1. The Main Conclusions to Be Used in This Paper
1.1. Theorem A (Be Summation Formula) [1]
is a plural column, The and function
, to set up
, f(u) interval
continuous differentiable function of, so there are
(1)
special: if
, Have a type:
(2)
1.2. Theorem B (Prime Number Theorem) [2]
1) A. Walfsz the results of the:
2) In “Riemann” The prime number theorem under the condition that the conjecture is true (Vonkock the results of the).
3) Theorem C (Siegel-Walfisz) [3]
Set l, k is suitable for
and
. The natural Numbers, Among them,
is any normal number, then:
,
Here
, And with the “O” the relevant constants depend only on
.
4) Theorem D (Mertens 1874)
If
, for any model q Non-principal features hold, so for any of these
the a there are:
,
Among them
.
2. The Proof of Summation Formula
2.1. Theorem 1
Set
, for the real function,
,
Meet the conditions:
1)
is interval
, continuous function of;
2) For any small positive number
, in
Satisfy condition on:
.
2.1.1. When
When
(3)
Among them
, for only with “y” related constants.
2.1.2. When y Sufficiently Large
(4)
Prove:
1) When
when, by “(1) type” available
Due to the
, due to the
Namely:
For only with “y” Related constants.
2) When
, and y Sufficiently large, by “(1) type” known:
Notes: Set some strings attached, Such as when
(Among them:
) when,
To set up, At this time “
” As with the “y” “T” Related constants.
For not meeting the conditions
can be summed as follows:
2.2. Theorem1'
Set
It’s an arithmetic function,
,
Meet the conditions:
interval
.
Is a continuous function of, then
(5)
Prove: by Abel the summation formula is easy to know:
conclusion.
3. The Proof of Several Common Conclusions about “Prime Number Theorem” [3]
Theorem 2 (Mertens Improvement of Prime Number Theorem) [4]
Verification: 1)
,
2)
,
3)
,
Among them A1, A2. For constant, ci > 0 (i = 1, 2, 3), Y for Euler constant.
Prove: From the prime number theorem:
,
Make
,
,
,
,
, Easy card with it.
The foot “(3) type” all conditions of, by “(3) type” available:
(when
when, Easy card:
)
If the:
,
If the
For constant.
2)
,
,
,
,
,
It is easy to prove that it satisfies “(3) type” all conditions of, by “(3) type” available:
Among them:
, for constant.
3) By “Mertens” Formula to know:
, among them
.
Knowing from the evidence before:
(
when)
Inference 1:
Verification: 1)
,
2)
,
3)
.
Prove: It can be derived directly from theorem two.
Inference 2: Two identity relations:
1)
,
2)
.
Proof: if so
1) Take
, using “(3) type”
, available
.
2) Take
, using “(3) type”
, available
.
Take the above A1, A2 is compared with the corresponding value in “Therorem 2”.
Inference 3: A1, A2 other forms of values:
1) Take
,
,
2)
Proof: a little.
Note: For A1, A2, the various expressions of value are derived from different methods used to prove “Theorem two”, some of which we have proved, some of which we will prove later, but it is worth mentioning that many times we just need to know that it is a constant.
Inference 4: An improvement on theorem D,
Make
,
Easy card:
(
when),
If the conditions of “Theorem 1” are met, the following can be obtained from “Theorem 1” and “Theorem C”:
It is easy to know from the above formula and “Theorem D”:
,
Namely:
.
Theorem 2': if “Riemann” If the guess is true, then:
1)
,
2)
,
3)
.
Prove: using “Riemann” If the guess is true, then “
”. This conclusion, the proof process is the same as “Theorem 2”, so it is omitted.
Theorem 3: 1)
,
2)
.
Prove: 1) The first
,
(6)
A prime number theorem:
Theorem 2
2)
Theorem 2
3)
Theorem 2
Note: The paper proves “
”. In fact, it is another proof method of theorem 2.
Theorem 3': If “Riemann” conjecture is true, then
1)
.
2)
.
Proof: using the “(1)” process in “Theorem 2” is the same as the proof of “Theorem 3”.
Corollary 1: Let N be even,
,
the
Prove: Club meets the condition
,
In the “p” If the number of is k0, then we know:
,
,
.
Easy to prove:
,
.
Theorem 3
Conclusion.
Note: The result we have obtained is actually an improvement on an important result cited in the screening method to prove goldbach’s conjecture. Of course, there are several related formulas that can also be improved, which will not be described here.
4. The Application of Summation Formula in “Dirichlet” Function [5] [6]
Theorem 4: If the
, the
1)
(c4 For a constant),
2)
.
Prove: 1) make
,
,
,
,
, It is easy to prove that it satisfies “(3) type” All conditions of, by “(3) type” Have to:
The constant
.
2)
Theorem 5:
If the
, the:
1)
,
The constant
.
2)
,
3)
,
Prove:
1)
(7)
while
(8)
1)
2)
For constant
3)
will (1), (2), (3) Can be substituted into Equation (8), available:
Then substitute the above formula into “Formula (7)” and sort it out
(9)
2) By
(10)
From “Formula (2)” in “Theorem A”
.
(9)
(10)
.
namely,
(11)
3) (1) by
(12)
2)
.
(12)
.
(11)
.
Type
.
Note: 1) This paper proves that
, while
(Dong Guangchang, 1956) [7], if you combine these two equations, you can understand it better “
”. Some variation rules of.
2) We can further prove this in other ways,
, and then get
, I won’t go into details here for lack of space.
Theorem 6: The function w(n) (or Ω(n)) improvement of relevant conclusions [8] [9]:
1)
.
2)
.
3)
.
Prove: 1)
(13)
1) Theorem two is easy to prove:
,
For constant
.
2) By “(6) type” Easy card:
.
3) Theorem two:
.
4) By
.
Theorem 2
.
Will (1), (2), (3) (4) Can be substituted into equation (13), available:
Will
(14)
2)
Theorem 2
Theorem 2
(14)
3) By (1), (2) The conclusions obtained are easy to prove:
Note: 1) The derivation process of “Ω(n)” function related conclusion is similar to “W(n)”.
2) In this paper, “
” slightly better than “Hardy-Ramanujan”, the results in.
3) With the o “
” The similarity method of values will be easy “Selber The formula” expressed in the following form:
Theorem of seven: if
Is euler function, then:
1)
,
Among them “
” For the normal number.
2) If “Riemnn” If the guess is true, then
.
Prove: This conclusion mainly uses “theorem 2 (Theorem 2’)”, the proof process is relatively simple, so skip [10].