|
[1]
|
Simulated training model in a low cost for laparoscopic inguinal hernioplasty
Acta Cirúrgica Brasileira,
2021
DOI:10.1590/acb360108
|
|
|
|
|
[2]
|
Value of robotic surgery in endometrial cancer by body mass index
International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics,
2020
DOI:10.1002/ijgo.13258
|
|
|
|
|
[3]
|
Value of robotic surgery in endometrial cancer by body mass index
International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics,
2020
DOI:10.1002/ijgo.13258
|
|
|
|
|
[4]
|
Technological innovation and personalized surgical treatment for early-stage endometrial cancer patients: A prospective multicenter Italian experience to evaluate the novel percutaneous approach
European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology,
2019
DOI:10.1016/j.ejogrb.2019.01.024
|
|
|
|
|
[5]
|
Infectious complications of laparoscopic and robotic hysterectomy: a systematic literature review and meta-analysis
International Journal of Gynecologic Cancer,
2019
DOI:10.1136/ijgc-2018-000098
|
|
|
|
|
[6]
|
Laparoscopic and Robotic-Assisted Hysterectomy for Uterine Leiomyomas: A Comparison of Complications and Costs
Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Canada,
2018
DOI:10.1016/j.jogc.2017.08.005
|
|
|
|
|
[7]
|
Robot-assisted hysterectomy for endometrial and cervical cancers: a systematic review
Journal of Robotic Surgery,
2017
DOI:10.1007/s11701-016-0621-9
|
|
|
|
|
[8]
|
Robot-assisted Surgery in Gynecologic Cancers
Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology,
2017
DOI:10.1016/j.jmig.2017.01.006
|
|
|
|
|
[9]
|
Minimally Invasive Surgery to Treat Gynecological Cancer
International Journal of Gynecological Cancer,
2017
DOI:10.1097/IGC.0000000000000925
|
|
|
|
|
[10]
|
A Comparison of Outcomes Between Open Hysterectomy and Robotic-Assisted Hysterectomy for Endometrial Cancer Using the National Cancer Database
International Journal of Gynecological Cancer,
2017
DOI:10.1097/IGC.0000000000001034
|
|
|
|
|
[11]
|
A comparison of operative outcomes between standard and robotic laparoscopic surgery for endometrial cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis
The International Journal of Medical Robotics and Computer Assisted Surgery,
2017
DOI:10.1002/rcs.1851
|
|
|
|
|
[12]
|
A comparison of operative outcomes between standard and robotic laparoscopic surgery for endometrial cancer: A systematic review and meta‐analysis
The International Journal of Medical Robotics and Computer Assisted Surgery,
2017
DOI:10.1002/rcs.1851
|
|
|
|
|
[13]
|
Telelap ALF-X vs Standard Laparoscopy for the Treatment of Early-Stage Endometrial Cancer: A Single-Institution Retrospective Cohort Study
Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology,
2016
DOI:10.1016/j.jmig.2015.11.006
|
|
|
|
|
[14]
|
Total Laparoscopic (S-LPS) versus TELELAP ALF-X Robotic-Assisted Hysterectomy: A Case-Control Study
Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology,
2016
DOI:10.1016/j.jmig.2016.05.008
|
|
|
|
|
[15]
|
The role of robotic surgery in endometrial cancer
Journal of Surgical Oncology,
2015
DOI:10.1002/jso.23988
|
|
|
|
|
[16]
|
The role of robotic surgery in endometrial cancer
Journal of Surgical Oncology,
2015
DOI:10.1002/jso.23988
|
|
|
|
|
[17]
|
A systematic review and cost analysis of robot-assisted hysterectomy in malignant and benign conditions
European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology,
2014
DOI:10.1016/j.ejogrb.2014.03.010
|
|
|
|
|
[18]
|
Robotic Surgery in Gynecologic Oncology: Updates and Innovations
Current Obstetrics and Gynecology Reports,
2014
DOI:10.1007/s13669-014-0101-z
|
|
|
|