Journal of Modern Physics

Volume 9, Issue 9 (August 2018)

ISSN Print: 2153-1196   ISSN Online: 2153-120X

Google-based Impact Factor: 0.86  Citations  h5-index & Ranking

A Possible Solution to the Disagreement about the Hubble Constant

HTML  XML Download Download as PDF (Size: 392KB)  PP. 1827-1837  
DOI: 10.4236/jmp.2018.99116    698 Downloads   1,985 Views  Citations

Affiliation(s)

ABSTRACT

The current disagreement about the Hubble constant H0 was described as a “Crisis in Cosmology”, at the April (2018) Meeting of the American Physical Society, and hence its resolution is of utmost importance. This work proposes that the solution to the disagreement between the Planck Collaboration cosmic microwave background (CMB) value of H0, together with the very close BOSS Collaboration baryon acoustic oscillation (BAO) value, and the significantly higher value of H0 found by the SHOES Collaboration cosmic distance ladder (CDL) work, is due to the fact that the CMB and BAO values of H0 are not for an accelerating universe, as generally believed, but are actually the values for a decelerating universe. In contrast, the CDL value of H0 is indeed that for an accelerating universe. It is shown that by replacing the negative deceleration parameter in the expression for logH0 in the CDL work by a positive deceleration parameter, the value of H0 can be brought down to agree with the CMB and BAO lower values. There is a brief review of the author’s decelerating model based on the Einstein de Sitter universe, augmented by a model of dark energy that does not have a negative pressure, but instead has a non-dispersive index of refraction n, causing the speed of light through the dark energy of intergalactic space to be reduced to c/n. As reported earlier, this assumption is sufficient to accommodate the increase in apparent magnitude of the Type Ia supernovae (SNe Ia). Additional support for the model is presented, together with a proposal for astronomical falsification.

Share and Cite:

Tangherlini, F. (2018) A Possible Solution to the Disagreement about the Hubble Constant. Journal of Modern Physics, 9, 1827-1837. doi: 10.4236/jmp.2018.99116.

Copyright © 2024 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

Creative Commons License

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.