1. Introduction
In quantum optics, a large cluster of quantum states can be constructed via unitary transformations from arbitrary initial states including the ground state [1] [2] [3] [4] . Unitary transformations can be interpreted as temporal evolutions of an initial state governed by specific Hamiltonians. For example, coherent (squeezed) state is constructed by applying an unitary transformation, so-called a displacement (squeeze) operator on initial states. Unlike the displacement operator, the squeeze operator consists of two-photon creation and annihilation operators, in which the nonlinear optical processes are involved. However, numerical evaluations for unitary transformations of arbitrary quantum state based on the classical Taylor series expansion become cumbersome [5] [6] [7] because the system’s Hamiltonian is time-independent and nonlinearly constructed by non-commuting operators.
This issue is addressed in this paper. The unique technique for studying the interactions of injected atoms with a cavity field presented by the author in his series of works [7] [8] [9] more than two decades ago is deepened here with an entirely new perspective in the spirit of “quantum” series expansions. This nonstandard unitary transformation technique is established as follows. First, the systems with only time-independent Hamiltonians are considered here. Realizations of quantum dynamics of the systems governed by time-dependent Hamiltonians have been recently reported by the author in [10] . Second, similarly as in Ref. [10] , the classical force terms are replaced with spin operators. Utilizing these two-state raising and lowering operators, various unitary transformations are realized here. As an example, both analytical and numerical results for the transition probabilities from arbitrary quantum states to the displaced [1] [3] [4] [7] , single- [1] [4] [7] [11] [12] and two-mode squeezed [4] [9] [13] and Holstein-Primakoff SU(1,1) transformed states [8] [14] are obtained.
The paper is organized as follows. In the next section, the standard approach for unitary transformations to produce the-above mentioned states is presented. In Section 3, our nonstandard technique for time-independent Hamiltonian systems is introduced and implemented demonstrating the realizations of the transformed arbitrary states. The final section concludes with some remarks.
2. Standard Unitary Transformations
Unitary transformations can be expressed as temporal evolutions as [1] [2] [3] [4]
(1)
here
and
and
are the transformed final state at time t and the initial state at time zero. The Hamiltonian
is the Hermitian and satisfies
. In the interaction picture and under the rotating wave approximation, the time-independent Hamiltonian for the given quantum system is explicitly written as [1]
(2)
where
and
are non-commuting boson annihilation and creation operators;
and
are the time-independent force terms. Unitary operator
satisfies
. Operators
constitute the generalized boson oscillator algebra [15] [16] basis
which satisfies the relations,
(3)
where
is the excitation number operator and real nonnegative structure function
(
,
) characterizes the given system. A vacuum (ground) state
is defined as
,
,
, see Table 1. Using Equation (1) for
, it is aimed to obtain final state
for the initial state including vacuum (ground) state
.
Table 1. Examples for unitary transformations with time-independent Hamiltonian.
2.1. Displaced Vacuum States:
Coherent state
is defined as displaced vacuum state
, which can also be expressed in terms of the Fock states
as [1] [3] [4]
(4)
here the mean photon number is
. The probability of detecting n photons in coherent state follows the Poissonian distribution
. Equivalently, coherent state is also defined as an eigenstate of annihilation operator as
. In the Fock state representation, the ground state or vacuum state
satisfies
and
, which are reduced from definitions such as
and
. From Equations (2) and (4), the unitary transformation and the displacement operator are equivalent when
and the final state reads as
.
2.2. Squeezed Vacuum States:
Squeezed vacuum state
is defined as single mode of the electromagnetic field where the fluctuations of one of the two quadrature become less than the short noise level [1] [3] [4] . Squeezing the ground (vacuum) state
is expressed in terms of the Fock states
as
(5)
here
and the mean photon number is
. From Equations (2) and (5), it is worth to note again that the unitary transformation and the displacement operator are identical when
.
2.3. The Holstein-Primakoff SU(1,1) Transformations:
The Holstein-Primakoff SU(1,1) coherent state
is defined as [8] [14] [17]
(6)
here
and the mean photon number is
. Comparing Equations (2) and (6), it is important to note that
.
2.4. Two-Mode Squeezed Vacuum States:
Two-mode squeezing of vacuum
is expressed in terms of the Fock states
as [4] [9] [13]
(7)
here
and the mean photon number is
and comparing Equations (2) and (7), it is identified as
.
3. Nonstandard Unitary Transformations
The author aims to solve for final state
in Equation (1) using our nonstandard technique previously introduced in Ref. ( [10] ) but, now, for the systems associated with time-independent Hamiltonians. It is formulated as: 1) the classical force terms are replaced with operators in the time-independent Hamiltonian Equation (2); 2) the density operator for the system under consideration is evolved after tracing over this force operator space. A time interval t is divided into N subintervals with a width of Δt when
and
but
being finite. The Hamiltonian is expanded to an additional operator space
as
(8)
where
and
commute and belong to different operator spaces. For example, new operator
can be chosen as
(9)
with
. For this choice, the force terms are replaced with the raising
and lowering
operators as
(10)
here
and
commute. The original Hamiltonian
in Equation (2) is replaced with a modified Hamiltonian
as
(11)
This is known as the unified Jaynes-Cummings Hamiltonian [15] [16] . A new iterative relation for the modified density operator
using the modified Hamiltonian given in Equation (11) is introduced here as the recurrent solution of the von Neumann equation for time evolution in Δt as
(12)
here
with
. Next it is demonstrated here that the results obtained by the two techniques merge as
(13)
for the same pure initial state
which stands for
and
. In the Fock state representation, the iterative relation for the jth density matrix element
is given by
(14)
where coefficients
and
. For
, the author uses the approximations
and
. A transformation is introduced as [7] [8] [9] [18]
(15)
here the former is denoted
with
. Similarly, the latter is denoted
with
(see Table 1. for the explicit expressions of
). Therefore, the reduced equation for
becomes
(16)
here
is a parameter representing coherence between
and
spin states. Vacuum state is expressed as
. Solving Equation (16) and using the transformation given in Equation (15), the density matrix elements for the output state
are expressed in terms of the density matrix elements for arbitrary, but not for necessarily ground state as input state
are found to be
(17)
with
and “
-functions”
are defined as
(18)
here
and
are normalization coefficients and
is either
or
. Thus, the relation for the probability amplitudes between (pure) input and (pure) output states in terms of wave functions are obtained
(19)
Moreover, the solution in Equations (17) and (18) are obtained under the conditions
,
,
and
. In particular, for nonlinear Hamiltonians, it must be
, which excludes the case
for displaced states. In the case of the input vacuum state
, the solution in Equation (19) simplified to
(20)
Thus, it reads explicitly as
(21)
with
. Depending on the explicit form of the structure function
, the displaced, squeezed, SU(1,1) transformed and two-mode squeezed vacuum states are realized by Equation (21) by using our nonstandard technique. Next, it is assumed that an initial state is not vacuum but given as the same type of state
such as
(22)
From Equation (19), the final state is found to be
as
(23)
where the initial displaced, squeezed and SU(1,1) transformed
states are further displaced (or squeezed) to be
. It is worth to note that further combinations of types of these states and transformations are clearly realized. For example, squeezing (displacing) of initially displaced (squeezed) vacuum state leads to the realization of squeezed (coherent) coherent (squeezed) states and so on [7] .
4. Conclusion
One of the challenges in quantum optics is that when the system’s Hamiltonian is time-independent and composed of non-commuting operators, then the numerical evaluations for the unitary transformations of arbitrary quantum state become cumbersome. Addressing this issue, the previous nonstandard unitary transformation technique associated with the unified Jaynes-Cummings model is extended with a new perspective as “quantum” series expansions against the classical Taylor series expansions. In particular, 1) The systems with time-independent Hamiltonians are considered; 2) The classical force terms are replaced with quantum operators; 3) The density matrix for the system under consideration is evolved after tracing over the force operator space. As a proof of principle of this nonstandard technique, utilizing the spin operators as force operators, both analytical and numerical results for the transition probabilities from arbitrary initial states to the final states such as displaced, single- and two-mode squeezed and Holstein-Primakoff SU(1,1) transformed states are obtained. Finally, it is concluded that, although, this technique is novel, its implementations for more general and extended systems are needed.