Compared Evaluation of Botulinum Toxin A and a Cosmetic Antiperspirant in the Treatment of Focal Axillary Hyperhidrosis

HTML  Download Download as PDF (Size: 561KB)  PP. 190-196  
DOI: 10.4236/jcdsa.2013.33029    4,192 Downloads   6,605 Views  Citations

ABSTRACT

Background: Primary focal hyperhidrosis can significantly reduce quality of life. Therefore a lot of treatment options in a range of conservative, physical and surgical techniques are available. Objective: To assess the efficacy of an antiperspirant containing aluminum chloride compared to a Botulinumtoxin A treatment for patients with primary focal hyperhidrosis. Methods and material: In this randomized, single-center, half-side trail, a clinical score was done by patients and physician to evaluate the severity of hyperhidrosis. Gravimetric tests were performed to gather the amount of sweat per unit of time. Furthermore the efficacy was determined using a four point questionnaire. Skin irritation was assessed by measuring pH value and transepidermal water loss. Results: A total of 22 patients were enrolled. Two weeks after baseline the hyperhidrosis level was significantly reduced (BTX-A: 92.9%, AL: 66.7%). In addition both treatment options induced a significant reduction of sweat production (BTX-A: 80.8%, AL: 68.8%). Please change in: Patients evaluated good resp, very good efficacy for both treatment options at day 28. pH value and TEWL never left physiological range. Conclusion: Both botulinum toxin A treatment and an antiperspirant containing aluminum chloride in the evaluated galenic formulation are an effective and safe treatment option for axillary focal hyperhidrosis.

Share and Cite:

M. Streker, S. Lübberding and M. Kerscher, "Compared Evaluation of Botulinum Toxin A and a Cosmetic Antiperspirant in the Treatment of Focal Axillary Hyperhidrosis," Journal of Cosmetics, Dermatological Sciences and Applications, Vol. 3 No. 3, 2013, pp. 190-196. doi: 10.4236/jcdsa.2013.33029.

Copyright © 2024 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

Creative Commons License

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.