Open Journal of Epidemiology

Volume 3, Issue 1 (February 2013)

ISSN Print: 2165-7459   ISSN Online: 2165-7467

Google-based Impact Factor: 0.53  Citations  

Correlates of self-reported colorectal cancer screening accuracy in a multi-specialty medical group practice

HTML  XML Download Download as PDF (Size: 64KB)  PP. 20-24  
DOI: 10.4236/ojepi.2013.31004    3,527 Downloads   5,866 Views  Citations

ABSTRACT

Purpose: We assessed whether accuracy of self-reported screening for colorectal cancer (CRC) varied by respondent characteristics or healthcare utilization. Methods: From 2005 to 2007, 857 respondents aged 51 - 74 were recruited from a multi-specialty medical group practice to answer a questionnaire about their CRC screening (CRCS) behaviors. Self-reports were compared with administrative and medical records to assess concordance, sensitivity, specificity, and report-to-records ratios for overall CRCS (fecal occult blood test, sigmoidoscopy, and/or colonoscopy). Results: Concordance was good (30.8 to <0.9) or fair (30.7 to <0.8) for most subgroups; respondents with >5 visits outside the clinic had poor (<0.7) concordance. Sensitivity estimates were mostly excellent (30.9) or good but poor for respondents whose healthcare provider did not advise a specific CRCS test. Specificity was poor for the following respondents: 65+ years, males, college graduates, family history of CRC, >5 visits outside of the clinic, or whose healthcare provider advised a specific CRCS test. Respondents 65+ years and with >5 outside visits over-reported CRCS. Conclusions: With few exceptions, self-reports of CRCS in an insured population is reasonably accurate across subgroups. More work is needed to replicate these findings in diverse settings and populations to better understand subgroup differences and improve measures of CRCS. 

Share and Cite:

White, A. , Vernon, S. , Eberth, J. , Tiro, J. , Coan, S. , Abotchie, P. and Greisinger, A. (2013) Correlates of self-reported colorectal cancer screening accuracy in a multi-specialty medical group practice. Open Journal of Epidemiology, 3, 20-24. doi: 10.4236/ojepi.2013.31004.

Cited by

[1] Screening for colorectal cancer in the United States: correlates and time trends by type of test
2021
[2] Screening for Colorectal Cancer in the United States: Correlates and Time Trends by Type of TestColorectal Cancer Screening: Correlates and Time Trends
… Biomarkers & Prevention, 2021
[3] Differences in colorectal cancer screening rates across income strata by levels of urbanization: results from the Canadian Community Health Survey (2013/2014)
Canadian Journal of Public Health, 2018
[4] Residential mobility and CRC screening: A spatial analysis of CRC screening in an urban safety-net clinic
ProQuest Dissertations Publishing, 2016
[5] The genetic ancestry of african americans, latinos, and european Americans across the United States
AJHG, 2015
[6] How many individuals will need to be screened to increase colorectal cancer screening prevalence to 80% by 2018?
Cancer, 2015
[7] Validation of Self-Report of Chest X-Ray Exam at a Prostate, Lung, Colorectal and Ovarian Cancer Screening Trial Center
Reviews on recent clinical trials, 2015
[8] Recent trends in breast, cervical, and colorectal cancer screening test utilization in Canada, using self-reported data from 2008 and 2012
Current Oncology, 2015
[9] Screening for colorectal cancer: Using data to set prevention priorities
Cancer Causes & Control, 2014
[10] The genetic ancestry of African, Latino, and European Americans across the United States.
bioRxiv, 2014
[11] Physician counseling on colorectal cancer screening and receipt of screening among Latino patients
Journal of general internal medicine, 2014
[12] The genetic ancestry of African, Latino, and European Americans across the United States
2014

Copyright © 2024 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

Creative Commons License

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.