Preliminary Study of Chemical Elements Distribution in Petroleum Source Rocks Donga and Yogou Formations of the Termit Sedimentary Basin (Est-Niger)

Abstract

XRF and EDX analyses were carried out on 18 batches of representative raw samples to determine the distribution of major chemical elements in the petroleum source rocks of Donga and Yogou formations of Termit sedimentary basin. The chemical composition of these formations is dominated by silicon (Si), aluminum (Al) and iron (Fe). This is consistent with the oxide composition, which is also dominated by silicon oxide (SiO2), aluminum oxide (Al2O3) and iron monoxide (FeO). No less important chemical elements are calcium (Ca), potassium (K), sulfur (S), titanium (Ti), magnesium (Mg), manganese (Mn) and barium (Ba), as well as some of their oxides. All these major chemical elements are carried by silicate detrital minerals associated with pyrite and goethite and/or clay minerals such as kaolinite and interstratified illite, smectite and chlorite. This trend is illustrated by the values of the Si/Al and SiO2/Al2O3 ratios.

Share and Cite:

Bachir, A. , Oumarou, A. , Souley, B. , Yaou, K. and Sani, A. (2024) Preliminary Study of Chemical Elements Distribution in Petroleum Source Rocks Donga and Yogou Formations of the Termit Sedimentary Basin (Est-Niger). Journal of Minerals and Materials Characterization and Engineering, 12, 49-62. doi: 10.4236/jmmce.2024.121004.

1. Introduction

The distribution of chemical elements in the lithosphere is linked to the geological processes (magmatism, metamorphism, hydrothermalism and sedimentary processes) that led to the formation of the rocks and minerals that are their essential constituents. The combined effects of these geological processes govern the systematic distribution in various geological environments or natural systems [1] . Thus, the relative abundance of chemical elements proposed by chemists and mineralogists, in particular [1] [2] , reflects the geochemical processes occurring within or at the earth’s surface. These geochemical processes allow chemical elements to be a useful geochemical tracer [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] . The coexistence of these chemical elements in terrestrial materials (rocks and minerals) results from certain affinities between these elements [7] [8] . In the case of petroleum sedimentary rocks such as those of Donga and Yogou (Termit Basin, Niger), these affinities often reflect the conditions under which the rocks were formed: transport, deposition and diagenesis [9] [10] [11] [12] [13] . Petroleum source rocks in the Donga and Yogou formations have been subjected to a summary mineralogical characterization [14] , but without addressing the way in which chemical elements are distributed.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Samples Analyzed

The samples analyzed were those of petroleum source rocks from the Donga and Yogou formations of the Termit sedimentary basin (Figure 1). They were collected in collaboration with the Centre de Documentation et d’Archives Pétrolières du Niger (CDP). They include cuttings from the Koulélé-1D, Fana-1, Helit-1, Melek-1 and Ounissoui-E1 wells (Figure 1).

Sampling was carried out with a 10-meter sampling step.

2.2. Methods

Rock cuttings samples were washed to remove drilling mud. X-ray fluorescence (XRF) analysis and scanning electron microscopy coupled with energy dispersive spectrometry (SEM/EDS) were applied to determine the composition of major chemical elements in these samples.

XRF was performed using a portable Niton XL3t® XRF spectrometer, coupled with a computer to ensure data transfer after analysis using Niton Data Transfer (NDT) software. Measurements in All-Geo mode were carried out on an accessory fitted with a Radio Frequency Identification (RFID) chip, enabling the analyzer to detect it automatically and convert it into a benchtop analyzer. Scanning electron microscopy coupled with energy dispersive spectrometry (SEM/EDS) were used to study the crystalline form of minerals using digital images, and to determine the major chemical elements and oxide composition of the samples analyzed.

The tool used is a D.C.A.R. Variable Pressure SEM/EDS (MEB FEG Supra 40 VP Zeiss), equipped with an X-ray detector (OXFORD Instruments X-Max 20) connected to an EDS microanalyzer platform (Inca Dry Cool, without liquid nitrogen).

Figure 1. Map location of sampled wells in Termit basin (modified from [15] ).

3. Results

3.1. Chemical Composition of the Donga Formation

The results of the distribution of major chemical elements in the Donga formation are shown in Table 1. They include silicon (Si), aluminum (Al), iron (Fe), calcium (Ca), potassium (K), sulfur (S), titanium (Ti), magnesium (Mg), manganese (Mn) and barium (Ba).

Elements Mg, Mn and Ba have very low proportions, averaging no more than 0.5% (Table 1). The elements K, S and Ti have low average proportions of 3.99%, 2.65% and 2.07% respectively. Ca has a relatively low average value of 5.37%, with the highest value in sample PO.E2.Dg (13.82%).

Table 1. Elemental composition of major chemical elements in the Donga formation.

Figure 2. Proportions of major chemical elements in Donga Formation rocks.

Figure 2 shows the histogram of the different proportions of major chemical elements in the Donga formation. The Donga formation is relatively rich in silicon, aluminum and iron (Figure 2), with average proportions of 49.49%, 17.79% and 17.45% respectively. The highest proportions of these elements are found in samples PK.E22.Dg (56.77%), PF.E21.Dg (22.03%) and PF.E20.Dg (20.09%) respectively.

3.2. Chemical Composition of the Yogou Formation

The major chemical elements present in the Yogou formation are listed in Table 2. They are composed of silicon (Si), aluminum (Al), iron (Fe), calcium (Ca), potassium (K), sulfur (S), titanium (Ti), magnesium (Mg), manganese (Mn) and barium (Ba).

The elements Si, Al and Fe (Table 2) are the most abundant in the Yogou formation. Their average proportions are 57.77%, 16.17% and 15.57% respectively. The highest proportions of these chemical elements are found in samples PF.E11.Yg (63.29%), PK.E26.Yg (17.52%) and PK.E26.Yg (19.29%) respectively.

Elements Ca, K, S and Ti have low proportions, averaging 1.82%, 3.57%, 1.81% and 2.42% respectively. The element K has the highest value in sample PH.E42.Yg (5.02%). The other three chemical elements, Mg, Mn and Ba, are in very low proportions, averaging no more than 0.7% (Table 2).

Figure 3 shows the histogram of the different proportions of major elements in the Yogou formation. Figure 3 shows that silicon is the most abundant chemical element in the Yogou formation.

3.3. Si/Al Chemical Element Ratios in the Donga and Yogou Formations

The Si/Al ratios presented in Table 1 and Table 2 range from 2.16 to 3.76, with an average of 2.80 for the Donga samples, and from 3.01 to 4.09, with an average

Table 2. Elemental composition of major chemical elements in the Yogou formation.

Figure 3. Proportions of major chemical elements in rocks of the Yogou formation.

of 3.60 for the Yogou samples (Figure 4).

Figure 4 shows the histogram of Si/Al atomic ratios of major chemical elements for the Donga formation in green and the Yogou formation in orange.

3.4. Identifying the Major Element and Oxide Composition of Donga and Yogou

Images and corresponding energy dispersive spectra of samples from the Donga and Yogou formations are shown in Figures 5-8.

The majority of element peaks in the EDS spectra, such as silicon (Si), aluminum (Al), magnesium (Mg), iron (Fe), sodium (Na), potassium (K), calcium (Ca), titanium (Ti) and sulfur (S), are common elements observed with XRF.

Figure 4. Atomic ratio (Si/Al) of the major chemical elements Si and Al in rocks from the Donga (green) and Yogou (orange) formations.

Figure 5. SEM and EDS images: (a) SEM micrographs showing the irregular crystalline form of the minerals and (b) EDS spectra of sample PK.E20.Dg from the Donga formation (spectrum 2) showing the major chemical elements with their compositions (by weight, atomic and %¨).

Figure 6. SEM and EDS images: (a) SEM micrographs showing the irregular crystalline form of la minerals and (b) EDS spectra of Donga Formation rock sample PK.E21.Dg (spectrum 1) showing the major chemical elements with their compositions (by weight, atomic and %¨).

Figure 7. SEM and EDS images: (a) SEM micrographs showing the irregular crystalline form of the minerals and (b) EDS spectra of rock sample PK.E26.Yg from the Yogou formation (spectrum 3) showing the major chemical elements with their compositions (by weight, atomic and %¨).

The elements gold (Au) and carbon (C) are taken from the sample support grid during analysis. The main chemical elements identified using energy dispersive spectrometry are shown in Table 4 and Figure 9, and the oxides in Figure 10.

3.4.1 Major Chemical Elements

Table 3 shows the proportions of major chemical elements in the EDS analysis of the Donga and Yogou samples.

Magnesium (Mg The chemical elements Si, Al and Fe are the most abundant, with average proportions of 19.08%, 11.10% and 5.02% respectively in the Donga

Figure 8. SEM and EDS images: (a) SEM micrographs showing the irregular crystalline form of the minerals and (b) EDS spectrm of rock sample PM.E1.Yg from the Yogou formation (spectrum 1) showing the major chemical elements with their compositions (by weight, atomic and %¨).

Table 3. Major chemical elements in EDS analysis.

Figure 9. Major chemical elements from EDS analysis of samples from the Donga (a) and Yogou (b) formations.

formation, and 21.07%, 8.24% and 4.1% in the Yogou formation. They are followed by Ca with 2.09% and K with 1.54% for Donga. In the Yogou formation, these chemical elements have 1.05% and 1.94% respectively. The chemical elements Ti, Mg, S and Na are in very low proportions, averaging no more than 1% (Table 3). Si/Al ratios are 1.58 and 1.88 for the Donga formation and 2.32 and 2.83 for the Yogou formation (Table 3).

Figure 9 shows the histogram of the different proportions of major chemical elements obtained by EDS analysis in the Donga and Yogou formations.

This figure shows the abundance of the elements Si, Al and Fe in both formations.

3.4.2. Oxides in the Donga and Yogou Formations

The proportion of oxides contained in rocks from the Donga and Yogou formations is shown in Table 4. These oxides include silicon oxide (SiO2), aluminum (Al2O3), iron (FeO), potassium (K2O), titanium (TiO2), calcium (CaO), magnesium (MgO), sodium (Na2O) and sulfur (SO3).

Analysis of this table shows that SiO2 is the most abundant oxide, with an average proportion of 40.82% for Donga and 46.45% for Yogou (Figure 10). It is followed by Al2O3. The average proportion of this element is 19.25% for Donga and 15.06% for Yogou. It is therefore less abundant in the latter formation (Figure 10). FeO oxide is also moderately abundant in these formations. These average proportions are 6.46% and 7.27% respectively in the Donga and Yogou formations. The proportions of other oxides are, in order of abundance, K2O (2.85% and 3.34%), MgO (1.62% and 1.74%), SO3 (2.65% and 1.03%), Ti2O (0.49% and 0.82%) and Na2O (0.35% and 0.16) in the Donga and Yogou formations.

Figure 10 shows the histogram of oxide proportions obtained by EDS analysis on samples from the Donga (Figure 10(a)) and Yogou (Figure 10(b)) formations. Analysis of this figure also shows the abundant proportions of the following oxides: SiO2, Al2O3 and FeO in both formations. These results are in agreement with the proportions of major elements obtained by XRF and EDS analyses.

Figure 11 shows the histogram of the different values of the ratio of major chemical elements and oxides obtained by EDS analysis of samples from the Donga and Yogou formations.

Table 4. Oxides from EDS analysis of Donga and Yogou samples.

Figure 10. Oxides in samples from the Donga (a) and Yogou (b) formations.

Figure 11. Si/Al and SiO2/Al2O3 ratios of major chemical elements from EDS analysis of samples from the Donga and Yogou formations.

4. Discussion

4.1. Major Chemical Elements in the Donga and Yogou Formations

The abundance of major elements such as silicon, aluminum and iron in the samples from Donga and Yogou formations revealed by XRF analysis is attributable to the presence of detrital minerals in these samples. Furthermore, the high proportion of Fe in these formations is either due to the presence of pyrite and goethite, or to substitutions in the octahedral and tetrahedral structures of Al3+ by Fe2+ and Si4+ by Al3+ or Fe3+ respectively in the clay material. These observations concerning the presence of non-silicates minerals iron-rich, notably pyrite and goethite, are in line with the work of [14] . Also, the presence of relatively high levels of the elements K and Ca is probably due to these substitutions. This could result in a slight charge deficit in the structure, which can be compensated for by these modifier cations (interfoliar) in the tetrahedral and octahedral sites as described by [16] . In addition, the uniform distribution of Fe and Mg elements on clay particles can be interpreted as the result of substitution of these elements in the clay crystal lattice and during the deposition of nanocrystalline grains of associated minerals such as pyrite, goethite as revealed by [14] .

Also, the average Ti, K and K2O contents, with an average of 3.99% and 3.57% by weight for Ti, 2.07% and 2.42% by weight for K and 2.85% and 3.34% by weight for K2O respectively for the Donga and Yogou formations, are relatively high. This suggests that the presence of titanium (Ti) in these formations is either linked to the crystalline networks of the clay minerals, or originates from detrital materials [16] [17] and confirmed by the work of [14] on the mineralogical characterization of the Donga and Yogou formations.

4.2. Oxides in the Donga and Yogou Formations

The works of [18] [19] has shown that Al2O3 and SiO2 contents are respectively proportional to the presence of clays and silicate detrital materials such as quartz. In this study, SiO2 is abundant in the Yogou formation, while Al2O3 is abundant in the Donga formation. This distribution characterizes a predominance of clay minerals in the Donga formation and is probably explained by the presence of sandy lenses in the Yogou formation, constituting Upper Cretaceous reservoirs in the Termit sedimentary basin, as described in the works of [20] [21] [22] [23] in the same Termit sedimentary basin.

Iron oxide (FeO) is also an important component in the Donga and Yogou formations, averaging 6.46% and 7.27% by weight respectively. This iron oxide (FeO) has known preferential associations with iron sulfides such as pyrite and marcasite. Mineralogical examination by [14] confirmed that the extent of iron concentration generally coincides with the presence of pyrite in these formations.

4.3. Influence of Si/Al and SiO2/Al2O3 Ratios and Donga and Yogou Oxides

The Al/Si ratios, which vary from 0.27 to 0.46 with an average of 0.35 for the Donga formation and from 0.2 to 0.33 with an average of 0.28 for the Yogou formation, are respectively low (Table 2 and Table 3), suggesting according to [18] that Si in most sediments is associated with silicates and clay minerals. According to previous work [14] [24] , the SiO2/Al2O3 ratio values in the Donga and Yogou formations belong to the range of SiO2/Al2O3 ratio values for 2:1 type clays (2Si and 1Al which is 2 to 4) [25] [26] . These ratios are significantly higher than those of standard kaolinite (ranging from 1.73 to 1.8) [25] [26] . This may be due to the presence of siliceous minerals, particularly quartz, in the rocks of the Donga and Yogou formations, as shown by [14] .

The abundance of silicon and aluminum on the one hand, and the relatively high Si/Al ratios on the other, provided by X-ray fluorescence spectrometry, confirm a clay, quartz and muscovite enrichment of the rocks in these formations, as noted by [14] . The high iron content is linked to the presence of pyrite in samples from the Donga and Yogou formations. Then, the relatively high contents of chemical elements such as S, Ti, Mg, Mn, and also Fe, Ca, and K is due to the presence of accessory minerals such as garnet, siderite, goethite and anatase in the Donga formation and sericite, anatase and goethite in the Yogou formation and pyrite and muscovite in these two formations [14] .

In addition to the high Si/Al ratios, the K and Ca element contents are probably due to substitutions in the octahedral and tetrahedral structures of Al3+ by Fe2+ and Si4+ by Al3+ or Fe3+ respectively. The results of mineralogical analysis of clay fractions from the Donga and Yogou formations obtained by [14] reveal the presence of interstratified clay minerals such that illite, smectite and chlorite type. Si/Al ratio values between 1 and 3, obtained by EDS analysis, indicate the predominance of kaolinite, 2:1 clays such as smectite and illite and siliceous minerals as described by [14] .

5. Conclusions

The distribution of chemical elements in petroleum source rocks of Donga and Yogou formations of the Termit sedimentary basin (Niger), shows that Fe, Si and Al are the most abundant elements. The major chemical element compositions of the samples analyzed are controlled mainly by clay minerals rather than by non-clay silicate minerals. This trend is illustrated by the values of the Si/Al ratios, although the proportion of silicate minerals is not negligible. The main oxides (SiO2, Al2O3 and FeO) identified by this study are unevenly distributed throughout the formations. The predominance of SiO2 and Al2O3 confirms the presence of quartz and clay minerals, as does the XRF analysis.

The major chemical elements identified in the Donga and Yogou formations are borne by minerals such as pyrite, goethite, clays, quartz, muscovite, siderite, anatase and garnet.

Finally, the Donga and Yogou formations are dominated by clays and contain silicate minerals associated with pyrite and goethite, while the clay fractions of these rocks are dominated by kaolinite and interbedded minerals such as illite, smectite and chlorite types.

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to express their sincere and honest gratitude to the Centre de Documentation et d’Archives Pétrolières du Niger (CDP).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this paper.

References

[1] Gao, P., et al. (2015) Evaluating Rare Earth Elements as a Proxy for Oil-Source Correlation. A Case Study from Aer Sag, Erlian Basin, Northern China. Organic Geochemistry, 87, 35-54.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.orggeochem.2015.07.004
[2] Zhao, Y., et al. (2018) Trace and Rare Earth Element Geochemistry of Crude Oils and Their Coexisting Water from the Jiyuan Area of the Ordos Basin, N China. Geological Journal, 53, 336-348.
https://doi.org/10.1002/gj.2897
[3] Nakada, R., Takahashi, Y., Zheng, G., Yamamoto, Y. and Shimizu, H. (2010) Abundances of Rare Earth Elements in Crude Oils and Their Partitions in Water. Geochemical Journal, 44, 411-418.
https://doi.org/10.2343/geochemj.1.0083
[4] Mani, D., Ratnam, B., Kalpana, M.S., Patil, D.J. and Dayal, A.M. (2016) Elemental and Organic Geochemistry of Gondwana Sediments from the Krishna-Godavari Basin, India. Geochemistry, 76, 117-131.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemer.2016.01.002
[5] Ramirez-Caro, D. (2013) Rare Earth Elements (REE) as Geochemical Clues to Reconstruct Hydrocarbon Generation History. Master Thesis, Kansas State University, Manhattan, Kansas.
https://krex.k-state.edu/handle/2097/16871
[6] Dreyfus, S. (2006) Détermination directe des éléments traces (Ni, V, Cu, Mo, Sn, Ba, Pb) et de leurs rapports isotopiques dans les huiles brutes par ICP/MS.Définition de nouveaux traceurs géochimiques et application à l’étude du système pétrolier du bassin de Portiguar (Brésil). Doctorat Thesis, Université de Pau, Pau.
http://www.theses.fr/2006PAUU3039
[7] Craigie, N. (2018) Principles of Elemental Chemostratigraphy: A Practical User Guide. In: Swennen, R. and Leuven, K.U., Eds., Advances in Oil and Gas Exploration & Production, Springer International Publishing, Berlin.
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-71216-1
[8] Ataman, G. (1966) Géochimie des minéraux argileux dans les bassins sédimentaires marins études sur le bassin triasique du Jura. Revue Française de Géotechnique, 25, 67-82.
https://www.persee.fr/doc/sgeol_0080-9020_1966_mon_25_1
[9] Awongo, M.L. (1984) Stratigraphie, sédimentologie et géochimie des terres noires du Jurassique moyen et supérieur de la Provence (Sud-Est de la France). Phdthesis, Université Paul Cézanne - Aix-Marseille III.
https://tel.archives-ouvertes.fr/tel-00799978
[10] Drugat, L. (2018) Geochemistry of Speleothems from the South-East of Europe (U-Th and 14C Chronology, Trace Elements, 87Sr/86Sr, 18O/16O, 13C/12C) for Climatic and Environmental Reconstructions during the Holocene. Theses, Université Paris-Saclay, Paris.
https://tel.archives-ouvertes.fr/tel-02495354
[11] Bjorlykke, K. (éd.) (2015) Petroleum Geoscience: From Sedimentary Environments to Rock Physics. 2e éd., Springer-Verlag, Berlin Heidelberg.
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-34132-8
[12] Meyers, P.A. (1994) Preservation of Elemental and Isotopic Source Identification of Sedimentary Organic Matter. Chemical Geology, 114, 289-302.
https://doi.org/10.1016/0009-2541(94)90059-0
[13] Moldowan, J.M., Seifert, W.K. and Gallegos, E.J. (1985) Relationship between Petroleum Composition and Depositional Environment of Petroleum Source Rocks. AAPG Bull., 69, 1255-1268.
https://doi.org/10.1306/AD462BC8-16F7-11D7-8645000102C1865D
[14] Ibrahim, M.A., Yao, K. and Digbehi, Z. (2020) Mineralogical Characterization of Upper Cretaceous Petroleum Source Rocks of Termit Sedimentary Basin (Niger). Journal of Materials and Environmental Science, 11, 1173-1183.
http://www.jmaterenvironsci.com
[15] Justin, W. (2017) 5 Reasons to Put Savannah Petroleum #SAVP on Your Watchlist. févr.
https://www.voxmarkets.co.uk/blogs/5-reasons-to-put-savannah-petroleum-savp-on-your-watchlist/
[16] Ross, D.J.K. and Bustin, R.M. (2009) Investigating the Use of Sedimentary Geochemical Proxies for Paleoenvironment Interpretation of Thermally Mature Organic-Rich Strata: Examples from the Devonian-Mississippian Shales, Western Canadian Sedimentary Basin. Chemical Geology, 260, 1-19.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemgeo.2008.10.027
[17] Moosavirad, S.M., Janardhana, M.R., Sethumadhav, M.S., Moghadam, M.R. and Shankara, M. (2010) Geochemistry of Lower Jurassic Shales of the Shemshak Formation, Kerman Province, Central Iran: Provenance, Source Weathering and Tectonic Setting. Chem. Geochemistry, 71, 279-288.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemer.2010.10.001
[18] Fu, X., Wang, J., Zeng, Y., Cheng, J. and Tan, F. (2011) Origin and Mode of Occurrence of Trace Elements in Marine Oil Shale from the Shengli River Area, Northern Tibet, China. Oil Shale, 28, 487.
https://doi.org/10.3176/oil.2011.4.03
[19] Bou Daher, S., Nader, F.H., Strauss, H. and Littke, R. (2014) Depositional Environment and Source-Rock Characterisation of Organic-Matter Rich Upper Santonian-Upper Campanian Carbonates, Northern Lebanon. Journal of Petroleum Geology, 37, 5-24.
https://doi.org/10.1111/jpg.12566
[20] Genik, G.J. (1992) Regional Framework, Structural and Petroleum Aspects of Rift Basins in Niger, Chad and the Central African Republic (C.A.R.). Tectonophysics, 213, 169-185.
https://doi.org/10.1016/0040-1951(92)90257-7
[21] Chang, E. and Zung, L.S. (2017) 3D Reservoir Characterization of Field Deta, Termit Basin, Niger. In: Awang, M., Negash, B.M., Md Akhir, N.A., Lubis, L.A. and Md. Rafek, A.G., éds., ICIPEG 2016, Springer, Singapore, 323-335.
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-3650-7_28
[22] Nasaruddin, M.N., Zung, L.S. and Rafek, A.G.M. (2017) Petrophysical Analysis of E5 Sand Group of Sokor Formation, Termit Basin, Niger. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 88, 012003.
https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/88/1/012003
[23] Ning, Z., Xia, G., Jiangqin, H., Zhongmin, C. and Guangya, Z. (2018) Sedimentary Characteristics and Lithological Trap Identification of Distant Braided Delta Deposits: A Case on Upper Cretaceous Yogou Formation of Termit Basin, Niger. E3S Web Conf., 53, 03020.
https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/20185303020
[24] Zhou, H., Peng, X. and Pan, J. (2004) Distribution, Source and Enrichment of Some Chemical Elements in Sediments of the Pearl River Estuary, China. Continental Shelf Research, 24, 1857-1875.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csr.2004.06.012
[25] Murray, H.H. (2006) Applied Clay Mineralogy: Occurrences, Processing and Applications of Kaolins, Bentonites, Palygorskitesepiolite, and Common Clays. 2nd Edition, Elsevier Science, Amsterdam, Boston.
[26] Ousman, Z., Alassane, A., Dan, L.N., Paolo, R., Gemma, T.P. and Issaka, A. (2008) Caractérisation des Sols de Périmètres Irrigués de l’Ouest du Niger par Diffraction de Rayons X. Scinapse, 10, 89-97.
https://scinapse.io/papers/2499476914

Copyright © 2024 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

Creative Commons License

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.