Journal of Modern Physics

Volume 4, Issue 8 (August 2013)

ISSN Print: 2153-1196   ISSN Online: 2153-120X

Google-based Impact Factor: 0.86  Citations  h5-index & Ranking

The Mathematical Foundations of General Relativity Revisited

HTML  Download Download as PDF (Size: 260KB)  PP. 223-239  
DOI: 10.4236/jmp.2013.48A022    6,355 Downloads   9,045 Views  Citations

ABSTRACT

The purpose of this paper is to present for the first time an elementary summary of a few recent results obtained through the application of the formal theory of partial differential equations and Lie pseudogroups in order to revisit the mathematical foundations of general relativity. Other engineering examples (control theory, elasticity theory, electromagnetism) will also be considered in order to illustrate the three fundamental results that we shall provide successively. 1) VESSIOT VERSUS CARTAN: The quadratic terms appearing in the “Riemann tensor” according to the “Vessiot structure equations” must not be identified with the quadratic terms appearing in the well known “Cartan structure equations” for Lie groups. In particular, “curvature + torsion” (Cartan) must not be considered as a generalization of “curvature alone” (Vessiot). 2) JANET VERSUS SPENCER: The “Ricci tensor” only depends on the nonlinear transformations (called “elations” by Cartan in 1922) that describe the “difference” existing between the Weyl group (10 parameters of the Poincaré subgroup + 1 dilatation) and the conformal group of space-time (15 parameters). It can be defined without using the indices leading to the standard contraction or trace of the Riemann tensor. Meanwhile, we shall obtain the number of components of the Riemann and Weyl tensors without any combinatoric argument on the exchange of indices. Accordingly and contrary to the “Janet sequence”, the “Spencer sequence” for the conformal Killing system and its formal adjoint fully describe the Cosserat equations, Maxwell equations and Weyl equations but General Relativity is not coherent with this result. 3) ALGEBRA VERSUS GEOMETRY: Using the powerful methods of “Algebraic Analysis”, that is a mixture of homological agebra and differential geometry, we shall prove that, contrary to other equations of physics (Cauchy equations, Cosserat equations, Maxwell equations), the Einstein equations cannot be “parametrized”, that is the generic solution cannot be expressed by means of the derivatives of a certain number of arbitrary potential-like functions, solving therefore negatively a 1000 $ challenge proposed by J. Wheeler in 1970. Accordingly, the mathematical foundations of electromagnetism and gravitation must be revisited within this formal framework, though striking it may look like. We insist on the fact that the arguments presented are of a purely mathematical nature and are thus unavoidable.

Share and Cite:

J. Pommaret, "The Mathematical Foundations of General Relativity Revisited," Journal of Modern Physics, Vol. 4 No. 8A, 2013, pp. 223-239. doi: 10.4236/jmp.2013.48A022.

Cited by

[1] How Many Structure Constants do Exist in Riemannian Geometry?
Mathematics in Computer Science, 2022
[2] Killing Operator for the Kerr Metric
arXiv preprint arXiv:2211.00064, 2022
[3] Minimum Resolution of the Minkowski, Schwarzschild and Kerr Differential Modules
arXiv preprint arXiv:2203.11694, 2022
[4] Nonlinear Conformal Electromagnetism
Journal of Modern Physics, 2022
[5] Minimum Parametrization of the Cauchy Stress Operator
2021
[6] Differential Correspondences and Control Theory
2021
[7] How Many Structure Constants Do Exist in Riemannian Geometry
2021
[8] Homological Solution of the Lanczos Problems in Arbitrary Dimension
2021
[9] Nonlinear Conformal Electromagnetism and Gravitation
2020
[10] The Conformal Group Revisited
2020
[11] A Mathematical Comparison of the Schwarzschild and Kerr Metrics
2020
[12] Generating Compatibility Conditions and General Relativity
2019
[13] Differential Homological Algebra and General Relativity
2019
[14] The Mathematical Foundations of Elasticity and Electromagnetism Revisited
2019
[15] A Mathematical Comment on Lanczos Potential Theory
2019
[16] Generating Compatibility Conditions in Mathematical Physics
2018
[17] From Elasticity to Electromagnetism: Beyond the Mirror
2018
[18] Minkowski, Schwarzschild and Kerr Metrics Revisited
2018
[19] Homological Solution of the Riemann-Lanczos and Weyl-Lanczos Problems in Arbitrary Dimension
2018
[20] Computer Algebra and Lanczos Potential
2018
[21] Algebraic Analysis and Mathematical Physics
2017
[22] Algebraic analysis and general relativity
Pré-publication, Document de travail, 2017
[23] Why Gravitational Waves Cannot Exist
2017
[24] Differential algebra and mathematical physics
2017
[25] A mathematical comment on gravitational waves
2017
[26] Bianchi identities for the Riemann and Weyl tensors
arXiv preprint arXiv:1603.05030, 2016
[27] Airy, Beltrami, Maxwell, Einstein and Lanczos Potentials Revisited
2016
[28] From Thermodynamics to Gauge Theory: The Virial Theorem Revisited
2015
[29] Clausius/Cosserat/Maxwell/Weyl Equations: The Viral Theorem Revisited
arXiv preprint arXiv:1504.04118, 2015
[30] Pure Differential Modules and a Result of Macaulay on Unmixed Polynomial Ideals
arXiv preprint arXiv:1507.07233, 2015
[31] Airy, Beltrami, Maxwell, Morera, Einstein and Lanczos potentials revisited
arXiv preprint arXiv:1512.05982, 2015
[32] Macaulay inverse systems and Cartan-Kahler theorem
arXiv preprint arXiv:1411.7070, 2014
[33] ALGEBRAIC ANALYSIS AND ITS APPLICATIONS
2013
[34] Relative parametrization of linear multidimensional systems
Multidimensional Systems and Signal Processing, 2013
[35] The mathematical foundations of gauge theory revisited
arXiv preprint arXiv:1310.4686, 2013

Copyright © 2024 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

Creative Commons License

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.