[1]
|
Agrawal, A., & Redford, K. H. (2006). Poverty, development, and biondiversity conservation: Shooting in the dark? Working paper No. 26. New York: Wildlife Conservation Society.
|
[2]
|
Ahorro, J. (2008). The waves of post-development theory and a consideration of the Philippines. Edmonton: University of Alberta.
|
[3]
|
Arts, B., & Van Tatenhove, J. (2004). Policy and power: A conceptual framework between the “old” and “new” policy idioms. Policy sciences, 37, 339-356. doi:10.1007/s11077-005-0156-9
|
[4]
|
Babbington, A. (2000). Re-encountering development: Livelihood transitions and place transformations in the Andes. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 90, 495-520.
doi:10.1111/0004-5608.00206
|
[5]
|
Barry, D., Campbell, J. Y., Fahn, J., Mallee, H., & Pradhan, U. (2003). Achieving significant impact at scale: Reflections on the challenge for global community forestry. URL (last checked 19-23 May 2003).
http://www.cifor.org/publications/corporate/cd-roms/bonn-proc/pdfs/papers/t7_final_barry.pdf
|
[6]
|
Berger, M. (1995). Post-cold war capitalism: Modernization and modes of resistance after the fall. Third World Quarterly, 16, 717728. doi:10.1080/01436599550035924
|
[7]
|
Bigombe′, P. (2003). The decentralized forestry taxation system in Cameroon. In J. Ribot, & D. Conyers (Eds.), Local management and state’s logic. Washington: World Resources Institute.
|
[8]
|
Blaike, P. (1998). Post-modernism and the calling out of development geography. Annual Meeting of the American Association of Geographers, Boston, 25-28 March 1998.
|
[9]
|
Brown, H. C. P., Wolf, S. A., & Lassoie, J. P. (2007). An analytic approach to structuring co-management of community forests in Cameroon, Progress in Development Studies, 7, 135-154.
doi:10.1177/146499340600700204
|
[10]
|
Colfer, C. J. P. (2005). The equitable forest: Diversity, community and resource management. Washington: RFF Press.
|
[11]
|
Contreras, A. (2003). Creating space for local forest management—The case of the Philippines. In D. Edmunds, & E. Wollenberg (Eds.), Local forest management: The impacts of devolution policies (pp. 127-149). London: Earthscan.
|
[12]
|
Crew, E., & Harrison, E. (1998). Whose Development? An ethnography of aid. London: Zed Books.
|
[13]
|
Devkota, R. (2010). Interests and powers as drivers of community forestry: A case study of Nepal. G?ttingen: University Press G?ttingen.
|
[14]
|
Edmunds, D., & Wollenberg, E. (2001). Historical perspectives on forest policy change in Asia: An introduction, Environmental History, 6, 190-212. doi:10.1093/envhis/6.2.190
|
[15]
|
Egbe, E. S. (1998). The range of possibilities for community forestry permitted within the framework of current Cameroonian legislation. Yaoundé: Ministry of Environment and Forests.
|
[16]
|
Escobar, A. (1995). Encountering development. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
|
[17]
|
Escobar, A. (2000). Beyond the search for a paradigm? post-development and beyond, Development, 43, 11-14.
doi:10.1057/palgrave.development.1110188
|
[18]
|
Etzioni, A. (1975). A comparative analysis of complex organizations: On power, involvement, and their correlates. New York: Free Press.
|
[19]
|
Ezzine de Blas, D., Ruiz Perez, M., Sayer, J. A., Lescuyer, G., Nasi, R., & Karsenty, A. (2009). External influences on and conditions for community logging management in Cameroon. World Development, 37, 445-456. doi:10.1016/j.worlddev.2008.03.011
|
[20]
|
Ferguson, J. (1994). The anti-politics machine: “Development”, depoliticization, and bureaucratic power in Lesotho. The Ecologist, 24, 176-181.
|
[21]
|
Fisher, J., van Heerde, J., & Tucker, A. (2010). Does one trust judgement fit all? Linking theory and empirics. British Journal of Politics & International Relations, 12, 161-188.
doi:10.1111/j.1467-856X.2009.00401.x
|
[22]
|
Foucault, M. (1983). The subject and power. In H. Dreyfus, & P. Rabinow (Eds.), Beyond structuralism and hermeneutics. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
|
[23]
|
Hobley, M. (2007). Forests—The poor man’s overcoat: Foresters as agents of change? Canberra: The Fenner School of Environment and Society, The Australian National University.
|
[24]
|
Kiely, R. (1999). The last refuge of the noble savage? A critical assessment of post-development theory. The European Journal of Development Research, 11, 30-55. doi:10.1080/09578819908426726
|
[25]
|
Kippler, C. (2010). Exploring post-development: Politics, the state and emancipation. The question of alternatives. URL(last checked 21 September 2011).
http://www.polis.leeds.ac.uk/assets/files/students/student-journal/ug-summer-10/caroline-kippler-summer-10.pdf
|
[26]
|
Krott, M. (1990). ?ffentliche verwaltung im umweltschutz, ergebnisse einer beh?rden-orientierten policy-analyse am beispiel waldschutz. Wien: Braunmüller.
|
[27]
|
Krott, M. (2005). Forest policy analysis. Dordrecht: Springer.
|
[28]
|
Krott, M., Bader, A., Devkota, R., Schusser, C., Maryudi, A., & Aurenhammer, A. (in review). Identifying driving forces in land use issues by actor-centered power analysis—Example of community forestry. In review in Land Use Policy.
|
[29]
|
Larson, A. M. (2005). Democratic decentralization in the forestry sector: Lessons learned from Africa, Asia and Latin America. In C. J. Colfer, & D. Capistrano (Eds.), The Politics of decentralization—Forests, power and people (pp. 32-62). London: Earthscan.
|
[30]
|
Larson, A. M., & Ribot, J. C. (2004). Democratic decentralization through a natural resource lens. European Journal of Development Research, 16, 1-25.
|
[31]
|
Larson, A. M., & Ribot, J. C. (2007). The poverty of forestry policy: Double standards on an uneven playing field. Sustainability Science Journal, 2, 189-204.
|
[32]
|
La Vi?a, A. G. M. (1997). Seeing with clear eyes: The challenge of community-based resource management and the role of academe. In: C. Castro, F. B. Pulhin, & L. C. Reyes (Eds.), Community-based resource management: A paradigm shift in forestry. Los Ba?os: University of the Philippines Los Ba?os.
|
[33]
|
Little, P., & Painter, M. (1995). Discourse, politics, and the development process: Reflections on Escobar’s “anthropology and the development encounter”. American Ethnologist, 22, 602-616.
doi:10.1525/ae.1995.22.3.02a00080
|
[34]
|
Mandondo, A. (2003). Snapshot views of international community forestry networks: Cameroon country study. Center for International Forestry Research.
|
[35]
|
Maryudi, A. (2011). The contesting aspirations in the forests: Actors, interests and power in community forestry in Java, Indonesia. G?ttingen: University Press G?ttingen.
|
[36]
|
Maryudi, A., Devkota, R., Schusser, C., Yufanyi Movuh, M., Salla, M., Aurenhammer, H., & Krott, M. (2012). Back to basics: Considerations in evaluating the outcomes of community forestry. Forest policy an Economics, 14, 1-5.
|
[37]
|
Matthews, S. (2004). Post-development theory and the question of alternatives: A view from Africa. Third World Quarterly, 25, 373384. doi:10.1080/0143659042000174860
|
[38]
|
Matthews, S. (2006). Responding to poverty in the light of the post-development debate: Some insights from the NGO Enda Graf Sahel. Africa development, 4, 52-72.
|
[39]
|
Mayers, J. (2005). Stakeholder power analysis. London: International Institute for Environment and Development (IIED).
|
[40]
|
Mbile, P., Ndzomo-Abanda, G., Essoumba, H., & Misouma, A. (2009). Alternate tenure and enterprise models in Cameroon: Community forests in the context of community rights and forest landscapes. Washington: World Agro forestry Centre and Rights and Resources Initiative.
|
[41]
|
McDermott, M. H., & Schreckenberg, K. (2009). Equity in community forestry: Insights from north and south. International Forestry Review, 11, 157-170. doi:10.1505/ifor.11.2.157
|
[42]
|
Mengang J. M. (1998). Resource use in the tri-national Sangha river region of equatorial Africa: Histories, knowledge forms, and institutions. Bulletin, 102, 8-28.
|
[43]
|
MINEP (2004). Etat des lieux de la foresterie communautaire au Cameroun. Ministere de l’Environnement et des Forets, Direction des Forêts, Cellule de Foresterie Communautaire.
|
[44]
|
M?llering, G. (2005). The trust/control duality: An integrative perspective on positive expectations of others. International Sociology, 20, 283-305. doi:10.1177/0268580905055478
|
[45]
|
Murphree, M. (2004). Communal approaches to natural resource management in Africa: From whence and to where? Berkeley: Center for African Studies.
|
[46]
|
Offe, C. (1977). Einleitung. In: P. Bachrach, & M. Baratz (Eds.), Macht und Armut: Eine theoretisch-empirische Untersuchung (pp. 7-34). Frankfurt: Verlag.
|
[47]
|
Oyono, P. R. (2004a). Institutional deficit, representation, and decentralized forest management in Cameroon. Washington: Elements of natural resource sociology for social theory and public policy, Environmental Governance in Africa.
|
[48]
|
Oyono, P. R. (2004b). One step forward, two steps back? Paradoxes of natural resource management decentralization in Cameroon. Journal of Modern African Studies, 42, 91-111.
doi:10.1017/S0022278X03004488
|
[49]
|
Oyono, P. R. (2005a). Profiling local-level outcomes of environmental decentralizations: The case of Cameroon’s forests in the Congo Basin. Journal of Environment and Development, 14, 317-337.
|
[50]
|
Oyono, P. R. (2005b). The foundations of the con?it de langage over land and forests in southern Cameroon. African Study Monographs, 26, 115-144.
|
[51]
|
Oyono, P. R. (2009). New niches of community rights to forests in Cameroon: Tenure reform, decentralization category or something else? International Journal of Social Forestry, 2, 1-23.
|
[52]
|
Oyono, P. R., Kouna, C., & Mala, W. (2005). Benefits of forests in Cameroon: Global structure, issues involving access, and decision-making hiccoughs. Forest Policy and Economics, 7, 357-368.
doi:10.1016/S1389-9341(03)00072-8
|
[53]
|
Pieterse, J. N. (1998). My paradigm of yours? Alternative development, post-development, and reflexive development. Development and Change, 29, 343-373. doi:10.1111/1467-7660.00081
|
[54]
|
Poffenberger, M. (2006). People in the forest: Community forestry experiences from southeast Asia. International Journal of Environment and Sustainable Development, 5, 57-69.
|
[55]
|
Pulhin, J. M., & Dressler, W. H. (2009). People, power and timber: The politics of community—Based forest management. Journal of Environmental Management, 91, 206-214.
doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2009.08.007
|
[56]
|
Rahnema, M. (1997). Development and the People’s Immune System: The story of another variety of AIDS. In M. Rahnema, & V. Bawtree, (Eds.), The post-development reader (pp. 111-129). London: Zed Books.
|
[57]
|
Rahnema, M., & Bawtree, V. (Eds.) (1997). The post-development reader. London: Zed Books.
|
[58]
|
Rebugio, L. L. (1998). Paradigm shift: The key to sustainable forestry and environmental resources management. Asian Journal of Sustainable Agriculture, 1, 13-24.
|
[59]
|
Rossi, D. (2004). Revisiting foucauldian approaches: Power dynamics in development projects. Journal of Development Studies, 40, 1-29.
doi:10.1080/0022038042000233786
|
[60]
|
Sachs, W. (Eds.) (1992). The development dictionary. A Guide to Knowledge as Power. London: Zed Books.
|
[61]
|
Sadan, E. (1997). Empowerment and community planning: Theory and practice of people-focused social solutions. Tel Aviv: Hakibbutz Hameuchad.
|
[62]
|
Sarin, M., Singh, N., Sundar, N., & Bhogal, R. (2003). Devolution as a threat to democratic decision-making in forestry? Findings from three states in India. in D. Edmunds, & E. Wollenberg (Eds.), Local forest management: The impacts of devolution policies (pp. 55-126). London: Earthscan.
|
[63]
|
Schnell, R., Hill, P., & Esser, E. (2005). Methoden der empirischen Sozialforschung. München: Auflage.
|
[64]
|
Schusser, C. (2012). Who determines biodiversity? An analysis of actors’ power and interests in community forestry in Namibia. Forest Policy and Economics, 21 July 2012.
|
[65]
|
Schusser, C., Krott, M., Devkota, R., Maryudi, A., Salla, M., Yufanyi Movuh, M. C. (2012). Sequence design of quantitative and qualitative surveys for increasing efficiency in forest policy research. Allgemeine Forest und Jagdzeitung, 183, 75-83.
|
[66]
|
Shackleton, S., Campbell, B., Wollenberg, E., & Edmunds, D. (2002). Devolution and community-based natural resource management: Creating space for local people to participate and benefit? Natural Resource Perspectives, 76, 1-6.
|
[67]
|
Sikor, T. (2006). Analyzing community-based forestry: Local, political and agrarian perspectives. Forest Policy and Economics, 8, 339-349
doi:10.1016/j.forpol.2005.08.005
|
[68]
|
Simon, H. A. (1981). Entscheidungsverhalten in organisationen: Eine Untersuchung von Entscheidungsprozessen in Management und Verwaltung. Landsberg am Lech.
|
[69]
|
Sobze, J. M. (2003). Analysis of implication of forest policy reform on CF in Cameroon: Case study of Lomié. G?ttingen: Cuvillier Verlag.
|
[70]
|
Storey, A. (2000). Post-development theory: Romanticism and pontius pilate politics. Development, 43, 4.
|
[71]
|
Sunderlin, D. W. (2004). Community forestry and poverty alleviation in Cambodia, Lao-PDR, and Vietnam: An agenda for research. Jakarta: Center for International Forestry Research.
|
[72]
|
Thoms, C. A. (2006). Conservation success, livelihoods failure? Community forestry in Nepal. Policy Matters, 14, 169-179.
|
[73]
|
Weber, M. (1964). The theory of social and economic organization. New York: Oxford University Press.
|
[74]
|
World Bank (2004). Sustaining forests: A development strategy. Washington: The World Bank.
|
[75]
|
World Bank (2005). World development indicators 2005. Washington: World Bank.
|
[76]
|
World Resources Institute (2005). The wealth of the poor-managing ecosystems to fight poverty. Washington: United Nations Development Program, United Nations Environment Program, World Bank, World Resources Institute.
|
[77]
|
Yufanyi Movuh, M. C. (2007). Community-based biodiversity conservation management: Reaching the goal of biodiversity conservation and community development. Master’s Thesis, München: GRIN Publishing.
|
[78]
|
Yufanyi Movuh, M. C., & Krott, M. (2012). The colonial heritage and post-colonial influence, entanglements and implications of the concept of community forestry by the example of Cameroon. Forest Policy and Economics, 15, 70-77. doi:10.1016/j.forpol.2011.05.004
|