Eutrophication Process of Soil nearby a Sanitary Landfill and Its Influence on Brazilian Savanna Vegetation

Abstract

This work aimed to demonstrate if exists a relation between eutrophic processes of soil (N, P, K, pH, and organic matter) with phytosociology mosaic of native tree species in Brazilian adjacent sanitary landfill areas of the savanna. One of the study area is located in Brasilia, Federal District, and the other one in Goiania, State of Goiás, 210 km far each other. The methodology consisted in techniques, procedures and specific software applied to this kind of data. There were used plots and subplots for each area and for the vegetation and soil survey. Statistical significance showed that there exists a relationship between eutrophic processes of soil with phytosociology mosaic of native savanna tree species.

Share and Cite:

Santana, O. and Imaña-Encinas, J. (2022) Eutrophication Process of Soil nearby a Sanitary Landfill and Its Influence on Brazilian Savanna Vegetation. Journal of Environmental Protection, 13, 344-359. doi: 10.4236/jep.2022.135022.

1. Introduction

Eutrophication can be defined simply as the production of organic matter in excess of what an ecosystem is normally adapted to processing [1], however, it is only part of a complex web of stressors that interact to shape and direct ecosystem level processes. Eutrophication is the process of enrichment of waters with excess plant nutrients, primarily phosphorus and nitrogen, which leads to enhanced growth of algae, periphyton, or macrophytes, so the eutrophication process is generated by human activities, and the most ubiquitous item is sewage, which is derived from a variety of sources: as a direct discharge, as a component of urban wastewater, or as sludge to be disposed of after treatment. In other words, it is the process in which a water body becomes overly enriched with nutrients, leading to plentiful growth of simple plant life. The excessive growth (or bloom) of algae and plankton in a water body are indicators of this process. In the last few decades, the eutrophication process shows a massive problem that is faced globally. The excessive presence of nitrogen and phosphorous in water leads to hypoxia and anoxia, reduced water quality, habitat degradation, loss of food web structure and the biodiversity [2]. In Brazil, around 260,000 tons of urban solid residues are collected daily. From this amount, about 35,000 tons are taken to sanitary landfills producing byproducts as biogas and leachates [2].

Savannas cover almost 20% of the earth’s surface in a belt between 15˚ and 20˚ of latitude in both hemispheres. Brazilian savannas (Cerrado) covers more than 20% of the Brazilian territory (2 million·km2), being the second in terms of national area covered [3] losing only to the Amazonian forest that occupied more than 3.5 million·km2 [4]. The savanna flora is one of the richest among the world’s savannas with more than 6000 species [5].

In the last decades, eutrophic process in soil and groundwater has developed by sanitary landfill presences in the Central Brazil [6]. This process results in the nutrients deposition, mainly: N, P and K ( [7] [8] [9]). Modification in pH, organic matter ( [8] [10]) and others chemical elements showed statistical significance (p < 0.05) and influence on the savanna vegetation ( [9] [11] [12]). The nutrient deposition produces effects in vegetation dynamics, particularly in tree; it enhances the biomass of the species and modifies value importance of species ( [1] [13]).

This study aimed to analyze the eutrophic process of soil in adjacent areas of sanitary landfill and the influences of this process in the Brazilian savanna vegetation. The answers to the question will be the main goal to demonstrate if the eutrophic process and nutrients deposition influence the savanna vegetation, around the sanitary landfill.

2. Materials

Two areas around sanitary landfill were studied: in the National Park of Brasilia, near Jockey Club landfill - 15˚45'56.56"S and 47˚59'55.25"W SAD 69 (in Brasilia city); and around the sanitary landfill of the Goiânia - 16˚39'09.77"S and 49˚23'37.08"W SAD 69 (in Goiânia city). These areas are located on savanna biome (Cerrado) in the Central Brazil.

Regional climate is Cwa (according Köppen climate classification), which is the typical savanna climate with wet summers (October to March) and dry winters (May to August).

Soils in the study area are mainly Latossoils and Neossoils (sandy soils), according to the Brazilian Classification System [14], or Oxisoils and Entisoils, respectively [15]. In each sanitary landfill were established three plots of 25 × 500 m (Figure 1), with 10 subplots each [6].

Figure 1. Plot and 10 subplot of sampling data of vegetation and 30 sampling soil points (x). The distance “0 m” means near area of the landfill.

3. Methods

Every individual tree (diameter at the breath height >5 cm) was sampled in each plot (Figure 1) and identified them to species level, using an identification key based on vegetative characters and comparative botanic matter in the herbarium UB of the University of Brasília and of the Brazilian Institute of Geology and Statistics (IBGE) both located in Brasilia city. Importance Value Index (IVI) was calculated according to [16].

Surface soil samples (0 - 15 cm) were collected from the adjacent area of landfill in savanna vegetation for chemical analysis, consisting in five subsamples which were combined. All soil samples were dried at 40˚C and sieved to <2 mm prior to analyses. The pH (H2O), organic matter (OM: oxidable carbon) and total nitrogenous (Nt) were analyzed according to Kieldahl method [17]. Soil samples were digested with a mixture of concentrated HNO3 and HClO4. Al, Ca, K and Mg, were determined with flame atomic absorption spectrometry, P with inductively coupled plasma-atomic emission spectroscopy. All digestions were performed in duplicate.

The Stuttgart Neural Network Simulator (SNNS) software package was used to create the network and conduct training and testing. The back propagation algorithm was used for the training procedure, where the neural network got in to a form of a set of input layers, one for each independent variable, a set of hidden layers, and one output layer representing the estimate of the dependent variable ( [8] [13] [18]). The form of the neural network used in this project is similar to the architecture used in [19]. These projects utilized the same neural network software package (SNNS) and software interface as did this study: a network of a hidden node for each input node, and the logistic sigmoid function.

The results (eigenvalues) were then altered using the logistic sigmoid function to reduce the range (+infinity, −infinity) usually to values between 0 and 1 ( [19] [20]). The contamination level in this model was reached within relation of the data with the control data according to [15].

Soil features and the Importance Value Index of plant species were ordinated by direct analysis of gradient. Canonical Correspondence Analysis (CCA) were used to investigate relationships between environmental variables (pH, OM, Nt, P, K, Ca, Mg and Al) and IVI in sample plots (GYN + BSB). Significance of the overall CCA ordination was tested using a Monte Carlo permutation procedure [20].

Den-trended Correspondence Analysis (DCA) [17] was also carried out for the 40 highest IVI. All multivariate analyses used the CANOCO package ( [20]). Linear adjusts (y = β0 + β1·x); p-value and R2 were calculated using an electronically analyses software.

4. Results

The 87 native tree species were identified (Table 1) and distributed in the 67 genders and 42 families. The families with the highest number of species were: Leguminosae with 11 species; Caesalpinaceae and Myrtaceae with five species each; and Rubiaceae, Melastomataceae, Apocynaceae and Annonaceae with four species each; this all representing 42% of sampling species.

The highest number of species distributed in many families corroborated with others phytosociological studies carried out in the savanna region (Table 2).

In Brasilia and Goiânia (210 km of distance between both cities) were registered 58% of the species in common: Miconia albicans, Stryphnodendron adstringens, Alibertia macrophylla, Piptocarpha rotundifolia, Rudgea viburnoides. Others species were registered in only one area: Cayaponia tayuya and Anadenanthera colubrina, only in Brasilia; and Couepia grandiflora and Macrosiphonia longiflora only in Goiânia.

The species with the highest IVI were: Miconia albicans with 25.80; Stryphnodendron adstringens with 16.28; Alibertia macrophylla with 16.27; Piptocarpha rotundifolia with 15.82; Rudgea viburnoides with 14.21; Qualea grandiflora with 13.93; Enterolobium contortisiliquum with 13.45; Dalbergia miscolobium with 11.13; and Byrsonima crassa with 11.12. The species that had the ten highest IVI value were registered in all subplots, with the exception of Byrsonima crassa, Byrsonima intermedia and Piptocarpha rotundifolia that were sampled in 80% of the subplots. Rudgea viburnoides was sampled in 55% of the subplots. The species that had IVI value <0.5 were sampled in 3% of subplots.

With the environmental variables (Table 3) were observed high average in relation of mesotrophic savanna data, this will be demonstrate if exist the eutrophic process in savanna soil around the sanitary landfills [21].

The average value of pH was high (±5.86) in relation of mesotrophic savanna data (Cerradão) which is ±4.7 ( [12]). The same results occurred with others soil variables that showed in average an enhance of values in relation to the mesotrophic savanna data: OM of 7.60% [22] to 15.15% in this study; Nt of 0.45% [23] to 0.76%; K (mg/100g) of 1.69 ( [12]) to 14.25; P (mg/100g) of 7.00 ( [1]) to 8.65; Ca (mmolc/kg) of 3.00 [24] to 8.00; and Mg (mmolc/kg) of 2.00 [25] to 10.75; respectively. Only Al (mmolc/kg) had low value in relation to the savanna studies, of 12 [12] to 8.5.

The contamination levels were observed with the results of network neural model analysis (Figure 2 and Figure 3) in relation with reference data [15], corroborating with results of Table 3. Figure 2 and Figure 3 show the central position of the studied plots.

Near areas of the landfills had contamination levels of 0.80 in Brasilia and 0.49 in Goiânia. These values corroborate with [3] data, which changed from 0.45 to

Table 1. Native tree species of savanna (Cerrado), average importance value index (IVI) registered in studied area of adjacent sanitary landfills: Jockey Club de Brasília landfill - BSB, and Goiânia landfill - GYN (SD = standard deviation, “x” represents the presence of specie in area).

Table 2. Floristic richness in phytosociological registers realized in the savanna areas.

0.99. [21] described that the distinct values between Brasilia and Goiânia were caused by differences age of landfill implementation (today more than 40 years).

In Table 4 were observed the eigenvalues and representative order of the soil variables. OM, Nt, P and Ca were the variables with the highest representation of the model. These variables represent 74.96% and 81.83% of all variance %, to Brasilia and Goiânia, respectively.

Figure 4 shows the linear adjusts between numbers of species with the environmental variables. All linear adjusts were significant (Table 5) showing directly proportional enhance of the soil features concentration with enhance of the numbers of species.

Table 3. Average and standard deviation (±) of physical and chemical soil propriety registered in studied plots: adjacent area of Jockey Club landfill in Brasilia/DF, plus current references data.

Figure 2. Study plots in Brasilia and contamination levels determined by network neural model.

Figure 3. Study plots in Goiânia and contamination levels determined by network neural model.

Figure 4. Number of species (±standard deviation) registered in the 20 subplots (♦Brasilia and rGoiânia) and its relation with chemical soil variables (Nt, OM, pH, P, K, Ca, Al and Mg). Linear adjust were plotted to Brasilia (- - - - BSB) and Goiânia (------ GYN).

Table 4. Eigenvalues of soil data in Brasilia and Goiânia.

*p-value to all variables <0.001.

Table 5. Statistical parameters of linear adjust between number of species in subplots (n˚ sp) (y) and soil variables (Nt = total nitrogenous, OM = organic matter, pH, P, K, Ca, Al and Mg) (x).

R2 = determination coefficient; EP = standard error; p = significance level.

Soil properties values against IVI species in Canonical Correspondence Analysis (CCA) revealed significant correlation in all soil variables (F > 3.18 and p < 0.001) in the axes, represented in the ordination diagram (Figure 4 and Figure 5).

The canonical coefficients, the intra set correlation coefficients, and the correlation between environmental variables and ordination axes are presented in

Figure 5. Canonical Correspondence Analysis (CCA) between the 40 species with high value of IVI and the eight soil variables (pH, OM = organic matter, Nt = total nitrogenous, P, K, Ca, Mg and Al). Ordination diagram of de-trended correspondence analysis (DCA) using the 40 highest IVI of the study areas.

Table 6, where the most significant variables of the first two axes according to t values for soil variables can also be distinguished. Considering the canonical coefficients and intra set correlation coefficient, the most significant soil variable were OM, Nt, Ca and Al. Al was the different one in relation to network neural model, this chemical element showed significance in correlation with vegetation data.

Species with highest IVI: Miconiaalbicans, Stryphnodrendonadstringens,

Table 6. Canonical correlation coefficients of the environmental variables: pH, OM = organic matter, Nt = total nitrogenous, P, K, Ca, Mg and Al. Coefficients >0.4 in bold.

Alibertiamacrophylla and Qualeagrandiflora joined in CCA near pH and Al axes. These axes received a set of 19 species. [12] also observed this same pattern when some species developed best in Al soil presence. Other important ax was P with 10 relationated species.

Others species joined with others axes, for example: Enterolobiumcontortisiliquum, Rudgeavirbunoides and Piptocarpharotundifolia; with K, OM and Ca, respectively, which are species that had high value of biomass. Miconiaferruginata, Brosimumgaudichaudii and Byrsonimacrassa had low correlation with the axes of the soil variables.

In soil study in physiognomies, [25] observed these patterns; species as Hymenaeaaurea were associated to Mg ax and Sweetiafruticosa to Ca ax.

In the de-trended correspondence analysis (DCA) for the highest IVI species, the first and second axes contributed with 34% and 57% of the variation, respectively. The ordination diagram of this analysis showed two different groups. The first was mainly formed by the highest IVI species (as Miconiaalbicans and Stryphnodrendonadstringens) and second by the lowest IVI species (as Ourateaspectabilis and Miconialangsdorffii).

5. Discussion

[26] [27] and [28] showed in their studies the IVI heterogeneity of tree species. These authors described that the dynamic alteration of the tree species in distinct areas were caused by different abiotical and environmental factors in the communities.

High value of standard deviation (SD) showed the preference of species by any place. This pattern resulted in large amplitude of IVI value. The SD varied from 0 to 50% of IVI value. The frequency, abundance and dominance parameters were transcribed in the IVI value [29].

[30] and [31] examined the relationship between soil and distance around landfills, and observed the high significant statistical of landfill presence in the soil features, the same was observed in [21] and [32]) studies.

Eutrophic process was also confirmed with the highest significant variation mainly N, P, K, Ca and organic matter deposition in the soil around the sanitary landfills. This pattern was observed in others studies around landfills ( [30] [31] [32] [33]).

[6] with diversity vegetation data around landfill (in the same area) observed enhance of diversity with enhance value of the soil features concentration, but did not observe statistical significance of floristic diversity between the subplots gradient (near or far of the landfills limit).

[14] and [25] described that soil gradient had a great impact in structure, dynamic and diversity of tree. [7] confirmed the effects of soil nutrients in the savanna vegetation mainly N, P, Ca, Al, Mg and K. [12] and [22] observed that OM and pH were also determinant factors in soil mesotrophic of vegetation feature and distribution.

[34] showed strong correlation between vegetation patterns and surface soils properties, in savanna region. He also observed that there is an intimate relationship between the properties of the surface soil horizons and the nature and also abundance of plant species which affects nutrient, as well as water absorption and retention in the biomass and upper rhizosphere.

Such a considerable correspondence between plant variation and soil features could be explained by the fact that vegetation itself influences soil characteristics at the upper layers, for instance by transferring organic matter through nutrient cycling [17].

Several authors examined the influence of fertility, such as the availability of nutrients in plant density and other vegetation characteristics ( [13] [26] [28] [33] [35]).

The multivariate relation between plant-soil in the nature was evidenced in this study, corroborating with [36]. [20] described that environment and species developed associated sets such as observed in DCA analysis. [37] showed that dynamic vegetation reflects the adaptation within the local soil nutrition.

6. Conclusion

The studied sanitary landfills were in the eutrophic process of soil with enhanced values of pH, OM, Nt, P, K, Ca and Mg in relation to the control and reference data of mesotrophic soils; and there is a relation between eutrophic process with the savanna vegetation and the species distribution around sanitary landfills.

Acknowledgements

We appreciate the Brazilian CNPq for the financial support while without it this research would not have been possible.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this paper.

References

[1] Nixon, S.W. (1995) Coastal Marine Eutrophication: A Definition, Social Causes, and Future Concerns. Ophelia, 41, 1999-219.
https://doi.org/10.1080/00785236.1995.10422044
[2] Leite, V.D., Pearson, H.W., Sousa, J.T., Lopes, W.S. and Luna, M.L. (2011) Ammonia Nitrogen Desoption from Sanitary Landfill Leachate in Filling Towers. Engenharia Agrícola, 34, 542-553.
https://doi.org/10.1590/S0100-69162014000300017
[3] Kumar, D. and Alappat, B.J. (2005) Evaluating Leachate Contamination Potential of Landfill Sites Using Leachate Pollution Index. Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy, 7, 190-197.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10098-004-0269-4
[4] Mittermeyer, R.A., Myers, N. and Mittermeier, C.G. (1999) Hotspots Earth’s Biologically Richest and Most Endagered Terrestrial Ecoregions. Conservation International, New York, 430 p.
[5] Mendonça, R.C., Felfili, J.M., Walter, B.M.T., Silva Júnior, M.C., Rezende, A.V., Filgueiras, T.S. and Nogueira, P.E. (1998) Flora vascular do Cerrado. In: Sano, S.M., Almeida, S.P. and Ribeiro, J.F. Eds., Cerrado: Ecologia e flora, Embrapa Cerrados, Planaltina, 289-556.
[6] Santana, O.A. and Imaña-Encinas, J. (2009) Composição química do solo e da água subterranea em áreas adjacentes a aterros sanitários. Revista Brasileira de Ciências Agrarias (Recife, Brasil), 4, 318-328.
[7] Bustamante, M.M.C., Medina, E., Asner, G.P., Nardoto, G.B. and Garcia-Montiel, D.C. (2006) Nitrogen Cycling in Tropical and Temperate Savannas. Biogeochemistry, 79, 209-237.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10533-006-9006-x
[8] Lemley, D.A. and Adams, J.B. (2019) Eutrophication. In: Fath, B., Ed., Earth Systems and Environmental Sciences, Vol. 1, Elsevier, Amsterdam, 86-90.
https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-409548-9.10957-1
[9] Erhunmwunse, N., Dirisu, A. and Ogbeibu, A. (2013) Managing Eutrophication in Nigeria Inland Waters. Journal of Water Resource and Protection, 5, 743-746.
https://doi.org/10.4236/jwarp.2013.57075
[10] Sardi-Saavedra, A., Peña-Salamanca, E.J., Madera-Parra, C.A. and Cerón-Hernández, V.A. (2016) Diversidad de las comunidades de algas a un sistema algal de alta tasa fotosintética para la biorremediación de lixiviados de rellenos sanitarios. Latin American Journal of Acuatic Research, 44, 113-120.
[11] da Silva, M.C. and Sarmento, T.R. (2009) Comunidades lenhosas no cerrado sentido restrito em duas posições topográficas na Estação Ecológica do Jardim Botanico de Brasília, DF, Brasil. Rodriguésia, 60, 277-294.
https://doi.org/10.1590/2175-7860200960204
[12] Haridasan, M. (2000) Nutrição mineral de plantas nativas do cerrado. Revista Brasileira Fisiologia Vegetal, 12, 54-64.
[13] Nardoto, G.B., Bustamante, M.M.C., Pinto, A.S. and Klink, C.A. (2006) Nutrient Use Efficiency at Ecosystem and Species Level in Savanna Areas of Central Brazil and Impacts of Fire. Journal of Tropical Ecology, 22, 191-201.
[14] EMBRAPA (Empresa Brasileira de Pequisa Agropecuária) (1999) Sistema brasileiro de classificação de solos. Brazilian Soil Classification System, Portal Embrapa, 412 p.
[15] Soil Survey Staff (1990) Keys to Soil Taxonomy. SMSS Technical Monograh No. 6. United States Department of Agriculture, Blacksburg, 886 p.
[16] Mueller-Dumbois, D. and Ellemberg, H. (2002) Aims and Methods of Vegetation Ecology. 2nd Edition, John Wiley and Sons, New York, 150 p.
[17] Lilienfein, J., Wilcke, W., Zimmermann, R., Gerstberger, P., Araújo, G. and Zech, W. (2001) Nutrient Storage in Soil and Biomass of Native Brazilian Cerrado. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Soil Science, 164, 487-495.
https://doi.org/10.1002/1522-2624(200110)164:5%3C487::AID-JPLN487%3E3.0.CO;2-I
[18] Shellito, B.A. and Pijanowski, B.C. (2003) Using Neural Nets to Model the Spatial Distributions of Geographic Information Society. Cartography and Geographic Information Science, 30, 281-290.
https://doi.org/10.1559/152304003100011207
[19] Pijanowski, B., Brown, D., Shellito, B. and Manik, G. (2002) Using Neural Networks and GIS to Forecast Land Use Changes: A Land Transformation Model. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 26, 553-575.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0198-9715(01)00015-1
[20] Ter Braak, C.J.F. (1992) Permutation versus Bootstrap Significance Tests in Multiple Regression and Anova. In: Jöckel, K.H., Rothe, G. and Sendler, W., Eds., Bootstrapping and Related Techniques, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 79-85.
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-48850-4_10
[21] Santana, O.A. and Imaña-Encinas, J. (2004) Modelo espacial de contaminação do solo e do lençol freático do aterro do Jockey Club para o Parque Nacional de Brasília. In: Pejon, O.J. and Zuquette, L.V., Eds., Cartografia Geotécnica e Geoambiental: Conhecimento do Meio Físico - Base para a Sutentabilidade. Suprema Gráfica Editora, São Carlos, 453-460.
[22] Janssens, F., Peeters, A., Tallowin, J.R.B., Bakker, J.P., Bekker, R.M., Fillat, F. and Oomes, M.J.M. (1998) Relationship between Soil Chemical Factors and Grassland Diversity. Plant and Soil, 202, 69-78.
https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1004389614865
[23] Lima, A.L.daS., Zanella, F., Schiavinato, M.A. and Haddad, C.R.B. (2006) Nitrogenous Compounds, Phenolic Compounds and Morphological Aspects of Leaves: Comparison of decIduous and semideciduous Arboreal Legumes. Scientia Agricola, 63, 40-45.
https://doi.org/10.1590/S0103-90162006000100007
[24] Mesquita, E.E., Pinto, J.C., Furtini Neto, A.E., dos Santos, í.P.A. and Tavares, V.B. (2004) Teores críticos de fósforo em três solos para o estabelecimento de capim-Mombaça, capim-Marandu e capim-Andropogon em vasos. Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia, 33, 290-301.
https://doi.org/10.1590/S1516-35982004000200004
[25] Carvalho, D.A., Oliveira Filho, A.T., Vilela, E.A., Curi, N., Van Den Berg, E., Fontes, M.A.L. and Botezelli, L. (2005) Distribuição de espécies arbóreo-arbustivas ao longo de um gradiente de solos e topografia em um trecho de floresta ripária do rio São Francisco em Três Marias, MG, Brasil. Revista Brasileira de Botanica, 28, 329-345.
https://doi.org/10.1590/S0100-84042005000200013
[26] Marimon Junior, B.H. and Haridasan, M. (2005) Comparação da vegetação arbórea e características edáficas de um cerradão e um cerrado sensu stricto em áreas adjacentes sobre solo distrófico no leste de Mato Grosso, Brasil. Acta Botaica Brasilica, 19, 913-926.
https://doi.org/10.1590/S0102-33062005000400026
[27] Andrade, L.A.Z., Felfili, J.M. and Violatti, L. (2002) Fitossociologia de uma área de cerrado denso na RECOR-IBGE, Brasília-DF. Acta Botanica Brasilica, 2, 225-240.
https://doi.org/10.1590/S0102-33062002000200009
[28] Batalha, M.A., Mantovani, W. and de Mesquita Júnior, H.N. (2001) Vegetation Structure in Cerrado Physiognomies in South-Eastern Brazil. Brazilian Journal of Biology, 61, 475-483.
https://doi.org/10.1590/S1519-69842001000300018
[29] Pereira-Silva, E.F.L., dos Santos, J.E., Kageyama, P.Y. and Hardt, E. (2004) Florística e fitossociologia dos estratos arbustivo e arbóreo de um remanescente de cerradão em uma Unidade de Conservação do Estado de São Paulo. Revista Brasileira de Botanica, 27, 533-544.
https://doi.org/10.1590/S0100-84042004000300013
[30] Shang, J.Q., Asce, M., Rowe, R.K. and Asce, F. (2003) Detecting Landfill Leachate Contamination Using Soil Electrical Properties. Practice Periodical of Hazardous Toxic and Radioactive Waste Management, 7, 3-11.
https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-025X(2003)7:1(3)
[31] Elliott, P., Briggs, D., Morris, S., de Hoogh, C., Hurt, C. and Jensen, T.K. (2001) Risk of Adverse Birth Outcomes in Populations Living near Landfill Sites. British Medical Journal, 323, 363-368.
https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.323.7309.363
[32] Santana, O.A., Imaña-Encinas, J., Studart-Corrêa, R. and Couto Júnior, A.F. (2008) Influencia del basural de la ciudad de Goiania sobre la diversidad florística arbórea de la sabana brasilera. Cerne (Labras, Brasil), 14, 212-219.
[33] Ziaja, M., Wójik, T. and Wrzesien, M. (2021) Phytosociological data in Assessment of Antropogenic Changes in Vegetation of Rzészów Reservoir. Sustainability, 13, Article No. 9071.
https://doi.org/10.3390/su13169071
[34] Furley, P.A. (1976) Soil-Slope-Plant Relationships in the Northern Maya Mountains, Belize. 3. Variations in the Nature and Distribution of Soil Properties. Journal of Biogeography, 3, 303-319.
https://doi.org/10.2307/3038020
[35] Zhidkova, A.Y. and Bednaya, T.A. (2021) Method of the Assessment of the Eutrophication of the Waters of the Gulf of Taganrog of the Sea of Azov Subject to the External Load on the Water Area. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 666, Article ID: 022063.
https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/666/2/022063
[36] Botrel, R.T., Oliveira Filho, A.T., Rodrigues, L.A. and Curi, N. (2002) Influência do solo e topografia sobre as variações da composiçã o florística e estrutura da comunidade arbóreo-arbustiva de uma floresta estacional semidecidual em Ingaí, MG. Revista Brasileira de Botanica, 25, 195-213.
https://doi.org/10.1590/S0100-84042002000200008
[37] Debski, I., Burslem, D.F.R.P. and Lamb, D. (2000) Ecological Processes Maintaining Differential Tree Species Distributions in an Australian Subtropical Rain Forest: Implications for Models of Species Coexistence. Journal of Tropical Ecology, 16, 387-415.
https://doi.org/10.1017/S0266467400001474

Copyright © 2024 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

Creative Commons License

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.