Burkitt Lymphoma Presenting as Ileocolic Intussusception in an Adult

Abstract

Adult intussusception is rare, highly associated with a malignant lead point, and often requires emergent surgical management. We report the case of a 44-year-old male who presented with generalized abdominal pain and was found to have early ileocolic intussusception secondary to a large ileocecal mass. Biopsies of the mass and an enlarged cardiophrenic lymph node, as well as pleural fluid cytology were all consistent with Burkitt lymphoma (BL). Curiously, the patient’s abdominal exam was reassuring, and the intussusception and malignant bowel obstruction resolved over 36 hours with conservative management alone. With a Burkitt lymphoma international prognostic index (BL-IPI) score of 2, the patient proceeded to treatment with combination chemoimmunotherapy and attained a complete response after four cycles. There was no bowel perforation or recurrent intussusception throughout treatment. Thus, this report marks the first reported case of adult BL-associated intussusception to resolve with non-invasive management and establishes a precedent for conservative management in select patients.

Share and Cite:

Borré, C. , Boyle, B. , Lynch, K. , Kanaparthi, A. , Csizmar, C. , Larson, D. , Braithwaite, M. , Johnson, I. , Witzig, T. and Suarez, D. (2023) Burkitt Lymphoma Presenting as Ileocolic Intussusception in an Adult. Open Journal of Blood Diseases, 13, 121-132. doi: 10.4236/ojbd.2023.134014.

1. Introduction

Numerous studies have established a correlation between bowel intussusception in adults and malignant lead points, including gastrointestinal carcinomas, non- Hodgkin lymphomas, and metastatic tumors [1] [2] . Though common in the pediatric population, Burkitt lymphoma (BL) is a rare cause of intussusception in adults, and little is known about the prognosis and survival of these patients. In this report, we present a unique case of BL-associated ileocolic intussusception in an adult patient that resolved with conservative management. Thus, this case establishes a precedent for the non-invasive management of BL-associated intussusception in very select patients.

2. Case Presentation

A 44-year-old, previously healthy male presented to a local emergency department (ED) with a four-week history of poorly localized abdominal pain. He endorsed nausea and non-bloody emesis with associated bloating, anorexia, and 20 pounds of unintentional weight loss over the preceding month. Abdominal imaging via computed tomography (CT) revealed a distal small bowel obstruction, and the patient was transferred to our ED for further management.

Upon arrival, the patient’s vital signs were stable with blood pressure 148/75 mmHg, pulse 89 beats/min, respiratory rate 18 breaths/min, SpO2 96% breathing ambient air, and temperature 36.6˚C. On examination, there was no abdominal tenderness to palpation, distention, or peritoneal signs. Laboratory findings were notable for a normal complete blood count including differential, creatinine 1.1 mg/dL with unknown baseline, a mild anion gap metabolic acidosis with a bicarbonate of 21 mmol/L and an anion gap of 17, and elevated liver enzymes with alanine aminotransferase (ALT) 48 U/L (reference range [ref.] 7 - 55), aspartate aminotransferase (AST) 58 U/L (ref. 8 - 48), and alkaline phosphatase (ALP) 72 U/L (ref. 40 - 129). Institutional interpretation of the outside CT indicated small bowel obstruction with early ileocolic intussusception at theileocecal valve with pathological lead point (Figure 1). Diffuse lymphadenopathy above and below the diaphragm, bilateral pleural effusions, and ascites with early peritoneal carcinomatosis were also described. The patient was admitted to Internal Medicine for management of theintestinal obstruction.

He underwent bowel decompression with nasogastric tube placement and received intravenous (IV) fluids. In consultation with both Gastroenterology and Colorectal Surgery, a trial of conservative management (including close observation with serial abdominal examinations) was pursued given the patient’s reassuring abdominal exam. Fortunately, his bowel obstruction resolved within 36 hours as demonstrated by symptom improvement, passage of flatus and stool, and successful progression to a regular diet. Meanwhile, the patient underwent a comprehensive evaluation. Additional laboratory studies were significant for a rising serum creatinine to 1.56 mg/dL with serum potassium 4.8 mmol/L, phosphorus 4.8 mg/dL (ref. 2.5 - 4.5), uric acid 11 mg/dL (ref. 3.7 - 8.0), and lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) 640 U/L (ref. 122 - 222). A peripheral blood smear revealed rare atypical lymphocytes, with reflex flow cytometry demonstrating a corresponding monotypic CD10-positive B cell population. The patient’s evaluation for an underlying malignancy included thoracentesis with pleural fluid

Figure 1. Computed tomography imaging of early ileocolic intussusception. (a) Sagittal view showing dilated bowel with air fluid levels and an early distal target sign (arrowhead). (b) Coronal view showing the transition point centered on an ileocecal mass (arrowhead). (c) Axial view of the ileocecal mass (arrowhead) and air-fluid levels.

cytology, endoscopic sampling of the ileocolonic mass, and guided biopsy of the enlarged cardiophrenic lymph nodes. The patient remained clinically improved and was discharged with close follow up. Days later, the lymph node biopsy results demonstrated a high-grade B cell lymphoma most consistent with Burkitt lymphoma (Figure 2). Concurrent fluorescence in-situ hybridization (FISH) revealed a MYC/IGH fusion in approximately 91% of nuclei. There was no rearrangement of BCL2 or BCL6. The pleural fluid and ileocolonic mass were involved by the same lymphoma cells.

Given the high risk of spontaneous tumor lysis syndrome (TLS) in Burkitt lymphoma and the patient’s recent acute kidney injury, he was readmitted to the Hospital Internal Medicine service for expedited evaluation and management. Re-admission laboratory results were notable for creatinine 1.46 mg/dL, potassium 5.4 mmol/L, phosphorus 5.1 mg/dL, LDH 1,057 U/L, and uric acid 17.1 mg/dL. The liver enzymes had also further elevated to ALT 155 U/L, AST 155 U/L, and ALP 143 U/L. The patient was treated for spontaneous TLS with IV fluids, rasburicase, and allopurinol, and his renal function slowly improved to a creatinine of 0.87 g/dL. Bone marrow biopsy revealed greater than 50% involvement by high grade B cell lymphoma (Figure 2). Fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG)-po- sitron emission tomography (PET)/CT confirmed extensive nodal, mesenteric, and peritoneal involvement in addition to the large, intensely FDG-avid (maximum standardized uptake value [SUVmax] 14.5) ileocolonic mass. Lumbar puncture with cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) cytology and flow cytometry showed no evidence of central nervous system (CNS) disease. Human immunodeficiency (HIV) and chronic hepatitis serologies were negative.

Thus, the patient was diagnosed with high-risk (by standard criteria), stage IV, Burkitt lymphoma. He was also considered high-risk by the recently-described Burkitt lymphoma international prognostic index (BL-IPI), meeting two criteria (age and LDH) to predict 3-year progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) of 63% and 64%, respectively [3] . Thus, he was transferred to the inpatient Hematology service for four cycles of highly dose-intensive chemo- immunotherapy consisting of rituximab in combination with cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and methotrexate (R-CODOX-M) alternating with

Figure 2. Histopathologyconsistent with Burkitt Lymphoma. Representative images of Wright Giemsa stained preparations (1000× magnification) from peripheral blood (a) and bone marrow aspirate (b) demonstrating an atypical aggressive-appearing lymphoid population with cytoplasmic vacuoles characteristic of Burkitt lymphoma. Biopsy of an affected cardiophrenic lymph node (100× magnification) shows a “starry sky” appearance by H&E (c). Immunohistochemistry reveals positive expression of CD20 (d), CD10 (e), BCL6 (f), negative expression of BCL2 (g), and overexpression of MYC (h). There was no expression of Epstein-Barr virus by in situ hybridization (i). These features support a diagnosis of Burkitt lymphoma.

ifosfamide, etoposide, and cytarabine (IVAC). Interim PET/CT showed a near complete response, and post-treatment PET/CT confirmed a complete response (Deauville score 1; Figure 3). The patient remained in complete remission at last follow up, 10 months after initial diagnosis.

3. Discussion

Burkitt lymphoma (BL) is a high-grade Bcell lymphoma genetically characterized by deregulated MYC oncogene expression due to chromosomal translocations that juxtapose MYC and an immunoglobulin locus, classically t(8;14) (q24;q32) [4] . Historically, three epidemiologic variants of BL have been described: endemic, sporadic (non-endemic), and immunodeficiency-associated [5] . However, this differentiation is somewhat confounded by the frequency of EBV positivity across all subtypes [6] , and the current classification systems recommend distinguishing

Figure 3. Staging, Interim, and Post-Treatment PET/CT Images. Representative images of PET/CT scans obtained (a) at the time of diagnosis; (b) after two cycles of R-CODOX-M/IVAC, demonstrating a near complete response; and (c) after all four cycles of therapy, demonstrating a complete response (Deauville score 1).

EBV-negative from EBV-positive cases [7] [8] . The patient described in this case had sporadic BL, which accounts for 1% - 2% of adult lymphomas [9] and has a trimodal age-specific incidence, with peaks at 10 years (most frequent), 40 years (especially in males, who are affected three-to-four times more frequently than females), and 75 years [10] .

In contrast to the mandibular masses frequently seen in endemic BL, sporadic BL has a high predilection for the gastrointestinal (GI) tract [4] [5] and frequently presents as a rapidly expanding intra-abdominal mass [11] . Indeed, the GI tract is themost common site of extranodal involvement across NHL [12] , likely owing to the presence of Peyer’s patches throughout the GI submucosa [4] . BL most commonly arises in the ileocecal region, and presentation elsewhere in the GI tract is rare [13] . Likewise, primary GI lymphoma without evidence of nodal involvement is also uncommon, with an incidence of only 17% in a population-based registry [14] .

Accordingly, the main GI complications of BL include bowel obstruction and intestinal perforation. Obstructions are classically due to mass effect and are often managed conservatively, due to the exquisite treatment sensitivity of BL and high likelihood of obstruction resolution with chemoimmunotherapy [15] [16] . Extensive resection should be avoided and surgical intervention is reserved for emergent situations such as perforation, recalcitrant GI bleeding, or persistent obstruction [16] .

Bowel perforation is a feared complication that occurs in approximately 9% of lymphoma patients with GI involvement [17] [18] . In a retrospective series of over one thousand cases of biopsy-proven GI lymphoma, more than half (52.4%) of the patients had an aggressive B cell lymphoma, and the incidence of perforation in this subgroup was 10.9% [17] . Fifteen patients in the series were diagnosed with BL, one of whom experienced a perforation (incidence of 6.6%). Of 100 identified perforations, the small bowel was the most common site (59%), including 23 ileocecal events (23%). Though classically thought of as a complication of chemotherapy, essentially half (51%) of the perforation events in the series occurred prior to the receipt of systemic therapy. In patients who experienced perforation after treatment, the median time from initiation of therapy to perforation was 35 days, dispelling the prior notion that perforation is an early complication of therapy [17] . Still, the composite of gastrointestinal bleeding and perforation remains the second-leading cause of treatment-related mortality in BL after sepsis [19] .

Intussusception is a rare complication of GI lymphoma. In general, intussusception is far more common in children and adolescents, with only 5% of intussusception cases occurring in adults [1] . While up to 20% of adult intussusception cases may be idiopathic, the vast majority (at least 80%) are secondary to a pathological lead point with an underlying tumor in roughly 75% of cases [1] [20] . Moreover, the clinical presentation of intussusception also differs between children and adults. The triad of emesis, hematochezia, and abdominal pain seenin children with intussusception is only present in 15% - 20% of adults who instead present with nausea and recurrent abdominal pain [21] . As abdominal ultrasound in adults is increasingly limited by body habitus and bowel gas, abdominal CT is widely regarded as the diagnostic modality of choice, with sensitivity of up to 100% in adults [22] . The classic imaging phenotype is a heterogenous “target” or “sausage-shaped” soft-tissue mass consisting of an outer intussuscipiens and central intussusceptum and isvirtually pathognomonic [23] [24] [25] . In contrast to children, attempts to reduce the intussuscepted bowel arenot recommended in adults due to the higher incidence of underlying malignancy and associated risks of perforation and peritoneal seeding. Thus, the management of adult intussusception remains primarily surgical except in the rare cases that resolve spontaneously [26] [27] .

We identified 12 prior reports of adult intussusception secondary to BL indexed in MEDLINE (PubMed) [28] - [39] . The features of these cases are summarized in Table 1. The median age was 31 years, which is younger than the second age-specific incidence peak of 40 years [10] . However, the male-predominance of this incidence peak is reflected in the reported cases, with most patients (62%) being male. Abdominal pain was the most common presenting symptom (92%), with no patients reporting the traditional pediatric manifestation of hematochezia. The ileocolic region remains the common site of BL-associated intussusception, perhaps due to the abundance of Peyer’s patches in the terminal ileum [4] .

Except for this patient’s case, all other instances of intussusception included in this cohort required either surgical resection (80%) or reduction (13%). A prior case series of adult intussusception from any cause reported a spontaneous resolution in 6 of 21 (29%) cases, though it is not clear how many of those cases were secondary to malignant lead points [40] . No patient with BL received upfront systemic chemotherapy as the primary means for addressing the intussusception. The course of our case, in conjunction with the outstanding response of BL to chemotherapy, prompts the question of whether a trial of conservative

Table 1. Reported features of adult intussusception secondary to Burkitt lymphoma.a

aTable includes data from the thirteen previously published cases and the case presented here. bData presented as median (range) or n (%). cAs the BL-IPI was developed in 2021 [3] , no prior studies included a calculation of the prognostic index or reported the component data; thus, this BL-IPI score represents the index for the patient described in this manuscript alone. eTwo patients had recurrent intussusception requiring a second intervention. fIndicates patients who received systemic therapy as the primary means for resolving the intussusception. gOnly four studies (including this manuscript) reported patient outcome data with follow up ranging from 4 months to 3 years.

management should be considered for patients with BL-related intussusception who have reassuring abdominal exams.

Prognostication and outcome data for BL-associated intussusception remain scarce. The BL international prognostic index (BL-IPI) was reported in 2021 [3] and stratifies patients into low-, intermediate-, and high-risk disease categories based on four parameters, including age ≥ 40 years, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status ≥ 2, LDH more than three times the upper limit of normal for the reporting laboratory’s reference range, and the presence of CNS involvement. These risk categories correlate with three-year overall survival values of up to 99%, 85%, and 64%, respectively. Since publication of the BL-IPI, only two other cases of BL-associated intussusception have been reported in the literature [32] [33] . However, neither case documented the BL-IPI score or its components. To date, only four studies (including this one) reported patient outcome data, with follow up ranging from four months to three years. Though no mortality was reported in these cases, there is insufficient data to conclude whether intussusception is associated with worse overall survival in BL.

Ultimately, combination chemoimmunotherapy remains the standard-of-care for adults with BL. One of three regimens is recommended for first-line therapy: 1) R-CODOX-M alternating with IVAC; 2) R-hyper CVAD (rituximab with hyperfractionated cyclophosphamide, vincristine, doxorubicin, and dexamethasone typically alongside high-dose methotrexate and cytarabine); or 3) DA-EPO- CH-R (dose-adjusted etoposide, prednisone, vincristine, cyclophosphamide, and doxorubicin plus rituximab) [41] [42] [43] [44] . Patients with high-risk disease, bone marrow involvement, or CNS disease require high-intensity regimens, such as R-CODOX-M/IVAC (as in our patient) or R-hyper CVAD [42] [44] . Otherwise, a risk-adapted approach using DA-R-EPOCH is suitable for patients without CNS disease, as recent data suggests similar efficacy to R-CODOX-M/IVAC but with lower treatment-related toxicity [45] . While approximately 90% of children with BL are cured with highly dose-intensive chemotherapy, adults are more susceptible to the toxic effects of therapy and outcomes are less favorable [5] . Prognosis in adults varies based on several risk factors, including age, performance status, serum LDH, and CNS involvement, factors that comprise the BL-IPI [3] . Using this model, overall survival ranges from 59% - 96%, figures that compare favorably to real-world data from multiple centers [19] [46] . The significantly worse outcomes for patients with high-risk disease and the considerable toxicity associated with the requisite highly-dose intensive chemotherapy underscore the need to develop both safer and more efficacious therapies for adults with BL.

4. Conclusions

This case highlights the challenge of diagnosing intussusception in adults and the importance of considering intussusception as an etiology of recurrent abdominal pain. Although intussusception can occur at any age, the presentation and diagnostic approach differ between pediatric and adult populations. Early recognition of intussusception in adults with CT scan is crucial, considering that it is often associated with a malignant lead point. Sporadic BL is an uncommon entity and due to its predilection for the gastrointestinal tract, is a rare cause of adult intussusception that can be further complicated by bowel perforation and tumor lysis syndrome. Surgery is often required to resolve adult intussusception, though rare cases may revert with conservative management, as described here. Indeed, this case is the first report of BL-associated intussusception to resolve without interventional management.

Coupled with the observation that even high-risk (per the BL-IPI) cases of BL respond briskly to chemotherapy, this case raises the question of whether conservative management or expedited chemotherapy are safe options for patients with BL-related intussusception who exhibit reassuring abdominal exams. The rapid rise in LDH underscores the emergent nature of high-risk BL, and avoiding surgery allowed this patient to proceed promptly to high-dose chemotherapy for the widely disseminated and rapidly progressing disease. Due to the rarity of the presentation, however, there is currently insufficient data to conclude whether BL-associated intussusception portends a worse overall prognosis, especially when considering the concurrent risk of bowel perforation.

Research Conduct

The patient consented to have their de-identified data used for research purposes upon hospital admission.

Acknowledgements

The authors gratefully acknowledge the many multidisciplinary care team members who participated in the care of this patient. This work was supported in part by the NIH (NCI 5-P50-CA097274), Mayo Clinic, and the Mayo Clinic School of Graduate Medical Education.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this paper.

References

[1] Marinis, A., Yiallourou, A., Samanides, L., Dafnios, N., Anastasopoulos, G., Vassiliou, I. and Theodosopoulos, T. (2009) Intussusception of the Bowel in Adults: A Review. World Journal of Gastroenterology, 15, 407-411.
https://doi.org/10.3748/wjg.15.407
[2] Sarma, D., Prabhu, R. and Rodrigues, G. (2012) Adult Intussusception: A Six-Year Experience at a Single Center. Annals of Gastroenterology, 25, 128-132.
[3] Olszewski, A.J., Jakobsen, L.H., Collins, G.P., Cwynarski, K., Bachanova, V., Blum, K.A., Boughan, K.M., Bower, M., Dalla Pria, A., Danilov, A., et al. (2021) Burkitt Lymphoma International Prognostic Index. Journal of Clinical Oncology: Official Journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology, 39, 1129-1138.
https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.20.03288
[4] López, C., Burkhardt, B., Chan, J.K.C., Leoncini, L., Mbulaiteye, S.M., Ogwang, M.D., Orem, J., Rochford, R., Roschewski, M. and Siebert, R. (2022) Burkitt Lymphoma. Nature Reviews Disease Primers, 8, Article No. 78.
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41572-022-00404-3
[5] Roschewski, M., Staudt, L.M. and Wilson, W.H. (2022) Burkitt’s Lymphoma. The New England Journal of Medicine, 387, 1111-1122.
https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMra2025746
[6] King, R.L., Hsi, E.D., Chan, W.C., Piris, M.A., Cook, J.R., Scott, D.W. and Swerdlow, S.H. (2023) Diagnostic Approaches and Future Directions in Burkitt Lymphoma and High-Grade B-Cell Lymphoma. Virchows Archiv, 482, 193-205.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00428-022-03404-6
[7] Alaggio, R., Amador, C., Anagnostopoulos, I., Attygalle, A.D., Araujo, I.B.O., Berti, E., Bhagat, G., Borges, A.M., Boyer, D., Calaminici, M., et al. (2022) The 5th Edition of the World Health Organization Classification of Haematolymphoid Tumours: Lymphoid Neoplasms. Leukemia, 36, 1720-1748.
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41375-022-01620-2
[8] Campo, E., Jaffe, E.S., Cook, J.R., Quintanilla-Martinez, L., Swerdlow, S.H., Anderson, K.C., Brousset, P., Cerroni, L., de Leval, L., Dirnhofer, S., et al. (2022) The International Consensus Classification of Mature Lymphoid Neoplasms: A Report from the Clinical Advisory Committee. Blood, 140, 1229-1253.
[9] Teras, L.R., DeSantis, C.E., Cerhan, J.R., Morton, L.M., Jemal, A. and Flowers, C.R. (2016) 2016 US Lymphoid Malignancy Statistics by World Health Organization Subtypes. CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians, 66, 443-459.
https://doi.org/10.3322/caac.21357
[10] Mbulaiteye, S.M., Anderson, W.F., Bhatia, K., Rosenberg, P.S., Linet, M.S. and Devesa, S.S. (2010) Trimodal Age-Specific Incidence Patterns for Burkitt Lymphoma in the United States, 1973-2005. International Journal of Cancer, 126, 1732-1739.
https://doi.org/10.1002/ijc.24934
[11] Bociek, R.G. (2005) Adult Burkitt’s Lymphoma. Clinical Lymphoma, 6, 11-20.
https://doi.org/10.3816/CLM.2005.n.021
[12] Gou, H.F., Zang, J., Jiang, M., Yang, Y., Cao, D. and Chen, X.C. (2012) Clinical Prognostic Analysis of 116 Patients with Primary Intestinal Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma. Medical Oncology, 29, 227-234.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12032-010-9783-x
[13] Čubranić, A., Golčić, M., Fučkar-Čupić, D., Brozović, B., Gajski, D. and Brumini, I. (2019) Burkitt Lymphoma in Gastrointestinal Tract: A Report of Two Cases. Acta Clinica Croatica, 58, 386-390.
https://doi.org/10.20471/acc.2019.58.02.25
[14] Otter, R., Bieger, R., Kluin, P.M., Hermans, J. and Willemze, R. (1989) Primary Gastrointestinal Non-Hodgkin’s Lymphoma in a Population-Based Registry. British Journal of Cancer, 60, 745-750.
https://doi.org/10.1038/bjc.1989.351
[15] Shirwaikar Thomas, A., Schwartz, M. and Quigley, E. (2019) Gastrointestinal Lymphoma: The New Mimic. BMJ Open Gastroenterology, 6, e000320.
https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjgast-2019-000320
[16] Koniaris, L.G., Drugas, G., Katzman, P.J. and Salloum, R. (2003) Management of Gastrointestinal Lymphoma. Journal of the American College of Surgeons, 197, 127-141.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S1072-7515(03)00002-4
[17] Vaidya, R., Habermann, T.M., Donohue, J.H., Ristow, K.M., Maurer, M.J., Macon, W.R., Colgan, J.P., Inwards, D.J., Ansell, S.M., Porrata, L.F., et al. (2013) Bowel Perforation in Intestinal Lymphoma: Incidence and Clinical Features. Annals of Oncology, 24, 2439-2443.
https://doi.org/10.1093/annonc/mdt188
[18] Vaidya, R. and Witzig, T.E. (2014) Incidence of Bowel Perforation in Gastrointestinal Lymphomas by Location and Histology. Annals of Oncology, 25, 1249-1250.
https://doi.org/10.1093/annonc/mdu135
[19] Evens, A.M., Danilov, A., Jagadeesh, D., Sperling, A., Kim, S.H., Vaca, R., Wei, C., Rector, D., Sundaram, S., Reddy, N., et al. (2021) Burkitt Lymphoma in the Modern Era: Real-World Outcomes and Prognostication across 30 US Cancer Centers. Blood, 137, 374-386.
https://doi.org/10.1182/blood.2020006926
[20] Honjo, H., Mike, M., Kusanagi, H. and Kano, N. (2015) Adult Intussusception: A Retrospective Review. World Journal of Surgery, 39, 134-138.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-014-2759-9
[21] Yalamarthi, S. and Smith, R.C. (2005) Adult Intussusception: Case Reports and Review of Literature. Postgraduate Medical Journal, 81, 174-177.
https://doi.org/10.1136/pgmj.2004.022749
[22] Al-Radaideh, A.M., Omari, H.Z. and Bani-Hani, K.E. (2018) Adult Intussusception: A 14-Year Retrospective Study of Clinical Assessment and Computed Tomography Diagnosis. Acta Gastro-Enterologica Belgica, 81, 367-372.
[23] Bar-Ziv, J. and Solomon, A. (1991) Computed Tomography in Adult Intussusception. Gastrointestinal Radiology, 16, 264-266.
https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01887362
[24] Gayer, G., Apter, S., Hofmann, C., Nass, S., Amitai, M., Zissin, R. and Hertz, M. (1998) Intussusception in Adults: CT Diagnosis. Clinical Radiology, 53, 53-57.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0009-9260(98)80035-4
[25] Kim, Y.H., Blake, M.A., Harisinghani, M.G., Archer-Arroyo, K., Hahn, P.F., Pitman, M.B. and Mueller, P.R. (2006) Adult Intestinal Intussusception: CT Appearances and Identification of a Causative Lead Point. Radiographics, 26, 733-744.
https://doi.org/10.1148/rg.263055100
[26] Barussaud, M., Regenet, N., Briennon, X., de Kerviler, B., Pessaux, P., Kohneh-Sharhi, N., Lehur, P.A., Hamy, A., Leborgne, J., Le Neel, J.C., et al. (2006) Clinical Spectrum and Surgical Approach of Adult Intussusceptions: A Multicentric Study. International Journal of Colorectal Disease, 21, 834-839.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-005-0789-3
[27] Wang, L.T., Wu, C.C., Yu, J.C., Hsiao, C.W., Hsu, C.C. and Jao, S.W. (2007) Clinical Entity and Treatment Strategies for Adult Intussusceptions: 20 Years’ Experience. Diseases of the Colon & Rectum, 50, 1941-1949.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10350-007-9048-8
[28] Baek, D.Y., Heo, D.H., Oh, S.M., Hwang, J.H., Hwang, J.H., Park, H.S. and Lee, C.S. (2018) A Case of Jejunal Intussusception Caused by Burkitt Lymphoma in an Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome Patient. Infection & Chemotherapy, 50, 51-54.
https://doi.org/10.3947/ic.2018.50.1.51
[29] Chang, D.K., Yoo, D.H., Kim, T.H., Kim, I.S., Jun, K.Y., Park, M.H. and Kim, S.Y. (1999) Burkitt’s Lymphoma Presenting as Ileocaecal Intussusception in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus. Clinical Rheumatology, 18, 253-256.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s100670050095
[30] El Hage Chehade, H.H., Abtar, H.K. and Seblini, M.I. (2013) Simultaneous Double Ileoileal Intussusception Due to Burkitt’s Lymphoma in a Young Male. Journal of Surgical Case Reports, 2013, rjt031.
https://doi.org/10.1093/jscr/rjt031
[31] Fernandes, C., Pinho, R., Ribeiro, I., Silva, J., Ponte, A., Leite, S. and Fraga, J. (2015) Recurrent Cecocolic Intussusception in a Young Woman. Gastroenterology & Hepatology, 38, 586-588.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gastrohep.2014.10.006
[32] Fiordaliso, M., Panaccio, P., Costantini, R. and De Marco, A.F. (2021) Comparison between Children and Adults Intussusception. Description of Two Cases and Review of Literature. Annali Italiani di Chirurgia, 92, 268-276.
[33] Márquez-Ustariz, A.C., Singh-Boscan, C.S. and Pinto-Lesmes, E. (2022) Intususcepción intestinal por linfoma de Burkitt en un paciente adulto. Primer reporte en Latinoamérica. Cirugía y Cirujanos, 90, 693-696.
https://doi.org/10.24875/CIRU.21000501
[34] Özant, A., Arslan, K., Özçay, N. and Besim, H. (2018) Adult Multicentric Burkitt Lymphoma with Bowel Obstruction Due to Intussusception. Turkish Journal of Gastroenterology, 29, 361-364.
https://doi.org/10.5152/tjg.2018.17743
[35] Sharma, P., Balasingham, S., Stawiarski, K., Rahmani, M., Costantino, A., Sharma, P., Xu, M. and Masoud, A. (2017) Burkitt Lymphoma as a Lead Point for Jejunojejunal Intussusception in a Human Immunodeficiency Virus Patient. Clinical Journal of Gastroenterology, 10, 342-350.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12328-017-0747-y
[36] Simson, R., Planner, A. and Alexander, R. (2017) Adult Burkitt’s Lymphoma Presenting as Intussusception: First UK Case Report. The Annals of The Royal College of Surgeons of England, 99, e206-e208.
https://doi.org/10.1308/rcsann.2017.0105
[37] Wetter, A., Schaudt, A., Lehnert, T., Schmidt-Matthiesen, A., Jacobi, V. and Vogl, T.J. (2006) Small-Bowel Intussusception as a Rare Differential Diagnosis in HIV-Po-sitive Patients with Acute Abdominal Pain. European Radiology, 16, 952-953.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-005-2785-y
[38] Zerwas, E., Kemper-Martin, A. and Comes, A. (2008) A Case Report of Adult Colonic Intussusception. The Journal of the Louisiana State Medical Society, 160, 102-103, 105.
[39] Felix, E.L., Cohen, M.H., Bernstein, A.D. and Schwartz, J.H. (1976) Adult Intussusception; Case Report of Recurrent Intussusception and Review of the Literature. The American Journal of Surgery, 131, 758-761.
https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9610(76)90196-3
[40] Neymark, M., Abramov, R., Dronov, M. and Gilshtein, H. (2021) Management of Adult Intussusception—A Case Series Experience from a Tertiary Center. World Journal of Surgery, 45, 3584-3591.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-021-06277-z
[41] Roschewski, M., Dunleavy, K., Abramson, J.S., Powell, B.L., Link, B.K., Patel, P., Bierman, P.J., Jagadeesh, D., Mitsuyasu, R.T., Peace, D., et al. (2020) Multicenter Study of Risk-Adapted Therapy with Dose-Adjusted EPOCH-R in Adults with Untreated Burkitt Lymphoma. Journal of Clinical Oncology: Official Journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology, 38, 2519-2529.
https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.20.00303
[42] Magrath, I., Adde, M., Shad, A., Venzon, D., Seibel, N., Gootenberg, J., Neely, J., Arndt, C., Nieder, M., Jaffe, E., et al. (1996) Adults and Children with Small Non-Cleaved-Cell Lymphoma Have a Similar Excellent Outcome When Treated with the Same Chemotherapy Regimen. Journal of Clinical Oncology: Official Journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology, 14, 925-934.
https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.1996.14.3.925
[43] Barnes, J.A., Lacasce, A.S., Feng, Y., Toomey, C.E., Neuberg, D., Michaelson, J.S., Hochberg, E.P. and Abramson, J.S. (2011) Evaluation of the Addition of Rituximab to CODOX-M/IVAC for Burkitt’s Lymphoma: A Retrospective Analysis. Annals of Oncology, 22, 1859-1864.
https://doi.org/10.1093/annonc/mdq677
[44] Samra, B., Khoury, J.D., Morita, K., Ravandi, F., Richard-Carpentier, G., Short, N.J., El Hussein, S., Thompson, P., Jain, N., Kantarjian, H., et al. (2021) Long-Term Outcome of Hyper-CVAD-R for Burkitt Leukemia/Lymphoma and High-Grade B-Cell Lymphoma: Focus on CNS Relapse. Blood Advances, 5, 3913-3918.
https://doi.org/10.1182/bloodadvances.2021004427
[45] Chamuleau, M. (2022) R-CODOX-M/R-IVAC versus Dose-Adjusted (DA)-EPO-CH-R in Patients with Newly Diagnosed High-Risk Burkitt Lymphoma; First Results of a Multi-Center Randomized Hovon/Sakk Trial [Abstract LB2370]. Proceedings of the European Hematology Association Congress EHA2022, Vienna, 9-12 June 2022.
[46] Sykorová, A., Procházka, V., Móciková, H., Janíková, A., Pytlík, R., Belada, D., Benešová, K., Klener, P., Ďuraš, J., Smolej, L., et al. (2022) Burkitt Lymphoma—A Retrospective Analysis of Data from the Registry of the Czech Lymphoma Study Group with External Validation of the Burkitt Lymphoma International Prognostic Index. Neoplasma, 69, 1466-1473.
https://doi.org/10.4149/neo_2022_221030N1064

Copyright © 2024 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

Creative Commons License

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.