Journal of Mathematical Finance

Volume 2, Issue 1 (February 2012)

ISSN Print: 2162-2434   ISSN Online: 2162-2442

Google-based Impact Factor: 0.87  Citations  h5-index & Ranking

A Comparison of VaR Estimation Procedures for Leptokurtic Equity Index Returns

HTML  Download Download as PDF (Size: 2059KB)  PP. 13-30  
DOI: 10.4236/jmf.2012.21002    5,380 Downloads   10,742 Views  Citations

ABSTRACT

The paper presents and tests Dynamic Value at Risk (VaR) estimation procedures for equity index returns. Volatility clustering and leptokurtosis are well-documented characteristics of such time series. An ARMA (1, 1)-GARCH (1, 1) approach models the inherent autocorrelation and dynamic volatility. Fattailed behavior is modeled in two ways. In the first approach, the ARMA-GARCH process is run assuming alternatively that the standardized residuals are distributed with Pearson Type IV, Johnson SU, Manly’s exponential transformation, normal and t-distributions. In the second approach, the ARMA-GARCH process is run with the pseudonormal assumption, the parameters calculated with the pseudo maximum likelihood procedure, and the standardized residuals are later alternatively modeled with Mixture of Normal distributions, Extreme Value Theory and other power transformations such as John-Draper, Bickel-Doksum, Manly, Yeo-Johnson and certain combinations of the above. The first approach yields five models, and the second ap-proach yields nine. These are tested with six equity index return time series using rolling windows. These models are compared by computing the 99%, 97.5% and 95% VaR violations and contrasting them with the expected number of violations.

Share and Cite:

M. Bhattacharyya and S. Madhav R, "A Comparison of VaR Estimation Procedures for Leptokurtic Equity Index Returns," Journal of Mathematical Finance, Vol. 2 No. 1, 2012, pp. 13-30. doi: 10.4236/jmf.2012.21002.

Cited by

[1] Value-at-Risk Estimation of Precious Metal Returns using Long Memory GARCH Models with Heavy-Tailed Distribution
Journal of Statistics …, 2022
[2] Can Choice of Reference Density Improve Power of M-Estimation Based Unit Root Tests?
Journal of Mathematical Finance, 2022
[3] Transformational Approach to Analytical Value-at-Risk for near Normal Distributions
2021
[4] How Risky Are the Options? A Comparison with the Underlying Stock Using MaxVaR as a Risk Measure
2020
[5] ANALISIS PERBANDINGAN NILAI VALUE AT RISK PADA METODE SIMULASI HISTORIS DAN METODE TRANSFORMASI JOHNSON (Studi Kasus Pada PT. Astra Agro Lestari, Tbk.)
BIMASTER, 2019
[6] 极值指标下平稳序列的风险测度
2018
[7] Risk Measurement of Stationary Sequence Under Extreme Value Index
2018
[8] Sustainable energy consumption in northeast asia: A Case from China's fuel oil futures market
Sustainability, 2018
[9] El marco regulatorio para riesgo de mercado basado en modelos VaR de Basilea II: un análisis en el contexto de la crisis financiera del año 2007
Thesis, 2016
[10] Modelagem condicional e específica de risco: qual o futuro das empresas X?
2016
[11] Postmodern Portfolio Theory
Postmodern Portfolio Theory, 2016
[12] Parametric VaR Analysis
Postmodern Portfolio Theory, 2016
[13] Estimation of dynamic VaR using JSU and PIV distributions
Risk Management, 2016
[14] Value-at-Risk and backtesting with the APARCH model and the standardized Pearson type IV distribution
Available at SSRN 2734058, 2016
[15] Estimation of dynamic VaR using JS U and PIV distributions
2016
[16] Evaluation of the South African equity markets in a value-at-risk framework
2015
[17] 非独立序列的 POT 模型及其在汇率风险中的应用
江苏大学学报: 社会科学版, 2015
[18] Quantification of VaR: A Note on VaR Valuation in the South African Equity Market
Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 2015
[19] Impact of non-normal return and market capitalization on estimation of VaR
Journal of Indian Business Research, 2015
[20] Modelos VaR para calcular el capital mínimo regulatorio por riesgo de mercado
Papeles de Europa, 2015
[21] Semiparametric density forecasting of electricity load for smart charging of electric vehicles
Control Applications (CCA), 2015 IEEE Conference on, 2015
[22] Extreme value theory, asset ranking and threshold choice: a practical note on VaR estimation
Journal of Risk, 2015
[23] MODELOS VAR PARA CALCULAR EL CAPITAL MÍNIMO REGULATORIO POR RIESGO DE MERCADO/VAR MODELS TO CALCULATE THE MINUMUN …
Papeles de Europa, 2015
[24] Sensitivity of Value at Risk estimation to NonNormality of returns and Market capitalization
2014
[25] Non-monotonic pricing kernel and an extended class of mixture of distributions for option pricing
Review of Derivatives Research, 2014
[26] ANALISIS NILAI RISIKO (VALUE AT RISK) MENGGUNAKAN UJI KEJADIAN BERNOULLI (BERNOULLI COVERAGE TEST)(Studi Kasus pada Indeks Harga Saham Gabungan)
Jurnal Gaussian, 2014
[27] A Quantile Regression Approach to Estimate Value at Risk: Evidence from China Stock Market
管理科學與統計決策, 2013

Copyright © 2024 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

Creative Commons License

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.