Average Luminous Mass of Early Galaxies at z = 10 - 20 Predicted as ~109 Solar Masses
T. R. Mongan
Sausalito, CA, USA.
DOI: 10.4236/jmp.2023.143015   PDF    HTML   XML   70 Downloads   285 Views  

Abstract

This paper predicts the average luminous mass of galaxies that will be detected by JWST space telescope at redshift z ≈ 10 - 20. The prediction, derived in the paper, is based on holographic analysis, developed from quantum mechanics, general relativity, thermodynamics, and Shannon information theory. Consistent with early JWST data, ~109 solar masses is the predicted average luminous mass of early galaxies at z ≈ 10 - 20 that will be detected by JWST.

Share and Cite:

Mongan, T. (2023) Average Luminous Mass of Early Galaxies at z = 10 - 20 Predicted as ~109 Solar Masses. Journal of Modern Physics, 14, 208-211. doi: 10.4236/jmp.2023.143015.

1. Introduction

Luminous galaxy candidates at z > 10 revealed by JWST indicate “future deep JWST observations may identify relatively bright galaxies to much earlier epochs than might have been expected” [1]. As explained below, holographic analysis based on quantum mechanics, general relativity, thermodynamics, and Shannon information theory indicates galaxies with mass ~109 solar masses should be expected at z = 10 - 20. The analysis does not assume or require a theory specifically relating arrangements of bits of information on holographic screens to distribution (as opposed to amount) of mass within such screens.

Behroozi et al. [2] listed some early predictions for what JWST will see, and then used a supercomputer simulation to predict JWST will find galaxies z > 10 with masses considerably below those revealed by early JWST data. In contrast, the prediction from holographic analysis below, ~109 solar masses for average luminous mass of galaxies at z ≈ 10 - 20, is consistent with early JWST results.

2. Holographic Analysis

Our post-inflationary universe, dominated by vacuum energy, has cosmological constant Λ = 1.088 × 10 56 cm 2 [3] and event horizon radius R H = 3 Λ = 1.661 × 10 28 cm . Holographic analysis [4] finds only a finite number N = π ln ( 2 ) ( R H l P ) 2 = 4.741 × 10 122 of bits of information on the event horizon are available to describe our universe, where Planck length l P = G c 3 = 1.616 × 10 33 cm .

Friedmann’s general relativistic equation H 0 2 = 8 π G 3 ρ c r i t + Λ c 2 3 for a flat Euclidean universe with critical density and cosmological constant requires Ω Λ Λ c 2 3 H 0 2 . PDG 2022 [3] lists present day Hubble expansion rate H 0 = 67.4 km / ( sec Mpc ) , critical density ρ c r i t = 3 H 0 2 8 π G = 8.53 × 10 30 g / cm 3 , dark energy density parameter Ω Λ = 0.685 , Hubble length c / H 0 = 1.37 × 10 28 cm , and matter density ρ m = ( 1 Ω Λ ) ρ c r i t . PDG parameters result in Λ c 2 3 Ω Λ H 0 2 = 0.997 , so our universe is indistinguishable from flat Euclidean space to three significant figures. Mass within the event horizon M H = 4 3 π ( 1 Ω Λ ) ρ c r i t R H 3 = ( 1 Ω Λ ) c 2 2 G 3 Λ = 5.14 × 10 55 g is constant in time, and M H = [ ( 1 Ω Λ ) c 2 2 G ( H 0 c ) 2 3 Λ ] R H 2 = ( 0.187 g / cm 2 ) R H 2 . The constant mass per bit of information m b i t = M H / N = 1.08 × 10 67 g .

In a fundamental sense, information specifies location of matter in space, and holographic analysis indicates 4.741 × 10122 bits of information on the spherical holographic screen (SHS) of the event horizon are associated with matter within our observable universe. Holographic analysis then indicates information and associated mass M within isolated gravitationally bound systems relates to radii R of spherical holographic screens around system centers of mass by M = ( 0.187 g / cm 2 ) R 2 .

Cosmic microwave background (CMB) radiation density at redshift z is ρ r ( z ) = ( 1 + z ) 4 ρ r ( 0 ) , where mass equivalent of today’s radiation energy density ρ r ( 0 ) = 4.59 × 10 34 g / cm 3 . Matter density ρ(z) is much greater than radiation density and Jeans mass [5] M J = π 48 ρ m 2 [ 2 c 3 π ρ r ( 0 ) G ] 3 = 2.30 × 10 50 g , the upper limit on mass of gravitationally bound systems stable against gravitational collapse, is independent of z . Large scale structures at z > 10 are gravitationally bound systems of individual stars with masses between Jeans mass M J and minimum stellar mass m min ( z ) at redshift z .

3. Minimum Stellar Mass at Redshift z

Minimum stellar mass m min ( z ) is estimated by setting escape velocity of protons at SHS radius R min for minimum stellar mass equal average velocity of protons in equilibrium with CMB radiation outside the SHS for m min ( z ) . Protons in equilibrium with CMB outside the SHS for stellar systems with mass < m min ( z ) can transfer energy to those systems until they reach m min ( z ) . Escape velocity v for protons of mass m p gravitationally bound at radius R from system center of mass M is calculated from 1 2 m p v 2 = G M m p R . Escape velocity of protons on the SHS for minimum mass stars with mass M at redshift z is velocity of protons in thermal equilibrium with CMB, so 3 2 k T ( z ) = G M m p R , where CMB temperature T ( z ) = ( 1 + z ) 2.725 K and Boltzmann constant k = 1.38 × 10 16 ( g cm 2 / sec 2 ) / K . With radius R = M / ( 0.187 g / cm 2 ) for structures of mass M , m min ( z ) = 1 0.187 ( 1.5 k ( 1 + z ) 2.725 G m p ) 2 g , so m min ( 10 ) = 8.26 M , m min ( 12 ) = 11.5 M , and m min ( 20 ) = 30.1 M , with solar mass M = 2 × 10 33 g . If outgoing protons at the SHS are in thermal equilibrium with outgoing photon flow from minimum mass stars, stars must have mass > m min ( z ) to appear against the CMB background. Maximum star mass 6 × 10 35 g 300 M [6] coincided with minimum star mass at z 65 , consistent with indications stars first formed at z 65 [7]. At z = 0 , minimum star mass 1.4 × 10 32 g = 0.07 M , consistent with hydrogen burning mass threshold separating brown dwarfs from lowest mass stars [8].

4. Average Galactic Mass at Redshift z

With no good reason to suspect information describing gravitationally bound systems is not uniformly distributed between mass bins, the number of gravitationally bound systems of mass m at redshift z can be taken as n ( m ) = K / m with constant K . Then total mass of observable gravitationally bound systems at redshift z is M H m min ( z ) M J m ( K m ) d m = K ( M J m min ( z ) ) and K M H / M J = 2.24 × 10 5 . The number of observable gravitationally bound structures in Jeans mass M J at redshift z is N ( z ) = m min ( z ) M J K m d m = K ln ( 2.30 × 10 50 g / m min ( z ) ) . Estimated average total mass of observable gravitationally bound structures at redshift z, M a v g ( z ) = M J / N ( z ) , at z = 10 - 20 is ~ 1.4 × 10 10 M , between estimated Milky Way mass ~ 10 45 g ~ 10 12 M and dwarf galaxy masses ~ 10 40 g ~ 10 7 M .

PDG 2022 [3] lists baryon density fraction of the universe Ω b = 0.0493 , so stellar mass is Ω b / ( 1 Ω Λ ) = 0.0720 times total galactic mass. Then stellar mass ~ 10 9 M of galaxy candidates at redshift z ≈ 10 - 12 identified by Naidu et al. in JWST data is consistent with “early appearance of UV-luminous galaxies with stellar masses as high as 10 9 M already at few 100 Myr after the Big Bang” [1].

5. Conclusion

Holographic analysis predicts the average galaxy detected by JWST space telescope at redshift z ≈ 10 - 12 will have luminous mass of about 109 solar masses, consistent with early JWST data.

Conflicts of Interest

The author declares no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this paper.

References

[1] Naidu, R., Oesch, P., van Dokkum, P., et al. (2022) The Astrophysical Journal Letters, 940, L14.
https://doi.org/10.3847/2041-8213/ac9b22
[2] Behroozi, P., Conroy, C., Wechsler, R., et al. (2020) Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 499, 5702-5718.
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/staa3164
[3] Workman, R., Burkert, V., Crede, V., et al. (2022) Progress of Theoretical and Experimental Physics, 2022, 083C01.
[4] Bousso, R. (2002) Reviews of Modern Physics, 74, 825-874.
https://doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.74.825
[5] Mongan, T. (2013) Journal of Modern Physics, 4, 50-54.
https://doi.org/10.4236/jmp.2013.47A1006
[6] Crowther, P., Schnuur, O., Hirschi, R., et al. (2010) Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 408, 731-751.
[7] Naoz, S., Noter, S. and Barkana, R. (2006) Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society: Letters, 373, L98-L102.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-3933.2006.00251.x
[8] Mireles, I., Shporer, A., Grieves, N., et al. (2020) AJ, 160, 133.

Copyright © 2024 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

Creative Commons License

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.