Effect of Maggot Production Residue on Amaranth Growth Parameters

Abstract

Amaranth is one of the most consumed vegetables in Niger Republic because of its nutritional values. However, the production of this plant requires nutrient-rich soils that are becoming scarce in most agricultural soils in Niger. This study aims to evaluate the fertilizing potential of the maggot production residue of Musca domestica L. 1758 and bovine excrement on the agronomic parameters of Amaranthus cruentus L., 1759. To do this, four densities (50, 100, 150, 200 g) of maggot production residue and bovine excrement were tested. Stem length, neck diameter and leaf number were strongly influenced by the interaction of the type of treatment (maggot production residue and bovine excrement) and dose. Dose 50 and dose 150 gave the best performance in length and diameter respectively for residue (length = 42.24 ± 8.98 cm; diameter = 0.88 ± 0.17 cm) and bovine droppings (length = 39.29 ± 8.10; diameter = 0.98 ± 0.77). On the leaf number side, no significant differences were observed between the doses for the residue. For bovine excrement, this number was higher at the 150 g dose (28.12 ± 4.98). The effect of the residue and bovine excrement on each corresponding dose shows that, for the stem length, only the 50 g dose was statistically influenced by the latter (P < 0.001). On the neck diameter side, only the 50 g and 100 g doses were statistically influenced by bovine residue and excrement (dose 50 g: P < 0.001; dose 100 g: P < 0.001). For each of these doses, the residue recorded the best performance both for the length of the rod and for the diameter at the collar. On the leaf number side, only the dose 50 g and 150 g varied statistically according to the type of fertilizer. At the 50 g dose, the residue recorded the largest number of leaves (27.10 ± 11.15), but the residue recorded the lowest number of leaves at the 100 g dose (21.01 ± 5.99). Foliar and root biomass varied statistically according to the dose within each fertilizer (foliar biomass: residue: P = 0.040; bovine excrement: P < 0.001; root biomass: residue: P < 0.001; bovine excrement: P < 0.001). The highest leaf biomass was obtained with doses 50 and 150 respectively for residue (155.00 ± 33.91 g) and bovine excrement (123.20 ± 20.57 g). The 150 g dose gave the best root biomass performance for the residue. For bovine excrement, the dose of 150 g and 200 g gave (without any significant difference between them) the best performance in root biomass with 21.80 ± 5.48 g and 21.50 ± 4.74 g respectively. The effect of residue and bovine excrement on each corresponding dose shows that, for foliar biomass, dose 50 and 100 g were statistically influenced by the latter (dose 50: P < 0.001; dose 100: P < 0.001). At each of these doses, the residue recorded the highest leaf biomass. For root biomass, each dose was statistically influenced by the type of fertilizer except dose 200 (P = 0.616). For each of these doses, maggot production residue gave better root biomass performance than bovine excrement except for dose 200 where no difference between the two fertilizers was observed (residue = 20.50 ± 3.97 g and dung = 21.50 ± 4.74 g). It appeared from this that the 50 g dose was to be the optimal dose of maggot production residue to bring for a better growth of amaranth plants. Whereas, this optimal dose is 150 g for the bovine droppings used in the present study.

Share and Cite:

Leyo, I. , Ousmane, Z. , Nomaou, D. , Guimbo, I. , Salaou, I. , Francis, F. and Megido, R. (2022) Effect of Maggot Production Residue on Amaranth Growth Parameters. Open Journal of Soil Science, 12, 571-585. doi: 10.4236/ojss.2022.1212024.

1. Introduction

Vegetables occupy an important place in the diversification of diets of populations in developing countries and are one of the main sources of nutrients. Regular consumption of vegetables contributes to improving the health of populations through the richness of protein and fiber but especially micronutrients such as certain minerals, vitamins and antioxidants [1] [2] [3] [4] [5]. In West Africa, cereals are the staple diet in which vegetables complement the nutritional value of the dishes consumed [6] [7] [8]. The Amaranthaceae family, native to temperate and tropical regions, offers a range of leafy vegetables of which the most widely grown in West Africa is the fast-growing amaranth (Amaranthus cruentus L., 1759) with large leaves [9]. Amaranth is grown intensively in urban and peri-urban market gardens for its leaves, which are rich in beta-carotene, protein, carbohydrates, calcium, iron, and vitamin C [10] [11]. Consumption of its leaves in sauce is highly recommended for children, lactating women and people suffering from malnutrition and is one of the most consumed vegetables in Niger Republic, both in urban and peri-urban areas [9]. However, amaranth production requires nutrient-rich soils, which are becoming increasingly scarce in Niger [9]. Drought and high population growth (3.3%), which adversely affect 2.5%, have led to a series of food crises (1973, 1984, 2001, 2005, 2010), resulting in increased pressure on the environment and a change in ecological balance and land degradation due to over-exploitation, often beyond the real capacity of ecosystems [12]

Most agricultural soils in Niger Republic (especially those used for rainfed cultivation) are tropical ferruginous and brown sub-arid soils characterized by sand contents varying between 80% and 90%, clay between 1% and 8%, and silt from 2% to 6% [13]. Their water retention capacity is very low, with a field capacity between 5% and 12%. They are generally acidic with a pH (water) ranging from 4.5 to 7, low in organic matter (0.15% to 0.7%), low in assimilable phosphorus (0.4 to 9.4 mg/kg soil) and low in nitrogen [14] [15] [16] [17] [18]. These are soils that are severely deficient in nutrients due in part to poor cropping practices and require an integrated system to manage their fertility. One of the methods to fertilize the soils is the application of chemical fertilizers, which are expensive and have adverse consequences on the environment and human health when misapplied [12] [19] [20].

In addition, the application of chemical fertilizers is generally only effective during the first few years of continuous application. Indeed, a decline in crop yields is observed after a few years due to the degradation of soil properties [15] [21] [22] [23].

Many insects can be used for recycling organic byproducts allowing for a reduction of organic byproducts in the environment while producing a food resource for animals and/or humans and a livestock residue considered as biofertilizer [24] [25] [26] [27]. Housefly maggots (Musca domestica L. 1758) are one of the best mechanisms for recycling organic waste [24] because it grows rapidly on a wide variety of organic byproducts [28]. There are very few studies on the capacity of the maggot production residue of Musca domestica as an organic fertilizer in crop improvement. This study main purpose of this research is to evaluate the fertilizer potential of Musca domestica maggot production residue produced on wheat bran in combination with cattle dung on the agronomic parameters of Amaranthus cruentus.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Plant Material

The plant material used is Amaranthus cruentus which is one of the most consumed leafy vegetables in the sub-region as it is an important source of nutrients.

2.2. Presentation of the Site

This study was conducted in the V district of the city of Niamey in an experimental plot of the Faculty of Agronomy of the Abdou Moumouni University of Niamey. The climate of the site is Sahelian with high temperatures between April and June and low temperatures between December and January. Rainfall varies from 400 to 600 mm per year, except for a few years when cumulative rainfall exceeds 700 mm. The soil of this site is generally sandy.

2.3. Origin of Maggot Production Residue and Cow Manure

The maggot production residue of M. domestica came from a rearing unit of the Faculty of Agronomy of the Abdou Moumouni University (Niamey, Niger). Indeed 25,000 M. domestica pupae were placed in three rearing cages (75 × 75 × 115 cm; Bug Dorm, Mega View Science, Taiwan) which correspond to a stocking density of about 2.8 cm3 per fly [29]. Cotton dipped in a mixture of powdered milk and granulated sugar (1:2 ratio), plus cotton dipped in sugar water (2:1) placed in plastic containers served as food for adult flies. The cages were placed in a room with a photoperiod of 12 h of light and 12 h of dark (12:12 L:D), a temperature of 27˚C ± 2˚C, and a relative humidity (RH) of 60% - 70% [29] [30]. Five days after adult emergence, plastic containers (83 mm diameter and 3 cm height) containing a mixture of water, wheat bran, and granulated sugar (7:2:1; moisture content) covered with filter paper (grade:50, circular, porosity:2.7 µm; Wattman, La Chapelle-sur-Erdre, France) were placed in cages, the cages (containing adult flies) as an oviposition medium [28]. The oviposition substrate was placed inside the cages for 8 hours (8.00 to 16.00 hours) to allow the flies to oviposit. The eggs were collected from the filter papers with a brush and incubated directly in trays containing the larval development substrate of wheat bran. After 6 days of larval development, the maggots were sieved, and the residue of the substrate was collected and packed in bags for further use.

The cow dung was collected from a cow shed of a cattle breeder in the city of Niamey. The sand used in the pots was collected on the river beaches and transported to the experimental field. As this sand was strongly leached by the river water, the hypothesis for its use is that it was poor in nutrients.

2.4. Chemical Analysis of Maggot Residue Samples and Cow Dung

After drying the maggot production residue and cow dung samples and grinding them, the following analyses were performed: organic matter, organic and total carbon, total nitrogen, total phosphorus, potassium and pH. After drying and grinding the samples of maggot production residues and cattle manure, different analyses were performed on the samples (Organic matter, organic carbon total carbon, total nitrogen, total phosphorus, potassium and pH). Organic matter (OM) and organic carbon (OC) were performed following the method of [31]. Total Carbon (C), total nitrogen (N), total phosphorus (P-total), total potassium (K-total) and pH (H2O), of cow manure and maggot production residue (MPR) were determined. The pH was determined according to the ratio 1/2.5 by a suspension of substrate sample in distilled water [32]. Total carbon was determined by [33] procedure. Total N and total P were determined by the Kjeldahl digestion method [34]. Total K was determined using a flame photometer after mineralization of organic substrate samples.

2.5. Experimental Device

The trial lasted from June 23 to September 7, 2020. To set up the trial, an experimental plot of 6.00 m × 4.10 m (24.60 m2) was delineated. Plastic containers (30 cm length and 33 cm diameter) were used. The spacing between rows and between containers in the same row was 20 cm. These pots were manually filled with sand (2/3 of the volume of the pots). The sand used was collected on the river beaches and transported to the experimental field. This sand was strongly leached by the river water, and the hypothesis is that it is poor in nutrients. The setup was a completely randomized block design with 10 replications.

Maggot production residue and cattle droppings were tested at 4 rates: 50 g; 100 g, 150 g and 200 g. The maggot production residue and cattle manure were placed in the containers and watered 24 h before sowing.

Every day, watering was done (1 liter of water per container) except on rainy days. Regular weeding was done to remove weeds in the perimeter. Weeding was performed on the 10th day after seedling emergence, leaving 2 plants per container. The trial lasted for two and a half months.

2.6. Effects of Maggot Production Residue and Cow Dung on Pigweed Growth

Observations were made on plant size measured from the crown to the terminal bud, leaf count, by counting the number of leaves for all plants in each container, and crown diameter measured with a caliper. Fresh leaf biomass and fresh root biomass were also measured.

2.7. Statistical Analysis

All statistical analyses and graphs were performed on the R environment version 4.0.3. A two-factor ANOVA (α = 0.05) was used to test the effect of two fixed factors (dose and treatment) on the different measured variables (crescent parameters, leaf and fresh root biomass). Duncan’s test-based comparison of means was performed to compare the means of the variables measured on the different doses according to each treatment as well as to compare the means of the treatments of these same variables according to each dose. Principal component analysis (PCA) was used to determine the relationship between growth parameters (stem length, collar diameter, number of leaves) on the discrimination of dose and treatment combination. The following R packages, agricolae and Factoshiny, were used in the analyses respectively: for univariates analysis and multivariate analysis.

3. Results

3.1. Chemical Characteristics of Maggot Production Residue and Cow Dung

The chemical composition of the organic cow dung and maggot production residue is presented in Table 1.

3.2. Effect of Dose and Treatments (Production Residue and Cow Dung) on Growth Parameters

The two-factor analysis of variance (Table 2) shows that stem length, collar

Table 1. Chemical composition of fertilizers.

Table 2. Summary of the two-factor analysis of variance.

diameter, and leaf number are strongly influenced by the interaction of treatment type and rate.

Stem length and collar diameter varied significantly with the rate applied for each fertilizer (Table 3—vertical comparison). For the number of leaves, no significant variation was observed as a function of the dose for the maggot production residue (P = 0.621) in contrast to the bovine manure (P < 0.001).

For residue, the highest stem length was obtained at the 50 g dose (42.24 ± 8.98 cm) and the lowest at the 200 g dose (29.83 ± 10.66 cm). For cattle dung, the stem length was highest at the 150 g dose (39.29 ± 8.10) and lowest at the 50 g dose (24.36 ± 5.29 cm)

For the residue, the diameter at the collar was higher at the 50 g dose (0.88 ± 0.17 cm) and lower at the 200 g dose (0.72 ± 0.18 cm). For cattle manure, the diameter is larger at the 150 g dose (0.98 ± 0.77) and smaller at the 50 g dose (0.56 ± 0.06). As for the number of leaves, there is no significant difference between the doses for the residue. For cattle manure, the number of leaves was

Table 3. Variation in length, collar diameter and number of leaves as a function of dose and fertilizer.

Legend: italicized value indicates significant tests (P < 0.05) and letters in parentheses are comparisons between fertilizer types. Letters are from Duncan comparison at α = 0.05 threshold.

higher at the 150 g rate (28.12 ± 4.98) with no significant difference between the other rates.

The effect of residue and cattle dung on each corresponding dose shows that, for stem length, only the 50 g dose was statistically influenced by them (P < 0.001;

(Table 3—horizontal comparison). At this dose, the highest stem length was obtained on residue (42.24 ± 8.98 cm) and the lowest on cattle dung (24.36 ± 5.29 cm). As for the diameter at the neck, only the 50 g and 100 g doses were statistically influenced by the residue and the bovine dung (50 g dose: P < 0.001; 100 g dose: P < 0.001). At both doses, the residue recorded the largest diameter with 0.88 ± 0.17 cm and 0.80 ± 0.15 cm for the 50g and 100g dose, respectively. For the number of leaves, only the 50 g and 150 g doses varied statistically according to the type of fertilizer. At the 50 g dose, the residue recorded the highest number of leaves (27.10 ± 11.15), but the latter recorded the lowest number of leaves at the 100 g dose (21.01 ± 5.99).

3.3. Effect of dose and Residue of Production and Cow Dung on Fresh Leaf and Root Biomass

Fresh leaf and root biomass are strongly influenced by the different doses and

Table 4. Summary of the two-factor analysis of variance.

Leaf and root biomass varied strongly with applied rate (Table 5—vertical comparison) for each fertilizer (leaf biomass: maggot residue: P = 0.040; cattle dung: P < 0.001; root biomass: maggot residue: P < 0.001; cattle dung: P < 0.001).

type of treatment applied and by the interaction of these two factors (Table 4).

The highest leaf biomass was obtained with doses 50 and 150 for residue (155.00 ± 33.91 g) and cattle dung (123.20 ± 20.57 g) respectively. On the other hand, the lowest leaf biomass was obtained with doses 200 and 50 for residue and cattle dung respectively. The 150 g dose gave the best performance in root biomass for the maggot production residue. For cattle manure, the 150 g and 200 g dose gave (without any significant difference between them) the best performance in root biomass with 21.80 ± 5.48 g and 21.50 ± 4.74 g respectively.

The effect of residue and cattle dung on each corresponding dose shows that, for leaf biomass, dose 50 and 100 g were statistically influenced by the latter (dose 50: P < 0.001; dose 100: P < 0.001; Table 5—horizontal comparison). At each of these doses, the residue recorded the highest leaf biomass with 155.00 ± 33.91 g and 129.20 ± 31.82 g for dose 50 and 100 respectively. For the other corresponding doses, no difference was observed between the residue and the cattle dung. For root biomass, each dose was statistically influenced by the type of fertilizer (Table 5—horizontal comparison) except dose 200 (P = 0.616). For each of these doses, maggot production residue gave the best performance in root biomass than bovine dung except for dose 200 where no difference between the two fertilizers was observed (residue = 20.50 ± 3.97 g and dung = 21.50 ± 4.74 g).

3.4. Principal Component Analysis

The first axis alone explains 91.34% of the total variability. Stem length, collar diameter, and number of leaves (Figure 1) are positively correlated with dimension 1 (length: correlation coefficient = 0.979 and P < 0.001; diameter: r = 0.974 and P < 0.001; number: correlation coefficient = 0.911 and P < 0.001. These parameters were positively correlated with each other. In other words, amaranth plants with the highest length also have the largest diameter and number of leaves.

4. Discussion

Fertilizer applications (maggot production residue and cow dung) had different

Table 5. Variation in fresh leaf and root biomass with dose and fertilizer.

Legend: italicized value indicates significant tests (P < 0.05) and letters in parentheses are for comparisons between substrate types. Letters are from Duncan comparison at α = 0.05 threshold.

Figure 1. Correlation circle of the variables.

effects on pigweed development depending on the dose. The application of fertilizer generally improved plant growth in contrast to the no-fertilizer control. These results reveal the importance of fertilization in production [35] [36] [37] [38].

For the maggot production residue, as the residue application rate increased, growth and yield parameters (except root fresh biomass) of amaranth decreased. In other words, the lowest dose (50 g) of the residue had a greater effect on all observed parameters than the higher doses. Indeed, several studies have shown that the residue from maggot production is a bio-fertilizer rich in nutrients (especially N and P) easily accessible to the plant. The application of high doses of this residue could lead to an excess of N and P that would result in decreases in plant growth and leaf yield [39] [40] [41]. Moreover, [42] also show that improvement very rich in nitrogen, induced a weak growth of Roselle plants (Hibiscus sabdariffa L., 1753) explained by a too high abundance of fertilizing elements (N and P especially). In Hibiscus sabdariffa, [43] conclude that the application of a high dose of 100 kg N per hectare induced a decrease in seed yield and calyx harvest index.

For bovine manure, the parameters observed increase as the dose applied increased until the maximum limit of 150 g above which these parameters decreased. This implies that the lower doses did not contain the nutrients required by the plant and that the higher doses might constitute an improvement in excess of the plant’s nutritional requirements [44] [45] [46] [47]. In their work on M. oleifera, [48] find that cattle dung alone sufficiently improved plant growth compared to NPK fertilizer. These authors explain this result by the ability of cattle dung to enrich the soil with nitrogen naturally.

For best amaranth production, a spacing of 20 cm × 20 cm (i.e. 250,000 bunches/ha) and 10 t/ha of well-decomposed manure is recommended [9]. The doses of 50 g, 100 g and 150 g used in the present study corresponded respectively to 12.5 t/ha, 25 t/ha, 37.5 t/ha of localized application (micro-dose) of residue under the same experimental conditions. Thus, the results obtained show that the dose of 50 g of maggot rearing substrate residue corresponding to 12.5 t/ha gave the best yields for all the parameters studied (stem length, collar diameter and fresh leaf biomass) except for root biomass where the dose of 150 g (37.5 t/ha) gave the best yield. For cattle manure, the 150 g dose (37.5 t/ha) gave the best yields. The effect of the residue and the cattle manure on each corresponding dose showed that, for the doses with a statistical difference, the residue gave the best performance than the cattle manure. However, it should be noted that a broadcast fertilization will consume more fertilizer than the localized pot fertilization used in this study. These results can be explained by the fact that the residue of maggot production already constituted a kind of compost, thus making the necessary nutrients available to the plant more quickly [39] [41]. Indeed, the cattle manure used for this trial was not previously mineralized (composting) which reduced the availability of nutrients for the plant [49]. The latter admits that the 3-month prior mineralization process made the cattle manure more efficient by making the nutrients needed by the plant more rapidly bioavailable. This mineralization lasted at least for 2 months for organic manures in general [50] [51]. In this study, because the trial lasted for two months, the cattle manure did not reach the stage of complete mineralization that would have made its nutrients available to the amaranth plants more quickly and sufficiently.

The use of composts produced from organic waste was known to increase soil fertility [52] [53] by improving soil structures, water and nutrient holding capacities, and microbial activity [54]. Furthermore, the viability of a land depended primarily on its humus richness [55], which made the use of animal manure a common practice in agriculture and constituted a valorization of livestock by-products highly appreciated in organic farming [56].

5. Conclusion

This study addresses for the first time in Niger Republic the use of maggot production residue for amaranth fertilization. The results indicate that this residue allows an improvement of the growth of the amaranth compared to the various kinds of fertilizers commonly used. In this pot experiment, 50 g (12.5 t/ha) appears to be the optimum dose of maggot-producing residue for improved amaranth plant growth. For the cattle manure used, the optimal dose is 150 g or 37.5 t/ha. Moreover, for each corresponding dose, the maggot production residue was more efficient than the cattle manure used. Thus, these treatments can be recommended to growers for better pigweed production. The medium- and long-term promotion and resilience of soil fertility can be promoted by maggot production residues. In this study no physicochemical parameters were measured at the soil level. Further study in this direction could better highlight the capacity of this residue to improve soil fertility and its ability to improve the availability and preservation of minerals in plants. In addition, studies on the effect of these organic fertilizers on the nutritional quality of amaranth as well as on their economic profitability on amaranth production are needed to better exploit these results.

Funding

This research received Belgium development cooperation (ARES-CCD) funding. Data Availability Statement: The data presented in this study are available in this article.

Acknowledgments

The authors are grateful to all those who contributed either way to complete this study.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this paper.

References

[1] Afshin, A., Sur, P.J., Fay, K.A., Cornaby, L., Ferrara, G., Salama, J.S. and Mullany, E.C. (2019) Health Effects of Dietary Risks in 195 Countries, 1990-2017: A Systematic Analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017. The Lancet, 393, 1958-1972.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(19)30041-8
[2] Gomes, F.S. and Reynolds, A.N. (2021) Effects of Fruits and Vegetables Intakes on Direct and Indirect Health Outcomes—Background Paper for the FAO/WHO International Workshop on Fruits and Vegetables 2020. FAO and PAHO, Rome.
https://doi.org/10.4060/cb5727en
[3] Horton, R., Beaglehole, R., Bonita, R., Raeburn, J., McKee, M. and Wall, S. (2014) From Public to Planetary Health: A Manifesto. The Lancet, 383, 847.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(14)60409-8
[4] Lock, K., Pomerleau, J., Causer, L., Altmann, DR. and McKee, M. (2005) The Global Burden of Disease Attributable to Low Consumption of Fruit and Vegetables: Implications for the Global Strategy On diet. Bulletin of the World Health Organization, 83, 100-108.
[5] Slavin, J. and Lloyd, B. (2012) Health Benefits of Fruits and Vegetables. Advances in Nutrition, 3, 506-516.
https://doi.org/10.3945/an.112.002154
[6] Messsiaen, C.-M. (1992) The Tropical Vegetable Garden. 2nd Revised Edition, Macmillan Press Limited, London, 57-365.
[7] Organisation Mondiale de la santé (OMS) (2003) Diet, Nutrition, and The Prevention of Chronic Diseases: Report of a Joint WHO/FAO Expert Consultation. World Health Organization, Geneva.
[8] Organisation Mondiale de la santé (OMS) (2005) Fruit and Vegetables for Health. Report of the Joint FAO/WHO Workshop. World Health Organization, Geneva.
[9] Souleymane, N., Legba, E.C., Aglinglo, L.A., Francisco, R.A., Sogbohossou, O.D., et al. (2021) Fiche technique synthétique pour la production des amarantes (Amaranthus spp.). Laboratory of Genetics, Biotechnology and Seed Sciences (GbioS).
https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.30958.54084
[10] James, B., Atcha-Ahowé, C., Godonou, I., Baimey, H., Goergen, H., Sikirou, R. and Toko, M. (2010) Integrated Pest Management in Vegetable Production: A Guide for Extension Workers in West Africa. IITA, Ibadan.
[11] Olaniyi, J.O., Adelasoye, K.A. and Jegede, C.O. (2008) Influence of Nitrogen Fetilizer on the Growth, Yield and Quality of Grain Amaranth Varieties. World Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 4, 506-513.
[12] FAO (Organisation des Nations Unies pour Alimentation et Agriculture) (2016) La gestion durable des sols: Clé pour la sécurité alimentaire et lanutrition en Afrique.
https://www.fao.org/publications/card/es/c/bb34ee17-2268-494e-bfea-b73d2f4a84d4/
[13] Annou, G. (2002) Grands types de sols du Niger. Quatorzième réunion dusous-comité Ouest et Centre Africain de corrélation des sols pour la miseen valeur des terres du 9 au 13 Octobre 2000 à Abomey (Bénin). Rapportsur les resources en sols du monde, No. 98, FAO, Rome, 169 p.
[14] Ambouta, J.M.K., Amadou, I. and Souley, I. (1998) La gestion de la fertilitéetévolution des sols de Gakudi (Maradi, Niger). Note de recherche. Cahiers Agricultures 7, 395-400.
[15] Bationo, A., Lompo, F. and Koala, S. (1998) Research on Nutrient Flows and Balances in West Africa: State-of-the-Art. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment 71, 19-35.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-8809(98)00129-7
[16] Lavigne-Delville, P. (1996) Gérer la fertilité des terres dans les pays du Sahel: Diagnostic et conseil aux paysans. 397 p.
https://agritrop.cirad.fr/306169/
[17] Pieri, C. (1989) Fertilité des terres des savanes. Bilan de trente ans derecherche et de développement agricoles au sud du Sahara. Ministèrede la Coopération et du Développement, CIRAD-IRAT, Paris, 444 p.
[18] Ambouta, J.M.K. (1994) Etude des facteurs de formation d’une crouted’érosion et de ses relations avec les propriétés internes d’un sol sableux finau Niger. Ph.D. Thesis, Université Laval, Québec, 97 p.
[19] Bado, B.V. (2002) Role des légumineuses sur la fertilité des sols ferrugineux tropicaux des zones guinéenne et soudanienne du Burkina Faso. Thèse de Doctorat de troisième cycle, Université de Laval, Québec, 166 p.
[20] Henao, J. and Baanante, C. (2006) Agricultural Production and Soil Nutrient Mining in Africa: Implications for Resource Conservation and Policy Development. International Fertilizer Development Center, Muscle Shoals.
[21] Koulibaly, B., Traoré, O., Dakuo, D. and Zombré, P.N. (2009) Effets des amendements locaux sur les rendements, les indices de nutrition et les bilans culturaux dans un système de rotation coton-mais dans l’ouest du BurkinaFaso. Biotechnology, Agronomy, Society and Environment, 13, 103-111.
[22] CILSS (2011) Capitalisation des actions d’amélioration durable de la fertilité des sols pour l’aide à la décision au Burkina Faso (FERSOL). Gestion durable des terres au Burkina Faso. Comment produire le compost à l’air libre avec la paille, 20 p.
[23] Koulibaly, B., Traoré, O., Dakuo, D. and Zombré, P.N. (2010) Effets de la valorisation des résidus de récolte sur la nutrition minérale du cotonnier etles rendements d’une rotation coton-mais-sorgho dans l’Ouest du BurkinaFaso. International Journal of Biological and Chemical Sciences, 4, 2120-2132.
https://doi.org/10.4314/ijbcs.v4i6.64953
[24] Cickova, H., Newton, G.L., Lacy, R.C. and Kozanek, M. (2015) The Use of Fly Larvae for Organic Waste Treatment. Waste Management, 35, 68-80.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2014.09.026
[25] Kovacik, P., Kozanek, M., Takac, P., Gallikova, M. and Varga, L. (2014) The Effect of Pig Manure Fermented by Larvae of House Flies on the Yield Parameters of Sunflowers (Helianthus annus L.). Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturea Mendelianae Brunensis, 58, 147-154.
https://doi.org/10.11118/actaun201058020147
[26] Newton, G.L., Sheppard, D.C., Watson, D.W., Burtle, G.J., Dove, C.R., Tomberlin, J.K. and Thelen, E.E. (2005) The Black Soldier Fly, Hermetia illucens, as a Manure Management/Resource Recovery Tool. Symposium on the State of the Science of Animal Manure and Waste Management, San Antonio, 5-7 January 2015.
[27] Pastor, B., Velasquez, Y., Gobbi, P. and Rojo, S. (2015) Conversion of Organic Wastes into Fly Larval Biomass: Bottlenecks and Challenges. Journal of Insects as Food and Feed, 1, 79-193.
https://doi.org/10.3920/JIFF2014.0024
[28] Leyo, I.H., Ousmane, Z.M., Francis, F. and Caparros Megido, R. (2021) Techniques to Produce Housefly (Musca domestica L. 1758) Maggots for Poultry Feed, a Literature Review. Tropicultura, 39, 2295-8010.
[29] Niu, Y., Heng, D., Yao, B., Cai, Z., Zhao, Z., Wu, S., Cong, P. and Yang, D. (2017) A Novel Bioconversion for Value-Added Products from Food Waste Using Muscadomestica. Waste Management, 61, 455-460.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2016.10.054
[30] Holmes, L.A., Vanlaerhoven, S.L. and Tomberlin, J.K. (2012) Relative Humidity Effects on the Life History of Hermetia illucens (Diptera: Stratiomyidae). Environmental Entomology, 41, 971-978.
https://doi.org/10.1603/EN12054
[31] M’Sadak, Y. and Ben M’Barek, A. (2013) Caractérisation qualitative du digestat solide de la bio méthanisation industrielle des fientes avicoles et alternative de son exploitation agronomique hors sol. Université de Sousse, Tunisie. Revue des Energies Renouvelables, 16, 33-42.
[32] Association Francaise de Normalisation (AFNOR) (1981) Détermination dupH. NF ISO 10390. AFNOR qualité des sols, Paris, 339-348.
[33] Walkley, A. and Black, I.A. (1934) An Examination of the Degtjareff Method for Determining Soil Organic Matter, and a Proposed Modification of the Chromic Acid Titration Method. Soil Science, 37, 29-38.
https://doi.org/10.1097/00010694-193401000-00003
[34] Hillebrand, W.F., Lundell, G.E.F., Bright, H.A. and Hoffman, J.I. (1953) Applied Inorganic Analysis. 2nd Edition, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York, 1034 p.
[35] Adolphe, N.N., Gustave, M.K., Remy, M.T., Angel, M.M. and Dieudonné N.N. (2020) Influence de l’apport des matières organiques sur la culture de poivron (Capsicum annum L.) Cultivé sur un sol sableux à Kabinda, province de Lomami, en République Démocratique du Congo. International Journal of Innovation and Applied Studies, 29, 613-618.
[36] Amadji, G.L. and Migan, D.Z. (2001) Influence d’un amendement organique (compost) sur les propriétés physico-chimiques et la productivité d’un sol ferrugineux tropical. Annales des Sciences Agronomiques du Bénin, 2, 123-139.
[37] Amidou, M., Djènontin, A.J. and Wennink, B. (2005) Valorisation des résidus de récolte dans l’exploitation agricole au nord du Bénin: utilizationde la bouseproduit dans le parc de stabulation des baeufs. Bulletin de laRecherche Agronomique du Bénin, 47, 19-25.
[38] Sissoko, D., Coulibaly, N. and Kéita, S. (2009) Analyse économique de l’essai de fertilisation du mais à base de fiente de volaille dans la zone périurbaine du District de Bamako. Les Cahiers de l’Economie Rurale, 7, 2-10.
[39] Bloukounon-Goubalan, A.Y., Saidou, A., Togbé, E., Chabi, F., Babatounde, S., Chrysostome, C.A.A., Kenis, M. and Mensah, G.A. (2017) Physical and Chemical Properties of Animals’ Organic Residues Decomposed by Musca domestica and Calliphora vomitoria Larvae. Journal of Agriculture and Environmental Sciences, 61, 92-104.
https://doi.org/10.15640/jaes
[40] Eghball, B., Wienhold, B.J., Gilley, J.E. and Eigenberg, R.A. (2002) Mineralization of Manure Nutrients. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 57, 470-473.
[41] Kebli, H. and Sokrat, S. (2017) Potentiel agronomique d’un engrais naturel à base de digestats de larves de mouches. Recherche Agronomique Suisse, 8, 88-95.
[42] Ognalaga, M. and Itsoma, E. (2014) Effet de Chromolaena odorata et de Leucaena leucocephalae sur la croissance et la production de l’oseille de Guinée (Hibiscus sabdariffa L.). Agronomie Africaine, 26, 1-88.
[43] Atta, S., Sarr, B., Bakasso, Y., Diallo, A.B., Lona, I, Saadou, M. and Glew, R.H. (2010) Roselle (Hibiscus sabdariffa L.) Yield and Yield Components in Response to Nitrogen Fertilization in Niger. Indian Journal of Agricultural Research, 44, 96-103.
[44] Gbadamosi, A.E. (2006) Fertilizer Response in Seedlings of Medicinal Plantenantia Chlorantha Oliv. Tropical and Subtropical Agroecosystems, 6, 111-115.
[45] Gbénou, P., Adandonon, A., Hambada, K.D.M. and Bodjrènou, S.S.E. (2021) Influence des doses de bouse de vaches sur la croissance et la production de la grande morelle (Solanum marcocarpon L.) dans les conditions agroécologiques de Kakanitchoé, commune d’Adjohoun au Bénin. RevueAfricaine d’Environnement et d’Agriculture, 4, 71-77.
[46] Hoque, R.A.T.M., Hossain, M.K., Mohiuddin, M. and Hoque M.M. (2004) Effect of Inorganic Fertilizers on the Initial Growth Performance of Anthocephalus chinensis (Lam.) Rich. Ex. Walp. Seedlings in the Nursery. Journal of Applied Sciences, 4, 477-485.
https://doi.org/10.3923/jas.2004.477.485
[47] Ikeh, O., Ndaeyo, N.U., Uduak, I.G., Iwo, G.A., Ugbe, L.A., Udoh, E.I. and Effiong, G.S. (2012) Growth and Yield Responses of Pepper (Capsicum frutescens L.) to Varied Poultry Manure Rates in Uyo, Southeastern Nigeria. ARPN Journal of Agricultural and Biological Science, 7, 735-742.
[48] Foidl, N., Makkar, H.P.S. and Becker, K. (2001) The Potential of Moringa oleifera for Agricultural and Industrial Uses. What Development Potential for Moringa Products? October, 20th - November 2nd, 2001. Dar es Salaam.
https://moringatrees.org/moringa-doc/the_potential_of_moringa_oleifera_for_agricultural_and_industrial_uses.pdf
[49] Kpéra, A., Gandonou, C.B., Aboh, A.B., Gandaho, S. and Gnancadja, L.S. (2017) Effet de différentes doses de bouse de vache, d’urine humaine et de leur combinaison sur la croissance végétative et le poids des fruits de l’ananas (Ananas comosus (L.) Merr.) au Sud Bénin. Journal of Applied Biosciences, 110, 10761-10775.
https://doi.org/10.4314/jab.v110i1.6
[50] Squire, G.R. (1990) The Physiology of Tropical Crop Production. CAB International, Wallingford, 143-177.
[51] UIFA (Union des Industries de la Fertilisation Azotée) (2000) Fertilisants et qualité des produits alimentaires. UIFA, Paris, 4 p.
[52] Kitabala, M.A., Tshala, U.J., Kalenda, M.A., Tshijika, I.M. and Mufind, K.M. (2016) Effets de différentes doses de compost sur la production et larentabilité de la tomate (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill) dans la ville de Kolwezi, Province du Lualaba (RD Congo). Journal of Applied Biosciences, 102, 9669-9679.
[53] Weber, J., Karczewska, A., Drozd, J., Lieznar, M., Lieznar, S., Jamroz, E. and Kocowiez, A. (2007) Agricultural and Ecological Aspects of Sandy Soil as Affected by the Application of Municipal Solid Waste Composts. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 39, 1294-1302.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2006.12.005
[54] Kowaljow, E. and Mazzarino, M.J. (2007) Soil Restoration in Semi-Arid Patagonia: Chemical and Biological Response to Different Compost Quality. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 39, 1580-1588.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2007.01.008
[55] Tognetti, C., Mazzarino, M.J. and Laos, F. (2008) Compost of Municipal Organic Waste: Effects of Different Management Practices on Degradability and Nutrient Release Capacity. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 49, 2290-2296.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2008.05.006
[56] Reganold, J.P., Glover, J.D., Andrews, P.K. and Hinman, H.R. (2001) Sustainability of Three Apple Production Systems. Nature, 410, 926-930.
https://doi.org/10.1038/35073574

Copyright © 2024 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

Creative Commons License

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.