Water Stress Effect on Biochemical Processes of Aus Rice Genotypes

Abstract

An experiment was carried out at Sher-e-Bangla Agricultural University, Dhaka, Bangladesh during the period from March to July 2014. Plants were grown in the rain-protected polyethylene shelter or shed to avoid rain under natural conditions. The experiment was conducted on biochemical characters of aus rice varieties in various soil moisture levels in three rice genotypes as BRRI dhan55 (V1), BR6976-2B-15 (V2), and tolerant check Hashikalmi (V3), and seven water stress were imposed as treatments. Treatments were 0 days of water stress (control) irrigated continuously throughout the experimental period (T0). From twenty days onwards water stress was imposed for seven days when the age of the seedling was 20 days (T1), 35 days (T2), 55 days (T3), 75 days (T4), 95 days (T5), and 115 days (T6). Our findings suggest that the proline, starch, and sugar content were also found comparatively higher in BRRI dhan55 and Hashikalmi among the genotypes under water stress conditions. Under water stress conditions, proline was accumulated, sugar, and starch were decreased. The soluble sugar content was much lower under water stress conditions due to lower RWC, chlorophyll content, stomatal conductance, and higher leaf rolling. Leaf accumulates anthocyanins under drought conditions and the red color increased as the intensity of water stress increased.

Share and Cite:

Jasmine, H. , Ahamed, K. and Biswas, J. (2022) Water Stress Effect on Biochemical Processes of Aus Rice Genotypes. American Journal of Plant Sciences, 13, 912-927. doi: 10.4236/ajps.2022.136060.

1. Introduction

Water deficit is a major problem in growing rice, especially in the low rainfall seasons [1]. Biochemical processes were massively affected by drought and the activities of antioxidant enzymes and proline accumulation were associated with the dry mass production and consequently with the drought tolerance of the upland rice varieties [2]. It was also reported that water deficit is one of the major environmental threats to rice (Oryzasativa L.) cultivation and production [3]. Rice is more susceptible to drought than any other crop. It is estimated that the world needs to produce 40% more rice to feed the population by 2025 [4].

In agriculture, mild to severe drought has been one of the major production limiting factors. Drought reduces plant growth by affecting various physiological and biochemical processes, such as photosynthesis, respiration, translocation, ion uptake, carbohydrates and nutrient metabolism, and growth promoters [5]. Metabolic changes during drought affect the reduction of nutrients such as carbohydrates, nitrates, and potassium concentration decreases [6]. It is also suggested that the high relative water content could help the tolerant variety to perform physio-biochemical processes more efficiently under water stress treatments than the susceptible variety [7]. Progressive drought stress induced a considerable accumulation of proline in water stressed maize plants. Proline accumulation was the first response of plants exposed to water-deficit stress in order to reduce injury to cells [8]. In the case of rice, shoot accumulate proline in water stress conditions, and also ABA accumulates in water stress conditions [9].

Anthocyanin content was increased under water stress conditions. Leaf accumulates anthocyanins under drought conditions and the color increased as the intensity of water deficit conditions. Anthocyanin was water-soluble pigment found in all plant tissues [10]. Anthocyanins had been located in the root, shoot and leaves. Anthocyanins had been found in or just below the upper epidermis of leaves and often appear at specific developmental stages found that anthocyanins usually appear red in leaf cells, but depending on their chemical nature and concentration, the vacuolar pH, and interactions with other pigments, they can result in pink, purple, blue, orange, brown, and even black leaf colors [11] [12].

There is an urgent need to increase rice production to meet global demand [4]. Severe water stress may result in the arrest of photosynthesis, disturbance of metabolism and finally, the death of plants [5]. Hence, water stress management strategies need to be taken for better yield and improved varieties that are more resilient to abiotic stresses. Agricultural technology related to crop production has to be developed according to specific location. Considering the above-mentioned facts, the present research work was undertaken to achieve the following objectives to find out the responses of biochemical processes of aus rice genotypes under water deficit conditions.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Experimental Site

The experiment was conducted at the Plant Physiology Laboratory (central laboratory) and Agricultural research field of Agricultural Botany, Sher-e-Bangla Agricultural University, Dhaka-1207, Bangladesh under polythene shed controlling the intrusion of rainfall.

2.2. Experimental Period

The experiment was conducted during the period from March 2014 to July 2014

2.3. Genotypes and Treatments

Three BRRI materials as BRRI dhan55 (V1), BR6976-2B-15 (V2) and tolerant check Hashikalmi (V3) were collected from Genetic Resource and Seed Division, Bangladesh Rice Research Institute. Seven drought conditions were used as treatments that started from 20 days of seedling age.

T0 = Irrigated continuously throughout the experimental period (control).

T1 = Drought condition during 7 days, when the age of the seedling was 20 days.

T2 = Drought condition was applied for second 7 days, when the age of the seedling was 35 days.

T3 = Drought condition was applied for third 7 days, when the age of the plant was 55 days.

T4 = Drought condition was applied for fourth 7 days, when the age of the plant was 75 days.

T5 = Drought condition was applied for fifth 7 days, when the age of the plant was 95 days.

T6 = Drought condition was applied for sixth 7 days, when the age of the plant was 115 days.

2.4. Experimental Design, Replications

The experiment was designed as RCBD, three replications, three genotypes and seven water deficit treatments (63 pots) were used.

2.5. Seed Treatment and Sowing

Seeds of uniform size and shape of each genotype were treated with Bavistin 5 gm for 20 minutes. The solution was prepared by dissolving 5 g of Bavistin in 1/2 liter of water. Treated seeds were place in the Petridish with water (Plate 1). Pre-soaked sprouted seeds were sown on March, 2014 in earthen pots under the rain protected polyethylene shade.

2.6. Pot Preparation and Fertilizer Management

Earthen pots of 38 cm × 25 cm in size were used and filled up with 10 kg sandy loam soil. The soil of the experimental area was sandy and sandy loam (Plate 2). The soil of the pot was fertilized uniformly with 0.9, 0.8, 0.8 g urea, triple super phosphate and muriate of potash corresponding to 160-150-150 kg urea, triple super phosphate and muriate of potash per hectare, respectively [13]. Experimental duration was March to July, 2014. After seedling establishment, three uniform and healthy seedlings were allowed to grow per pot. The sprouted seeds were normally irrigated for ensuring normal growth. Water stress was imposed for seven days, when the age of the plant was 20, 35, 55, 75, 95 and 115 days.

Plate 1. Treated seeds were place in the Petridish with water.

Plate 2. Soil preparation, filled up with 10 kg sandy loam soil and fertilized.

2.7. The Biochemical Parameters Determined

Plant growth under drought were influenced by altered photosynthesis, respiration, translocation, ion uptake, leaf proline accumulation, soluble sugar (carbohydrates), insoluble sugar (starch), nutrient metabolism, and hormones. In this study, leaf proline accumulation, soluble sugar (carbohydrates), insoluble sugar (starch), proline was determined in the Agricultural Botany laboratory under central laboratory of Sher-e-Bangla Agricultural University.

1) Leaf proline accumulation

At the end of the stress, the middle portion of flag leaf was collected for proline estimation following nin-hydrin method [14]. The protocol is based on the formation of red colored form zone by proline with ninhydrin in acidic medium, which is soluble in organic solvents like toluene.

Instruments, glassware and reagents

Test-tube, Test-tube stand, micro-pipettes (20 - 200 ml, 100 - 1000 ml and 5 ml), Whatman No. 1 filter paper, visible range spectrophotometer, centrifuge tube, centrifuge machine. Reagents were Glacial acetic acid (Analytical grade), Salfosalycylic acid (3%): Three gram of sulphosalycylic acid was dissolved in 100 ml of distilled water. Orthophoohoric acid (6 N): Required volume of orthophoric acid (38.1) were taken the volume were made to 100 ml, using distilled water to get 6 N orthophoohoric acid. Ninhydrin: Ninhydrin (1.25 g) were dissolved in a blend of 30 ml of glacial acetic acid 20 ml of 6N orthophoric acid.

Procedure

1) Plant tissue 0.5 g was homogenized in 5 ml of 3% sulphosalycylic acid using pre washed mortar and pestle.

2) The homogenate was filtered through Whatman No. 1 filter paper and collect filtrate for the estimation of proline content.

3) 2 ml of extract were taken in the test tube and add 2 ml of glacial acetic acid and 2 ml of ninhydrin reagent.

4) Heat reaction mixture in a boiling water bath at 100˚C for 1 hour. Brick red color was developed.

5) After cooling the reaction mixtures, 4 ml of toluene were added and then transferred to a separating funnel.

6.) After mixing, the chromospheres containing toluene were separated and absorbance was read at 520 nm in spectrometer against toluene blank.

7) Standard curve of proline was taking 5 to 100 µg·ml−1 concentration.

8) Free proline content was estimated by referring to a standard curve made from known concentrations of proline by taking following formula.

μmoles proline / g of fresh plant materials = { ( μg proline / ml × ml toluene ) / 115 . 5 μ g / μ moles } / g sample / 5

Preparation of proline standard curve

80 mg of pure proline was dissolved into 100 mL of distilled water to get 800 ppm proline stock solution for preparing proline standard curve. By diluting this solution, 50 ppm, 100 ppm, 200 ppm, 400 ppm and 800 ppm solution were prepared in 20 mL each. The absorbance was measured with the help of Spectrophotometer at 520 nm. By plotting the concentration of proline (ppm) in “X” axis and obtained absorbance reading in “Y” axis a standard curve was prepared. From the absorbance reading obtained from samples, their respective proline content was estimated in ppm by using proline standard curve and converted into micro gram per gram (µg/g) unit using the following formula:

Amount of proline ( μ g / g ) = x 2 × 10 500 × 1000

2) Estimation of soluble sugar

Dried composite sample were grounded finely with mortar and pastel. 100 mg finely ground sample place in 15 ml centrifuge tube and 10 ml of 80% ethanol were added. The tubes were covered with aluminum and kept in a boiling water bath 80˚C - 85˚C for 30 minutes. Then the sample were centrifuged at 5000 rpm (by G-13 Centrifuge Machine, Model: NF 200, Turkey) for 10 minutes at room temperature) and decanted in to a 50 ml beaker. These extractions were repeated three or more 3 times. The alcohol extract was evaporated on a boiling water bath 80˚C - 85˚C until most of the alcohol were removed (the volume was reduced to about 3 ml.). The volume was made up to 25 ml with distilled water. 5 ml of this diluted sugar extract were taken in to 100 ml volumetric flask and should be made up the volume with distilled water. 5 ml diluted sugar take into Pyrex test tube which containing standard glucose (0, 0.01, 0.025, 0.05, 0.1, 0.2 and 0.3 mg/5ml) were put into ice bath. 10ml anthron reagents were added slowly in each test tube. Anthron reagents were prepared, 2 g anthrone were dissolved in one-liter concentrated sulfuric acid and stored in a refrigerator and a fresh solution. A Fresh solution was prepared every day. Reagent run down the side of the test tube and stirred slowly with a glass rod. Then the tubes were put in boiling water bath for exactly 7.5 minutes and cool down immediately in ice. Then the absorbance measured at 630 nm and sugar content was estimated using standard curve.

Calculation:The regression equation obtained from the standard curve is given below: Y = 0.3x – 0.14, Where, Y = absorbance at 630 nm, X = amount of glucose in mg

The amount of sugar in the extracts was obtained from the regression equation by putting the respective absorbance values of the extracts and taking into consideration the appropriate dilution factor.

3) Estimation of starch

The residue left in the centrifuge tube after collecting starch extract were dried in an oven at 80˚C and 2 ml distilled water were added to each centrifuge tube. The tubes were put in boiling water bath for 15 minutes and stirred occasionally. Then the tubes were allowed to cool and 2 ml 9.2 N HClO4 (perchloric acid) were added to each tube while were stirred occasionally or 15 minutes and made up 10 ml of distilled water. The supernatant was collected and add 2 m 4.6 N HClO4 were added to the residue and stirred for 15 minute and the solution made up 10 ml distilled water. Then suspension centrifuge and made up 50 with distilled water. 5 ml starch extract were transferred to 50 ml volumetric flask and made up the volume with distilled water. 5 ml diluted extract starch taken into separate 50 ml Pyrex test tubes which contains standard glucose (0.1, 0.25, 0.50, 0.75, 1 and 1.5 mg/5ml including 0.6 ml 0.46 N HCl04 solution for each tube) were put into ice bath and add 10 ml anthron reagent were added slowly, the reagent being allowed to run down the side of the test tubes. The solution was stirred slowly with a glass rod. Then the tubes were put in boiling water bath for exactly 7.5 minutes and cool down immediately in ice. Then the absorbance measured at 630 nm and sugar content was estimated using standard curve.

Calculation

The regression equation obtained from the standard curve is given below:

Y = 0. 165 x + 0.0 15

where, Y = absorbance at 630 nm.

X = amount of glucose in mg.

The amount of starch in the extracts was obtained from the regression equation by putting the respective absorbance values of the extracts and taking into consideration the appropriate dilution factor.

Calibration curve for the estimation of starch concentration

Extraction of anthocyanins

According to [15], anthocyanins were extracted from rice leaves. In the study, total anthocyanins were extracted from rice leaves using methanol and 1% HCL. Just after collection fresh sample were grounded finely with mortar and pastel. After grinding, samples were incubated overnight at room temperature in extraction buffer. 0.5 g finely ground sample place in 15 ml centrifuge tube and 60 ml of methanol were added with 1.6 ml HCL. Homogenates/ extracts were centrifuged at 16,000 g for 15 min and absorption of the extracts was determined at 530 and 657 nm by spectrometer. Then, anthocyanins were quantified according to the formula proposed by [15] as follows: QAnthocyanins = (A530 – 0.25 × A657) × M−1; QAnthocyanins: amount of anthocyanins, A530: absorption at 530 nm wavelength, A657: absorption at 530 nm wavelength, M: fresh weight (g) of the tissues, (60 ml MEOH and 1.6 ML 37% HCL).

Data analysis

The data were statistically analyzed following MSTAT-C software package and the mean differences were adjusted by Duncan’s Multiple Range Test (DMRT) at 5% level of significance [16].

3. Results and Discussions

The results with discussion of the experiments are presented in this chapter.

3.1. Proline Accumulation

Proline content (µg/g) of different rice genotypes under drought condition has been shown (Tables 1-3). Significant difference among the genotypes, the treatments and interaction effect for the character of proline content were found. In this study, in case of varietal affect the highest proline content found was 2.15 (µg/g) in BRRI dhan55 (V1) followed by 2.14 (µg/g) in Hashikalmi (V3) and the lowest proline content found was 2.13 in BR6976 2B-15. In case of interaction effect the highest proline content found was 2.26 (µg/g) in V1T0 and the lowest proline content found was 1.4 (µg/g) in V3T3 and in V2T6 under drought condition.

Due to drought condition (Plate 3) higher proline accumulation in BRRI dhan55 (V1) and comparatively lowest proline content was in BR6976 2B-15 (V2) which was significantly different among the genotypes. This result agrees with the result of [8] that proline accumulation was the first response of plants exposed to water-deficit stress in order to reduce injury to cells. Progressive drought stress induced a considerable accumulation of proline in water stressed maize plants. A similar finding was observed with the results of [17] that tolerant cultivar showed the highest accumulation of proline in bean plants. The highest accumulation of proline due to water stress (Plate 4 and Plate 5) was observed in genotype BB24 (382%) followed by BB43 (368%) and the lowest accumulation was in BB04 (163%). Genotype BARI bushbean-2 exhibited an intermediate behavior in proline accumulation. Accumulation of proline content under water stress indicates accumulated proline might act as a compatible solute regulating and reducing water loss from the plant cell during water deficit [18]. Decreasing of turgor pressure is the first reason for proline accumulation under drought stress condition. One of the physiological responses that plants use against drought is proline accumulation [19]. The proline accumulated in plants under water stress can protects the cell by balancing the osmotic potential of cytosol with that of vacuole and external environment [20]. The level of increase in the proline concentration in response to water stress varied between the rice varieties. Thus, the proline content (Plate 6) is a good indicator for screening drought tolerant varieties in water stress condition [21] and [22].

Table 1. Varietal effects of proline, soluble sugar and starch content genotypes under water stress condition.

Values followed by some letter(s) indicate significantly different from each other by DMRT at 5% level.

Table 2. Treatment effects of proline, soluble sugar and starch content genotypes under water stress condition.

Values followed by some letter(s) indicate significantly different from each other by DMRT at 5% level.

Table 3. Interaction effect of proline, sugar and starch of three rice genotypes under water stress condition.

Values followed by some letter(s) indicate significantly different from each other by DMRT at 5% level.

Plate 3. Different rice genotypes before drought treatment at reproductive stage.

Plate 4. Different rice genotypes after water stress treatment at reproductive stage.

Plate 5. Effect of water stress of different rice genotypes at reproductive stage.

Plate 6. Leaf proline analysis of different rice genotypes under water stress conditions.

3.2. Soluble Sugar Content

Soluble sugar content of leaf of different rice genotypes under drought condition have been shown in the Tables 1-3. Significant difference among the genotypes, the treatments and interaction effect for soluble sugar content were found. In case of varietal effect, the highest sugar content found was 0.20 mg/g in BRRI dhan55 (V1) followed by 0.19 mg/g Hashikalmi and the lowest sugar content found was 0.18 mg/g in BR 6976-2B-15 (V2). In case of treatment effect, the highest varietal effect of proline, soluble sugar and starch content of three rice sugar content found was 0.199 mg/g in T0 and the lowest sugar content found was 0.13 mg/g in T5. In case of combination effect the highest sugar, content found was 0.200 mg/g in V2T0 and the lowest sugar content found was 0.112 mg/g in V2T2. Due to water stress conditions, soluble sugar content of leaf of different rice genotypes was found significantly much lower. BRRI dhan55 and tolerant check Hashikalmi which was less affected and the lowest soluble sugar content was found in BR 6976-2B-15 (V2). The soluble sugar content was much lower under water stress condition and this might be due to lower RWC, chlorophyll content, stomatal conductance and higher leaf rolling. Similar observations have been reported [15] who showed that under severe drought, growth was inhibited by high concentration of ABA and sugar, whereas low concentrations promote growth. ABA applications enhanced the percentage recovery of drought plants.

3.3. Starch Content

Starch content of different rice genotypes under drought condition have been shown in Tables 1-3. In case of varietal effect, the highest starch content found was 0.067 mg/g in Hasikalmi (V3) followed by 0.057 mg/g in BRRI dhan55 (V1) and the lowest starch content found was 0.054 mg/g in BR 6976-2B-15 (V2) which was significant difference among the genotypes. In case of treatment effect, the highest starch content was 0.063 mg/g in T6 and the lowest starch content was 0.054 mg/g in T0 which were significantly different among the treatment. In case of combination effect the highest starch, content found was 0.067 mg/g and the lowest starch content found was 0.053 mg/g which were not significantly different from each other. Due to water stress treatments starch content of different rice genotypes was significantly different among the genotypes. But the reduction was comparatively lower in BR 6976-2B-15 (V2) compared to other genotypes. Among the genotypes, in drought plant, the starch content was also found comparatively higher in BRRI dhan55 among the genotypes under water stress conditions, due to limitation of gas diffusion and reduced stomatal conductance, the production of carbohydrate is hampered. So, the rice genotypes that maintained higher carbohydrate before drought, they develop new leaves more quickly and accumulated greater biomass during recovery [23].

Anthocyanin content of leaf

Anthocyanin content (QAnthocyanins = (A530 – 0.25 × A657) × M−1) of different rice genotypes under drought condition (Plate 7) have been shown in Figure 1. Here the highest anthocyanin content was found in 0.464 in BRRI dhan55 (V1) followed by 0.402 in Hashikalmi (V3) and the lowest found was 0.305 in BR6976-2B-15 (V2). Anthocyanin content was increased under water stress condition. The lowest anthocyanin content was 0.0062 which was well water green color leaf.

In the study, anthocyanin content was increased under water stress condition. Leaf accumulates anthocyanins under drought conditions and the red color increased as the intensity of water deficit increased. Under drought condition BRRI dhan55 (V1) produced more anthocyanins followed by Hashikalmi (V3) to survive plant against stress conditions. This result has the similarity with the results who stated that anthocyanin were water soluble pigments found in all plant tissues due to stress condition [10]. Anthocyanins usually appear red color in

Plate 7. Leaf anthocyanin analysis of different rice genotypes under water stress conditions.

Figure 1. Anthocyanin content of three rice genotypes under water deficit conditions.

leaf cells due to stress condition, but depending on their chemical nature and concentration, the vacuolar pH and interactions with other pigments, they can result in red, pink, purple, blue, orange, brown, and even black leaf colors [24]. Anthocyanins had been located in the root, shoot, and leaves [11] [12]. Anthocyanins had been found in or just below the upper epidermis of leaves published the articles that coloration has assumed red foliage to be the outcome of the production of anthocyanins on plant [25].

Anthocyanins are polyphenol compounds a group of polyphenolic pigments found in nature, which contribute vivid colors to many fruits and vegetables and act as photo protective light screen, quenching excess photons and, thereby, mitigate photo inhibitory and photo-oxidative damage [26] and [27]. Anthocyanins neutralize reactive oxygen and nitrogen species compounds ascorbic acid and α-tocopherol do [28]. Anthocyanins are synthesized from the flavonoid biosynthetic pathway derived from the general phenylpropanoid pathway. Flavonoids play important roles in plants, such as pigmentation, plant reproduction by recruiting pollinators and seed dispersers and by stress protection. Anthocyanins scavenge free radicals and reducing the oxidative stress. Anthocyanins act as H-atom donator or as single electron transfer. Anthocyanin molecules will change their color depending upon the pH of their environment [29]. Anthocyanins are photo protective agents which shade and protect the photosynthetic apparatus by absorbing excess visible and UV light and scavenging free radicals [30].

Anthocyanins have a higher antioxidant activity than other flavonoids, due to their positively charged oxygen atom [31]. The antioxidant activity of anthocyanins depends on the degree of hydroxylation at the B-ring as well as the type and extent of acylation and glycosylation [32]. Hydroxylation at the B-ring enhances antioxidant capacity (−OH > −OCH3 −H), therefore the antioxidant capacity of anthocyanidins decreases in the order of Dp > Pt > Mv = Cy > Pn > Pg [33]. Furthermore, glycosylation reduces the free radical scavenging ability of anthocyanins compared to their aglycone forms, by decreasing their hydrogen-donating, metal-chelating and electron delocalizing abilities [34]. The more sugar units at C3 and C5 position, the lower the antioxidant activity is [32]. Finally, acylation of glycosyl moieties may partly circumvent the negative effect of glycosylation [35]. In summary, antioxidant activity increases with the number of hydroxyl groups in the B-ring and decreases with the number of glycosyl groups attached to the A and C ring. The latter effect is less severe when the glycosides are acylated.

The photo protective role of anthocyanins is seen in juvenile expanding leaves, because anthocyanin accumulation correlates with the development of photo stability [36]. Anthocyanins are thought to act as osmoregulatory under drought stress, because many drought-tolerant plant species contain anthocyanins [37]. In turn, plant tissues containing anthocyanins are usually rather resistant to drought [37]. Consistently, drought stress decreases chlorophyll concentrations [38] and [39]. Furthermore, soluble protein concentrations are reported to decrease under drought stress [38] and [39].

4. Conclusion

From the above results, the conclusion may be drawn as BRRI dhan55 and Hashikalmi showed better performance in all day’s water stresses. Under water stress conditions, proline was accumulated, and sugar and starch were decreased.

Acknowledgements

We thank anonymous reviewers for their kind review of the manuscript. This research was supported by Sher-e-Bangla Agricultural University Research System (SAURES) and HEQEP (Higher Education Quality Enhancement Project for providing financial support to conduct the research work.

Authors’ Contributions

This work was carried out in collaboration among all authors. Author HSJ conducted the research work. KUA designed and supervised the study and edited the manuscript. Author HSJ managed the literature searches and JKB collected genotypes from Genetic Resource and Seed Division, Bangladesh Rice Research Institute. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this paper.

References

[1] Usman, M., Raheem, Z.F., Ahsan, T., Iqbal, A., Sarfaraz, Z.N. and Haq, Z. (2013) Morphological, Physiological and Biochemical Attributes as Indicators for Drought Tolerance in Rice (Oryza sativa L.). European Journal of Biological Sciences, 5, 23-28.
[2] Lum, M.S. (2014) Effect of Drought Stress on Growth, Proline and Antioxidant Enzyme Activities of Upland Rice. Journal of Animal and Plant Sciences, 24, 1487-1493.
[3] IRRI (2005) Annual Report for 2004. International Rice Research Institute, Los Banos.
[4] FAO (2002) Crops and Drops Making the Best Use of Water for Agriculture. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome.
[5] Jaleel, C.A., Manivannan, P., Murali, P.V., Gomathinayagam, M. and Panneerselvam, R. (2008c) Antioxidant Potential and Indole Alkaloid Profile Variations with Water Deficits along Different Parts of Two Varieties of Catharanthus roseus. Colloids and Surfaces B: Biointerfaces, 62, 312-318.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.colsurfb.2007.10.013
[6] Shao, H.B., Chu, L.Y., Shao, M.A., Jaleel, C.A. and Hong-Mei, M. (2008) Higher Plant Antioxidants and Redox Signaling under Environmental Stresses. Comptes Rendus Biologies, 331, 433-441.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crvi.2008.03.011
[7] Moussa, H.R. and Aziz, S.M.A. (2008) Comparative Response of Drought Tolerant and Drought Sensitive Maize Genotypes to Water Stress. Australian Journal of Crop Science, 1, 31-36.
[8] Anjum, S., Xie, X., Wang, L., Saleem, M., Man, C. and Lei, W. (2011) Morphological, Physiological and Biochemical Responses of Plants to Drought Stress. African Journal of Agricultural Research, 6, 2026-2032.
[9] Peleg, Z. and Blumwald, E. (2011) Hormone Balance and Abiotic Stress Tolerance in Crop Plants. Current Opinion in Plant Biology, 14, 290-295.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pbi.2011.02.001
[10] Scott, L.C. (1999) Invited Review Environmental Significance of Anthocyanins in Plant Stress Responses. Photochemistry and Photobiology, 70, 1-9.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-1097.1999.tb01944.x
[11] Krol, M., Gray, G.R., Hurry, V.M., Malek, L. and Huner, N.P.A. (1995) Low Temperature Stress and Photoperiod Affect an Increased Tolerance to Photoinhibition in Pinus bonksiana Seedlings. Canadian Journal of Botany, 73, 1119-1127.
https://doi.org/10.1139/b95-122
[12] Burger, J. and Edwards, G.E. (1996) Photosynthetic Efficiency and Photodamage by UV and Visible Radiation. In Red versus Green Leaf Coleus Varieties. Plant and Cell Physiology, 37, 395-399.
https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.pcp.a028959
[13] BRRI (2008) Annual Internal Review for 2007-2008. Bangladesh Rice Research Institute, Gazipur.
[14] Bates, L.S., Waldern, R. and Teare, I.D. (1973) Rapid Determination of Free Proline for Water Stressed Studies. Plant Soil, 39, 205-207.
https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00018060
[15] Mehrtens, F., Kranz, H., Bednarek, P. and Weisshaar, B. (2005) The Arabidopsis Transcription Factor MYB12 Is a Flavonol-Specific Regulator of Phenylpropanoid Biosynthesis. Plant Physiology, 138, 1083-1096.
https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.104.058032
[16] Russell, D.F. (1986) MSTAT-C Pakage Programme. Crop and Soil Science Department, Michigan University, Ann Arbor.
[17] Stoyanov, Z. (2005) Effects of Water Stress on Leaf Water Relations of Young Bean Plant. Journal of Central European Agriculture, 6, 35-56.
[18] Yokota, A., Takahara, K. and Akashi, K. (2006) Water Stress Physiology and Molecular Biology of Stress Tolerance in Plants. Springer, Berlin, 15-39.
https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-4225-6_2
[19] Girousse, C., Bournoville, R. and Bonnemain, J.L. (1996) Water Deficit-Induced Changes in Concentrations in Proline and Some Other Amino Acids in the Phoem Sap of Alfalfa. Plant Physiology, 111, 109-119.
https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.111.1.109
[20] Pireivatloum, J., Qasimov, N. and Maralian, H. (2010) Effect of Soil Water Stress on Yield and Proline Content of Four Wheat Lines. African Journal of Biotechnology, 9, 36-40.
[21] Bayoumi, T.Y., Manal H.E. and Metwali E.M. (2008) Application of Physiological and Biochemical Indices as a Screening Technique for Drought Tolerance in Wheat Genotypes. African Journal of Biotechnology, 7, 2341-2352.
[22] Rahdari, P. and Hoseini, S.M. (2012) Drought Stress: A Review. International Journal of Agronomy and Plant Production, 3, 443-446.
[23] Singh, S.S., Kumar, S., Dwivedi, S.K., Bhatt, B.P., Mehta, P., Elanchezhian, R., Singh, V.P. and Singh, O.N. (2014) Morpho-Physiological Traits Associated with Reproductive Stage Drought Tolerance of Rice (Oryza sativa L.) Genotypes under Rain-Fed Condition of Eastern Indo-Gangetic Plain. Indian Journal of Plant Physiology, 19, 87-93.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s40502-014-0075-x
[24] Anderson, O.M. and Jordheim, M. (2006) The Anthocyanins. In: Anderson, O.M. and Markham, K.R., Eds., Flavonoids: Chemistry, Biochemistry and Applications, CRC Press, Boca Raton, 471-553.
[25] Davies, K.M. (2004) Important Rare Plant Pigments. In: Davies, K.M., Ed., Plant Pigments and Their Manipulation, Annual Plant Reviews, Blackwell, Oxford, 214-247.
https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119312994.apr0137
[26] Steyn, W.J., Wand, S.J.E., Holcroft, D.M. and Jacobs, G. (2002) Anthocyanins in Vegetative Tissues: A Proposed Unified Function in Photoprotection. New Phytologist, 155, 349-361.
https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1469-8137.2002.00482.x
[27] Merzlyak, M.N., Chivkunova O.B., Solovchenko A.E. and Naqvi, K.R. (2008) Light Absorption by Anthocyanins in Juvenile, Stressed, and Senescing Leaves. Journal of Experimental Botany, 59, 3903-3911.
https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/ern230
[28] Wang, H., Nair, M.G., Strasburg, G.M., Chang, Y.C., Booren, A.M. and Gray, J.I. (1999) Antioxidant and Antiinflammatory Activities of Anthocyanins and Their Aglycon, Cyanidin, from Tart Cherries. Journal of Natural Products, 62, 294-296.
https://doi.org/10.1021/np980501m
[29] Fossen, T., Cabrita, L. and Andersen, O.M. (1998) Color and Stability of Pure Anthocyanins Influenced by pH including the Alkaline Region. Food Chemistry, 63, 435-440.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0308-8146(98)00065-X
[30] Guo, J., Han, W. and Wang, M.H. (2008) Ultraviolet and Environmental Stresses Involved in the Induction and Regulation of Anthocyanin Biosynthesis: A Review. African Journal of Biotechnology, 7, 4966-4972.
https://www.ajol.info/index.php/ajb/article/view/59709
[31] Kong, J.M., Chia, L.S., Goh, N.K., Chia, T.F. and Brouillard, R. (2003) Analysis and Biological Activities of Anthocyanins. Phytochemistry, 64, 923-933.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0031-9422(03)00438-2
[32] Sadilova, E., Stintzing, F.C. and Carle, R. (2006) Anthocyanins, Colour and Antioxidant Properties of Eggplant (Solanum melongena L.) and Violet Pepper (Capsicum annuum L.) Peel Extracts. Zeitschrift für Naturforschung C, 61, 527-535.
https://doi.org/10.1515/znc-2006-7-810
[33] Pojer, E., Mattivi, F., Johnson, D. and Stockley, C.S. (2013) The Case for Anthocyanin Consumption to Promote Human Health: A Review. Comprehensive Reviews in Food Science and Food Safety, 12, 483-508.
https://doi.org/10.1111/1541-4337.12024
[34] Zhao, C.L., Chen, Z.J., Bai, X.S., Ding, C., Long, T.J. and Wei, F.G. (2014) Structure-Activity Relationships of Anthocyanidin Glycosylation. Molecular Diversity, 18, 687-700.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11030-014-9520-z
[35] Lachman, J. and Hamouz, K. (2005) Red and Purple Colored Potatoes as a Significant Antioxidant Source in Human Nutrition—A Review. Plant, Soil and Environment, 51, 477-482.
https://doi.org/10.17221/3620-PSE
[36] Drumm-Herrel, H. and Mohr, H. (1985) Photostability of Seedlings Differing in Their Potential to Synthesize Anthocyanin. Physiologia Plantarum, 64, 60-66.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1399-3054.1985.tb01213.x
[37] Chalker-Scott, L. (1999) Environmental Significance of Anthocyanins in Plant Stress Responses. Photochemistry and Photobiology, 70, 1-9.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-1097.1999.tb01944.x
[38] Moran, J.F., Becana, M., Iturbe-Ormaetxe, I., Frechilla, S., Klucas, R.V. and Aparicio-Tejo, P. (1994) Drought Induces Oxidative Stress in Pea Plants. Planta, 194, 346-352.
https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00197534
[39] Parry, M.A.J., Andralojc, P.J., Khan, S., Lea, P.J. and Keys, A.J. (2002) Rubisco Activity: Effects of Drought Stress. Annals of Botany, 89, 833-839.
https://doi.org/10.1093/aob/mcf103

Copyright © 2024 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

Creative Commons License

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.