equitable distribution of resources to address these socioeconomic challenges, ensuring that all families, regardless of their economic status, have equal opportunities for optimal rehabilitation outcomes [32] .

To provide a more in-depth analysis, the discussion could expand on specific socioeconomic challenges that families may face, such as limited financial resources or inadequate access to educational opportunities. Additionally, exploring how these challenges may influence the time and resources parents can dedicate to their child’s rehabilitation process can further elucidate the impact of socioeconomic factors on parental roles.

5.3. Tailoring Interventions

Tailoring interventions to suit the unique needs arising from cultural and socioeconomic influences is crucial for fostering inclusivity and effectiveness. This involves not only adapting communication strategies and educational materials to align with diverse cultural perspectives but also implementing outreach programs to bridge the gaps in accessibility caused by socioeconomic disparities [32] [33] .

In conclusion, a comprehensive understanding of cultural and socioeconomic influences is important in shaping effective parental roles in hearing loss rehabilitation. By recognizing and addressing the diverse perspectives within different cultural contexts and actively mitigating socioeconomic barriers, interventions can be crafted to ensure equitable access and optimal outcomes for all families navigating the challenges of hearing loss.

6. Gaps in Current Research

While efforts have been made in understanding parental roles in the rehabilitation of children with permanent hearing loss, there persist notable gaps that warrant exploration. Recognizing and addressing these gaps is imperative for directing future research efforts toward achieving a more comprehensive understanding of this vital subject [3] .

One significant gap lies in the exploration of the long-term effects of varying parental involvement levels on the developmental outcomes of children with hearing loss. While existing research acknowledges the positive impact of parental engagement, there is a scarcity of longitudinal studies that dives into the sustained effects over time. Investigating how the intensity and nature of parental involvement during early intervention correlate with the long-term educational, social, and emotional outcomes of children could provide valuable insights.

Additionally, there is a need for more research examining the efficacy of diverse intervention strategies within different cultural and socioeconomic contexts. Existing literature underscores the influence of cultural and economic factors on hearing loss rehabilitation outcomes, but a deeper exploration of how interventions tailored to specific cultural and socioeconomic backgrounds impact parental roles and, consequently, child outcomes is lacking.

Furthermore, the evolving landscape of technology introduces another avenue for exploration. With the increasing integration of telehealth and digital resources in healthcare, understanding the role of technology in enhancing parental involvement and its impact on the rehabilitation process is an area that remains relatively uncharted. Exploring how technology can be leveraged to provide support, resources, and interventions for parents of children with hearing loss could contribute significantly to shaping future practices.

The influence of the broader community and societal attitudes on parental roles is another dimension that warrants attention. While individual parental involvement is integral, understanding how community support and societal perceptions contribute to or hinder effective parental roles in hearing loss rehabilitation is an aspect that requires further investigation.

Therefore, acknowledging the gaps in current research is a crucial step toward advancing our understanding of parental roles in the rehabilitation of children with permanent hearing loss. Exploring the long-term effects of parental involvement, investigating intervention strategies within diverse contexts, delving into the role of technology, and understanding societal influences will collectively contribute to a more comprehensive and informed foundation for future research and practical applications.

7. Conclusion: Toward Practical Implications and Future Directions

In conclusion, the literature review provides a comprehensive exploration of parental roles in the rehabilitation of children with permanent hearing loss. From historical shifts in perspectives to theoretical frameworks guiding our understanding, this review sets the stage for further studies to evaluate specific aspects such as early intervention, communication, emotional development, challenges, and successes. The sections of this paper explored various factors, presenting a comprehensive synthesis of existing literature and paving the way for future research and clinical practices in this topic.

8. Recommendations

1) Implement Culturally Tailored Interventions:

Tailoring interventions to align with the diverse cultural backgrounds of families can enhance engagement and effectiveness. Practitioners and policymakers should consider incorporating culturally sensitive strategies into rehabilitation programs, acknowledging and respecting the unique perspectives of different communities.

2) Address Socioeconomic Barriers:

To mitigate the impact of socioeconomic disparities on access to rehabilitation services, there is a need for targeted policies and initiatives. This may include financial support programs, educational resources for families with limited resources, and community-based outreach efforts to ensure equitable access for all children, regardless of their economic status.

3) Promote Early Intervention Strategies:

Encouraging and facilitating early intervention strategies is critical for optimizing outcomes. Policymakers and practitioners should collaborate to develop and promote programs that emphasize the importance of early detection, diagnosis, and intervention, ensuring that children with permanent hearing loss receive timely and comprehensive support.

4) Enhance Professional Training and Collaboration:

Professionals working in the field of hearing loss rehabilitation should undergo training that emphasizes cultural competence and awareness of socioeconomic influences. Moreover, fostering collaboration between professionals, educators, and parents can create a more holistic support system for children with permanent hearing loss.

9. Future Directions

1) Longitudinal Studies on Rehabilitation Outcomes:

Future research endeavors should prioritize longitudinal studies to track the long-term impact of parental involvement on rehabilitation outcomes. This can provide insights into the sustained effects of early interventions and the evolving role of parents as children with permanent hearing loss progress through different developmental stages.

2) Exploration of Innovative Technologies:

Given the rapidly advancing technological landscape, research should explore how innovative technologies, such as assistive devices and communication apps, can be integrated into rehabilitation programs. This includes investigating how parents can be empowered to utilize these technologies effectively to support their children’s communication and development.

3) In-depth Analysis of Specific Cultural Factors:

Further research should delve into specific cultural factors that influence parental roles in hearing loss rehabilitation. Understanding the impact of cultural attitudes, beliefs, and practices on parental involvement can inform the development of targeted interventions that resonate with diverse cultural contexts.

In moving forward, a joint effort from researchers, practitioners, and policymakers is needed to translate the insights from this literature review into actionable strategies. By implementing these recommendations and addressing the identified gaps, we can foster a more inclusive and effective rehabilitation environment for children with permanent hearing loss and their families.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

[1] Davenport, C.A. and Smolen, E.R. (2023) The Role of Parents in Early Intervention. The Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, Enad050.
https://doi.org/10.1093/deafed/enad050
[2] Giallini, I., Nicastri, M., Mariani, L., Turchetta, R., Ruoppolo, G., Vincentiis, M., et al. (2021) Benefits of Parent Training in the Rehabilitation of Deaf or Hard of Hearing Children of Hearing Parents: A Systematic Review. Audiology Research, 11, 653-672.
https://doi.org/10.3390/audiolres11040060
[3] Erbasi, E., Scarinci, N., Hickson, L. and Ching, T.Y.C. (2018) Parental Involvement in the Care and Intervention of Children with Hearing Loss. International Journal of Audiology, 57, S15-S26.
https://doi.org/10.1080/14992027.2016.1220679
[4] Davidson, L., Anne, S., Kenna, M. and Lieu, J.E.C. (2020) Hearing Loss in Children: A Review. JAMA, 21, 2195-205.
https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2020.17647
[5] Levickis, P., Conway, L., Smith, J. and Bennetts, S. (2022) Parent-Child Interaction and Its Impact on Language Development. In: Language Development Individual Differences in a Social Context, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 166-192.
https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108643719.010
[6] Peacock-Chambers, E., Ivy, K. and Bair-Merritt, M. (2017) Primary Care Interventions for Early Childhood Development: A Systematic Review. Pediatrics, 140, e20171661.
https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2017-1661
[7] Coleman, J.S. (1988) Social Capital in the Creation of Human Capital. The American Journal of Sociology, 94, S95-S120.
https://doi.org/10.1086/228943
[8] Bourdieu, P. and Richardson, J. (1986) The Forms of Capital. Handbook of Theory and Research for the Sociology of Education, Greenwood, Westport, 241-258.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/9780470755679.ch15
[9] Putnam, R.D. (2000) Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community. Simon & Schuster, New York.
https://doi.org/10.1145/358916.361990
[10] Bronfenbrenner (1977) Toward an Experimental Ecology of Human Development. American Psychologist, 7, 513-531.
https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.32.7.513
[11] Ingber, S. (2018) Parental Involvement in Early Intervention for Children with Hearing Loss. In: Dattner, E.H.G. and Ravid, D., Eds., Handbook of Communication Disorders: Theoretical, Empirical, and Applied Linguistic Perspectives, De Gruyter Mouton, Berlin, 793-810.
https://doi.org/10.1515/9781614514909-039
[12] Yu, M., Xie, H., Chen, Q. and Yao, S. (2021) Exploring the New Rehabilitation Model of Hearing Impaired Children from the Perspective of Family.
https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-602748/v1
[13] Holzinger, D., Hofer, J., Dall, M. and Fellinger, J. (2022) Multidimensional Family-Centred Early Intervention in Children with Hearing Loss: A Conceptual Model. Journal of Clinical Medicine, 11, Article No. 1548.
https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm11061548
[14] Christa, L.-C., Meghana, B. and Wadnerkar-Kamble (2015) Enhancing Parent-Child Communication and Parental Self-Esteem with a Video-Feedback Intervention: Outcomes with Prelingual Deaf and Hard-of-Hearing Children. The Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 6, 266-274.
https://doi.org/10.1093/deafed/env008
[15] Noll, D., DiFabio, D., Moodie, S., Graham, I.D., Potter, B., Grandpierre, V., et al. (2021) Coaching Caregivers of Children Who Are Deaf or Hard of Hearing: A Scoping Review. The Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 26, 453-468.
https://doi.org/10.1093/deafed/enab018
[16] Sevinç, Ş. and Şenkal, Ö.A. (2021) Parent Participation in Early Intervention/Early Childhood Hearing Impairment Program. Nigerian Journal of Clinical Practice, 24, 254-261.
https://doi.org/10.4103/njcp.njcp_139_20
[17] Ambrose, S., Appenzeller, M., Mai, A. and DesJardin, J. (2020) Beliefs and Self-Efficacy of Parents of Young Children with Hearing Loss. Journal of Early Hearing Detection and Intervention, 5, 73-85.
https://doi.org/10.1097/01.HJ.0000717176.09147.0d
[18] Wright, B., Hargate, R., Garside, M., Carr, G., Wakefield, T., Swanwick, R., et al. (2021) A Systematic Scoping Review of Early Interventions for Parents of Deaf Infants. BMC Pediatrics, 21, Article No. 467.
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12887-021-02893-9
[19] Blank, A., Holt, RF., Pisoni, D.B. and Kronenberger, W.G. (2020) Associations between Parenting Stress, Language Comprehension, and Inhibitory Control in Children with Hearing Loss. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 63, 321-333.
https://doi.org/10.1044/2019_JSLHR-19-00230
[20] Friedmann, N. and Rusou, D. (2015) Critical Period for First Language: The Crucial Role of Language Input during the First Year of Life. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 35, 27-34.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conb.2015.06.003
[21] Ching, T.Y.C., Crowe, K., Martin, V., Day, J., Mahler, N., Youn, S., et al. (N.D.) Language Development and Everyday Functioning of Children with Hearing Loss Assessed at 3 Years of Age.
[22] Kumar, M. and Tripathi, D. (2022) Language and Communication Challenges for Hearing Impairment at Early Childhood. International Journal of Advanced Research in Science, Communication and Technology, 2, 23-26.
https://doi.org/10.48175/IJARSCT-7647
[23] Shojaei, E., Jafari, Z. and Gholami, M. (2016) Effect of Early Intervention on Language Development in Hearing-Impaired Children. Iranian Journal of Otorhinolaryngology, 28, 13-21.
[24] Tsou, Y.T., Li, B., Eichengreen, A., Frijns, J.H.M. and Rieffe, C. (2021) Emotions in Deaf and Hard-of-Hearing and Typically Hearing Children. The Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 26, 469-482.
https://doi.org/10.1093/deafed/enab022
[25] Yuen, S., Li, B., Tsou, Y.T., Meng, Q., Wang, L., Liang, W., et al. (2022) Family Systems and Emotional Functioning in Deaf or Hard-of-Hearing Preschool Children. The Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 27, 125-136.
https://doi.org/10.1093/deafed/enab044
[26] Dammeyer, J., Hansen, A.T., Crowe, K. and Marschark, M. (2019) Childhood Hearing Loss: Impact on Parents and Family Life. International Journal of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology, 120, 140-145.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijporl.2019.02.027
[27] Szarkowski, A. and Dirks, E. (2021) Fathers of Young Deaf or Hard-of-Hearing Children: A Systematic Review. The Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 26, 187-208.
https://doi.org/10.1093/deafed/enaa039
[28] Gunjawate, D.R., Ravi, R. and Driscoll, C. (2023) Stress among Parents of Children with Hearing Loss and How They Deal with It: A Systematic Review. International Archives of Otorhinolaryngology, 27, E166-E177.
https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0042-1743273
[29] Dall, M., Weber, C., Holzinger, D., Binder, D., Hofer, J., Horvarth, S., et al. (2023) Preschool Children with Hearing Loss: Social Communication and Parenting Stress. Journal of Personalized Medicine, 14, Article No. 47.
https://doi.org/10.3390/jpm14010047
[30] Continisio, G.I., D’Errico, D., Toscano, S., Maldonato, N.M., De Falco, R., Nunziata, F., et al. (2023) Parenting Stress in Mothers of Children with Permanent Hearing Impairment. Children, 10, Article No. 517.
https://doi.org/10.3390/children10030517
[31] Mpofu, E., Chronister, J., Johnson, E. and Denham, G. (2012) Aspects of Culture Influencing Rehabilitation and Persons with Disabilities. In: Kennedy, P., Ed., The Oxford Handbook of Rehabilitation Psychology, Oxford Academic, Oxford, 543-553.
https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199733989.013.0030
[32] Binos, P., Papastefanou, T. and Psillas, G. (2023) Socio-Economic Status and Language Development in Hearing Loss: A Critical Appraisal. Audiology Research, 13, 151-159.
https://doi.org/10.3390/audiolres13010015
[33] Smith, B., Zhang, J., Pham, G.N., Pakanati, K., Raol, N., Ongkasuwan, J., et al. (2019) Effects of Socioeconomic Status on Children with Hearing Loss. International Journal of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology, 116, 114-117.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijporl.2018.10.032

Copyright © 2024 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

Creative Commons License

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.