Effects of Microcystis aeruginosa on New Jersey Aquatic Benthic Macroinvertebrates

Abstract

As increases in anthropogenic eutrophication and climate change contribute to more severe and frequent cyanobacterial harmful algal blooms in freshwater ecosystems worldwide, understanding the effects and consequences cyanobacterial blooms have on aquatic organisms is crucial. Microcystis aeruginosa is one of the most common cyanobacteria taxa found in cyanobacterial blooms, producing a number of toxins including Microcystins. This study examined the effects of Microcystis aeruginosa on aquatic benthic macroinvertebrates, specifically the pollution intolerant taxa Ephemeroptera, the pollution moderately intolerant taxa Zygoptera, and the pollution tolerant taxa Chironomidae. In a controlled lab environment, macroinvertebrates were exposed to approximately 100,000 cells/ml of Microcystis aeruginosa. The survival percentage was lower for macroinvertebrates exposed to Microcystis aeruginosa in all three tolerance groups (p < 0.001) while corresponding with the pollution tolerance levels of the species. Mayflies had a survival percentage of 38% in the treatment groups compared to a 98% survival percentage for control groups. Damselflies had a 43% survival percentage in the treatment groups compared to a 98% survival percentage in the control groups. Midges had a 72% survival percentage in the treatment groups compared to a 100% survival percentage in the control groups. These findings support the notion that cyanobacterial blooms have deleterious effects on freshwater ecosystems and can affect aquatic food webs.

Share and Cite:

Beck, S. and Wu, M. (2021) Effects of Microcystis aeruginosa on New Jersey Aquatic Benthic Macroinvertebrates. Advances in Microbiology, 11, 165-180. doi: 10.4236/aim.2021.113012.

1. Introduction

1.1. Water Quality and Cyanobacteria

The quality of fresh water around the world has declined in recent decades, decreasing the suitability for human use and for supporting healthy ecosystems. This poses a problem due to fresh water being an invaluable natural resource. Humans rely on fresh water every single day, using it to drink, bathe, and cook as well as for recreational and household purposes. Unhygienic and poor quality of water makes up 3.1% of the world’s deaths [1]. Fresh water also sustains wildlife, including those that are of ecological importance. Aquatic wildlife, particularly plants, insects, and fish, suffers from poor water quality as they can be sensitive to short-term changes. An excess of sediments, road salts, nutrients, and other contaminants can affect the ability for wildlife to persist in freshwater aquatic ecosystems, eventually altering the structure and dynamics of these delicate environments. One major factor related to the decline in water quality is an increase in cyanobacterial abundance in many freshwater systems [2].

Cyanobacteria are organisms with characteristics of both bacteria and algae; they contain blue-green pigments and, unlike other bacteria, perform photosynthesis, giving them the name “blue-green algae” [3]. Cyanobacteria have been extant for an estimated 2.5 billion years, making them the oldest oxygenic phototrophic inhabitants on Earth [4]. Among cyanobacteria taxa, Microcystisspp. are among the most pervasive and often produce toxins [2], rendering these species as a common threat to the welfare of freshwater ecosystems throughout the United States, and especially in New Jersey [5]. Microcystisspp. can produce the toxins Microcystins, Anatoxin-a, β-N-methylamino-L-alanine (BMAA), and Lipopolysaccharide (LPS) [6]. Microcystin exposure in humans can lead to adverse health effects ranging from a mild skin rash to serious illness; unexplained sickness and death have been observed in dogs and other domestic animals that have come in contact with bodies of water containing high concentrations of microcystins [5].

1.2. Cyanobacterial Harmful Algal Blooms

When conditions are right, cyanobacteria can experience rapid population growth, called a cyanobacterial harmful algal bloom (CyanoHAB). CyanoHAB is a worldwide phenomenon, commonly occurring in fresh water, estuaries, and coastal marine ecosystems [7]. Occurrences of CyanoHAB have become common in watersheds primarily due to increases in anthropogenic sources contributing to heightened inputs of limiting nutrients [8]. Increases in limiting nutrients, such as nitrogen and phosphorus, can lead to eutrophication, which is a major stressor in freshwater ecosystems caused by runoff containing agricultural fertilizers, urban pollution, and sewage discharge [9]. This enrichment of nutrients in waterbodies provides cyanobacteria the resources to rapidly multiply and create a bloom [10]. Water temperature is also a major contributing factor to CyanoHAB. Blooms usually occur from spring to fall when water temperatures are warm but can last year round, especially in New Jersey. Warmer temperatures prevent water from mixing in waterbodies that tend to be stagnant or slow moving, including lakes, reservoirs, and ponds, which is known as stratification, allowing cyanobacteria to grow faster and in thicker mats [11]. Climate change has intensified CyanoHAB around the world through warming and increasing hydrologic variability [10]. Changes in rainfall patterns have led to increased precipitation frequency and magnitude, heightening nutrient runoffs into waterbodies [12].

The World Health Organization (WHO) has determined that human exposure at a density between 20,000 cells/ml and 100,000 cells/ml can result in a moderate probability of acute health effects [3]. The New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection (NJDEP) defines a CyanoHAB event as a cyanobacterial cell density of 20,000 cells/ml or higher [5] [13]. The NJDEP has developed a 5-tier system, Alert Levels (Watch, Alert, Advisory, Warning, Danger), that is based on a bloom’s cyanotoxin level and cyanobacterial cell concentrations [5]. This system provides guidance and advice for recreational exposure to CyanoHAB and their toxins. The NJDEP considers a CyanoHAB containing 100,000 cells/ml or more in the advisory, warning, and danger tiers, capable of producing very high adverse health effects [5]. In 2019, New Jersey saw a 45% increase in confirmed CyanoHAB events compared to 2017 and 2018; events included 25 bathing beaches and 4 drinking water sources [14]. 73% of those CyanoHAB events were above 100,000 cells/ml, the highest cell count being 56,300,000 cells/ml at Rosedale Lake [14]. CyanoHAB are problematic for humans, reducing access to clean and safe water for drinking and recreational purposes [15], reducing fisheries production potential [16], and negatively affecting human health through cyanotoxin accumulation in edible fish tissue [17].

1.3. Benthic Macroinvertebrates

CyanoHAB have led to the mortality of fish, benthic organisms, and other wildlife that live in and near freshwater ecosystems through direct cyanobacteria toxin exposure and bioaccumulation of toxins in food webs [4]. One group that is particularly vulnerable to cyanobacteria is aquatic benthic macroinvertebrates, which are a vital trophic link between primary producers, detritus, and consumers [18]. Due to their high taxonomic diversity, position in freshwater ecosystem food webs, and variety of feeding habits and habitat tolerances, benthic macroinvertebrates are functional ecosystem health indicators [4], commonly used as bioindicators to assess ecosystem health and determine if an ecosystem is experiencing anthropogenic ecological degradation [19].

Benthic macroinvertebrates regulate water quality, decomposition, and nutrient cycling in freshwater ecosystems [20]. They comprise different functional feeding groups due to variation in behavioral mechanisms of acquiring food. These groups include scrapers, shredders, gatherers, filterers, and predators, all of which provide a balance to the trophic dynamics of a benthic ecosystem by consuming a variety of foods such as algae, detritus, leaf litter, suspended organic particles, and other small organisms [21]. When an imbalance of this community structure occurs, the detrital food web and rate of decomposition can be disrupted, slowing down the recycling of nutrients and organic material.

The United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) has categorized benthic macroinvertebrates into three groups based on their tolerance to pollution: intolerant, moderately intolerant, and tolerant. CyanoHAB can lead to mortality in benthic organisms through clogged respiratory structures, oxygen depletion, and toxicity [22]. Cyanobacteria, specifically Microcystisspp., has led to mortality in invertebrates such as Daphnia spp. [23] , brine shrimp, Artemiasalina [24] , and copepods [25]. Microcystisspp. has also been observed to kill the aquatic mosquito larvae, Aedesaegypti [26]. However, an understanding of how cyanobacteria can disrupt communities of benthic macroinvertebrates across pollution tolerance groups remains incomplete.

This study aims to investigate the effect of Microcystisaeruginosa on the survival of benthic macroinvertebrates, across three pollution tolerance groups, intolerant, moderately intolerant, and tolerant. For this study, I tested immature stadia of the pollution intolerant taxa Ephemeroptera, mayfly nymphs, pollution moderately intolerant taxa Zygoptera, damselfly nymphs, and pollution tolerant taxa Chironomidae, midge larvae [27], in a lab setting. Mayflies, damselflies, and midges share a natural habitat in New Jersey freshwater ecosystems and are each in a different macroinvertebrate pollution tolerance group. Mayflies are considered to be important in freshwater ecosystems and are commonly used as ecological indicators as they are sensitive to environmental changes [28]. Mayflies are primarily collector-gatherer detritivores but can also be herbivores and carnivores [29]. They mainly scrape periphyton off substrate and consume algae and detritus [30]. Mayflies are incredibly important in aquatic food webs as they are the main food source for many fish species [31]. Damselflies are instrumental to aquatic ecosystems. Their life histories change when their habitats switch from aquatic to terrestrial environments; they are predators in aquatic ecosystems and prey in terrestrial ecosystems [32]. Midges are considered to be the most abundant and diverse group of benthic macroinvertebrates [33]. Midges are opportunistic omnivores, consuming decomposed plant and animal matters, diatoms, and algae [34]. Their different feeding behaviors, usually gathering, filter feeding, and sometimes predatory, contribute to the recycling of organic matter, making them an integral part of aquatic food webs [9].

CyanoHAB may affect benthic macroinvertebrate community structure by reducing populations of less pollution-tolerant macroinvertebrate species, thus disrupting the composition of benthic macroinvertebrate communities. Such disruptions may affect the structure and function of entire food webs. The objective of this study is to determine if by exposing benthic macroinvertebrates from different pollution tolerance groups to Microcystisaeruginosa, as compared to the control group that was not exposed to Microcystisaeruginosa, the benthic macroinvertebrates would sustain a significantly higher mortality which would roughly correspond to their respective pollution tolerance levels.

2. Methods and Materials

2.1. Study Organisms

Ephemeroptera nymphs, Zygoptera nymphs, and Chironomidae larvae were collected from a manmade lake, Lake Wapalanne, in Sandyston, New Jersey in November of 2019. Macroinvertebrates were identified using the NJDEP’s Ambient Biological Monitoring Using Benthic Macroinvertebrates: Field, Lab, and Assessment Methods Standard Operation Procedure. Located in a watershed within forest landscape and protected land, Lake Wapalanne is fed by Big Flat Brook, with controlled outflow by a weir.

Experiments were conducted on either of the two Ephemerellidae genera, E. ephemerella and E. eurylophella, as these organisms naturally inhabit the benthos of Lake Wapalanne and its tributaries. E. ephemerella and E. eurylophella are considered scrapers and collectors, feeding on available periphyton found on substrate [35]. The Chironomidae species Chironomusriparius larvae were used in the experiment. This species, which are collector-gatherers, feed mainly on detritus [36] The experiment examined a combination of the three Zygoptera genera, Calopterygidaecalopteryx, Coenagrionidaeenallagma, and Lestidaelestes, as these organisms naturally inhabit the benthos of Lake Wapalanne and its tributaries, and have similar habitat preferences, feeding behaviors, and life histories [35]. C. calopteryx,C. enallagma, and L. lestes are predators in their environment, feeding mainly on small invertebrates [35]

Microcystisaeruginosa was cultured from a stock of Microcystisaeruginosa, originally purchased from UTEX Culture Collection of Algae at The University of Texas at Austin, using the Cyanobacteria BG-11 Freshwater Solution (50X, Sigma Aldrich) in an environmental growth chamber with light and temperature control at Montclair State University. The growth chamber maintained a temperature between 23 and 25 degrees Celsius with a light cycle of twelve hours of light followed by twelve hours of dark.

2.2. Experimental Design

Immediately after collection, macroinvertebrates were transported back to Montclair State University’s greenhouse. After four weeks of acclimation, benthic macroinvertebrates were maintained in two 95L black plastic bins (one treatment and one control) that contained 28L of dechlorinated tap water in order to mimic the natural environment at the bottom of shallow aquatic ecosystems.

Benthic macroinvertebrates were randomly allocated into 30.5 centimeters tall plastic pipes, each with a diameter of 7.6 centimeters (Figure 1). The three macroinvertebrate pollution tolerance groups were replicated four times in each bin, making a total of twelve plastic pipes per bin; there were fifteen individuals

Figure 1. Diagram of experimental design.

in each plastic pipe. Two sections, each measuring 5 centimeters wide and 25.4 centimeters long, were cut out of plastic pipes and covered with fiberglass mesh (pore size 1 mm2), to allow water and Microcystisaeruginosa cells to flow freely through plastic pipes but keep macroinvertebrates inside (Figure 1). Gravel and Potamogetonperfoliatus L. (clasping leaf pondweed) were taken from the lake and placed in the plastic pipes to mimic a natural lake environment.

CyanoHAB usually take place in the summer and fall months when water temperature is warm, therefore experiments were conducted in a temperature-controlled greenhouse. Cyanobacteria and its growth rate show a strong response to high water temperatures, usually above 25 degrees Celsius [10]; thermometers and water heaters were used to maintain a water temperature of 20 to 25 degrees Celsius. Aerators were used to keep water oxygenated and circulated. In this study, the treatment group was inoculated with M. aeruginosa at a concentration of approximately 100,000 cells/ml. Microcystisaeruginosa cell count was monitored every three days and maintained as needed using a microscope. Macroinvertebrate survival was checked every six days for a 36-day period to determine macroinvertebrate survival and mortality. Individuals were confirmed dead by the absence of body or gill movement. Macroinvertebrates that emerged into terrestrial adults during the experiment were considered alive during data analysis.

2.3. Statistical Analysis

To test for differences in survival percentages among the treatments (insect type and cyanobacteria presence), I used a generalized linear model with a binomial distribution which approximates a logistic regression with categorical data. A binomial distribution is often used when testing for differences in percentages or ratios among groups. I then conducted a Tukey’s posthoc analysis to test for specific differences among the groups, comparing each species and the treatment and control groups for each species. One-way ANOVA was used to test for differences in means in total surviving macroinvertebrates between control and treatment groups. A p-value of less than 0.05 is considered statistically significant for this study. For this analysis, I used the glm and TukeyHSDfunctions, along with the Anova function in the car package in R.

3. Results

3.1. Benthic Macroinvertebrate Survival

Microcystisaeruginosa presence (χ2 = 5.8809, df= 1, p = 0.01531) and insect type (χ2 = 1.6738, df= 2, p = 0.43305) predicted the survival percentage of the macroinvertebrates, but there was no interaction (χ2 = 0.3232, df= 2, p = 0.85079) between Microcystisaeruginosa presence and insect type (Table 1). The Tukey’s posthoc test revealed that the presence of Microcystisaeruginosa had a significant effect on the number of surviving mayflies (p < 0.001), damselflies (p < 0.001), and midges (p < 0.001) (Figure 2). The Tukey’s test also revealed a significant difference between midge survival percentages and the survival percentages of both mayflies and damselflies, but the difference between mayfly and damselfly survival rates was not statistically significant. This demonstrates that mayflies (pollution intolerant) and damselflies (moderately intolerant) had similar responses to Microcystisaeruginosa in terms of mortality. In the treatment, there was no significant difference between the survival percentages of each macroinvertebrate pollution tolerance group.

The mean survival percentage for treatment groups exposed to Microcystisaeruginosa was substantially lower than the mean survival percentage for control groups not exposed to Microcystisaeruginosa (p < 0.001). Mayflies had a survival percentage of 38% in the Microcystisaeruginosa treatment group compared to a 98% survival percentage in the control group (Figure 3). Damselflies had a survival percentage of 43% in the Microcystisaeruginosa treatment group compared to a 98% survival percentage in the control group (Figure 3). Midges had a survival percentage of 72% in the Microcystisaeruginosa treatment group compared to a 100% survival percentage in the control group (Figure 3).

Table 1. Generalized linear model results showing the effect of Microcystisaeruginosa on the survival of the different benthic macroinvertebrates. Significant results are in bold.

Figure 2. The mean number of surviving mayflies, damselflies, and midges after being exposed to Microcystisaeruginosa compared to the mean number of surviving mayflies, damselflies, and midges in the control group (p < 0.05).

Figure 3. The survival percentage of mayflies, damselflies, and midges after being exposed to Microcystisaeruginosa compared to the survival percentage of mayflies, damselflies, and midges in the control group (p < 0.05).

In the treatment group, the percentage of individuals that died corresponded with their respective pollution tolerance levels: mayflies (pollution intolerant) died earliest on average and in the highest total number of deaths, and midges (pollution tolerant) died the latest on average and in the lowest total number of deaths, while these values for damselflies (moderately intolerant) fell in between (Figure 4). In the control group, there was only one death recorded for mayflies and damselflies, which occurred at the seventh week (Figure 4).

3.2. Number of Surviving Insects

These results can also be demonstrated in terms of mean surviving insects of 15 macroinvertebrates, including insects that emerged (Table 2). A notable dissimilarity in the number of emerged macroinvertebrates occurred between treatment and control groups. Among treatment mayflies, zero emerged, whereas seven emerged in the control group. One damselfly emerged in the treatment group, and nine emerged in the control group. No midges emerged in either group. The several emerged individuals in the control group could be a result of normal macroinvertebrate growth in a healthy environment. Microcystisaeruginosa appeared to have a substantial effect on either the growth or ability to emerge for certain macroinvertebrates (Figure 5). Due to the emergence of insects, some individuals did not remain present in the full experiment, which should be taken into consideration.

Figure 4. The comparative mean survival percentage of mayflies, damselflies, and midges exposed and not exposed to Microcystisaeruginosa (p < 0.05) over a 36 day period, in intervals of every 6 days.

Table 2. Mean surviving mayflies, damselflies, and midges exposed to Microcystisaeruginosa compared to mean surviving mayflies, damselflies, and midges in the treatment group. Table includes number of emerged insects.

Figure 5. The number of emerged mayflies, damselflies, and midges exposed to Microcystisaeruginosa compared to the number of emerged mayflies, damselflies, and midges not exposed to Microcystisaeruginosa.

4. Discussion

A previous study on the survival of mayflies [37] when exposed to microcystin-LR documented similar findings, where 20% of egg hatchlings died in a seven-day period when exposed to lower toxin concentrations of 0.01 μg/ml; 100% of egg hatchlings died within five days when exposed to a higher concentration of microcystin-LR of 10.0 μg/ml. Microcystisaeruginosa had a negative effect on the survival of the macroinvertebrates in this experiment, reducing the survival by more than 60% in the most sensitive group, Ephemeroptera. Mayflies are particularly sensitive to poor water quality and pollution and had the lowest survival percentage, 38%.

In a previous study where the different mayfly larval stages were exposed to microcystins, the eggs required two extra days for 90% to emerge [37] In addition, 20% of the egg hatchlings (young nymphs) exposed to typical bloom conditions (0.01 μg/ml) died within a seven-day period, and at the highest concentration (10 μg/ml), 100% of egg hatchlings died after five days [37]. Microcystins, therefore, had a negative effect on the emergence time of mayfly eggs and the survival of egg hatchlings thereafter. A similar response occurred in this study where Microcystisaeruginosa delayed or prohibited nymphs from emerging into terrestrial insects. Since benthic macroinvertebrates have different larval stages that are a part of aquatic and terrestrial ecosystems, exposure could affect both food webs in a natural setting.

CyanoHAB have been shown to reduce feeding rates for not only filter feeding taxa [38], but for visual predators due to reduced water quality and light [39]. Damselflies are visual predators and thrive in waters that have limited suspended particles, high visibility and high oxygen levels. CyanoHAB create an unfavorable environment for damselflies, with increasing suspended particles, decreasing visibility, and deoxygenating bottom waters [4]. Midges and mosquito larvae are both pollution tolerant. In a study, where mosquito larvae were exposed to Microcystisaeruginosa and toxic strains of Anabaena circinalis and Oscillatoriaagardhii, the larvae developed lesions in their epithelial cells just after a 24-hour exposure period [40]. Microcystisaeruginosa and cyanotoxins that it produces can affect benthic macroinvertebrates by being ingested or diffused across the cuticle, egg, or gill membranes [37]. However, the exact nature of the effects of Microcystisaeruginosa and other cyanobacteria exposure is difficult to determine due to the limited information available regarding the toxicity to benthic macroinvertebrates. A consideration for future research on the effects of Microcystisaeruginosa on benthic macroinvertebrates is that studies should take into account that each macroinvertebrate species likely has a unique tolerance to Microcystisaeruginosa. Although Microcystisaeruginosa had an effect on these specific species of macroinvertebrates, that may not be the case for other species of the same taxonomic order.

The survival results for each species of macroinvertebrates in this experiment corresponded with the pollution tolerance levels of the species, and the mean number of pollution-tolerant midges was significantly different than the mean number of surviving mayflies and damselflies, indicating that pollution tolerance should be a consideration in future studies of benthic macroinvertebrates and exposure to CyanoHAB, especially when Microcystisaeruginosa is present. In the control groups, there is no statistical difference in survival means between any macroinvertebrate species. These results further suggest that measures to mitigate or control CyanoHAB, specifically their monitoring and evaluation components, should consider the relationship between macroinvertebrate survival percentages as it pertains to Microcystisaeruginosa exposure and pollution tolerance levels. Further research is needed to determine how broader populations of pollution-tolerant macroinvertebrate species such as midges are affected by CyanoHAB in relation to populations of less pollution-tolerant macroinvertebrate species. If pollution-tolerant macroinvertebrates have higher survival probabilities to CyanoHAB than less tolerant species, this could result in changes to community structure, resulting in changes in ecosystem functions and services. Benthic macroinvertebrates are among the most diverse [41] and ubiquitous [42] organisms in freshwater ecosystems, giving them a vital ecological role. Because benthic macroinvertebrates are an important trophic link between primary producers and consumers [18], a shift in abundance and diversity could affect each trophic level to which these macroinvertebrates are connected [43].

As anthropogenic eutrophication and climate change increase the magnitude and frequency of CyanoHAB events around the world, the need to understand how blooms affect aquatic ecosystems is paramount. Further, Microcystisaeruginosa was shown to kill benthic macroinvertebrates at different rates relative to their pollution tolerance group, thus reducing biodiversity and abundance. Because this study suggests a link between CyanoHAB and a reduction in biodiversity among benthic macroinvertebrate communities, climate change should be approached with even greater urgency because of the critical role macroinvertebrate biodiversity plays in an ecosystem. Since macroinvertebrates are environmental indicators, the mortality displayed in this study and previous studies demonstrates that CyanoHAB can have deleterious effects on freshwater ecosystems.

Future studies should be conducted in the lab and field in order to better understand the impacts of CyanoHAB on the structure, function, and dynamics of aquatic as well as terrestrial food webs. In addition, studying the effects that different concentrations of cyanobacteria have on aquatic organisms could help predict its threats to ecosystems, especially in freshwater environments that experience recurring CyanoHAB events within a year. Beyond the direct effects that climate change has on increasing the magnitude and frequency of CyanoHAB, future studies should investigate how other aspects of climate change, such as warmer temperatures, more or less rainfall, species migration, etc., interact with cyanobacteria and its effects on benthic macroinvertebrate communities. Finally, future research on the effects of Microcystisspp. should take into account that each macroinvertebrate species likely has a unique reaction to cyanobacteria.

5. Conclusion

The present study demonstrated that Microcystisaeruginosa, in high concentrations causes increased mortality in benthic macroinvertebrates in correspondence to their pollution tolerance levels. Additionally, Microcystisaeruginosa delayed or prevented macroinvertebrate nymphs from emerging into terrestrial stadia. Previous studies have also shown that Microcystisaeruginosa and other cyanobacteria cause mortality in aquatic fauna, including insects, fish, and vegetation. This study provides a new perspective on possible ecological changes caused by CyanoHAB. However, many questions about how CyanoHAB affects the structure of both aquatic and terrestrial food webs remain unanswered. Future research on the effects of Microcystisaeruginosa should take into account that each benthic macroinvertebrate species likely has a unique reaction to cyanobacteria. Although Microcystisaeruginosa had an effect on these specific species of macroinvertebrates, that may not be the case for other species of the same taxonomic order. Moreover, cyanobacteria seem to have the ability to take advantage of an increasingly warming world. Researchers should focus on how this advantage will affect freshwater ecosystems ecologically and economically in the future as bloom events continue to increase.

Acknowledgements

This project is funded by the New Jersey Center for Water Science and Technology at Montclair State University. The authors thank Ms. Yaritza Acosta-Carabello and Ms. Anne Hurley for their assistance in the laboratory. The authors want to extend our gratitude to Dr. Matthew Schuler for the guidance and assistance in statistical analysis.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this paper.

References

[1] Pawari, M.J. and Gawande, S. (2015) Ground Water Pollution & Its Consequence. International Journal of Engineering Research and General Science, 3, 773-776.
[2] Sivonen, K. and Jones, G.J. (1999) Toxic Cyanobacteria in Water: A Guide to Their Public Health Consequences, Monitoring and Management. WHO, Geneva, 41-111.
[3] World Health Organization (WHO) (2009) Guidelines for Safe Recreational Water Environments.
http://www.who.int/water_sanitation_health/publications/srwe1/en
[4] Akamagwuna & Odume (2020) Ephemeroptera, Plecoptera and Trichoptera (EPT) Functional Feeding Group Responses to Fine Grain Sediment Stress in a River in the Eastern Cape, South Africa. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 192, 214.
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32140788
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-020-8187-4
[5] New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection (NJDEP) (2020) 2020 Cyanobacterial Harmful Algal Bloom (HAB) Freshwater Recreational Response Strategy.
[6] Abeysiriwardena, N.M., Gascoigne, S.J.L. and Anandappa, A. (2018) Algal Bloom Expansion Increases Cyanotoxin Risk in Food. The Yale Journal of Biology and Medicine, 91, 129-142.
[7] Bricker, S.B., Longstaff, B., Dennison, W., Jones, A., Boicourt, K., Wicks, C. and Woerner, J. (2008) Effects of Nutrient Enrichment in the Nation’s Estuaries: A Decade of Change. Harmful Algae, 8, 21-32.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hal.2008.08.028
[8] Huisman, J.M., Matthijs, H.C.P. and Visser, P.M. (2005) Harmful Cyanobacteria. Aquatic Ecology Series 3.
https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-3022-3
[9] Stankovic, N., Kostic, I., Jovanovic, B., Savic-Zdravkovic, S., Matic, S., Basic, J., Cvetkovic, T., Simeunovic, J. and Milosevic, D. (2020) Can Phytoplankton Blooming Be Harmful to Benthic Organisms? The Toxic Influence of Anabaena ap. and Chlorella sp. on Chironomus riparius Larvae. Science of the Total Environment, 729, Article ID: 138666.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.138666
[10] Paerl, H.W. (2018) Mitigating Toxic Planktonic Cyanobacterial Blooms in Aquatic Ecosystems Facing Increasing Anthropogenic and Climate Pressures. Toxins, 10, 76-92.
https://doi.org/10.3390/toxins10020076
[11] Hudnell, H.K., Jones, C., Labisi, B., Lucero, V., Hill, D.R. and Eiler, J. (2010) Freshwater Harmful Algal Bloom (FHAB) Suppression with Solar Powered Circulation (SPC). Harmful Algae, 9, 208-217.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hal.2009.10.003
[12] Kunkel, K.E. andsager, K. and Easterling, D.R. (1999) Long-Term Trends in Extreme Precipitation Events over the Conterminous United States and Canada. Climate, 12, 2515-2527.
https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0442(1999)012<2515:LTTIEP>2.0.CO;2
[13] Loftin, K.A., Zeigler, A.C. and Meyer, M.T. (2008) Guidelines for Design and Sampling for Cyanobacterial Toxin and Taste-and-Odor Studies in Lakes and Reservoirs. U.S. Department of Interior, U.S. Geological Survey.
[14] Mcgeorge, L. (2020) Response Strategy, Monitoring and 2017-2019 HAB Events.
https://www.state.nj.us/dep/hab/docs/McGeorgeHAB020420EcoComplex.pdf
[15] Qin, B., Zhu, G., Gao, G., Zhang, Y., Li, W., Pearl, W.W. and Carmichael, W.W. (2010) Drinking Water Crisis in Lake Taihu, China: Linkage to Climatic Variability and Lake Management. Environmental Management, 45, 105-112.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-009-9393-6
[16] Lee, G.F. and Jones, R.A. (1991) Effects of Eutrophication on Fishers. Review of Aquatic Science, 5, 287-305.
[17] Chueng, M.Y., Liang, S. and Lee, J. (2013) Toxin-Producing Cyanobacteria in Freshwater: A Review of the Problems, Impact on Drinking Water Safety, and Efforts for Protecting Public Health. The Journal of Microbiology, 51, 1-10.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12275-013-2549-3
[18] Poirier, A.T. and Cattaneo, A. (2010) Benthic Cyanobacteria and Filamentous Chlorophytes Affect Macroinvertebrates Assemblages in a Large Fluvial Lake. Journal of the North American Benthological Society, 29, 737-749.
https://doi.org/10.1899/09-110.1
[19] Jonsson, M., Polvi, L.E., Sponseller, R.A. and Stenroth, K. (2018) Catchment Properties Predict Autochthony in Stream Filter Feeders. Hydrobiologia, 815, 83-95.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10750-018-3553-8
[20] Wallace, J.B. and Webster, J.R. (1996) The Role of Macroinvertebrates in Stream Ecosystems Function. Annual Review of Entomology, 41, 115-139.
https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.en.41.010196.000555
[21] Barbour, M.T., Gerritsen, J., Snyder, B.D. and Stribling, J.B. (1999) Rapid Bioassessment Protocols for Use in Streams and Wadable Rivers: Periphyton, Benthic Macroinvertebrates and Fish. 2nd Edition, EPA 841-B-99-002, Office of Water, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington DC.
[22] Kroger, K., Gardner, J.P.A., Rowden, A.A. and Wear, R.G. (2006) Long-Term Effect of a Toxic Algal Bloom on Subtidal Soft-Sediment Macroinvertebrate Communities in Wellington Harbour, New Zealand. Estruine, Coastal, and Shelf Science, 67, 589-604.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecss.2005.12.010
[23] DeMott, W.R., Zhang, Q.X. and Carmichael, W.W. (1991) Effects of Toxic Cyanobacteria and Purified Toxins on the Survival and Feeding of a Copepod and Three Species of Daphnia. Limnology and Oceanography, 36, 1346-1357.
https://doi.org/10.4319/lo.1991.36.7.1346
[24] Metcalf, J.S., Lindsay, J., Beattie, K.A., Birmingham, S., Saker, M.L., Toeroekne, A.K. and Codd, G.A. (2002) Toxicity of Cylindrospermopsin to the Brine Shrimp Artemia salina: Comparisons with Protein Synthesis Inhibitors and Microcystins. Toxicon, 40, 1115-1120.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0041-0101(02)00105-8
[25] Reinikainen, M., Lindvall, F., Meriluoto, J.A.O., Repka, S., Sivonen, K., Spoof, L. and Wahlsten, M. (2002) Effects of Dissolved Cyanobacterial Toxins on the Survival and Egg Hatching of Estuarine Calanoid Copepods. Marine Biology, 140, 577-583.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00227-001-0720-6
[26] Kiviranta, J., Abdel-Hameed, A., Sivonen, K., Niemelae, S.I. and Carlberg, G. (1993) Toxicity of Cyanobacteria to Mosquito Larvae-Screening of Active Compounds. Environmental Toxicology Water Quality, 8, 63-71.
https://doi.org/10.1002/tox.2530080107
[27] Voshell Jr., J.R. (2002) A Guide to Common Freshwater Invertebrates of North America. McDonald & Woodward Pub., Newark.
[28] Menetrey, N., Oertli, B., Sartori, M. and Wagner, A. (2008) Eutrophication: Are Mayflies (Ephemeroptera) Good Bioindicators for Ponds? Hydrobiologia, 597, 125-135.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10750-007-9223-x
[29] McShaffrey, D. and McCafferty, W.P. (1991) Ecological Association of the Mayfly Ephemerella needhami (Ephemeroptera: Ephemerellidae) and the Green Alga Cladophora (Chlorophyta: Cladophoraceae). Journal of Freshwater Ecology, 6, 383-394.
https://doi.org/10.1080/02705060.1991.9665318
[30] McShaffrey, D. and McCafferty, W.P. (1990) Feeding Behavior and Related Functional Morphology of the Mayfly Ephemerella needhami (Ephemeroptera: Ephemerellidae). Journal of Insect Behavior, 3, 673-688.
https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01052336
[31] Morse, J.C., Stark, B.P., McCafferty, W.P. and Tennessen, K.J. (1997) Southern Appalachian and Other Southeastern Streams at Risk: Implications for Mayflies, Dragonflies, and Damselflies, Stoneflies, and Caddisflies. In: Benz, G.W. and Collins, D.E., Eds., Aquatic Fauna in Peril: The Southeastern Perspective, No. 1, Southeast Aquatic Research Institute, 17-42.
[32] Butler, R. and deMaynadier, P. (2008) The Significance of Aquatic and Shoreline Habitat Integrity to the Conservation of Lacustrine Damselflies (Odonota). Journal of Insect Conservation, 12, 23-26.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10841-006-9059-0
[33] Milosevic, D., Simic, V., Stojkovic, M., Cerba, D., Mancev, D., Petrovic, A. and Paunovic, M. (2013) Spatio-Temporal Pattern of the Chironomidae Community: Toward the Use of Non-Biting Midges in Bioassessment Programs. Aquatic Ecology, 47, 37-55.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10452-012-9423-y
[34] Peckarsky, B.L., Fraissinet, P.R., Conklin, D.J. and Penton, M. (1990) Freshwater Macroinvertebrates of Northeastern North America. Comstock Pub. Associates.
[35] Pennak, R.W. (1978) Fresh-Water Invertebrates of the United States. 2nd Edition, John Wiley and Sons, New York.
[36] Pery, A.R.R., Mons, R., Flammarion, P., Lagadic, L. and Garric, J. (2009) A Modeling Approach to Link Food Availability, Growth, Emergence, and Reproduction for Midge Chironomus riparius. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, 21, 2507-2513.
https://doi.org/10.1002/etc.5620211133
[37] Smith, J.L., Boyer, E.M. and Schulz, K.L. (2007) Toxicity of Microcystin-LR, a Cyanobacterial Toxin, to Multiple Life Stages of the Burrowing Mayfly, Hexagenia, and Possible Implications for Recruitment. Environmental Toxicology, 23, 499-506.
https://doi.org/10.1002/tox.20369
[38] Yang, Z., Kong, F., Shi, X. and Cao, H. (2006) Morphological Response of Microcystis aeruginosa to Grazing by Different Sorts of Zooplankton. Hydrobiologia, 563, 225-230.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10750-005-0008-9
[39] Jiang, X., Yang, W., Zhang, L., Chen, L. and Niu, Y. (2014) Predation and Cyanobacteria Jointly Facilitate Competitive Dominance of Small-Bodied Cladocerans. Journal of Plankton Research, 36, 956-965.
https://doi.org/10.1093/plankt/fbu032
[40] Saario, E., Abdel-Hameed, A. and Kiviranta, J. (1994) Larvicidal Microcystin Toxins of Cyanobacteria Affect Midgut Epithelial Cells of Aedes aegypti Mosquitoes. Medical and Veterinary Entomology, 8, 398-400.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2915.1994.tb00108.x
[41] Strayer, D.L. (2006) Challenges for Freshwater Invertebrate Conservation. Journal of the North American Benthological Society, 25, 271-287.
https://doi.org/10.1899/0887-3593(2006)25[271:CFFIC]2.0.CO;2
[42] Voelz, N.J. and Mcarthur J.V. (2000) An Exploration of Factors Influencing Lotic Insect Species Richness. Biodiversity & Conservation, 9, 1543-1570.
https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008984802844
[43] Maisto, G., Milano, V. and Santorufo, L. (2017) Relationships among Site Characteristics, Taxonomical Structure and Function Trait Distribution of Arthropods in Forest, Urban, and Agricultural Soils of Southern Italy. Ecological Research, 32, 511-521.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11284-017-1464-1

Copyright © 2021 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

Creative Commons License

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.