Advances in Infectious Diseases

Volume 14, Issue 2 (June 2024)

ISSN Print: 2164-2648   ISSN Online: 2164-2656

Google-based Impact Factor: 0.77  Citations  

Portraying Diabetic Foot Ulcers: Comparative Evaluation of Diabetic Foot Infections versus Diabetic Foot Ulcers

HTML  XML Download Download as PDF (Size: 330KB)  PP. 297-309  
DOI: 10.4236/aid.2024.142022    43 Downloads   298 Views  

ABSTRACT

Background: Confusion often arises in caring for diabetic foot infections and ulcers, especially with antimicrobials; we aim to shed light on this entity and alert healthcare workers to its stewardship. Methods: Records were reviewed between February 2016 and September 2023. Data for patients diagnosed with diabetes and foot ulcers, infected or not, were examined following ICD 9 search terms. Records for patients were included if they were prediabetic/diabetic adults with foot ulcers, more than 18 years old, and on antidiabetic treatment. Patients were excluded if they insulin resistant, with normal HgbA1c levels, wheel-chair dependent, bed-bound, non-diabetic patients, diabetic patients who had vascular lower limb surgery earlier to ulcers, diabetic patients who had aortocoronary bypass, deep venous thrombosis within six months, malignancy, and severe clinical depression. A modified IWGDF/IDSA guidelines definitions for DFI and DFU was considered. Statistical analysis was done using R programming. Statistical methods were employed as appropriate, and a significant P-value was considered for P < 0.05. Results: Most characteristics were well balanced between DFI and DFU, on imaging osteomyelitis and tissue swelling were significantly more in DFI. Endovascular radiological procedures showed angiograms to be considerably more in DFI, while angioplasty was more in DFU, in addition to smoking. Bacteremia was uncommon, and swab cultures were mostly polymicrobial in both ulcers; no clear association with blood bacteria was detected with the polymicrobial growth, though few were concordant. Antimicrobials prescribed for both ulcers were not statistically different except for carbapenems, which were more in DFI (P < 0.0001). Conclusion: Attention should be paid to best practices while caring for diabetic ulcers. These include swab culture interpretations, the use of antimicrobials, and plan management according to DFI or DFU to utilize either local care or combination with antimicrobials.

Share and Cite:

Ramahi, J. , Sharqawi, L. , AL-Najafi, S. , Awwad, E. , Al-Obaidi, H. , Mohammad, A. , Nofal, S. , Al-Janabi, D. , Zuhair, I. , Al-Masaeid, H. , Al-Ithawi, M. , Rasheed, D. , Al-Far, B. , Al-Izi, O. and Al-Bustanji, Q. (2024) Portraying Diabetic Foot Ulcers: Comparative Evaluation of Diabetic Foot Infections versus Diabetic Foot Ulcers. Advances in Infectious Diseases, 14, 297-309. doi: 10.4236/aid.2024.142022.

Cited by

No relevant information.

Copyright © 2024 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

Creative Commons License

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.