Psychology

Volume 5, Issue 18 (November 2014)

ISSN Print: 2152-7180   ISSN Online: 2152-7199

Google-based Impact Factor: 1.81  Citations  

Executive and Non-Executive Cognitive Abilities in Teenagers: Differences as a Function of Intelligence

HTML  XML Download Download as PDF (Size: 2626KB)  PP. 2018-2032  
DOI: 10.4236/psych.2014.518205    5,090 Downloads   7,216 Views  Citations

ABSTRACT

Intelligence and cognitive abilities, including executive functions (EF), have been addressed by psychometrics and cognitive psychology, respectively. Studies have found similarities and overlap among constructs, especially between EF and fluid intelligence (Gf). This study’s aim was to investigate in teenagers: 1) the relationships among Gf, crystallized intelligence (Gc), cognitive, and executive abilities; and 2) the differences among groups with average, superior and very superior intelligence in regard to cognitive and executive functions. A total of 120 adolescents aged between 15 and 16 years old were assessed via IQ tests (the WISC III and Raven’s), EF (computer version of the Stroop Test, FAS Verbal Fluency Test, Trail Making Test—part B), and cognitive abilities (Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test [PPVT], Repetition of words and pseudo words Test, the Rey Complex Figure [REY CF]). Low to moderate correlations were found among measures of intelligence and cognitive and executive functions. Even though interrelated, the measures seem to capture somewhat distinct aspects. Subsequently, the participants were divided into three groups according to their performance on Raven’s Test: Group with very superior intelligence (VSI), Group with superior intelligence (SI), and Group with average intelligence (AI). The ANOVA revealed the groups’ significant effect (VSI, SI, AI), that is, the VSI and SI groups tended to perform better on the WISC subtests, in the cognitive measures of the PPVT, Rey CF, and in executive measure (FAS). A tendency of increasingly better performance in the various abilities according to groups was observed, but the hypothesis of greater specific association between Gf and EF was not confirmed. The results show better general performance according to the level of intelligence.

Share and Cite:

Godoy, S. , Dias, N. & Seabra, A. (2014). Executive and Non-Executive Cognitive Abilities in Teenagers: Differences as a Function of Intelligence. Psychology, 5, 2018-2032. doi: 10.4236/psych.2014.518205.

Cited by

[1] Design Cognition while using digital tools: A Distributed Cognition Approach
2021 5th International Conference on …, 2021
[2] Hubungan Inteligensi Dengan Fungsi Eksekutif Pada Anak Gifted Relationship Between Intelligence And Executive Function To Gifted Children
Jurnal Ilmiah Psikologi …, 2021
[3] ИНТЕЛЛЕКТУАЛЬНЫЕ ОСОБЕННОСТИ ЛИЧНОСТИ СТУДЕНТОВ РАЗНОГО УРОВНЯ АДАПТАЦИИ К ОБУЧЕНИЮ В ВУЗЕ
… педагогического университета им …, 2021
[4] Exploring a bidirectional model of executive functions and fluid intelligence across early development
2019
[5] Eksekutive funksjoner og fagprestasjoner
2019
[6] Inhibition, shifting and updating in relation to psychometric intelligence across ability groups in the psychiatric population
Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 2018
[7] Longitudinal associations between components of self-regulation, intelligence and early academic skills
Dissertation, 2017
[8] Predictive Value of Traditional Measures of Executive Function on Broad Abilities of the Cattell–Horn–Carroll Theory of Cognitive Abilities
Assessment, 2017
[9] Funções executivas e cognição social em crianças com transtorno de déficit de atenção e hiperatividade
2017
[10] Hubungan Inteligensi Dengan Fungsi Eksekutif Pada Anak Gifted

Copyright © 2024 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

Creative Commons License

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.