"Eliciting Probabilities, Means, Medians, Variances and Covariances without Assuming Risk Neutrality"
written by Karl H. Schlag, Joël J. van der Weele,
published by Theoretical Economics Letters, Vol.3 No.1, 2013
has been cited by the following article(s):
  • Google Scholar
  • CrossRef
[1] The Binary Lottery Procedure does not induce risk neutrality in the Holt-Laury and Eckel-Grossman tasks
2019
[2] Belief elicitation when more than money matters
2019
[3] Looking at the bright side: The motivational value of confidence
2019
[4] The impact of fine size and uncertainty on punishment and deterrence: Theory and evidence from the laboratory
Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 2018
[5] Judicial Effort and the Appeals System: Theory and Experiment
2018
[6] Eliciting prior beliefs
2018
[7] Looking at the bright side: The motivation value of overconfidence
2018
[8] On proper scoring rules and cumulative prospect theory
EURO Journal on Decision Processes, 2018
[9] On the Road to Making Science of “Art”: Risk Bias in Market Scoring Rules
2018
[10] Robust scoring rules
2018
[11] Committees of Experts in the Lab
2018
[12] Essays in Corporate Prediction Markets
2017
[13] An Experimental Study on Sequential Auctions with Privately Known Capacities
University Ca' Foscari of Venice, Dept. of Economics Research Paper Series, 2017
[14] Watch your Words: an Experimental Study on Communication and the Opportunity Cost of Delegation
Working Paper, 2017
[15] Gender, performance estimation and self-selection to tasks: Evidence from the laboratory
Dissertation, 2017
[16] Gender, self-selection and moral hazard in teams
2017
[17] Intention-based reciprocity and signaling of intentions
Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 2017
[18] How is Information Valued? Evidence from Framed Field Experiments
The Economic Journal, 2016
[19] A Note on Sandroni-Shmaya Belief Elicitation Mechanism
2016
[20] Justice under uncertainty
2016
[21] Essays in information elicitation and market design
2016
[22] Belief Elicitation with a Synchronized Lottery Choice Menu That Is Invariant to Risk Attitudes
American Economic Journal: Microeconomics, 2016
[23] Overcoming Coordination Failure in a Critical Mass Game: Strategic Motives and Action Disclosure
AMSE Working Papers, 2016
[24] Measuring Responsiveness to Feedback as a Personal Trait
Tinbergen Institute Discussion Paper, 2016
[25] A DUAL CHARACTERIZATION OF OPTIMAL BEHAVIOR FOR SCORING RULES
2016
[26] Screening Agents in Belief Eliciting Mechanisms
2016
[27] An Overview of Applications of Proper Scoring Rules
2016
[28] A method to elicit beliefs as most likely intervals
Judgment and Decision Making, 2015
[29] Judicial effort and the appeal system: theory and experiment
2015
[30] Trust, values, and false consensus
International Economic Review, 2015
[31] A penny for your thoughts: A survey of methods for eliciting beliefs
Experimental Economics, 2015
[32] Essays on the Economics of Organizations, Productivity and Labor
2015
[33] Feedback manipulation and learning in games
2015
[34] The Demand for Information and Individual Consistency in Belief Updating
2015
[35] Managing self-confidence
2014
[36] Belief updating and the demand for information
SSRN, 2014
[37] Eliciting subjective probabilities with binary lotteries
Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization.Elsevier, 2014
[38] Belief Elicitation in the Laboratory
Annual Review of Economics, 2014
[39] Preferences and beliefs in a sequential social dilemma: A within-subjects analysis
Games and Economic Behavior.Elsevier, 2014
[40] Minimum Truth Serums with Optional Predictions
2014
[41] Inequality and relative ability beliefs
The Economic Journal, 2014
[42] Belief Elicitation in the Lab
Annual Review of Economics, 2013
[43] A mechanism for eliciting the mean and quantiles of a random variable
Economics Letters.Elsevier, 2013
[44] Incentives for eliciting confidence intervals
Available at SSRN 2271061, 2013
[45] How is information (under-) valued? evidence from framed field experiments
SSRN, 2013
[46] Eliciting beliefs by paying in chance
Economic Theory Bulletin, 2013
[47] We should totally open a restaurant: performance uncertainty and optimistic beliefs
2013
[48] IEF
2013
[49] Eliciting beliefs: Proper scoring rules, incentives, stakes and hedging
European Economic Review, 2013
[50] The binarized scoring rule
2013
[51] Belief elicitation in the presence of naïve respondents: An experimental study
Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 2012
[52] Trust and Cheating
National Bureau of Economic Research, 2012
[53] Decision under Risk, Uncertainty and Ambiguity: Theory and Experiments
ProQuest Dissertations Publishing, 2012
[54] Probability elicitation for agents with arbitrary risk preferences
2011
[55] Managing self-confidence: Theory and experimental evidence
2011
[56] Three Essays on Methods and Statistics in Experimental and Behavioral Economics
2011
[57] Belief elicitation in experiments: is there a hedging problem?
Experimental Economics, 2010
[58] The binarized scoring rule of belief elicitation
2010