Author(s)

Douglas Chesley Gill

Independent Researcher, Midland, Canada.

Is the mathematical description of the Universe quantum, classical, both or neither? The mandated assumption of rationalism is that if an argument is inconsistent, it is flawed for a conclusion. However, suppose the structural basis of the Universe is fundamentally inconsistent. In that case, paradoxes in the frameworks of logic and mathematics would not be anomalies. A geometric model with a counter-rational framework of inconsistent relationships is applied to analyze Hardy’s paradox, the fine structure constant, and the general relationship between the correlated quantum and classical EPR-type structures. The model conjectures that the well-studied paradoxes found in theoretical arguments and empirically in EPR phenomena are not anomalies and instead point to a new framework for modelling universal structures that incorporates inconsistency.

Hardy’s Paradox, Fine Structure Constant, Coupling Constant (e), EPR Phenomena, Bell’s Theorem, Universal State, Paradox, Russell’s Paradox

Gill, D. (2024) Is the Mathematics of the Universe—Quantum, Classical, Both or Neither? A Geometric Model. Open Journal of Philosophy, 14, 424-440. doi: 10.4236/ojpp.2024.142027.