Are “Straight to Test” Pathways Always Best for Patients? A Prospective Observational Study of Two-Week-Wait Colorectal Referrals

Journals Menu

Follow SCIRP

ISSN Print: 2157-9407
ISSN Online: 2157-9415
www.scirp.org/journal/ss
E-mail: ss@scirp.org

Citations h5-index & Ranking

"Are “Straight to Test” Pathways Always Best for Patients? A Prospective Observational Study of Two-Week-Wait Colorectal Referrals"
written by Frances Mosley, Jon R. Ausobsky, John P. Griffith,
published by Surgical Science, Vol.4 No.10, 2013

has been cited by the following article(s):

[1]	Need For Whole Large Bowel Investigation in Sole Change in Bowel Habit: An Analysis of 719 Patients
	2019

[2]	Is a “straight to test” strategy a pragmatic alternative to the conventional two-week wait referral pathway for colorectal cancer in an ethnically diverse hospital …
	International Journal of Surgery Open, 2018

[3]	Improving safety and quality in endoscopy patient pathways
	2018

[1]	Need For Whole Large Bowel Investigation in Sole Change in Bowel Habit: An Analysis of 719 Patients Journal of Investigative Surgery, 2019 DOI:10.1080/08941939.2019.1589606

[2]	Is a “straight to test” strategy a pragmatic alternative to the conventional two-week wait referral pathway for colorectal cancer in an ethnically diverse hospital catchment area? A single-centre case series International Journal of Surgery Open, 2018 DOI:10.1016/j.ijso.2018.10.005

[3]	Is a “straight to test” strategy a pragmatic alternative to the conventional two-week wait referral pathway for colorectal cancer in an ethnically diverse hospital catchment area? A single-centre case series International Journal of Surgery Open, 2018 DOI:10.1016/j.ijso.2018.10.005

Follow SCIRP