Author(s)

Andrew Walcott Beckwith

Physics Department, College of Physics, Huxi Campus, Chongqing University, Chongqing, China.

First off, the term Δt is for the smallest unit of time step. Now, due to reasons we will discuss we state that, contrary to the wishes of a reviewer, the author asserts that a full Galois theory analysis of a quintic is mandatory for reasons which reflect about how the physics answers are all radically different for abbreviated lower math tech answers to this problem. i.e. if one turns the quantic to a quadratic, one gets answers materially different from when one applies the Gauss-Lucas theorem. So, despite the distaste of some in the physics community, this article pitches Galois theory for a restricted quintic. We begin our analysis of if a quintic equation for a shift in time, as for a Kerr Newman black hole affects possible temperature values, which may lead to opening or closing of a worm hole throat. Following Juan Maldacena, et al., we evaluate the total energy of a worm hole, with the proviso that the energy of the worm hole, in four dimensions for a closed throat has energy of the worm hole, as proportional to negative value of (temperature times a fermionic number, q) which is if we view a worm hole as a connection between two black holes, a way to show if there is a connection between quantization of gravity, and if the worm hole throat is closed. Or open. For the quantic polynomial, we relate Δt to a ( Δt )⁵ + A₁ ⋅ ( Δt )² + A₂ = 0 Quintic polynomial which has several combinations which Galois theoretical sense is generally solvable. We find that A₂ has a number, n of presumed produced gravitons, in the time interval Δt and that both A₁ and A₂ have an Ergosphere area, due to the induced Kerr-Newman black hole. If Gravitons and Gravitinos have the relationship the author purports in an article the author wrote years ago, as cited in this publication, then we have a way to discuss if quantization of gravity as affecting temperature T, in the worm hole tells us if a worm hole is open or closed. And a choice of the solvable constraints affects temperature, T, which in turn affects the sign of a worm hole throat is far harder to solve. We explain the genesis of black hole physics negative temperature which is necessary for a positive black hole entropy, and then state our results have something very equivalent in terms of worm ding ( Δt )⁵ + A₁ ⋅ ( Δt )² + A₂ = 0 we will be having X = Δt assumed to be negligible, We then look at a quadratic version in the solution of X = Δt so we are looking at four regimes for solving a quintic, with the infinitesimal value of Δt effectively reduced our quintic to a quadratic equation. Note that in the small Δt limit for d = 1, 3, 5, 7, we cleanly avoid any imaginary time no matter what the sign of T_temp is. In the case where we have X = Δt assumed to be negligible, the connection in our text about coupling constants, if d = 3, may in itself for infinitesimal Δt lend toward supporting d = 3. This is different from the more general case for general Galois solvability of ( Δt )⁵ + A₁ ⋅ ( Δt )² + A₂ = 0. d ≠ 1 means we need to consider Galois theory. If d = 2, 4, 6, need T_temp <0 for coefficient A₁ to be greater than zero. If d ≠ 1 and is instead d = 3, 5, 7, there is an absence of general solutions in the Galois solution sense. This because if. d ≠ 1 A₁ <0 whenever d = 3, 5, 7. And when d = 1 in order to have any solvability one would need X = Δt assumed to be infinitesimal in ( Δt )⁵ + A₁ ⋅ ( Δt )² + A₂ = 0.

Kerr Newman Black Hole, High-Frequency Gravitational Waves (HGW), Solvable Quintic Equations, Wormholes

Beckwith, A. (2019) How ( Δt )⁵ + A₁ ⋅ ( Δt )² + A₂ = 0 Is Generally, in the Galois Sense Solvable for a Kerr-Newman Black Hole Affect Questions on the Opening and Closing of a Wormhole Throat and the Simplification of the Problem, Dramatically Speaking, If d = 1 (Kaluza Klein Theory) and Explaining the Lack of Overlap with the Results When Applying the Gauss-Lucas Theorem. Journal of High Energy Physics, Gravitation and Cosmology, 5, 235-278. doi: 10.4236/jhepgc.2019.51014.