|
[1]
|
Rhinoplasty
2023
DOI:10.1016/B978-0-323-69775-0.00030-5
|
|
|
|
|
[2]
|
Conventional Rotary Technique and Piezosurgical Technique in the Removal of Impacted Mandibular Third Molar: A Comparative Study
The Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice,
2023
DOI:10.5005/jp-journals-10024-3469
|
|
|
|
|
[3]
|
A Pilot Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial Comparing Piezo Versus Conventional Rotary Surgery for Removal of Impacted Mandibular Third Molars
Bioengineering,
2022
DOI:10.3390/bioengineering9070276
|
|
|
|
|
[4]
|
A Pilot Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial Comparing Piezo Versus Conventional Rotary Surgery for Removal of Impacted Mandibular Third Molars
Bioengineering,
2022
DOI:10.3390/bioengineering9070276
|
|
|
|
|
[5]
|
Periotome versus piezotome as an aid for atraumatic extraction: a randomized controlled trial
Journal of the Korean Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons,
2022
DOI:10.5125/jkaoms.2022.48.6.356
|
|
|
|
|
[6]
|
“Piezosurgery vs bur in impacted mandibular third molar surgery: Evaluation of postoperative sequelae”
Journal of Oral Biology and Craniofacial Research,
2019
DOI:10.1016/j.jobcr.2019.06.007
|
|
|
|
|
[7]
|
Randomized clinical study comparing Piezoelectric Surgery with conventional rotatory osteotomy in mandibular third molars surgeries
The Saudi Dental Journal,
2019
DOI:10.1016/j.sdentj.2019.11.010
|
|
|
|
|
[8]
|
Piezotome-Genioplasty reduces post-surgical morbidity and enhances patient satisfaction: a randomized clinical trial
Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery,
2018
DOI:10.1016/j.joms.2018.02.015
|
|
|
|
|
[9]
|
Cutting bone with drills, burs, lasers and piezotomes: A comprehensive systematic review and recommendations for the clinician
International Journal of Oral and Craniofacial Science,
2017
DOI:10.17352/2455-4634.000028
|
|
|
|
|
[10]
|
Piezoelectric compared with conventional rotary osteotomy for the prevention of postoperative sequelae and complications after surgical extraction of mandibular third molars: a systematic review and meta-analysis
British Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery,
2016
DOI:10.1016/j.bjoms.2016.07.020
|
|
|
|
|
[11]
|
Does the piezoelectric surgical technique produce fewer postoperative sequelae after lower third molar surgery than conventional rotary instruments? A systematic review and meta analysis
International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery,
2016
DOI:10.1016/j.ijom.2015.10.005
|
|
|
|
|
[12]
|
Piezotome Rhinoplasty Reduces Postsurgical Morbidity and Enhances Patient Satisfaction: A Multidisciplinary Clinical Study
Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery,
2016
DOI:10.1016/j.joms.2016.04.013
|
|
|
|
|
[13]
|
Biomechanical Stability of Dental Implants in Augmented Maxillary Sites: Results of a Randomized Clinical Study with Four Different Biomaterials and PRF and a Biological View on Guided Bone Regeneration
BioMed Research International,
2015
DOI:10.1155/2015/850340
|
|
|
|
|
[14]
|
Randomized clinical study comparing piezosurgery and conventional rotatory surgery in mandibular cyst enucleation
Journal of Cranio-Maxillofacial Surgery,
2014
DOI:10.1016/j.jcms.2013.06.013
|
|
|
|
|
[15]
|
Biological Principles and Physiology of Bone Regeneration under the Schneiderian Membrane after Sinus Lift Surgery: A Radiological Study in 14 Patients Treated with the Transcrestal Hydrodynamic Ultrasonic Cavitational Sinus Lift (Intralift)
International Journal of Dentistry,
2012
DOI:10.1155/2012/576238
|
|
|
|