Monitoring of Escherichia coli, Salmonella spp. and Staphylococci in Poultry Meat-Based Fast Food in Saudi Arabia

Abstract

An investigation was made to survey the possible presence of Staphylococcus aureus, Escherichia coli and Salmonella spp. from fast-food shops in Al-Ahsa Province, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia (KSA), as potential reservoir of human infection and antimicrobial resistance. A total of 100 samples of shawarma poultry meat were collected from different localities of the province. Conventional, commercial VITEK 2 and molecular techniques were used for isolates’ identification and antibiogram detection. Staph aureus was isolated at a rate of 14% and CNS as Staph. sciuri and Staph. xylosus at 2%. E. coli was identified at a rate of 12% and antibiogram analysis showed 41.67% of isolates to be extended-spectrum β-lactamases (ESBL) with evidence of multi-drug resistance (MDR). Molecular analysis of E. coli revealed presence of sero-groups O1 and O2, entero-toxigenic (ETEC), shiga-toxigenic, ST540 and the prototypical ETEC strain H10407 which are potential public health hazard. Salmonella enterica serovar Enteritidis showed 19% prevalence while S. Typhimurium with 8% prevalence. Anti-microbial sensitivity of 15 strains of S. Enteritidis and 5 strains of S. Typhimurium showed multi-drug resistance (MDR).

Share and Cite:

Al-Humam, N. and Mohamed, A. (2022) Monitoring of Escherichia coli, Salmonella spp. and Staphylococci in Poultry Meat-Based Fast Food in Saudi Arabia. Advances in Microbiology, 12, 159-176. doi: 10.4236/aim.2022.123013.

1. Introduction

Food-borne diseases caused by pathogenic bacteria are prevalent and still occur at unacceptably high rates in developed and developing countries. The common pathogens that cause most of foodborne diseases are Campylobacter jejuni, Escherichia coli O157:H7, Staphylococcus aureus, Listeria monocytogenes, Bacillus cereus, Salmonella enterica, Vibrio spp., Shiga toxin-producing E. coli (STEC) and Clostridium perfringens [1] [2]. The large number of fast ready-to-eat food shops represent a problem to Public Health authorities responsible for the safety of food [3]. Consumption of poultry meat is increasing world-wide due probably to nutritious value and personal health issues. Under-cooked poultry meat in fast food shops is a dangerous vehicle for pathogens transmission.

Staph. aureus is a common bacterial species found as a commensal in the nose and on the skin of healthy humans and animals. Staphylococcal food poisoning is a common problem that alarm health-care providers worldwide. Entero-toxigenic strains of Staph. aureus secretes enterotoxins in food that consequently may cause poisoning when eaten.

Pathogenicity of Coagulase-Negative Staphylococci (CNS) to man and animals in recent years, prompted extensive studies to determine their role in these diseases [4]. Staph. sciuri group is generally considered of doubtful pathogenicity in human infection. However, Staph. sciuri has been associated with serious human diseases, such as endocarditis, peritonitis, septic shock, and wound infections [5] [6].

Salmonella enterica

Bacteria of the genus Salmonella are Gram-negative, facultatively anaerobic, non-spore forming, usually motile rods belonging to the Family Enterobacteriaceae and primarily associated with animals. The genus currently contains just two species, Salmonella enterica (including six subspecies) and Salmonella bongori. Most of the Salmonella isolates from cases of human infection belong to Salmonella enterica subspecies enterica. The genus is also further subdivided into approximately 2500 serovars (or serotypes), characterised on the basis of their somatic (O) and flagellar (H) antigens [7].

Until recently, individual serovars were referred to as if they were species, for example Salmonella typhimurium. However the current convention is to refer to this serovar as Salmonella enterica subsp. enterica serovar Typhimurium. But it is customary to shorten this to Salmonella Typhimurium. The commonest serovars associated with human disease are S. Typhimurium and S. Enteritidis, but many others have been shown to cause disease, notably S. Infantis, S. Virchow and S. Newport [8].

Given the long history of foodborne salmonellosis, it is not surprising that the need for microbiological testing of food ingredients and food products is very significant. A substantial number of methods, both traditional and rapid, have been developed over the years for the detection and identification of Salmonella.

Salmonella isolates are accepted by many researchers as the most circulating and frequent bacterial agents causing disease in avian species. It is associated with high economic losses because of high mortality, morbidity and lowered production in poultry. As well, it is considered as a major food-borne pathogen in most countries of the world especially in developing countries [9] [10].

Contamination by Salmonella spp. in poultry products occurs frequently and can be transmitted to humans through contact and consumption of undercooked poultry meat [11] [12].

Escherichia coli is a member of Family Enterobacteriaceae that live as a commensal in the intestinal tract of humans and animals but occasionally may cause infection in the intestinal tract and other body systems. Biochemical reactions are used, traditionally, for identification and confirmation of bacteria to species level. Extra-intestinal pathogenic Escherichia coli (ExPEC) is a diverse E. coli pathogenic group with genetic diversity which reflect its colonization of widespread ecological niches [13]. Entero-haemorrhagic strains of E. coli produce a toxin almost identical to that of Shigella dysenteriae, which is responsible for gastroenteritis in man. Some farm animals are sub-clinically infected with E. coli O157, related to ExPEC, where their faeces may contain E. coli O157 in varying numbers.

Anti-microbial susceptibility testing is vital for control of food-borne infectious bacteria. The emergence of isolates presenting resistance to several antibiotics i.e. multi-drug resistance (MDR) is of concern because these drugs are crucial to the successful treatment. A bacterial species exhibits MDR when showing resistance to more than three unrelated antibiotics.

Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) has emerged as a global health problem. Hence, contamination of poultry feeds with bacteria may lead to increase in AMR strains. From 48 studies, only one of the studies did not report multidrug resistance. At least 18 bacterial spp. were reported to be resistant to many locally available antimicrobial agents. A total 16 residue studies reported high levels of drug residues in the form of prevalence or concentration above the recommended international limit [14]. A trial in Canada to change from conventional use of antimicrobials in broiler production to reduction practices indicated that restriction of antibiotic use should start immediately [15]. AMR specific interventions are in early stages of development in EU as there are many data gaps. Epidemiological studies at food production environments linked to One Health at EU are needed [16]. Poultry reared at backyard in California showed AMR of Salmonella similar to commercial poultry imposing zoonotic risks and food contamination; flock surveillance programme is needed [17]. Most common serotypes in poultry products were Salmonella Enteritidis and Salmonella Typhimurium. Highest AMR was recorded for nalidixic acid and ampicillin which highlight the need to control misuse of antibiotics in poultry [18]. Pharmacokinetics/Pharmacodynamics (PK/PD) models, establish rational dosage regimens, are suggested for veterinary antimicrobials to face misuse and abuse of antibiotics. They would achieve efficacy in prevention AMR, prevention and treatment of bacterial infection [19]. Environment link to AMR was studied by trapping 493 flies to isolate Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae and Staphylococcus spp. Target bacteria were isolated and 35.3% of flies carried AMR species and 9.0% harboured multidrug resistant isolates. Therefore flies can indicate environmental contamination of AMR [20]. In the EU, increased cases of human salmonellosis after 2014 led to investigate conditions in poultry production. Although evidence from the study is inconclusive, there is conclusive evidence that increased stocking density, stress and larger farms result in spread of Salmonella in laying hens [21].

Multilocus sequence typing (MLST) provides an efficient genotyping tool for molecular epidemiology analysis. E. coli strains with identical MLST profiles (known as sequence types or STs) may possess distinct genotypes. This enable different ecological- or pathological-typical lifestyles. However, STs are not uniform with regard to genetic properties or ecological/pathological-typical behaviors [14].

In Al-Ahsa Province, KSA, Salmonella enteritidis was reported as the cause of an outbreak of food poising by eating chicken shawarma [15].

Conventional methods are used routinely for identification of microorganisms with increased number of misidentification making it continuously unreliable. The VITEK 2 Automated System (bioMérieux) is a widely used instruments in clinical microbiology laboratories for identification of bacteria and evaluation of anti-microbial susceptibility profile [16]. Further, molecular bacteriological techniques are receiving attention from clinical microbiology laboratories. Partial 16S rRNA gene sequencing has been used for accurate bacterial identification [17] [18].

In Al-Ahsa Province, KSA, data about food-borne pathogenic bacteria is meagre, hence the present study aimed for identification and characterization of Staphylococci, E. coli and Salmonella spp. from fast-food shops.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Collection of Samples

The survey was carried out in Al-Ahsa Province, Eastern Region, KSA. A total of 100 samples were collected from fast-food shops in different localities of the Province. Sandwiches of shawarma poultry are prepared by making slices of poultry meat, layer on vertical spit, slow-roasted, mix with vegetables and delivered fresh for breakfast to consumers. Samples were put into sterile plastic bags and sent to the laboratory in an ice box within maximum two hours from the time of purchase. Processing in the laboratory by aseptically weighing 25 gm of sample in sterile stomacher bags (Seward Medical StomacherR Bags), diluted with 225 ml of sterilized 0.1% w/v peptone water (Oxoid) and macerated in a stomacher for 3 min.

2.2. Staphylococci

A selective medium for Staphylococci Baird Parker agar (BD Diagnostics, Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA), supplemented with egg yolk tellurite emulsion, is used for primary isolation and incubated at 37˚C overnight. Recovered single colonies were streaked onto 5% citrated sheep blood agar plates and incubated at 37˚C overnight. Cultural characteristics, morphology and biochemical tests were done to identify Staphylococci. Confirmation of the identification of isolates and antimicrobial susceptibility profile to a wide range of antimicrobial drugs were done by VITEK 2 technique (bioMerieux, France).

For Enterobacteriacaeae, the following media MacConkey Agar (MCA) for E. coli detection, Sorbitol MacCankoky Agar (SMAC) for STX-EC. Purple colonies on MCA were identified as E. coli, whereas white colonies on SMAC were presumptive STX-EC and were therefore stereotyped by PCR for confirmation. On the other hand, Serial dilutions (10-fold) of the samples were made in 1% sterile peptone water (Difco, UK). Then 0.1 mL of each dilution was inoculated into Salmonella enrichment medium, Selenite F broth (Oxoid, UK), and incubated at 37˚C for 24 - 48 h. Thereafter, the growth was transferred to the media recommended for Salmonella spp. including: MCA, Xylose lysine deoxycholate agar (XLD) (Oxoid, UK) and Deoxycholate citrate agar (DCA) (Oxoid, UK), and incubated at 37˚C for 24 h. Salmonella colonies, characterized by producing non-lactose fermenting pale colored colonies on MCA, and with black centres on DCA medium and pink-red colonies with black centres on XLD medium, were picked up and sub-cultured. The colonies were confirmed as Gram negative bacteria using Gram staining procedures, and glycerol cultures of all of the isolates were prepared and stored at −80˚C for further analysis. The isolated bacterial strains were subjected to identification using biochemical tests and VITEK 2 technique (bioMerieux, France). Antimicrobial sensitivity test was done by VITEK 2 technique. The tested anti-microbial agents are: Ampicillin, Amoxicillin, Piperacillin, Cefotaxime, Ceftazidime, Cefepime, Ertapenem, Imipenem, Meropenem, Amikacin, Gentamicin, Ciprofloxacin, Norofloxacine, Fosfomycin, Nitrofurantoin, Trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole.

2.3. Molecular Analysis

1) Staph. aureus:

DNA was extracted by sub-culturing Staph. aureus isolates into Luria Bertani broth and incubated at 37˚C for 18 hours. A volume of 1 ml was centrifuged at 3500g/3min in micro-centrifuge tubes and the supernatant (S/N) was discarded. The precipitate was suspended in 200 μl of extraction buffer (0.1 M Tris-HCl pH 7.5, 0.05 M EDTA pH 8.0, 1.25% SDS) and mixed well. The tube was incubated at 63˚C for 3 min, brought to room temperature, washed at 3500g/3min and S/N was removed gently to a new tube. An equal volume of absolute ethanol was added to precipitate DNA, washed for 3 min at 3500x g and dried by air flow.

PCR on 16S rRNA using 27F and 1492R primers was performed by Macrogen Inc. (Seoul, South Korea). Sequences of the primers were:

27F 5’ (AGA GTT TGA TCM TGG CTC AG) 3’

1492R 5’ (TAC GGY TAC CTT GTT ACG ACT T) 3’

2) Enterobacteriacaeae:

DNA was extracted by sub-culturing E. coli and Salmonella spp. isolates into Luria Bertani broth and incubated at 37˚C for 18 hours. A volume of 1 ml was centrifuged at 3500 g/3 min in micro-centrifuge tubes and the supernatant (S/N) was discarded. The precipitate was suspended in 200 μl of extraction buffer (0.1 M Tris-HCl pH 7.5, 0.05 M EDTA pH 8.0, 1.25% SDS) and mixed well. The tube was incubated at 63˚C for 3 min, brought to room temperature, washed at 3500 g/3min and S/N was removed gently to a new tube. An equal volume of absolute ethanol was added to precipitate DNA, washed for 3 min at 3500x g and dried by air flow.

PCR on 16S rRNA using 27F and 1492R primers was performed by Macrogen Inc. (Seoul, South Korea). Sequences of the primers were:

Primer Type Type 2 Sequence (5 to 3) Reference;

27F Universal AgAgTTTgATCMTGGCTCAg;

1492R Universal TACggYTACCTTgTTACgACTT [19].

3) 16S ribosomal RNA gene sequence analysis:

Determined sequences were compared with sequences available in GeneBank, EMBL, and DDBJ databases using the BLAST algorithm,15 through the National centre for biotechnology information server (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov) and with sequences available in Ribosomal database project (RDP-II), release 9.59, by use of Sequence match algorithm 9. In order to assign isolate to a species, each derived sequence aligned by the BLAST algorithm, yielded at least 99% similarity score with identified species in the BLAST search, and the highest S-ab value with identified species in the Sequence match search.

3. Results

Staphylococci

Staph aureus was isolated from 14 samples at a rate of 14% by conventional methods and confirmed by VITEK 2 technique. CNS identified by VITEK 2 technique as Staph. sciuri and Staph. xylosus from two samples (2%).

Antibiogram analysis of all isolates showed 5 strains (35.7%) to be MRSA with the following profile: Benzylpenicillin MIC ≥ 0.5 R; Ampicillin MIC ≥ 0.4 R; Oxacillin MIC ≥ 4 R; Gentamicin MIC ≤ 0.5 S; Ciprofloxacin MIC ≤ 0.5 S; levofloxacin MIC ≤ 0.12 S; Moxifloxacin MIC ≤ 0.25 S; Erythromycin MIC 2 IR; Clindamycin MIC 0.5 S; Quinupristin/Dalfopristin MIC 1 S; Linezolid MIC 2 S; Vancomycin MIC 2 S; Tetracycline MIC 2 S; Tigecyclin MIC ≤ 0.12 S; Nitrofurantoin MIC 64 IR; Rifampicin MIC 1 S; Trimethoprim/Sulfa MIC ≥ 320 R (Table 1).

Non-MRSA isolates were R to Ciprofloxacin.

All isolates were confirmed by molecular analysis. A dendrogram showing relatedness of CNS isolates as Staph. sciuri was identified and confirmed from two samples (Figure 1).

1) Enterobacteriacaeae:

Table 1. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing of MRSA isolates from fast food shops in Al-Ahsa province, KSA.

Figure 1. Dendrogram showing genetic relatedness among the isolated CNS strains based on 16Sr DNA sequences analysis.

E. coli was isolated and identified from 12 specimens at a rate of 12% by conventional methods and VITEK 2 technique biochemical confirmation.

Antibiogram analysis, by VITEK 2 technique, showed 5 strains (41.67%) of all isolates to be extended-spectrum β-lactamases (ESBL) positive with the following profile:

ESBL MIC: Pos; Ampicillin: MIC ≥ 32 R; Amoxicillin MIC ≤ 2 S; Piperacillin MIC ≥ 128 R; Cefotaxime MIC ≥ 64 R; Ceftazidime MIC ≥ 1 IR; Cefepime MIC ≥ 64 R; Ertapenem MIC ≤ 0.5 S; Imipenem MIC ≤ 0.25 S; Meropenem MIC ≤ 0.25 S; Amikacin MIC ≥ 64 R; Gentamicin MIC ≥ 16 R; Ciprofloxacin MIC ≥ 4 R; Norofloxacine MIC ≥ 16 R; Fosfomycin MIC ≤ 16 S; Nitrofurantoin MIC 64 IR; Trimethoprim/Sulfa MIC ≥ 320 R (Table 2).

2) Antibiogram profile of 7 strains (58.33%) identified as ESBL negative:

ESBL MIC: Neg; Ampicillin: MIC ≤ 2 S; Amoxicillin MIC ≤ 2 S Piperacillin MIC ≤ 4 S; Cefotaxime MIC ≤ 4 S; Ceftazidime MIC ≤ 1 S; Cefepime MIC ≤ 1 S; Ertapenem MIC ≤ 0.5 S; Imipenem MIC ≤ 0.25 S; Meropenem MIC ≤ 0.25 S; Amikacin MIC ≤ 2 S; Gentamicin MIC ≤ 1 S; Ciprofloxacin MIC ≥ 4 R; NorofloxacineMIC ≥ 16 R; Fosfomycin MIC ≤ 16 S; Nitrofurantoin MIC ≤ 16 S.

Trimethoprim/Sulfa MIC ≥ 320 R (Table 3).

Molecular technique analysis of E. coli isolates documented the following strains as shown on (Table 4).

Escherichia coli ETEC H10407, complete genome

Escherichia coli ETEC H10407, complete genome

Escherichia coli O25b:H4-ST131 str. EC958 chromo

Escherichia coli strain P33 16S ribosomal RNA gen

Escherichia coli strain LW1655F+ 16S ribosomal RN

Table 2. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing of E. coli ESBL positive isolates from fast food shops in Al-Ahsa province, KSA.

Table 3. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing of E. coli ESBL negative isolates from fast food shops in Al-Ahsa province, KSA.

Escherichia coli UMNK88, complete genome

Escherichia coli JJ1886, complete genome

Escherichia coli O145:H28 str. RM12581, complete

Escherichia coli O25b:H4-ST131 str. EC958 chromo

Escherichia coli strain ST540, complete genome

Escherichia coli O103:H2 str. 12009 DNA, complete genome

Escherichia coli O104:H4 str. 2009EL-2071, complete genome

S. enterica serovar Enteritidis showed highest prevalence 19% while S. Typhimurium with 8% prevalence in food samples by VITEK 2 technique biochemical confirmation and molecular method.

Antibiogram of 15 strains of S. Enteritidis showed the following profile:

Ampicillin: MIC ≤ 1 S; Amoxicillin MIC ≤ 1 S; Piperacillin MIC ≤ 1 S; Cefotaxime MIC ≥ 32 R; Ceftazidime MIC ≤ 1 S; Cefepime MIC ≤ 1 S; Ertapenem MIC ≤ 0.5 S; Imipenem MIC ≤ 0. 5 S; Meropenem MIC ≤ 0.25 S; Amikacin MIC ≥ 32 R; Gentamicin MIC ≥ 32 R; Ciprofloxacin MIC ≥ 32 R; Norofloxacine MIC ≤ 0.5 S; Fosfomycin MIC ≤ 16 S; Nitrofurantoin MIC 256 R; Trimethoprim/Sulfa MIC ≥ 320 R (Table 5).

Antibiogram of 5 strains of S.Typhimurium showed the following profile:

Ampicillin: MIC ≤ 1 S; Amoxicillin MIC ≤ 1 S; Piperacillin MIC ≤ 4 S; Cefotaxime MIC ≥ 32 R; Ceftazidime MIC ≥ 32 R; Cefepime MIC ≥ 32 R; Ertapenem MIC ≤ 0.5 S; Imipenem MIC ≤ 0. 5 S; Meropenem MIC ≤ 0.25 S; Amikacin MIC ≥

Table 4. Molecular technique analysis of E. coli isolates from fast food shops in Al-Ahsa province, KSA.

Table 5. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing of S. Enteritidis isolates from fast food shops in Al-Ahsa province, KSA.

Table 6. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing of S. Typhimurium isolates from fast food shops in Al-Ahsa province, KSA.

32 R; Gentamicin MIC ≥ 32 R; Ciprofloxacin MIC ≥ 32 R; Norofloxacine MIC ≥ 32 R; Fosfomycin MIC ≤ 16 S; Nitrofurantoin MIC 256 R; Trimethoprim/Sulfa MIC ≥ 320 R (Table 6).

4. Discussion

The present study aimed to explore prevalence of pathogenic bacteria in poultry-based fast-food shops and their anti-microbial susceptibility pattern. In Staphylococci, Staph aureus was isolated at rate of 14% and Staph. sciuri at 2%. Poultry meat may be contaminated with Staph aureus at preparation stage or from food-handlers. Staph aureus is non-spore-former but can cause contamination of food products during food processing. It can grow in a wide range of temperatures (7˚C to 48.5˚C; optimum 30˚C to 37˚C), pH (4.2 to 9.3; optimum 7 to 7.5), and concentration of sodium chloride up to 15% NaCl. Staph aureus can tolerate desiccation to survive in almost dry and stressful environments such as the human nose and skin [20]. Staphylococcal food poisoning has been reported and investigation in one outbreak pointed to the food-handler who transmitted the pathogen to the food [21]. Another study documented that highest occurrence of Staph aureus was on hands of abattoir workers (79.6%) and beef carcasses (59.9%) [22].

This is the first report of isolation of Staph. sciuri which belongs to CNS from food samples in Saudi Arabia. Food poisoning was reported to be caused occasionally by other Staphylococcus species such as Staph. intermedius [23]. An epidemiological survey among CNS in ready-to-eat meats was done. PCR has been established as a reliable tool for identification of various microorganisms such as bacteria, fungi and yeasts at the genus and species level. PCR identification of foodborne pathogens has many advantages such as accuracy, simplicity, sensitivity and reproducibility. It has been established that by PCR methods, isolated CNS contained toxigenic and antimicrobial-resistance genes [24]. Other workers reported presence of classical enterotoxin and antibiotics resistance genes in CNS from poultry [25]. Recently Staph. sciuri is considered as emerging human pathogen most frequently causing wound infections and carrying antibiotic resistance genes [26].

Globally, the status of antimicrobial resistant of microbes in the food chain and their capacity to be dispersed through the international food trade, is increasing.

MRSA isolates in the present study, showed resistance to Benzylpenicillin, Ampicillin, Oxacillin, Erythromycin, Nitrofurantoin and Trimethoprim. On the other hand, non-MRSA showed similar resistance pattern plus being resistant to ciprofloxacin. This indicates multi-drug resistance among the isolates with potential to transmit resistance through the food chain. It has been reported that MRSA isolates from retail meat, a mastitic cow and CA-MRSA isolates were closely related according to spa type. They were identical according to PFGE pattern, ST, and SCCmec and had the characteristics of ST8/SCCmec Ivl [27].

E. coli was isolated and identified from 12 specimens at a rate of 12%. Anti-microbial analysis of all isolates showed 41.67% of strains to be ESBL positive. ESBLs are a large group of plasmid-mediated enzymes which induce resistance to most beta-lactam antibiotics [28]. Antibiogram analysis of this group, as shown in the results, indicates multi-drug resistance among isolates. Resistance was determined for Ampicillin, Piperacillin, Cefotaxime, Ceftazidime, Cefepime, Amikacin, Gentamicin, Ciprofloxacin, Norofloxacine, Nitrofurantoin and Trimethoprim. While ESBL negative strains were resistant to Ciprofloxacin, Norofloxacine and Trimethoprim. This is interesting for the study area as it highlights the prevalence of multi-drug resistance among E. coli isolates from poultry fast-food with potential of transmission to humans. Multi-drug resistance was reported for 64.91% of E. coli isolates from poultry meat [29]. Another study indicated that ESBL/plasmid mediated AmpC-type cephalosporinase (pAmpC) E.coli in the broiler production pyramid is prevalent, with measureable transfer between subsequent production levels [30]. The problem of transfer of antimicrobial resistance from animals to man is stressed with the emergence of E. coli strains harbouring transferable-plasmids carrying multiple antimicrobial resistance genes [31]. Another study documented that ESBL-E. coli in retail chicken meats could be a potential reservoir for multidrug resistance determinants and that some are potentially harmful to humans [32].

Molecular analysis of E. coli strains, in the present study, showed presence of sero-groups O1 and O2, ETEC, shiga-toxigenic E. coli and other strains as displayed on the results. Other workers reported that whole genome sequencing on 100 ESBL/pAmpC-EC isolated from broilers, revealed that isolates carried resistance genes to four antimicrobial classes plus cephalosporins. In addition these uncommon ESBL/pAmpC-E. coli lineages, previously reported in diverse hosts, including humans, could emerge in poultry [33]. [34] sequenced the O-antigen clusters of various E. coli serogroups O1 and O2 strains. It indicated that the O1 and O2 are encoded by different sets of O-antigen encoding genes and identified potential new O-groups. Moreover, E. coli strains belonging to serogroups O1 and O2 are frequently associated with human infections, especially extra-intestinal infections. In the present study, two strains were identified as ETEC H10407 which are known to produce both heat-labile (LT) and heat-stable (ST) enterotoxins. Isolation of ETEC from two outbreaks of diaerrhea in broiler chicks potentially may transmit infection to man, has been reported [35]. Other workers indicated that the prototypical ETEC strain H10407 harbours LT and ST enterotoxins along with the colonization factor antigen I adhesin and other classical virulence factors. In humans, enterotoxin is functionally and structurally similar to the diaerrhea-inducing cholera toxin produced by Vibrio cholerae [36].

Poultry salmonellosis is a challenge to Veterinary and Human Medicine with substantial increase in its incidence. Prevalence of S. Enteritidis, in the present study, was 19% in food samples. Salmonella Enteritidis is commonly associated with poultry products, whereas S. Typhimurium has a wider species range, including ruminants, swine and poultry [37]. As well, diverse epidemiological studies indicated importance of poultry foodstuffs in transmission of Salmonella to man [38]. Salmonellosis has been the most frequent cause of food-borne outbreaks in Europe [39] while in the USA, CDC estimated more than 1 million annual cases of food-borne salmonellosis [40].

Anti-microbial sensitivity tests, in the present study, indicated high percentage of anti-microbial resistance among S. Enteritidis strains, 15 strains exhibited MDR. Reaction to cephalosporin showed resistance to cefotaxime and sensitivity to the rest, which are not in routine use in the study area. There is resistance to aminoglycosides, ciprofloxacin, nitrofurantoin and trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole. On the other hand, isolates were sensitive to several β-lactams antibiotics (ampicillin, amoxicillin and piperacillin).

Isolation and identification of frank food poisoning bacterial species, in the present study, from poultry meat shawarma could raise concern about the preparation method of this popular dish. Other workers in Lebanon, reported that meat-based fast foods, especially Shawarma, could be a public health hazard, as they may act as a potential vehicle for many antimicrobial-resistant bacteria [41]. The findings of the present study, indicate that fast-food, in the study area, carried food poisoning pathogenic bacterial species with MDR. Therefore, it is advisable to carry out further surveys, based on the present results, to address the problem extent pinpointing weak points of transmission and suggest preventive measures. Such measures could be to adopt an integrated “One Health” approach to survey antimicrobial resistance in enteric bacteria from humans, retail meat, and food animals. Moreover, surveillance areas should be expanded, adding new bacterial species and antibiotics [42].

5. Conclusions

In the reported study, conventional, commercial VITEK 2 and molecular techniques were used for identification of isolates from poultry meat sandwiches and anti-microbial sensitivity testing. Staph aureus was isolated at a rate of 14% and Staph. sciuri and Staph. xylosus of CNS at 2%. Anti-microbial susceptibility test indicated 35.7% of isolates to be MRSA. E. coli was identified at a rate of 12% and antibiogram analysis showed 41.67% of isolates to be ESBL with evidence of multi-drug resistance. E. coli revealed presence of sero-groups O1 and O2, entero-toxigenic (ETEC), shiga-toxigenic, ST540 and the prototypical ETEC strain H10407. Salmonella enterica serovar Enteritidis showed 19% prevalence while S. Typhimurium with 8% prevalence. Anti-microbial sensitivity of 15 strains of S. Enteritidis and 5 strains of S. Typhimurium showed multi-drug resistance (MDR).

To recapitulate, poultry meat sandwiches in the study area, were contaminated with Staph aureus and CNS, E. coli, S. Enteritidis and S. Typhimurium. The isolated strains exhibited MDR which indicates that besides potential transmission of food poisoning agents, they may transmit anti-microbial resistance. More investigations to explore the problem and formulate preventive measures, are unavoidable.

Acknowledgements

Authors are grateful to the Deanship of Scientific Research, King Faisal University for generously funding this work Project No. 150049. The authors would also like to thank Macrogen, Inc. for 16S rRNA sequence analysis of isolates. The excellent technical help provided by Mr. Sultan Al Turki is appreciated.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this paper.

References

[1] Scallan, E., Hoekstra, R.M., Angulo, F.J., Tauxe, R.V., Widdowson, M.A., Roy, S.L., et al. (2011) Foodborne Illness Acquired in the United States Major Pathogens. Emerging Infectious Diseases, 17, 7-15.
https://doi.org/10.3201/eid1701.P11101
[2] Zhao, X., Lin, C.W., Wang, J. and Oh, D.H. (2014) Advances in Rapid Detection Methods for Foodborne Pathogens. Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology, 24, 297-312.
https://doi.org/10.4014/jmb.1310.10013
[3] Lee, N., Kwon, K.Y., Oh, S.K., Chang, H.J., Chun, H.S. and Choi, S.W. (2014) A Multiplex PCR Assay for Simultaneous Detection of Escherichia coli O157:H7, Bacillus cereus, Vibrio parahaemolyticus, Salmonella spp., Listeria monocytogenes, and Staphylococcus aureus in Korea Ready-to-Eat Food. Foodborne Pathogens and Disease, 11, 574-580.
https://doi.org/10.1089/fpd.2013.1638
[4] Kloos, W.E. and Bannerman, T.L. (1994) Update on Clinical Significance of Coagulase-Negative Staphylococci. Clinical Microbiology Reviews, 7, 117-140.
https://doi.org/10.1128/CMR.7.1.117
[5] Horii, T., Suzuki, Y., Kimura, T., Kanno, T. and Maekawa, M. (2001) Intravenous Catheter Related Septic Shock Caused by Staphylococcus sciuri and Escherichia vulneris. Scandinavian Journal of Infectious Diseases, 33, 930-932.
https://doi.org/10.1080/00365540110076750
[6] Stepanovic, S., Jezek, P., Vukovic, D., Dakic, I., Petras, P., et al. (2003) Isolation of Members of the Staphylococcus sciuri Group from Urine and Their Relationship to Urinary Tract Infections. Journal of Clinical Microbiology, 41, 5262-5264.
https://doi.org/10.1128/JCM.41.11.5262-5264.2003
[7] Molbak, K., Olsen, J. and Wegener, H. (2006) Salmonella Infections. In: Reimann, H. and Cliver, D., Eds., Foodborne Infections and Intoxications, Academic Press, Cambridge, 55-115.
https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-012588365-8/50007-4
[8] Anjay, A.K., Agarwal, R.K., Ramees, T.P., Dubal, Z.B., Kaushik, P., Kumar, M.S., Dudhe, N.C., Milton, A.A.P., Abhishek, B.K. and Shagufta, B. (2015) Molecular Typing of Salmonella typhimurium and S. enteritidis Serovars from Diverse Origin by ERIC-PCR. Journal of Pure and Applied Microbiology, 9, 2627-2634.
[9] Soultose, N., Koidis, P. and Madden, R.H. (2003) Prevalence of Listeria and Salmonellae in Retail Chicken in Northern Ireland. Applied Microbiology, 37, 421-423.
https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1472-765X.2003.01423.x
[10] Carraminana, J.J., Agustin, I. and Herrera, A. (2004) High Prevalence of Multiple Resistance to Antibiotics in Salmonellae Serovars Isolated from a Poultry Slaughterhouse in Spain. Veterinary Microbiology, 104, 133-139.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vetmic.2004.08.010
[11] Bailey, J.S. and Cosby, D.E. (2003) Detection of Salmonellae from Chicken Rinses and Chicken Hot Dogs with Automated Bax PCR System. Journal of Food Protection, 66, 2138-2140.
https://doi.org/10.4315/0362-028X-66.11.2138
[12] Kimura, A.C., Reddy, V. and Marcus, R. (2004) Chicken Consumption Is a Newly Identified Risk Factor for Sporadic Salmonellae Enteric Serotype Enteritidis Infections in the United States. Clinical Infectious Diseases, 38, 244-252.
https://doi.org/10.1086/381576
[13] Singer, R.S. (2015) Urinary Tract Infections Attributed to Diverse ExPEC Strains in Food Animals: Evidence and Data Gaps. Frontiers in Microbiology, 6, Article No. 28.
https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2015.00028
[14] Oloso, N.O., Fagbo, S., Garbati, M., et al. (2018) Antimicrobial Resistance in Food Animals and the Environment in Nigeria: A Review. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 15, 1284.
https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph15061284
[15] Huber, L., Gow, S.P., Carson, C.A., et al. (2021) Reduction in Antimicrobial Use and Resistance to Salmonella, Campylobacter, and Escherichia coli in Broiler Chickens, Canada, 2013-2019. Emerging Infectious Diseases, 27, 2434-2444.
https://doi.org/10.3201/eid2709.204395
[16] Koutsoumanis, K., Allende, A., álvarez-Ordóñez, A., et al. (2021) Role Played by the Environment in the Emergence and Spread of Antimicrobial Resistance (AMR) through the Food Chain. EFSA Journal, 19, e06651.
https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2021.6651
[17] Clothier, K.A., Kim, P., Mete, A., et al. (2018) Frequency, Serotype Distribution, and Antimicrobial Susceptibility Patterns of Salmonella in Small Poultry Flocks in California. Journal of Veterinary Diagnostic Investigation, 30, 471-475.
https://doi.org/10.1177/1040638718755418
[18] Herrera-Sánchez, M.P., Rodríguez-Hernández, R., et al. (2020) Antibiotic Resistance in Salmonella spp. Isolated from Poultry: A Global Overview. Veterinary World, 13, 2070-2084.
https://doi.org/10.14202/vetworld.2020.2070-2084
[19] Luo, W., Chen, D., Wu, M., et al. (2019) Pharmacokinetics/Pharmacodynamics Models of Veterinary Antimicrobial Agents. Journal of Veterinary Science, 20, e40.
https://doi.org/10.4142/jvs.2019.20.e40
[20] Hathcock, T., Butaye, P., Kang, Y., et al. (2019) Multidrug-Resistant Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae and Staphylococcus spp. in Houseflies and Blowflies from Farms and Their Environmental Settings. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 16, 3583.
https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16193583
[21] Koutsoumanis, K., Allende, A., Alvarez-Ordóñez, A., et al. (2019) Salmonella Control in Poultry Flocks and Its Public Health Impact. EFSA Journal, 17, e05596.
https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2019.5596
[22] Gowda, T.K.G.M., Latha, C., Sunil, B. and Van Damme, I. (2017) Occurrence and Antibiotic Susceptibility of Listeria Species and Staphylococcus aureus in Cattle Slaughterhouses of Kerala, South India. Foodborne Pathogens and Disease, 14, 573-579.
https://doi.org/10.1089/fpd.2017.2293
[23] Khambaty, F.M., Bennett, R.W. and Shah, D.B. (1994) Application of Pulse Field Gel Electrophoresis to the Epidemiological Characterisation of Staphylococcus intermedius Implicated in a Food-Related Outbreak. Epidemiology and Infection, 113, 75-81.
https://doi.org/10.1017/S0950268800051487
[24] Okoli, C.E., Njoga, E.O., Enem, S.I., Godwin, E.E., Nwanta, J.A. and Chah, K.F. (2018) Prevalence, Toxigenic Potential and Antimicrobial Susceptibility Profile of Staphylococcus Isolated from Ready-to-Eat Meats. Veterinary World, 11, 1214-1221.
https://doi.org/10.14202/vetworld.2018.1214-1221
[25] Pyzik, E., Marek, A., Stępień-Pyśniak, D., Urban-Chmiel, R., Jarosz, Ł.S. and Jagiełło-Podębska, I. (2019) Detection of Antibiotic Resistance and Classical Enterotoxin Genes in Coagulase-Negative Staphylococci Isolated from Poultry in Poland. Journal of Veterinary Research, 63, 183-190.
https://doi.org/10.2478/jvetres-2019-0023
[26] Shittu, A., Lin, J., Morrison, D. and Kolawole, D. (2004) Isolation and Molecular Characterization of Multiresistant Staphylococcus sciuri and Staphylococcus haemolyticus Associated with Skin and Soft-Tissue Infections. Journal of Medical Microbiology, 53, 51-55.
https://doi.org/10.1099/jmm.0.05294-0
[27] Sato, T., Usui, M., Konishi, N., et al. (2017) Closely Related Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Isolates from Retail Meat, Cows with Mastitis, and Humans in Japan. PLoS ONE, 12, e0187319.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0187319
[28] Bush, K. and Jacoby, G.A. (2010) Updated Functional Classification of β-Lactamases. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, 54, 969-976.
https://doi.org/10.1128/AAC.01009-09
[29] Momtaz, H., Rahimi, E. and Moshkelani, S. (2012) Molecular Detection of Antimicrobial Resistance Genes in E. coli Isolated from Slaughtered Commercial Chickens in Iran. Veterinarni Medicina, 57, 193-197.
https://doi.org/10.17221/5916-VETMED
[30] Apostolakos, I., Mughini-Gras, L., Fasolato, L. and Piccirillo, A. (2019) Assessing the Occurrence and Transfer Dynamics of ESBL/pAmpC-Producing Escherichia coli across the Broiler Production Pyramid. PLoS ONE, 14, e0217174.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0217174
[31] Kawamura, K., Nagano, N., Suzuki, M., Wachino, J., Kimura, K. and Arakawa, Y. (2017) ESBL-Producing Escherichia coli and Its Rapid Rise among Healthy People. Food Safety (Tokyo), 5, 122-150.
https://doi.org/10.14252/foodsafetyfscj.2017011
[32] Nahar, A., Awasthi, S.P., Hatanaka, N., Okuno, K., Hoang, P.H., Hassan, J., Hinenoya, A. and Yamasaki, S. (2018) Prevalence and Characteristics of Extended-Spectrum β-Lactamase-Producing Escherichia coli in Domestic and Imported Chicken Meats in Japan. The Journal of Veterinary Medical Science, 80, 510-517.
https://doi.org/10.1292/jvms.17-0708
[33] Apostolakos, I., Feudi, C., Eichhorn, I., Palmieri, N., Fasolato, L., Schwarz, S. and Piccirillo, A. (2020) High-Resolution Characterisation of ESBL/pAmpC-Producing Escherichia coli Isolated from the Broiler Production Pyramid. Scientific Reports, 10, Article No. 11123.
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-68036-9
[34] Delannoy, S., Beutin, L., Mariani-Kurkdjian, P., Fleiss, A., Bonacorsi, S. and Fach, P. (2017) The Escherichia coli Serogroup O1 and O2 Lipopolysaccharides Are Encoded by Multiple O-antigen Gene Clusters. Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology, 7, 30.
https://doi.org/10.3389/fcimb.2017.00030
[35] Joya, J.E., Suji, T.T., Jacalne, A.V., Arita, M., Sukamoto, T.T., Honda, T. and Miwatani, T. (1990) Demonstration of Enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli in Diarrheic Broiler Chicks. European Journal of Epidemiology, 6, 88-90.
https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00155557
[36] Crofts, A.A., Simone, M., Giovanetti, E.J., Rubin, F.M., et al. (2018) Enterotoxigenic E. coli Virulence Gene Regulation in Human Infections. PNAS, 115, E8968-E8976.
https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1808982115
[37] Hugas, M. and Beloeil, P. (2014) Controlling Salmonella along the Food Chain in the European Union—Progress over the Last Ten Years. Eurosurveillance, 19, 20804.
https://doi.org/10.2807/1560-7917.ES2014.19.19.20804
[38] Cosby, D.E., Cox, N.A., Harrison, M.A., Wilson, J.L., Buhr, R.J. and Fedorka-Cray, P.J. (2015) Salmonella and Antimicrobial Resistance in Broilers: A Review. Journal of Applied Poultry Research, 24, 408-426.
https://doi.org/10.3382/japr/pfv038
[39] EFSA European Food Safety Authority (2015) The European Union Summary Report on Trends and Sources of Zoonoses, Zoonotic Agents and Foodborne Outbreaks in 2013. EFSA Journal, 13, 165. https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2015.3991
[40] Scallan, E., Griffin, P.M., Angulo, F.J., Tauxe, R.V. and Hoekstra, R.M. (2011) Foodborne Illness Acquired in the United States-Unspecified Agents. Emerging Infectious Diseases, 17, 16-22.
https://doi.org/10.3201/eid1701.P21101
[41] Harakeh, S., Yassine, H., Gharios, M., et al. (2005) Isolation, Molecular Characterization and Antimicrobial Resistance Patterns of Salmonella and Escherichia coli Isolates from Meat-Based Fast Food in Lebanon. Science of the Total Environment, 341, 33-44.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2004.09.025
[42] Karp, B.E., Tate, H., Plumblee, J.R., et al. (2017) National Antimicrobial Resistance Monitoring System: Two Decades of Advancing Public Health Through Integrated Surveillance of Antimicrobial Resistance. Foodborne Pathogens and Disease, 14, 545-557.
https://doi.org/10.1089/fpd.2017.2283

Copyright © 2024 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

Creative Commons License

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.