Reformulation of the Vening-Meinesz Moritz Inverse Problem of Isostasy for Isostatic Gravity Disturbances

Journals Menu

Follow SCIRP

	+1 323-425-8868
	customer@scirp.org
	+86 18163351462(WhatsApp)
	1655362766

	Paper Publishing WeChat

International Journal of Geosciences

ISSN Print: 2156-8359
ISSN Online: 2156-8367
www.scirp.org/journal/ijg
E-mail: ijg@scirp.org

Google-based Impact Factor: 1.03
Citations

Journals Menu

"Reformulation of the Vening-Meinesz Moritz Inverse Problem of Isostasy for Isostatic Gravity Disturbances"
written by Robert Tenzer, Mohammad Bagherbandi,
published by International Journal of Geosciences, Vol.3 No.5A, 2012

has been cited by the following article(s):

Google Scholar
CrossRef

[1]	Determining the effective elastic thickness through cross-correlation between isostatic disturbances
	Filho, CM Martins, RM Baldez… - Geodesy and …, 2023

[2]	Crustal Structure and Moho Depth in the Tibetan Plateau from Inverse Modelling of Gravity Data
	Applications of Data Assimilation and Inverse …, 2023

[3]	MOHV21: a least squares combination of five global Moho depth models
	Journal of Geodesy, 2022

[4]	Combination of three global Moho density contrast models by a weighted least-squares procedure
	Journal of Applied Geodesy, 2022

[5]	On Moho Determination by the Vening Meinesz-Moritz Technique
	2021

[6]	Reformulation of Parker–Oldenburg's method for Earth's spherical approximation
	2020

[7]	Interface inversion of gravitational data using spherical triangular tessellation: An application for the estimation of the Moon's crustal thickness
	2019

[8]	Estimating a combined Moho model for marine areas via satellite altimetric-gravity and seismic crustal models
	2019

[9]	How to Calculate Bouguer Gravity Data in Planetary Studies
	Surveys in Geophysics, 2018

[10]	A regional gravimetric Moho recovery under Tibet using gravitational potential data from a satellite global model
	Studia Geophysica et Geodaetica, 2018

[11]	Combined Gravimetric–Seismic Crustal Model for Antarctica
	Surveys in Geophysics, 2018

[12]	Towards the Moho depth and Moho density contrast along with their uncertainties from seismic and satellite gravity observations
	Journal of Applied Geodesy, 2017

[13]	Moho Modeling Using FFT Technique
	Pure and Applied Geophysics, 2017

[14]	Gravity Inversion
	Gravity Inversion and Integration, 2017

[15]	垂直重力梯度反演 Moho 面的频谱域公式及其应用
	2016

[16]	Theoretical deficiencies of isostatic schemes in modeling the crustal thickness along the convergent continental tectonic plate boundaries
	Journal of Earth Science, 2016

[17]	Global Isostatic Gravity Maps From Satellite Missions and Their Applications in the Lithospheric Structure Studies
	IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing , 2016

[18]	Generalized model for a Moho inversion from gravity and vertical gravity-gradient data
	2016

[19]	Formula of Moho inversion in the spectral domain using vertical gravity gradient and its application
	2016

[20]	垂直重力梯度反演犕狅犺狅面的频谱域公式及其应用
	2016

[21]	Isostatic crustal thickness under the Tibetan Plateau and Himalayas from satellite gravity gradiometry data
	Earth Sciences Research Journal?, 2015

[22]	On Gravity Inversion by No-Topography and Rigorous Isostatic Gravity Anomalies
	Pure and Applied Geophysics, 2015

[23]	The development of physical geodesy during 1984-2014–A personal review
	Journal of Geodetic Science, 2015

[24]	A new Fennoscandian crustal thickness model based on CRUST1. 0 and a gravimetric–isostatic approach
	Earth-Science Reviews, 2015

[25]	Modelling Moho depth in ocean areas based on satellite altimetry using Vening Meinesz–Moritz'method
	Acta Geodaetica et Geophysica, 2015

[26]	Comparison of various isostatic marine gravity disturbances
	2015

[27]	Comparative Study of the Uniform and Variable Moho Density Contrast in the Vening Meinesz-Moritz's Isostatic Scheme fortheGravimetric Moho Recovery
	International Association of Geodesy Symposia book series, 2015

[28]	Moho depth uncertainties in the Vening-Meinesz Moritz inverse problem of isostasy
	Studia Geophysica et Geodaetica, 2014

[29]	Isostasy–Geodesy
	Encyclopedia of Geodesy, 2014

[30]	Inverse problem for the gravimetric modeling of the crust-mantle density contrast
	Contributions to Geophysics and Geodesy, 2013

[31]	Improved global crustal thickness modeling based on the VMM isostatic model and non-isostatic gravity correction
	Journal of Geodynamics, 2013

[32]	On the isostatic gravity anomaly and disturbance and their applications to Vening Meinesz–Moritz gravimetric inverse problem
	Geophysical Journal International, 2013

[33]	Expressions for the global gravimetric Moho modeling in spectral domain
	Pure and Applied Geophysics, 2013

[34]	Isostatic gravity disturbances in the definition of the Vening Meinesz-Moritz inverse problem of isostasy
	2013

[1]	MOHV21: a least squares combination of five global Moho depth models Journal of Geodesy, 2022 DOI:10.1007/s00190-022-01631-y

[2]	Combination of three global Moho density contrast models by a weighted least-squares procedure Journal of Applied Geodesy, 2022 DOI:10.1515/jag-2022-0004

[3]	Combination of three global Moho density contrast models by a weighted least-squares procedure Journal of Applied Geodesy, 2022 DOI:10.1515/jag-2022-0004

[4]	Geodetic Sciences - Theory, Applications and Recent Developments [Working Title] 2021 DOI:10.5772/intechopen.97449

[5]	Estimating a combined Moho model for marine areas via satellite altimetric - gravity and seismic crustal models Studia Geophysica et Geodaetica, 2020 DOI:10.1007/s11200-019-1067-0

[6]	Reformulation of Parker–Oldenburg's method for Earth's spherical approximation Geophysical Journal International, 2020 DOI:10.1093/gji/ggaa200

[7]	Interface inversion of gravitational data using spherical triangular tessellation: an application for the estimation of the Moon's crustal thickness Geophysical Journal International, 2019 DOI:10.1093/gji/ggz026

[8]	How to Calculate Bouguer Gravity Data in Planetary Studies Surveys in Geophysics, 2018 DOI:10.1007/s10712-018-9504-0

[9]	Towards the Moho depth and Moho density contrast along with their uncertainties from seismic and satellite gravity observations Journal of Applied Geodesy, 2017 DOI:10.1515/jag-2017-0019

[10]	Global Isostatic Gravity Maps From Satellite Missions and Their Applications in the Lithospheric Structure Studies IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing, 2017 DOI:10.1109/JSTARS.2016.2556219

[11]	Moho Modeling Using FFT Technique Pure and Applied Geophysics, 2017 DOI:10.1007/s00024-017-1503-4

[12]	Gravity Inversion and Integration 2017 DOI:10.1007/978-3-319-50298-4_8

[13]	Combined Gravimetric–Seismic Crustal Model for Antarctica Surveys in Geophysics, 2017 DOI:10.1007/s10712-017-9423-5

[14]	A regional gravimetric Moho recovery under Tibet using gravitational potential data from a satellite global model Studia Geophysica et Geodaetica, 2017 DOI:10.1007/s11200-017-0812-5

[15]	Theoretical deficiencies of isostatic schemes in modeling the crustal thickness along the convergent continental tectonic plate boundaries Journal of Earth Science, 2016 DOI:10.1007/s12583-015-0608-x

[16]	Generalized model for a Moho inversion from gravity and vertical gravity-gradient data Geophysical Journal International, 2016 DOI:10.1093/gji/ggw251

[17]	Modelling Moho depth in ocean areas based on satellite altimetry using Vening Meinesz–Moritz’ method Acta Geodaetica et Geophysica, 2016 DOI:10.1007/s40328-015-0116-6

[18]	The development of physical geodesy during 1984-2014 – A personal review Journal of Geodetic Science, 2015 DOI:10.1515/jogs-2015-0003

[19]	Comparison of various isostatic marine gravity disturbances Journal of Earth System Science, 2015 DOI:10.1007/s12040-015-0610-9

[20]	On Gravity Inversion by No-Topography and Rigorous Isostatic Gravity Anomalies Pure and Applied Geophysics, 2015 DOI:10.1007/s00024-015-1032-y

[21]	A new Fennoscandian crustal thickness model based on CRUST1.0 and a gravimetric–isostatic approach Earth-Science Reviews, 2015 DOI:10.1016/j.earscirev.2015.03.003

[22]	IGFS 2014 International Association of Geodesy Symposia, 2015 DOI:10.1007/1345_2015_210

[23]	IGFS 2014 International Association of Geodesy Symposia, 2015 DOI:10.1007/1345_2015_210

[24]	Encyclopedia of Geodesy 2014 DOI:10.1007/978-3-319-02370-0_111-1

[25]	Encyclopedia of Geodesy 2014 DOI:10.1007/978-3-319-02370-0_111-1

[26]	Expressions for the Global Gravimetric Moho Modeling in Spectral Domain Pure and Applied Geophysics, 2014 DOI:10.1007/s00024-013-0740-4

[27]	Moho depth uncertainties in the Vening-Meinesz Moritz inverse problem of isostasy Studia Geophysica et Geodaetica, 2014 DOI:10.1007/s11200-013-1258-z

[28]	On the isostatic gravity anomaly and disturbance and their applications to Vening Meinesz-Moritz gravimetric inverse problem Geophysical Journal International, 2013 DOI:10.1093/gji/ggt008

[29]	Improved global crustal thickness modeling based on the VMM isostatic model and non-isostatic gravity correction Journal of Geodynamics, 2013 DOI:10.1016/j.jog.2013.01.002

Follow SCIRP

	+1 323-425-8868
	customer@scirp.org
	+86 18163351462(WhatsApp)
	1655362766

	Paper Publishing WeChat

International Journal of Geosciences

International Journal of Geosciences

Journals Menu

Home

About SCIRP

Service

Policies