Influence of the Partial Substitution of Bitumen by a Mixture of Sulphur and Tyre and Plastic Bottle Powders on the Behaviour of Bituminous Concrete

Abstract

This article deals with the influence of the partial substitution of bitumen by a mixture of sulphur and tyre and plastic bottle powders on the characterization of asphalt concrete. The approach adopted was to subject a control asphalt concrete to level 2 formulation tests as well as those modified at 10%, 20%, 30% and 40% by substituting bitumen with a mixture of tyre powder, plastic bottle powder and sulphur at 40%, 28% and 32% respectively. The results of the PCG, Duriez and rutting tests carried out on the control and modified bituminous concretes (manufactured using the wet process) revealed three (03) major findings, in particular with regard to workability, resistance to simple compression and rutting. The experimental results show an increasing trend in the essential parameters. At 40% substitution, there was a 22.73% increase in compactness, reflecting a significant improvement in the material’s workability. With regard to simple compressive strength, the increase is 34.02% at 40% substitution, highlighting the limitation of crack formation and propagation under heavy precipitation. With regard to rutting, the 16% drop in susceptibility at 40% substitution reflects a significant improvement in the behaviour of the material under dynamic mechanical stresses in heavy precipitation. The improvement in these behaviours results from the insertion of the plastic bottle powder into the interstices of the granular skeleton, thus reducing its cellular structure, and also from the interactions between the sulphur with the tyre powder and the sulphur with the plastic bottle powder, i.e. cross-linking or vulcanisation.

Share and Cite:

Mbida, P. , Kunwufine, D. , Bwemba, C. and Mbessa, M. (2023) Influence of the Partial Substitution of Bitumen by a Mixture of Sulphur and Tyre and Plastic Bottle Powders on the Behaviour of Bituminous Concrete. Journal of Minerals and Materials Characterization and Engineering, 11, 213-223. doi: 10.4236/jmmce.2023.116016.

1. Introduction

The deterioration observed on asphalt pavements is often linked either to climatic or traffic stresses, or to the ageing of the material making up the wearing course. The deterioration observed may be stripping, cracking or irreversible deformation [1] . Several proposals have been made to remedy the situation, including asphalt concrete doped with plastics [2] [3] , sulphur [4] [5] , or rubber, as revealed in the 2008 report by Quebec politicians working with RECY-QUEBEC on the recycling of tyre waste. On the other hand, the persistence of certain pathologies remains a topical issue, in particular thermal susceptibility, cushioning and grip, even though dopants have hitherto only been used in a single phase.

However, it should be noted that sulphur can double certain mechanical properties [6] of plastics and rubber, which are non-biodegradable materials whose abundance of waste destroys the environment. The adhesive power of rubber and its ability to limit the propagation of cracks in an asphalt concrete wearing course [7] and the ability of plastic to make the bituminous matrix denser [8] , are assets to be capitalised on at the same time as the added value of sulphur.

In this article, the behaviour of BBSG 0/10, following the substitution of bitumen at 10%, 20%, 30% and 40% by the sum by mass of tyre powder, plastic bottle powder and sulphur at 40%, 28% and 32% respectively, will be evaluated by means of level 2 formulation tests.

2. Materials and Method

2.1. Materials

2.1.1. Components of the Control Asphalt Concrete

The two (02) components used are bitumen obtained from Arab Contractor’S Ltd, a public works company in Cameroon, and aggregates from the AKAK ESSE quarry, in the Mvila department, South Cameroon Region.

2.1.2. Partial Bitumen Substitutes

Three (03) partial bitumen substitutes are used, including sulphur, tyre powder and plastic bottle waste powder.

2.2. Method

This consists of subjecting modified bituminous concrete to level 2 formulation tests in the same way as control bituminous concrete, following the characterization of its components.

2.2.1. Characterisation of Conventional Components

This consists of determining the following parameters in accordance with the relevant standards:

~ Moisture content (NF P 94 - 050);

~ Particle size analysis (NF P 94 - 056);

~ Los Angelès coefficient (NF P 18 - 573);

~ Micro Deval coefficient (NF P 18 - 572);

~ Flattening coefficient (NF P 18 - 561);

~ Sand equivalent (NF P 18 - 598).

2.2.2. Control Asphalt Concrete

1) Formulation and manufacture of control asphalt concrete

The formulation consists of determining the rate of each granular component in accordance with standard NF P 98-150-1, and then determining the percentage of bitumen (Pbi) calculated using Equation (1) [9] .

P b i = ( T G + 120 ) / 100 (1)

where TG, the total particle size, is the sum of the percentages of passings of the granular mix at mesh sizes 16, 12.5, 10, 6.3, 4, 2 and 0.080.

The control asphalt concrete is manufactured in accordance with standard NF EN 13 108-1.

2) Characterization of the control asphalt concrete

This is carried out by means of level 2 mix design tests which are:

~ PCG test (NF EN-P 12 697 - 31);

~ Duriez test (NF P 98 251 - 1);

~ The rutting test (NF EN-P 12 697 - 22).

2.2.3. Modified Bituminous Concrete

They are produced using sulphur, tyre powder and plastic bottle powder.

1) Obtaining partial substituent of bitumen

Three (03) partial bitumen substituents will be used, namely sulphur, tyre powder and plastic bottle powder. They will be obtained following a very precise procedure.

The sulphur was bought on the local Cameroonian market in the form of carrots before being crushed and sieved through a 1-millimetre mesh sieve to make it easier to weigh. Extracted in neighbouring Nigeria, the carrot shape of the sulphur indicates that it was obtained using the Flash process.

The powdered plastic bottle waste will be obtained in eight (08) consecutive stages, including:

a) Collection of waste plastic bottles (non-opaque, transparent and coloured);

b) Removal of the caps;

c) Cutting into flakes and manual washing;

d) Spinning and drying;

e) Melting;

f) Cooling the paste to room temperature;

g) Manual grinding of the hardened paste;

h) Screening with a 1 mm sieve.

The tyre powder will be obtained in seven consecutive stages, including:

a) Collection of waste tyres;

b) Manual coarse cutting into flakes;

c) Cutting into elements of approximately 1 cm2;

d) Washing under running water;

e) Dewatering;

f) Shredding;

g) Screening with a 1 mm sieve;

h) Magnetic purification.

2) Formulation of modified bituminous concrete

Modified bituminous concretes are just 10%, 20%, 30% and then 40% bitumen by the sum by mass of tyre powder, plastic bottle powder and sulphur, at a rate of 40%, 28% and 32% respectively.

3) Manufacture of modified bituminous concrete

This is done using the wet process [10] and in accordance with the Guide [11] for the manufacture of asphalt mixes with rubber powder from used tyres in Spain.

4) Characterization of modified bituminous concrete

This is also done by means of level 2 mix design tests.

3. Results and Interpretation

The results to be interpreted are the parameters obtained from tests carried out on aggregates and on bituminous concrete (pure and modified) previously formulated and manufactured.

3.1. Aggregate Parameters

These are the particle size parameters and the essential properties of the aggregates. The particle size parameters are made up of the particle size (Table 1) and the curvature (Cc) and uniformity (Cu) coefficients.

Examination of Table 1 shows that the composition of the granular mix fits well into the LCPC spindle of the BBSG 0/10.

Furthermore, the coefficient of uniformity (Cu = 23.70) and the coefficient of curvature (Cc = 2.45) of the granular mix satisfy the inequalities 1 < Cc < 3 and Cu > 4. This highlights a good spread of granular diameters in accordance with standard NF P 18 - 540.

The essential properties of the said aggregates are given in Table 2.

In accordance with the requirements of the relevant standards, these aggregates can be used in the manufacture of bituminous concrete.

Table 1. Granulometry.

Table 2. Essential properties of aggregates.

3.2. Formula for Bituminous Concrete

Noting TP as tyre powder, PBP as plastic bottle powder, S as sulphur and BBMi asphalt concrete with i% bitumen substitution, the consequent variants are shown in Table 3.

3.3. Asphalt Concrete Parameters

These are the PCG, Duriez and rutting parameters. For the following, we note “BBMi” the bituminous concretes modifies i% substitution.

3.3.1. Duriez Parameters

Two (02) Duriez parameters are presented in Table 4 including the simple compressive strength “RC” and the degradation coefficient “α”.

It is observed that the simple compressive strength increases progressively with an increase of 12.5% for 40% substitution. This gap is identical to that of asphalt concrete modified by the addition of 15% plastics [12] . The strength of BBM40 (10.4 MPa) is close to that of some anti-rutting bituminous concretes, in particular REXOVIA (10.2 MPa) [13] , and RUFLEX M (9.8 MPa) [14] produced

Table 3. BBM1 variants.

Table 4. Duriez parameters.

respectively by the laboratories EUROVIA (which is a VINCI company) [13] and COLAS. As a result, BBM40 is classified as an anti-rutting bituminous concrete. Furthermore, BBM40 is of lower strength than so-called very high-performance bituminous concretes such as ECOFLEX LT (11.3 MPa) [15] and MULTICOL (15 MPa) [16] produced respectively by the SCREG and COLAS laboratories. Therefore, BBM40 is not one of the so-called very high-performance bituminous concretes.

All variants have a good ability to resist stripping under mechanical stress in the presence of water depending on the requirement. Only the BBM40 has a coefficient close to that of the material whose degradation coefficient is 0.85 [17] . Also, it is improved that, this parameter is by 09% for asphalt concrete modified with 15% plastics whereas the reinforcement is only 01.21% for the present work [12] . Furthermore, the degradation coefficient of BBM40 is slightly higher than that of REXOVIA (0.81) [13] while ECOFLEX LT (0.89) [15] , MULTICOL (0.9) [16] and RUFLEX M 0/10 (0.98) [14] withstand static mechanical stresses under heavy precipitation better than BBM40.

The increase in simple compressive strength results from the formation of several linear and/or star-shaped bonds [18] [19] that become more intertwined followed by the development of hydrophilic character.

3.3.2. PCG Parameters

Table 5 shows the variations in voids and compactness, PCG parameters.

Examination of Table 5 reveals that only BBM40 has a non-compliant voids rate per 100 gyrations, whereas this specification of standard NF P 98 - 252 is verified by the other variants.

Indeed, the compactness of BBMi is higher than that of the material by 94% of compactness [17] . But the 01.04% improvement obtained for the present work is

Table 5. Variations in PCG parameters.

lower than the 05% improvement recorded for bituminous concretes manufactured by dry process, obtained by partial substitution of bitumen by rubber powder and those from partial substitution of 0/3 by rubber powder [20] . The same is true for asphalt concretes doped with rubber fines and those doped with rubber granules [21] .

Furthermore, at 10 gyrations, the four (04) modified bituminous concretes are more cellular than the anti-rutting bituminous concretes, in particular ECOFLEX LT (11.5%) [15] and COFLEX N (12.6%) on the one hand, and on the other, the very high performance concretes, namely Shell Thiopave and MULTICOL [16] , which have a maximum of 11% voids. On the other hand, at 80 gyrations, the compactness of MULTICOL (93%) is lower than that of each BBMi.

The increasing evolution of workability observed via the progression of compactness is, on the one hand, a consequence of the plastic bottle powder which reduces the cellular structure by melting and cooling [20] of the granular skeleton matrix and, on the other hand, a result of the double sulphuric cross-linking [19] [21] .

3.3.3. Resistance to Rutting

Changes in rutting resistance are shown in Table 6.

Table 6. Trends in rutting resistance of modified bituminous concretes.

Resistance to rutting increases with the rate of substitution and the rut depth rate falls by 19% for 40% substitution. Similarly, another work [22] [23] shows that incorporating plastic into bitumen increases its rigidity at high temperatures and also boosts rutting resistance. This theory of improving resistance to rutting by injecting plastic into the bitumen is corroborated by Nouali [24] , while Zhang et al (2018) [25] reached the same conclusions by substituting 1.5% of aggregates with tyre powder.

Furthermore, rutting-resistant bituminous concretes such as REXOVIA [13] , ECOFLEX LT [15] and RUFLEX M [14] have rut depths of 5%, 3% and 5.6% respectively. These values, which are fairly close to those of BBM30 (5.91%) and BBM40 (5.90%), can be used to classify the last two (02) variants as anti-rutting bituminous concretes.

With a susceptibility to rutting of 7.5% at 30,000 cycles, class 2 high modulus asphalt is not preferable to BBM40 (5.9%), which is less prone to rutting than MULTICOL [16] , which has a maximum rut depth of 3%.

The improvement in the stability of the material under the combined action of dynamic and thermal stresses derives from the interactions between the sulphur and the plastic bottle powder and then between the sulphur and the tyre powder [18] [19] .

4. Conclusions

~ Tyres and plastic bottles, as derivatives of crude oil such as bitumen, have chemical affinities with the latter in the same way as sulphur, which is one of the chemical components of this composite. This chemical base guarantees the compatibility of these four (04) materials, namely bitumen, sulphur, tyre powder and plastic bottle powder [19] [23] [24] ;

~ The plastic bottle powder used is inserted into the matrix of the reference material, reducing the honeycomb structure of the reference composite. This insertion follows the softening of the plastic bottle powder, which forms a film after cooling. This film, which is further densified by the sulphur that interacts with the tyre and plastic bottle powders by cross-linking, helps to increase workability [19] [23] ;

~ The increase in simple compressive strength and stability for both static (Duriez test) and dynamic (rutting test) mechanical stresses are the result of the double sulphuric vulcanisation with the tyre powder on the one hand and with the plastic bottle powder on the other [24] [25] . This vulcanisation or cross-linking takes the form of linkages or bridging, which is the formation of new chemical bonds following the destruction of certain multiple bonds and benzene nuclei.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this paper.

References

[1] Dongmo-Engeland, J.B. (2005) Characterization of Rutting Deformations in Bituminous Pavements. National Institute of Applied Sciences of Lyon, Lyon, 266 p.
[2] Kouidri, D. and Mebarka, T. (2017) Influence of Plastic Waste on the Performance of Dune Sand Asphalt Concrete. Université Kasdi Merbah Ouargla, Ouargla, 104 p.
[3] Boukhari, A., Kébaiili, N. and Bouchebra, M. (2017) Asphalt Concrete Modified with Plastic Waste “Study to Determine the Modification Interval”. 2nd National Seminar on Roads and Airfields in Arid Zones (SANARAZA 2015), Université Kasdi Merbah Ouargla, Ouargla, 27 p.
[4] Nicholls, J.C. (2009) Review of Shell Thiopave Sulfur-Extended Asphalt Modifier. TRL Report TRL672. National Academy of Sciences, USA, 10 p.
[5] Trang, N.T., Hung, T.N., Khang, P.H., Cậy, B.X. and Kien, B.N. (2021) Research on the Effects of Sulfur on Characteristics of Sulfur Bituminous Binder (SBB) and Hot Mix Asphalt-Sulfur (HMAS). Transport and Communications Science Journal, 72, 33-45.
https://doi.org/10.47869/tcsj.72.1.5
[6] Luttringer, A.D. (1926) The Encyclopedia of Hard Rubber. A.-D. Cillard, Rue des vinaigriers-Paris X, Paris, 212 p.
[7] Cheheb, Z. (2012) Measurement of the Thermal Properties of Rubber-Based Compounds under Processing Conditions. University of Nantes, Nantes, 232 p.
[8] Kawanou, H., Tchehouali, D., Sanya, A. and Vianou, K. (2014) Effects of Incorporating Plastic Bag Waste Melt on Bitumen Consistency and Asphalt Concrete Stability. Afrique Science Journal, 10, 39-52.
[9] Said, L. (2013) Course at the University of Montreal in Canada: Asphalt Mixes. 38 p.
[10] Saoula, S. (2008) Improvement of the Stability of Modified Bituminous Binders within EVA. International Journal of Applied Engineering Research, 7, 575-584.
[11] Guide for the Manufacture of Asphalt Mixes with Rubber Powder from Used Tyres in Spain 2014. José Bermejo Munoz, Juan Gallego Medina and Leticia Saiz Rodrguez, Madridk.
[12] Ratsifaherandahy Flemond, D., Mamiharijaona, R., Rajaonah, R., Ramorason, J. and Randriamalala Tiana, R. (2022) Improving the Mechanical Performance of Semi-Grained Asphalt Concrete with Pure Bitumen and Waste Plastics. American Journal of Innovative Research and Applied Sciences, 15, 123-130.
[13] VINCI: Direction Technique de EUROVIA (2002) Technical Opinion on a Non-Rutting Bituminous Concrete: REXOVIA. Pierre Anjolras, Canada, 4 p.
[14] COLAS: Comité Français pour les Techniques Routières (2002) Technical Opinion on Thin Bituminous Concrete 0/10 or 0/14: LE RUFLEX M. Frédéric Gardès, Paris, 12 p.
[15] SCREG Technical and Development Department (2006) Energy-Efficient Asphalt Mixes. Environmental Surfacings: ECOFLEX LT. Thomas Pruvost, Lyon, 2 p.
[16] COLAS (2003) Technical Note 6 on a Very High Performance Asphalt Mix: MULTICOL. Guillaume Goes, Boulogne-Billancourt, 6 p
[17] Zadjaoui, A., Karam, F. and Bendimerad, A. (2015) Control of High Modulus Bituminous Concrete Paving Works: Case of Western Algeria.78 p.
[18] Gentles, M.J., Moss, J.B., Herzog, H.L. and Hershberg, E.B. (1958) The Dienol-Benzene Rearrangement.1 Some Chemistry of 1,4-Androstadiene-3,17-Dione. Journal of the American Chemical Society, 80, 3702-3705.
https://doi.org/10.1021/ja01547a058
[19] Yamashita, S., Nishimura, J., Furukawa, M. and Yoshino, T. (1981) C3 Cyclopolymerization. Journal of Polymer Science: Polymer Chemistry Edition, 8, 77-93.
[20] Mohamed Brahim, H., Daas, D. and Kebaili, N. (2014) Experimental Study of Asphalt Concrete Modified with Rubber Powder-Influence of Modification Mode. Revue ElWahat pour les Recherches et les Etudes, 7, 33-43.
[21] Kebaili, N. (2017) Rubber Asphalt: Recycling of Rubber Power in Road Construction. Université Kasdi Merbah Ouargla, Ouargla, 152 p.
[22] Plieninger, H. and Keilich, G. (1956) Die Dienol-Benzol-Umlagerung. Angewandte Chemie, 68, 618.
https://doi.org/10.1002/ange.19560681914
[23] Murillo, R., Aylon, E., Navarro, M.V., Callen, M.S., Aranda, A. and Mastral, A.M. (2006) The Application of Thermal Processes to Valorise Waste Tyre. Fuel Processing Technology, 87, 143-147.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuproc.2005.07.005
[24] Nouali, M. (2021) Valorisation of Waste Plastic Bags for More Efficient Road Mixes. Academic Journal of Civil Engineering, 39, 251-258.
[25] Zhang, Y., Wang, S., Lee, Y. and Li, Y. (2018) Study on the Mechanical Properties of Asphalt Concrete with Waste Tire Rubber Powder. Construction and Building Materials Journal, 191, 946-953.

Copyright © 2024 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

Creative Commons License

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.