[1]
|
Brown, P., & Levinson, S. C. (1987). Politeness: Some universals in language usage. Cambridge: University Press.
|
[2]
|
Couper-Kuhlen, E. (2009). A sequential approach to affect: The case of “disappointment”. In M. Haakana, M. Laakso, & J. Lindstr?m, J. (Eds.), Talk in interaction—Comparative dimensions (pp. 94-123). Helsinki: Finnish Literature Society (SKS).
|
[3]
|
Hinds, L. (2009). Public satisfaction with police: The influence of general attitudes and police-citizen encounters. International journal of police science and management, 11, 54-65.
doi:10.1350/ijps.2009.11.1.109
|
[4]
|
J?nsson, L. (1988). The police interview as communicative situation. Link?ping: Link?ping University.
|
[5]
|
J?nsson, L. & Linell, P. (1996). Misbelief sequences in police interviews. In: M. Thelander et al. (Eds), Samspel och variation: Spr?kliga studier till?gnade Bengt Nordberg p? 60-?rsdagen (pp. 199-208). Uppsala: Uppsala University.
|
[6]
|
Luckmann, T. (1990). Social communication, dialogue and conversation. In I. Markovà, & K. Foppa (Eds.), The dynamics of dialogue (pp. 45-59). New York: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
|
[7]
|
Manning, P. K. (1988.) Symbolic communication. Signifying calls and the police response. Cambridge, Massachussetts: MIT Press.
|
[8]
|
Riis-Johansen, M. O. (2005). The police interview as conversation. Trondheim: Hovedoppgave i anvendt spr?kvitenskap. Institutt for spr?k-og kommunikasjonsstudier, NTNU.
|
[9]
|
Rosenbaum, D. P. et al. (2005). Attitudes toward the police: The effects of direct and vicarious experience. Police Quarterly, 8, 343-365.
doi:10.1177/1098611104271085
|
[10]
|
R?nneberg, K. (2009). Police conversations with the public. Linguistic features which may help or hamper the communication process. Acta Humaniora No. 378, Oslo: University of Oslo.
|
[11]
|
R?nneberg, K. (2011). Police Conversations with the Public. Linguistic features which may help or hamper the communication process. Unipub.
|
[12]
|
R?nneberg, K., & Svennevig, J. (2010). Declining to help: Rejections in service requests to the police. Discourse & Communication, 4, 279-305.
|
[13]
|
Skogan, W. G. (2005). Citizen satisfaction with police encounters. Police Quarterly, 8, 298-321. doi:10.1177/1098611104271086
|
[14]
|
Skogan, W. G. (2006). Asymmetry in the impact of encounters with police. Policing & Society, 16, 99-126.
doi:10.1080/10439460600662098
|
[15]
|
Skogan, W. G. (2009). Concern about crime and confidence in the police: Reassurance or accountability? Police Quarterly, 12, 301-317.
doi:10.1177/1098611109339893
|
[16]
|
Tyler, T. R. (2006). Why people obey the law. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
|
[17]
|
Tyler, T. R., & Huo, Y. J. (2002). Trust in the law: Encouraging public cooperation with the police and courts. New York: Russel Sage.
|
[18]
|
Weitzer, R. & Tuch, S. A. (2005). Determinants of public satisfaction with the police. Police Quarterly, 8, 279-296.
doi:10.1177/1098611104271106
|
[19]
|
Whalen, M. R., & Zimmerman, D. H. (1987). Sequential and institutional contexts in calls for help. Social Psychology Quarterly, 50, 172-185. doi:10.2307/2786750
|
[20]
|
Whalen, M. R., & Zimmerman, D. H. (1990). Describing trouble: Practical epistemology in citizen calls to the police. Language in Society, 19, 465-492. doi:10.1017/S0047404500014779
|
[21]
|
Zimmerman, D. H. (1992). The interactional organization of calls for emergency assistance. In P. Drew, & J. Heritage (Eds.), Talk at work. Interaction in institutional settings (pp. 418-469). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
|