Trends in Extra-Ovarian Cancer Tissues and Organs Resection in Patients with Ovarian Cancer

Qingmiao Wang, Hua Linghu^*

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China.

DOI: 10.4236/jbm.2023.114027                

Abstract

Ovarian cancer mostly presents with extensive peritoneal cavity and extraperitoneal dissemination. Satisfactory and complete resection of the lesions is one of the key factors to improve the prognosis. The trend of surgical resection of extra-ovarian tissues and organs invaded by the tumor has become obvious in order to remove all primary loci and all metastases as much as possible to minimize residual tumor lesions. This article provides a literature review on organ resection in ovarian cancer cytoreduction, summarizing the perioperative complications and survival outcomes at the time of different organ surgery, with the aim of providing guidance for clinical work.

Keywords

Ovarian Cancer, Organ, Surgery, Prognosis

1. Introduction

Ovarian cancer is the most common malignant neoplasm in gynecology, and the mortality rate is the highest among gynecologic malignancies [1] [2] [3] . The standard treatment is cytoreduction in combination with paclitaxel and platinum-based chemotherapy [4] [5] . Due to absence of early and effective screening methods, most patients have progressed to advanced disease with extensive metastases in the pelvic and abdominal cavities at the time of presentation. Except for patients with severe comorbidities or extensive metastases that preclude surgery, the standard treatment for advanced epithelial ovarian cancer is cytoreduction supplemented with paclitaxel and platinum-based combination chemotherapy [6] [7] . Following primary or interval debulking surgery and postoperative chemotherapy, most patients will achieve clinical remission, but the vast majority will relapse within a short period of time. Currently, several studies have shown that the outcome of cytoreduction is an important factor affecting survival. Optimal and complete resection is one of the key factors to improve the prognosis of advanced ovarian cancer (AOC) [8] [9] [10] [11] . However, the complete reduction rate in epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) is less than 50%, and residual lesions may be due to large intraperitoneal tumors, tumors that metastasized to critical anatomical sites, molecular pathologic features, severe medical complication, venerable age, and inexperience of the surgeon [12] [13] .

Ovarian cancer is usually characterized by extensive peritoneal cavity and extraperitoneal spread. In order to minimize the residual tumor lesions, there has been a clear trend to surgically resect the extra-ovarian tissues and organs invaded by tumors [14] [15] , including diaphragmatic resection, partial hepatectomy, partial pancreatectomy, partial intestinal resection or splenectomy. This article reviews the perioperative complications and survival outcomes of patients with ovarian cancer who underwent surgery on different organs.

2. Upper Abdominal Surgery

Peritoneal spread is the most common spread pattern of ovarian cancer, usually in the form of miliary loci that may involve the hepatic capsule and the right diaphragm. Extensive upper abdominal surgery can increase the rate of optimal debulking surgery [16] [17] , and improve the survival of patients. However, difficulty in exposing the surgical site increases surgical complexity, and aggressive surgery increases postoperative complications [18] . Kuhn et al. reported an increased incidence of perioperative severe complications in patients undergoing upper abdominal surgery compared with standard surgery, but Chi et al. found that major postoperative complications and postoperative mortality were acceptable in patients undergoing extensive upper abdominal surgery [19] [20] .

2.1. Diaphragm Surgery

Diaphragmatic metastases, especially to the right hemidiaphragm, are extremely common in patients with AOC, with up to 40% of patients presenting with massive metastatic diaphragmatic lesions [21] [22] . In recent years, many studies have emphasized the importance of diaphragmatic tumor resection. The tumor can be reduced by means of focal electrocoagulation, diaphragmatic peritoneal stripping, diaphragmatic resection, etc. The surgical method depends on the gynecologist’s judgment of the lesion type and extent of spread. A thorough understanding of the upper abdominal anatomy is the basis for thorough exploration and cytoreduction, thereby reducing the risk of bleeding due to damage to major vessels. The most common complication after diaphragm surgery is pleural effusion. In a recent meta-analysis of 292 patients who underwent diaphragm surgery (197 diaphragmatic peritoneal stripping and 75 diaphragmatic full-thickness resection), the incidence of pleural effusion after diaphragmatic peritoneal stripping and diaphragmatic resection was 43% and 53%, respectively. The requirements for postoperative pleural puncture or chest tube insertion were 4% and 9%, respectively. Patients with diaphragmatic resection were more likely to have pleural effusion, pneumothorax, pneumonia [22] . The MSKCC study showed that the incidence of ipsilateral pleural effusion was 58%, and the overall incidence of postoperative pleural puncture or chest tube insertion was 15% [23] . Diaphragm surgery is a critical step in cytoreduction in patients with advanced and recurrent ovarian cancer with an acceptable incidence, and rigorous postoperative pulmonary management can significantly reduce the incidence of chest complications [24] , while the prediction, prevention and management of subsequent complications should also be emphasized [25] .

2.2. Liver Surgery

Approximately 40% of patients diagnosed with AOC have substantial metastatic lesions in the upper abdomen (diaphragm, liver) [26] . For patients with FIGO IV ovarian cancer, liver is the most common distant metastasis organ, about 37% - 57%, followed by distant lymph nodes, lung, bone and brain, and the median overall survival of patients with liver metastasis is 30 months [27] . In a study of ovarian cancer patients with liver metastasis, partial liver resection had a significant survival benefit compared to liver biopsy [28] . Similar results were reported in a multicenter study of 2655 patients with liver metastases from ovarian cancer who underwent cytoreduction of upper abdominal tumors [29] . Previous study emphasized the equal importance of complete cytoreduction not only in the lower abdomen, but also in the case of liver involvement [30] . Wang et al. found that patients with hepatic metastatic ovarian cancer who underwent partial liver resection up to R0 during cytoreduction had an OS of 50.1 months, compared with 20.0 months in patients who underwent partial liver resection up to non-R0 after during cytoreduction [31] . Studies have demonstrated the safety of liver surgery as part of cytoreduction surgery [31] [32] [33] . Chi et al. reported the most common postoperative complications after liver surgery, including pancreatic leakage, ascites, pleural effusion, with a morbidity and mortality of 22% and 1.4%, respectively [19] . Liver surgery for metastatic ovarian cancer is safe, and resection of liver lesions does not increase the rate of surgery-related complications for experienced surgeons. Hepatectomy should only be performed if complete cytoreduction to no residual lesions and the excision margin is negative, both at initial diagnosis and in the case of recurrence.

2.3. Splenectomy

Splenic involvement in patients with AOC is mainly manifested as the involvement of parenchyma, splenic hilum and peritoneum [34] . Splenectomy is required when the tumor involves the splenic surface, hilum, parenchyma, or when peritoneal involvement cannot be removed alone. The main complications after splenectomy include abdominal complications (such as peritoneal effusion, anastomotic leakage, abscess, pancreatic leakage, etc.) and pulmonary complications (such as pleural effusion, pneumonia and pulmonary embolism) and infectious complications (such as sepsis, and overwhelming post-splenectomy infection) [35] . Patients with splenectomy had longer time to postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy due to higher rates of postoperative complications (e.g., postoperative infection, reoperation, and length of postoperative hospital stay) [36] , and delayed chemotherapy after cytoreduction is an independent prognostic factor for survival, with a median duration of adjuvant chemotherapy after splenectomy recommended at 5 - 6 weeks postoperatively [37] . Optimal debulking surgery was achieved in 34 patients who underwent splenectomy had a better survival in Sun’s study [38] . There is a common indication for splenectomy for tumor involvement, rarely due to splenic injury. Splenectomy should be attempted in all patients with splenic involvement who can achieve optimal cytoreduction, whether primary or interval debulking surgery, after adequate preoperative evaluation.

3. Intestinal Surgery

Ovarian cancer is prone to involve the small intestine or colon, so resection of intestinal metastases is a key part of cytoreductive, and intestinal surgery includes intestinal resection, intestinal tumor stripping. The decision of whether to perform intestinal resection and the extent of resection often needs to be made in conjunction with the intraoperative situation [39] . Reports of intestinal resection have been published to increase optimal debulking surgery rates and improve patient survival [40] [41] , however, extension of the surgical scope is associated with higher rates of intraoperative and early postoperative complications (e.g., bleeding, anastomotic dehiscence, and infection) [42] . The long-term sequelae of perioperative morbidity of intestinal resection may lead to increased mortality, and intestinal resection may be a negative prognostic factor [43] . Fistulas are sometimes performed after intestinal resection, which significantly reduces the comfort of the patient. In Abdul’s study it was suggested that intestinal resection should only be performed if it can achieve complete cytoreduction or if it can reduce or prevent impending bowel obstruction [44] . A Korean multicenter study showed that the survival outcome of patients undergoing intestinal resection was not inferior to that of patients undergoing low anterior resection if optimal debulking could be guaranteed [45] . In patients suffering from intestinal metastases with ovarian cancer, the impact of postoperative complications and fistulas on patients’ distant survival should be taken into consideration before deciding whether to perform intestinal resection [46] .

4. Lymphnode Surgery

Lymphnode involvement in ovarian cancer is approximately 44% - 46%, and pelvic and para-aortic lymphnode dissection contributes to maximal cytoreduction in advanced EOC and has been performed as an important surgical procedure [47] . Common postoperative complications include fever, lymphatic cysts, and lymphedema, and severe cases may require reoperation [48] [49] . Controversy remains regarding the impact of lymphnode dissection on survival. Several studies suggest that lymph node dissection is associated with a better prognosis [50] . Andreas’s analysis of advanced ovarian cancer patients with primary debulking surgery showed that lymphnode dissection was associated with higher survival in patients with complete cytoreduction [51] . In Maggioni’s randomized controlled trial for early-stage EOC, lymphnode dissection did not benefit either overall survival or progression-free survival, although more metastatic lymphnodes were removed in the lymphnode dissection group [52] . A different perspective was presented by the LION trial, which included patients with negative lymphnode metastases who achieved complete cytoreduction randomized into lymphnode dissection group and non-lymphnode dissection group, showing that lymphnode metastases were pathologically present in 55.7% of cases in the lymph node dissection group and that lymph node dissection did not provide any survival benefit [48] . Whether to perform lymphnode surgery, gynecologic oncologists should formulate an individualized surgical plan, correctly identify patients who can benefit from it, choose an appropriate surgical route, and minimize postoperative complications.

5. Conclusion

Ovarian cancer is prone to extensive metastasis to adjacent organs. With the advancement of surgical oncology, most gynecologic oncologists advocate an aggressive approach to remove involved tissues as much as possible. The trends of extra-ovarian cancer tissues and organs resection have been obvious, but the impact of aggressive surgery on patients’ perioperative complications and quality of life still needs attention. Various factors such as the general physical condition of the patient and the degree of tumor dissemination influence the surgical plan of the gynecologic oncologist, and the use of targeted drugs such as PARP inhibitors also influence the choice of treatment plan. Surgery is still the basis of ovarian cancer treatment. For patients with multiple organ involvement, a multidisciplinary discussion should be conducted before surgery, and the surgical approach should be selected comprehensively by combining the patient’s general condition and his own technical level during surgery, so as to avoid the discomfort of life and survival benefits brought by highly invasive surgery.

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this paper.

References

[1]	Torre, L.A., Trabert, B., Desantis, C.E., Miller, K.D., Samimi, G., Runowicz, C.D., et al. (2018) Ovarian Cancer Statistics. CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians, 68, 284-296. https://doi.org/10.3322/caac.21456
[2]	Bray, F., Ferlay, J., Soerjomataram, I., Siegel, R.L., Torre, L.A. and Jemal, A. (2018) Global Cancer Statistics 2018: Globocan Estimates of Incidence and Mortality Worldwide for 36 Cancers in 185 Countries. CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians, 68, 394-424. https://doi.org/10.3322/caac.21492
[3]	Siegel, R.L., Miller, K.D. and Jemal, A. (2018) Cancer Statistics, 2018. CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians, 68, 7-30. https://doi.org/10.3322/caac.21442
[4]	Kim, S.R., Kotsopoulos, J., Sun, P., Bernardini, M.Q., Laframboise, S. and Ferguson, S.E. (2021) The Impacts of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy and of Cytoreductive Surgery on 10-year Survival from Advanced Ovarian Cancer. International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics, 153, 417-423. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijgo.13542
[5]	Machida, H., Tokunaga, H., Matsuo, K., Matsumura, N., Kobayashi, Y. Tabata, T., et al. (2020) Survival Outcome and Perioperative Complication Related to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy with Carboplatin and Paclitaxel for Advanced Ovarian Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. European Journal of Surgical Oncology, 46, 868-875. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejso.2019.11.520
[6]	Ataseven, B., Chiva, L.M., Harter, P., Gonzalez-Martin, A. and du Bois, A. (2016) FIGO Stage IV Epithelial Ovarian, Fallopian Tube and Peritoneal Cancer Revisited. Gynecologic Oncology, 142, 597-607. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ygyno.2016.06.013
[7]	Kumar, L., Pramanik, R., Kumar, S., Bhatla, N. and Malik, S. (2015) Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Gynaecological Cancers—Implications for Staging. Best Practice & Research Clinical Obstetrics & Gynaecology, 29, 790-801. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2015.02.008
[8]	Park, S.J., Kim, J., Kim, S.N., Lee, E.J., Oh, S., Seol, A., et al. (2019) Practice Patterns of Surgery for Advanced Ovarian Cancer: Analysis from International Surveys. Japanese Journal of Clinical Oncology, 49, 137-145. https://doi.org/10.1093/jjco/hyy175
[9]	Liberale, G., Pop, C.F., Polastro, L., Kerger, J., Moreau, M., Chintinne, M., et al. (2020) A Radical Approach to Achieve Complete Cytoreductive Surgery Improve Survival of Patients with Advanced Ovarian Cancer. Journal of Visceral Surgery, 157, 79-86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jviscsurg.2019.12.002
[10]	Sorensen, S.M., Schnack, T.H. and Hogdall, C. (2019) Impact of Residual Disease on Overall Survival in Women with Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics Stage IIIB-IIIC vs Stage IV Epithelial Ovarian Cancer after Primary Surgery. Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica, 98, 34-43. https://doi.org/10.1111/aogs.13453
[11]	Greer, A., Gockley, A., Manning-Geist, B., Melamed, A., Sisodia, R.C., Berkowitz, R., et al. (2021) Impact of Residual Disease at Interval Debulking Surgery on Platinum Resistance and Patterns of Recurrence for Advanced-Stage Ovarian Cancer. International Journal of Gynecological Cancer, 31, 1341-1347. https://doi.org/10.1136/ijgc-2020-001505
[12]	du Bois, A., Reuss, A., Pujade-Lauraine, E., Harter, P., Ray-Coquard, I. and Pfisterer, J. (2009) Role of Surgical Outcome as Prognostic Factor in Advanced Epithelial Ovarian Cancer: A Combined Exploratory Analysis of 3 Prospectively Randomized Phase 3 Multicenter Trials: By the Arbeitsgemeinschaft Gynaekologische Onkologie Studiengruppe Ovarialkarzinom (AGO-OVAR) and the Groupe d’Investigateurs Nationaux Pour les Etudes des Cancers de l’Ovaire (GINECO). Cancer, 115, 1234-1244. https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.24149
[13]	Brand, A.H. (2011) Ovarian Cancer Debulking Surgery: A Survey of Practice in Australia and New Zealand. International Journal of Gynecological Cancer, 21, 230-235. https://doi.org/10.1097/IGC.0b013e318205fb4f
[14]	Dottino, J.A., He, W., Sun, C.C., Zhao, H., Fu, S., Rauh-Hain, J.A., et al. (2020) National Trends in Bowel and Upper Abdominal Procedures in Ovarian Cancer Surgery. International Journal of Gynecological Cancer, 30, 1195-1202. https://doi.org/10.1136/ijgc-2020-001243
[15]	Jones, N.L., Chen, L., Chatterjee, S., Tergas, A.I., Burke, W.M., Hou, J.Y., et al. (2018) National Trends in Extended Procedures for Ovarian Cancer Debulking Surgery. International Journal of Gynecological Cancer, 28, 19-25. https://doi.org/10.1097/IGC.0000000000001132
[16]	Chi, D.S., Eisenhauer, E.L., Zivanovic, O., Sonoda, Y., Abu-Rustum, N.R., Levine, D.A., et al. (2009) Improved Progression-Free and Overall Survival in Advanced Ovarian Cancer as a Result of a Change in Surgical Paradigm. Gynecologic Oncology, 114, 26-31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ygyno.2009.03.018
[17]	Barlin, J.N., Long, K.C., Tanner, E.J., Gardner, G.J., Leitao, M.J., Levine, D.A., et al. (2013) Optimal (≤1 cm) But Visible Residual Disease: Is Extensive Debulking Warranted? Gynecologic Oncology, 130, 284-288. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ygyno.2013.05.006
[18]	Tozzi, R., Traill, Z., Garruto, C.R., Ferrari, F., Soleymani, M.H., Nieuwstad, J., et al. (2016) Porta Hepatis Peritonectomy and Hepato-Celiac Lymphadenectomy in Patients with Stage IIIC-IV Ovarian Cancer: Diagnostic Pathway, Surgical Technique and Outcomes. Gynecologic Oncology, 143, 35-39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ygyno.2016.08.232
[19]	Chi, D.S., Zivanovic, O., Levinson, K.L., Kolev, V., Huh, J., Dottino, J., et al. (2010) The Incidence of Major Complications after the Performance of Extensive Upper Abdominal Surgical Procedures during Primary Cytoreduction of Advanced Ovarian, Tubal, and Peritoneal Carcinomas. Gynecologic Oncology, 119, 38-42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ygyno.2010.05.031
[20]	Yalcin, Y., Tatar, B., Erdemoglu, E. and Erdemoglu, E. (2019) The Parameters to Estimate Postoperative Severe Complications Classified through Clavien-Dindo after Upper Abdominal Surgery in Patients with Primary and Recurrent Ovarian Cancer. Ginekologia Polska, 90, 557-564. https://doi.org/10.5603/GP.2019.0097
[21]	Benedetti, P.P., Di Donato, V., Fischetti, M., Casorelli, A., Perniola, G., Musella, A., et al. (2015) Predictors of Postoperative Morbidity after Cytoreduction for Advanced Ovarian Cancer: Analysis and Management of Complications in Upper Abdominal Surgery. Gynecologic Oncology, 137, 406-411. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ygyno.2015.03.043
[22]	Bogani, G., Ditto, A., Martinelli, F., Lorusso, D., Chiappa, V., Donfrancesco, C., et al. (2016) Surgical Techniques for Diaphragmatic Resection during Cytoreduction in Advanced or Recurrent Ovarian Carcinoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. The International Journal of Gynecological Cancer, 26, 371-380. https://doi.org/10.1097/IGC.0000000000000597
[23]	Eisenhauer, E.L., D’Angelica, M.I., Abu-Rustum, N.R., Sonoda, Y., Jarnagin, W.R., Barakat, R.R. and Chi, D.S. (2006) Incidence and Management of Pleural Effusions after Diaphragm Peritonectomy or Resection for Advanced Mullerian Cancer. Gynecologic Oncology, 103, 871-877. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ygyno.2006.05.023
[24]	Ye, S., He, T., Liang, S., Chen, X., Wu, X.H., Yang, H.J. and Xiang, L.B. (2017) Diaphragmatic Surgery and Related Complications in Primary Cytoreduction for Advanced Ovarian, Tubal, and Peritoneal Carcinoma. BMC Cancer, 17, Article No. 317. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-017-3311-8
[25]	Datta, A., Sebastian, A., Chandy, R.G., Thomas, V., Thomas, D.S., Karuppusami, R., et al. (2021) Complications and Outcomes of Diaphragm Surgeries in Epithelial Ovarian Malignancies. Indian Journal of Surgical Oncology, 12, 822-829. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13193-021-01438-x
[26]	Kato, K., Katsuda, T. and Takeshima, N. (2016) Cytoreduction of Diaphragmatic Metastasis from Ovarian Cancer with Involvement of the Liver Using a Ventral Liver Mobilization Technique. Gynecologic Oncology, 140, 577-579. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ygyno.2016.01.017
[27]	Deng, K., Yang, C., Tan, Q., Song, W., Lu, M., Zhao, W., et al. (2018) Sites of Distant Metastases and Overall Survival in Ovarian Cancer: A Study of 1481 Patients. Gynecologic Oncology, 150, 460-465. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ygyno.2018.06.022
[28]	Kamel, S.I., de Jong, M.C., Schulick, R.D., Diaz-Montes, T.P., Wolfgang, C.L., Hirose, K., et al. (2011) The Role of Liver-Directed Surgery in Patients with Hepatic Metastasis from a Gynecologic Primary Carcinoma. World Journal of Surgery, 35, 1345-1354. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-011-1074-y
[29]	Rodriguez, N., Miller, A., Richard, S.D., Rungruang, B., Hamilton, C.A., Bookman, M.A., et al. (2013) Upper Abdominal Procedures in Advanced Stage Ovarian or Primary Peritoneal Carcinoma Patients with Minimal or No Gross Residual Disease: An Analysis of Gynecologic Oncology Group (GOG) 182. Gynecologic Oncology, 130, 487-492. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ygyno.2013.06.017
[30]	Bristow, R.E., Tomacruz, R.S., Armstrong, D.K., Trimble, E.L. and Montz, F.J. (2002) Survival Effect of Maximal Cytoreductive Surgery for Advanced Ovarian Carcinoma during the Platinum Era: A Meta-Analysis. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 20, 1248-1259. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2002.20.5.1248
[31]	Wang, M., Zhou, J., Zhang, L., Zhao, Y., Zhang, N., Wang, L., et al. (2019) Surgical Treatment of Ovarian Cancer Liver Metastasis. Hepatobiliary Surgery and Nutrition, 8, 129-137. https://doi.org/10.21037/hbsn.2018.12.06
[32]	Gasparri, M.L., Grandi, G., Bolla, D., Gloor, B., Imboden, S., Panici, P.B., Mueller, M.D. and Papadia, A. (2016) Hepatic Resection during Cytoreductive Surgery for Primary or Recurrent Epithelial Ovarian Cancer. Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology, 142, 1509-1520. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00432-015-2090-3
[33]	Luna-Abanto, J., Garcia, R.L., Laura, M.J., Alvarez, L.M. and Villoslada, T.V. (2020) Liver Resection as Part of Cytoreductive Surgery for Ovarian Cancer. Journal of Gynecologic Surgery, 36, 70-75. https://doi.org/10.1089/gyn.2019.0074
[34]	Durmus, Y., Isci, B.E., Duru, C.A., Kayikcioglu, F. and Boran, N. (2019) Metastasis Patterns of the Spleen and Association with Survival Outcomes in Advanced Ovarian-Tubal-Peritoneal Epithelial Cancer. Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics, 300, 1367-1375. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-019-05300-y
[35]	Dagbert, F., Thievenaz, R., Decullier, E., Bakrin, N., Cotte, E., Rousset, P., et al. (2016) Splenectomy Increases Postoperative Complications Following Cytoreductive Surgery and Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy. Annals of Surgical Oncology, 23, 1980-1985. https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-016-5147-x
[36]	Said, S.A., van der Aa, M.A., Veldmate, G., de Hullu, J.A. and van Altena, A.M. (2022) Oncologic Outcomes after Splenectomy during Initial Cytoreductive Surgery in Advanced Epithelial Ovarian Cancer: A Nationwide Population-Based Cohort Study. Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica, 101, 56-67. https://doi.org/10.1111/aogs.14286
[37]	Timmermans, M., van der Aa, M.A., Lalisang, R.I., Witteveen, P.O., Van de Vijver, K.K., Kruitwagen, R.F. and Sonke, G.S. (2018) Interval between Debulking Surgery and Adjuvant Chemotherapy Is Associated with Overall Survival in Patients with Advanced Ovarian Cancer. Gynecologic Oncology, 150, 446-450. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ygyno.2018.07.004
[38]	Munkarah, A., Levenback, C., Wolf, J.K., Bodurka-Bevers, D., Tortolero-Luna, G., Morris, R.T. and Gershenson, D.M. (2001) Secondary Cytoreductive Surgery for Localized Intra-Abdominal Recurrences in Epithelial Ovarian Cancer. Gynecologic Oncology, 81, 237-241. https://doi.org/10.1006/gyno.2001.6143
[39]	Son, J.H. and Chang, S.J. (2021) Extrapelvic Bowel Resection and Anastomosis in Cytoreductive Surgery for Ovarian Cancer. Gland Surgery, 10, 1207-1211. https://doi.org/10.21037/gs-2019-ursoc-01
[40]	Bachmann, R., Rothmund, R., Kramer, B., Brucker, S.Y., Konigsrainer, A., Konigsrainer, I., et al. (2015) The Prognostic Role of Optimal Cytoreduction in Advanced, Bowel Infiltrating Ovarian Cancer. Journal of Investigative Surgery, 28, 160-166. https://doi.org/10.3109/08941939.2014.994794
[41]	Sebastian, A., Thomas, A., Varghese, G., Yadav, B., Chandy, R. and Peedicayil, A. (2018) Outcome of Bowel Resection in Women with Advanced Ovarian Carcinoma. Indian Journal of Surgical Oncology, 9, 511-518. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13193-018-0790-2
[42]	Derlatka, P., Sienko, J., Grabowska-Derlatka, L., Palczewski, P., Danska-Bidzinska, A., Bidzinski, M. and Czajkowski, K. (2016) Results of Optimal Debulking Surgery with Bowel Resection in Patients with Advanced Ovarian Cancer. World Journal of Surgical Oncology, 14, Article No. 58. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12957-016-0800-1
[43]	Mcnamara, B., Guerra, R., Qin, J., Craig, A.D., Chen, L.M., Varma, M.G. and Chapman, J.S. (2021) Survival Impact of Bowel Resection at the Time of Interval Cytoreductive Surgery for Advanced Ovarian Cancer. Gynecologic Oncology Reports, 38, Article 100870. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gore.2021.100870
[44]	Abdul, S., Tidy, J.A. and Paterson, M.E. (2006) Can We Identify the Patients Who Are Likely to Undergo Bowel Resection at the Time of Surgery for Ovarian Cancer? Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 26, 357-362. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443610600613565
[45]	Kim, M., Suh, D.H., Park, J.Y., Paik, E.S., Lee, S. and Eoh, K.J. (2018) Survival Impact of Low Anterior Resection in Patients with Epithelial Ovarian Cancer Grossly Confined to the Pelvic Cavity: A Korean Multicenter Study. Journal of Gynecological Oncology, 29, e60. https://doi.org/10.3802/jgo.2018.29.e6
[46]	Oseledchyk, A., Hunold, L.E., Mallmann, M.R., Domrose, C.M., Abramian, A., Debald, M. et al. (2016) Impact of Extended Primary Surgery on Suboptimally Operable Patients with Advanced Ovarian Cancer. International Journal of Gynecological Cancer, 26, 873-883. https://doi.org/10.1097/IGC.0000000000000707
[47]	Winter, W.R., Maxwell, G.L., Tian, C., Sundborg, M.J., Rose, G.S., Rose, P.G., et al. (2008) Tumor Residual after Surgical Cytoreduction in Prediction of Clinical Outcome in Stage IV Epithelial Ovarian Cancer: A Gynecologic Oncology Group Study. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 26, 83-89. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2007.13.1953
[48]	Harter, P., Sehouli, J., Lorusso, D., Reuss, A., Vergote, I., Marth, C., et al. (2019) A Randomized Trial of Lymphadenectomy in Patients with Advanced Ovarian Neoplasms. The New England Journal of Medicine, 380, 822-832. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1808424
[49]	Frenzel, F., Hollaender, S., Fries, P., Stroeder, R. and Stroeder, J. (2020) Jejunal Obstruction Due to Rare Internal Hernia between Skeletonized External Iliac Artery and Vein as Late Complication of Laparoscopic Hysterectomy with Pelvic Lymphadenectomy—Case Report and Review of Literature. Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics, 302, 1075-1080. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-020-05724-x
[50]	Paik, E.S., Shim, M., Choi, H.J., Lee, Y.Y., Kim, T.J., Lee, J.W., et al. (2016) Impact of Lymphadenectomy on Survival after Recurrence in Patients with Advanced Ovarian Cancer without Suspected Lymph Node Metastasis. Gynecologic Oncology, 143, 252-257. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ygyno.2016.08.321
[51]	du Bois, A., Reuss, A., Harter, P., Pujade-Lauraine, E., Ray-Coquard, I. and Pfisterer, J. (2010) Potential Role of Lymphadenectomy in Advanced Ovarian Cancer: A Combined Exploratory Analysis of Three Prospectively Randomized Phase III Multicenter Trials. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 28, 1733-1739. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2009.25.3617
[52]	Maggioni, A., Benedetti, P.P., Dell’Anna, T., Landoni, F., Lissoni, A., Pellegrino, A., et al. (2006) Randomised Study of Systematic Lymphadenectomy in Patients with Epithelial Ovarian Cancer Macroscopically Confined to the Pelvis. British Journal of Cancer, 95, 699-704. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6603323