Author(s)

Paul Perkins^1,2*, Richard J. N. Helmer³, Colin Mackintosh⁴, Allan G. Hahn^1,5,6,7,8

¹University of Canberra Research Institute for Sport and Exercise, Canberra, Australia.
²Boxing Australia Limited, Canberra, Australia.
³Superinteractive Pty Ltd, Geelong, Australia.
⁴AppSen, Canberra, Australia.
⁵Queensland Academy of Sport Centre of Excellence for Applied Sport Science Research, Brisbane, Australia.
⁶Griffith University School of Engineering, Brisbane, Australia.
⁷Australian Institute of Sport, Canberra, Australia.
⁸Victoria University College of Engineering and Science, Melbourne, Australia.

Technology is being increasingly used to aid judging in sport, but its employment as the primary means of scoring is rare. We have developed and implemented a fully automated scoring system in the context of a modified, low-risk form of boxing. The system, which requires contestants to wear vests and gloves incorporating sensor fabrics, has been used in multiple settings over the past five years. During that period, it has undergone progressive iteration guided by action research methodology. Here, we summarise that iteration, reflect on present status and identify possible future directions. We have found that concept of automated scoring has wide appeal, and the wearable technology is almost universally considered comfortable. Nevertheless, some issues remain to be addressed. Use of the technology requires considerable prior and subsequent commitment of time. Apparently valid contacts occasionally fail to score. Causative factors include the configuration of electrical circuitry in the vests and deterioration of that circuitry with repeated vest use and washing. Also, false positive scores are sometimes generated by vest self-shorting and effects of sweat. Many contestants adopt unorthodox styles aimed at exploiting the characteristics of the automated scoring methodology, affecting the aesthetics of the modified sport. There is an expectation that technologically-based scoring should have much greater accuracy than human judging, and should be essentially fail-proof. Disillusionment can occur in situations where this expectation is not met. We have identified potential solutions to all the existing issues, with some now being actively explored. Continuation of the quest seems justified by popular dissatisfaction with subjective human judging of boxing and other sports, but we have come to realise that purely technological judging can introduce unforeseen complexities. Our observations could be relevant to various sports interested in the notion of technological judging.

Automated Scoring Technology, Box’Tag, Smart Fabric, Sport Technology, Wearable Sensors

Perkins, P. , Helmer, R. , Mackintosh, C. and Hahn, A. (2017) Reflections on Long-Term Development and Use of Automated Scoring Technology in a Sport (Modified Boxing) Context. World Journal of Engineering and Technology, 5, 455-480. doi: 10.4236/wjet.2017.53040.