[1]
|
Ajsivinac Sian, J. E., García Mátzar, L. P. O., Cutzal, M. C., & Alonzo Guaján, I. E. (2004). Gramática descriptiva del idioma maya Ka qchikel: Rutzijoxik rucholik ri Kaqchikel ch’ab’al. Academia de las Lenguas Mayas de Guatemala, Comunidad Lingüística Kaqchikel.
|
[2]
|
Aissen, J. L. (1992). Topic and focus in Mayan. Language, 68, 43-80.
|
[3]
|
Baayen, R. H. (2008). Analyzing linguistic data: A practical introduc tion to statistics using R. New York: Cambridge University Press.
doi:10.1017/CBO9780511801686
|
[4]
|
Bader, M., & Meng, M. (1999). Subject-object ambiguities in German embedded clauses: An across-the-board comparison. Journal of Psy cholinguistic Research, 28, 121-143.
doi:10.1023/A:1023206208142
|
[5]
|
Bock, K., & Warren, K. R. (1985). Conceptual accessibility and syntac tic structure in sentence formulation. Cognition, 21, 47-67.
doi:10.1016/0010-0277(85)90023-X
|
[6]
|
Boersma, P. (2001). Praat, a system for doing phonetics by computer. Glot International, 5, 341-345.
|
[7]
|
Brown, R. M., Maxwell, J. M., & Little, W. E. (2006). La ütz awach?: Introduction to Kaqchikel Maya language. Austin: University of Te xas Press.
|
[8]
|
Caplan, D., Chen, E., & Waters, G. (2008). Task-dependent and task independent neurovascular responses to syntactic processing. Cortex, 44, 257-275. doi:10.1016/j.cortex.2006.06.005
|
[9]
|
Coon, J. (2010). VOS as predicate fronting in Chol Mayan. Lingua, 120, 345-378. doi:10.1016/j.lingua.2008.07.006
|
[10]
|
England, N. C. (1991). Changes in basic word order in Mayan lan guages. International Journal of American Linguistics, 57, 446-486.
|
[11]
|
Erdocia, K., Laka, I., Mestres-Missé, A., & Rodriguez-Fornells, A. (2009). Syntactic complexity and ambiguity resolution in a free word order language: Behavioral and electrophysiological evidences from Basque. Brain and Language, 109, 1-17.
doi:10.1016/j.bandl.2008.12.003
|
[12]
|
García Matzar, L. P., & Rodríguez Guaján, P. B’. J. O. (1997). Rukemik ri Kaqchikel chi’: Gramática kaqchikel. Guatemala City: Cholsamaj.
|
[13]
|
Gennari, S., Mirkovic, J., & MacDonald, M. (2012). Animacy and com petition in relative clause production: A cross-linguistic investigation. Cognitive Psychology, 65, 141-176.
doi:10.1016/j.cogpsych.2012.03.002
|
[14]
|
Gibson, E. (2000). Dependency locality theory: A distance-based theory of linguistic complexity. In A. Marantz, Y. Miyashita, & W. O’Neil (Eds.), Image, language, brain: Papers from the first mind articulation project symposium (pp. 95-126). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
|
[15]
|
Kaiser, E., & Trueswell, J. C. (2004). The role of discourse context in the processing of a flexible word-order language. Cognition, 94, 113 147. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2004.01.002
|
[16]
|
Koizumi, M., Yasugi, Y., Tamaoka, K., Kiyama, S., Kim, J., García Matzar, L. P. O., & Ajsivinac Sian, J. E. (under review). On the (non-)universality of the preference for subject-object word order in sentence comprehension: A sentence processing study in Kaqchikel Maya.
|
[17]
|
Kubo, T., Ono, H., Tanaka, M., Koizumi, M., & Sakai, H. (2012). How does animacy affect word order in a VOS language? Poster present ed at the 25th Annual CUNY Conference on Human Sentence Pro cessing, New York.
|
[18]
|
Lewis, M. P. (2009). Ethnologue: Languages of the world (16th ed.). Dallas, TX: SIL International. http://www.ethnologue.com/
|
[19]
|
Mazuka, R., Itoh, K., & Kondo, T. (2002). Costs of scrambling in Japa nese sentence processing. In M. Nakayama (Ed.), Sentence process ing in East Asian languages (pp. 131-166). Stanford, CA: CSLI Pub lications.
|
[20]
|
Preminger, O. (2011). Agreement as a fallible operation. Doctoral dis sertation, MIT.
|
[21]
|
Rodríguez Guaján, J. O. (1994). Rutz’ib’axik ri Kaqchikel: Manual de redacción Kaqchikel. Guatemala City: Editorial Cholsamaj.
|
[22]
|
Sekerina, I. A. (1997). The syntax and processing of Russian scrambled constructions in Russian. Doctoral Dissertation, New York: City University of New York.
|
[23]
|
Tamaoka, K., Sakai, H., Kawahara, J., Miyaoka, Y., Lim, H., & Koizu mi, M. (2005). Priority information used for the processing of Japa nese sentences: Thematic roles, case particles or grammatical functions? Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 34, 273-324.
doi:10.1007/s10936-005-3641-6
|
[24]
|
Tamaoka, K., Asano, M., Miyaoka, Y., & Yokosawa, K. (2013). Pre and post-head processing for single and double-scrambled sentences of a head-final language as measured by the eye tracking method. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research.
doi:10.1007/s10936-013-9244-8
|
[25]
|
Tanaka, M., Branigan, H. P., McLean, J. F., & Pickering, M. P. (2011). Conceptual influences on word order and voice in sentence produc tion: Evidence from Japanese. Journal of Memory and Language, 65, 318-330. doi:10.1016/j.jml.2011.04.009
|
[26]
|
Tay Coyoy, A. (1996). Análisis de situación de la educación maya en Guatemala. Guatemala City: Cholsamaj.
|
[27]
|
Tichoc Cumes, R., Ajsivinac Sian, J. E., García, L. P. O., Espantzay, I. C., Cutzal, C. M., & Alosno Guajan, E. (2000). Runuk’ul pa rub’eyal rutz’ib’axik ri Kaqchikel ch’ab’ al: Gramática normativa del idioma Maya Kaqchikel. Chimaltenango, Guatemala: Comunidad Lingüísti ca Kaqchikel de la Academia de las Lenguas Mayas de Guatemala.
|