|
[1]
|
The Balance 2∙f (O) – f (H) as a Cornerstone in Formulation of Electrolytic Systems
Journal of New Developments in Chemistry,
2018
DOI:10.14302/issn.2377-2549.jndc-18-2177
|
|
|
|
|
[2]
|
Some Regularities Involved with Oxidation Numbers Stated in Formulation of Redox Systems According to GATES/GEB Principles
Journal of Analytical, Bioanalytical and Separation Techniques,
2018
DOI:10.15436/2476-1869.17.1569
|
|
|
|
|
[3]
|
Redox - Principles and Advanced Applications
2017
DOI:10.5772/intechopen.69341
|
|
|
|
|
[4]
|
Advances in Titration Techniques
2017
DOI:10.5772/intechopen.69249
|
|
|
|
|
[5]
|
Advances in Titration Techniques
2017
DOI:10.5772/intechopen.69248
|
|
|
|
|
[6]
|
Formulation of Dynamic Redox Systems according to GATES/GEB Principles
International Journal of Electrochemical Science,
2016
DOI:10.1016/S1452-3981(23)16124-4
|
|
|
|
|
[7]
|
“Why Not Stoichiometry” versus “Stoichiometry—Why Not?” Part III: Extension of GATES/GEB on Complex Dynamic Redox Systems
Critical Reviews in Analytical Chemistry,
2015
DOI:10.1080/10408347.2014.953673
|
|
|
|
|
[8]
|
“Why Not Stoichiometry” Versus “Stoichiometry—Why Not?” Part II: GATES in Context with Redox Systems
Critical Reviews in Analytical Chemistry,
2015
DOI:10.1080/10408347.2014.937853
|
|
|
|
|
[9]
|
General Relation Valid for Electrolytic Systems
Journal of Analytical Sciences, Methods and Instrumentation,
2015
DOI:10.4236/jasmi.2015.54009
|
|
|
|