[1]
|
Andronico, A. & Lo Faro, A. (2005). Defining problems: The opem method of coordination, fundamental rights and the theory of governance. In O. De Schutter, & S. Deakin (Eds.), Social rights and market forces. Is the open coordination of employment and social policies the future of social Europe? (pp. 41-96). Bruxelles: Bruylant.
|
[2]
|
Appadurai, A. (1996). Modernity at large: Cultural dimensions of gloabalization. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
|
[3]
|
Avbelj, M. (2008). Questioning EU constitutionalisms. German Law Journal, 9, 1-26.
|
[4]
|
Becker, S. (2009). The role of national parliaments in the open method of coordination. Working Paper FG 1, 2009/10, August 2009 SWP Berlin. URL (last checked 20 December 2012).
http://swp-berlin.org/fileadmin/contents/products/arbeitspapiere/national_parliaments_KS.pdf
|
[5]
|
Benz, A. (2007). Accountable multilevel governance by the open method of coordination? European Law Journal, 13, 505-522.
doi:10.1111/j.1468-0386.2007.00381.x
|
[6]
|
Benz, A., & Papadopoulos, Y. (2006). Actors, institutions and democratic governance: Comparing across levels. In A. Benz, & Y. Papadopoulos (Eds.), Governance and democracy. Comparing national, European and international experiences (pp. 273-295). London: Routledge.
|
[7]
|
Bermann, G. (2001). Law in an Enlarged European Union. EUSA Review, 14, 1-5.
|
[8]
|
Beveridge, F., & Velluti, S. (2008), Gender and the open method of coordination. Dartmouth: Ashgate.
|
[9]
|
Borrás, S., & Radaelli, C. (2010). Recalibrating the open method of coordination: Towards diverse and more effective usages. Swedish Institute for European Policy Studies, 7, 43.
|
[10]
|
Borrás, S., & Radaelli, C. (2011). The politics of governance architectures: Creation, change and effects of the EU lisbon strategy. Journal of European Public Policy, 18, 463-484.
doi:10.1080/13501763.2011.560069
|
[11]
|
Bulmer, S. (2012). Governing the lisbon strategy: Uncertain governance in turbulent economic times. In D. Papadimitriou, & P. Copeland (Eds.), Ten years of the EU’s lisbon agenda (pp. 29-49). Basingstoke: Palgrave MacMillan.
|
[12]
|
Castellano, G. Jeunema?tre, A., & Lange, B. (2012). Reforming European Union financial regulation: Thinking through governance models. European Business Law Review, 3, 409-446.
|
[13]
|
Chalmers, D. (2009). Gauging the cumbersomeness of EU law. Current legal problems, 62, 405-439. doi:10.1093/clp/62.1.405
|
[14]
|
Cohen, J., & Sabel, C. (1997). Directly-deliberative polyarchy. European Law Journal, 3, 313-342. doi:10.1111/1468-0386.00034
|
[15]
|
Cotterell, R. (2007). Is it bad to be different? Comparative law and the appreciation of diversity. In E. Orucu, & D. Nelsen (Eds.), Comparative law: A handbook (pp. 133-154). Oxford: Hart Publishing.
|
[16]
|
Craig, P. (2008). The treaty of lisbon, process, architecture and substance. European Law Review, 33, 137-166.
|
[17]
|
Dawson, M. (2009). Soft law and the rule of law in the European Union: Revision or redundancy? EUI Working Papers, RSCAS 2009/24.
|
[18]
|
Dawson, M. (2010). Transforming into what? New governance in the EU and the “managerial sensibility” in modern law. Wisconsin Law Review Symposium Issue on New Governance and the Transformation of Law, 2, 390-440. doi:10.1017/CBO9781139017442
|
[19]
|
Dawson, M. (2011). New governance and the transformation of European law. Coordinating EU social law and policy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
|
[20]
|
Dawson, M. (2011). Three waves of new governance in the European Union. European Law Review, 36, 208-226.
|
[21]
|
De Búrca, G. (2000). Differentiation within the “core”? The case of the internal market. In G. De Búrca, & J. Scott (Eds.), Constitutional change in the EU: From uniformity to flexibility? (pp. 133-171). Oxford: Hart Publishing.
|
[22]
|
De Búrca, G. (2003). The constitutional challenge of new governance in the European Union. European Law Review, 28, 814-839.
|
[23]
|
De Búrca, G. (2006). EU race discrimination law: A hybrid model? In G. de Búrca, & J. Scott (Eds.), Law and new governance in the EU and US (pp. 97-120). Oxford: Hart Publishing.
|
[24]
|
De Búrca, G. (2010). New governance and experimentalism: An introduction. Wisconsin Law Review Symposium Issue on New Governance and the Transformation of Law, 2, 227-238.
|
[25]
|
De Búrca, G., & Scott, J. (2000). Constitutional change in the EU: From uniformity to flexibility? Oxford: Hart.
|
[26]
|
De Búrca, G., & Scott, J. (2007). Introduction. Narrowing the gap? Law and new approaches to governance in the European Union. Columbia Journal of European Law, 13, 513-518.
|
[27]
|
De Ruijter, A., & Hervey, T. (2012). Healthcare and the lisbon strategy. In D. Papadimitriou, & P. Copeland (Eds.), The EU’s lisbon strategy. Evaluating Success, understanding failure (pp. 130-148). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
|
[28]
|
De Witte, B. (2012). The European union as an international legal experiment. In G. de Búrca, & J. H. H. Weiler (Eds.), The Worlds of European Constitutionalism (pp. 19-56). Cambridge: CUP.
|
[29]
|
Dougan, M. (2006). “And some fell on stony ground ???”—A critical reading of G. Majone’s dilemma of European integration. European Law Review, 31, 865-878.
|
[30]
|
Dougan, M. (2011). What are we to make of the citizens. Initiative? Common Market Law Review, 48, 1807-1848.
|
[31]
|
Duina, F., & Raunio, T. (2007). The open method of coordination and national parliaments: Further marginalization or new opportunities? Journal of European Public Policy, 14, 489-506.
doi:10.1080/13501760701314318
|
[32]
|
Erlanger, H. et al. (2005). Foreword. Is it time for a new legal realism? Wisconsin Law Review, 2005, 335-363.
|
[33]
|
Esty, C. D. (2006). Good governance at the supranational scale: Globalizing administrative law. Yale Law Journal, 115, 1490-1562.
|
[34]
|
Everson, M. (1998). Administering Europe. Journal of Common Market Studies, 36, 195-215.
|
[35]
|
Gardner, J. (2001). Legal Positivism: Myths. American Journal of Jurisprudence, 199-227.
|
[36]
|
Harlow, C. (2002). Accountability in the European Union (p. 171). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
|
[37]
|
Harlow, C., & Rawlings, R. (2007). Promoting accountability in multilevel governance: A network approach. European Law Journal, 13, 542-562.
|
[38]
|
Hatzopoulos, V. (2012). Regulating services in the European Union (p. 346). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
|
[39]
|
Hervey, T. (2010). Adjudicating in the shadow of the informal settlement? The court of justice of the European Union, “new governance” and social welfare. Current Legal Problems, 63, 92-152.
doi:10.1093/clp/63.1.92
|
[40]
|
Holder, J., & Scott, J. (2006). Law and new environmental governance in the European Union. In G. De Búrca, & J. Scott (Eds.), Law and new governance in the EU and the US (pp. 211-242). Oxford: Hart.
|
[41]
|
Hood, C. (1986). The hidden public sector: The “quangocratization” of the world. In F.-X., Kaufman, G., Majone, & V. Ostrom (Eds.), Guidance, control and evaluation in the public sector (pp. 183-207). New York: De Gruyter.
|
[42]
|
Joerges, C., & R?dl, F. (2009). Informal politics, formalised law and the “social deficit” of European integration: Reflections after the judgments of the ECJ in Viking and Laval. European Law Journal, 15, 1-19. doi:10.1111/j.1468-0386.2008.00448.x
|
[43]
|
Kilpatrick, C. (2006). New EU employment governance and constitutionalism. In G. de Búrca, & J. Scott (Eds.), Law and New Governance in the EU and the US, pp. 121-152.
|
[44]
|
Kingsbury, B., Krisch, N., Stewart, B. R., & Wiener, B. J. (2005). Foreword: Global governance as administration—National and transnational approaches to global administrative law. Law and Contemporary Problems, 68, 1-13.
|
[45]
|
Klabbers, J. (1998). The undesirability of soft law. Nordic Journal of International Law, 67, 381-391. doi:10.1163/15718109820295741
|
[46]
|
Koutakalis, C., Buzogany A., & B?rzel, T. (2010). When soft regulation is not enough: The integrated pollution prevention and control directive of the European Union. Regulation & Governance, 4, 329 344. doi:10.1111/j.1748-5991.2010.01084.x
|
[47]
|
Krisch, N., & Kingsbury, B. (2006). Introduction: Global governance and global administrative law in the international legal order. European Journal of International Law, 17, 1-13. doi:10.1093/ejil/chi170
|
[48]
|
Ladeur, K.-H. (1997). The integration of scientific and technological expertise into the process of standard—Setting according to German law. In C. Joerges et al. (Eds.), Integrating Scientific Expertise into Regulatory Decision-Making (pp. 141-167). Baden-Baden: Nomos.
|
[49]
|
Lindahl, H. (2010). A-Legality: Postnationalism and the question of legal boundaries. Modern Law Review, 73, 30-56.
doi:10.1111/j.1468-2230.2009.00783.x
|
[50]
|
Lobel, O. (2004). The renew deal: The fall of regulation and the rise of governance in contemporary legal thought. Minnesota Law Review, 89, 342-470.
|
[51]
|
Maher, I. (2007). Economic governance: Hybridity, accountability and control. In G. de Búrca, & J. Scott (Eds.), Narrowing the gap? Law and new approaches to governance in the European Union. Columbia Journal of European Law, 13, 679-704.
|
[52]
|
Majone, G. (2002). Delegation of regulatory powers in a mixed polity. European Law Journal, 8, 319-339. doi:10.1111/1468-0386.00156
|
[53]
|
Mendes, J. (2011). Participation and the role of law after Lisbon: A legal view on article 11 TEU. Common Market Law Review, 48, 1849-1877.
|
[54]
|
M?llers, C. (2006). European governance: Meaning and value of a concept. Common Market Law Review, 43, 313-336.
|
[55]
|
Mulgan, R. (2000). “Accountability”: An ever-expanding concept? Public Administration, 78, 555-574.
|
[56]
|
Nelken, D. (2008). Normalizing time: European integration and court delays in Italy. In A. Petersen et al. (Eds.), Paradoxes of European Legal Integration (pp. 299-324). Aldershot: Ashgate.
|
[57]
|
Papadopoulos, Y. (2007). Problems of democratic accountability in network and multilevel governance. European Law Journal, 13, 469 486. doi:10.1111/j.1468-0386.2007.00379.x
|
[58]
|
Pisani-Ferry, J., & Sapir, A. (2006). Last exit to Lisbon. Bruegel Policy Brief 2006/02. URL (last checked 20 December 2012).
http://www.bruegel.org/index.php?pid=73
|
[59]
|
Poiares Maduro, M. (2003). Europe and the constitution: What if this is as good as it gets? In J. H. H. Weiler, & M. Wind (Eds.), European Constitutionalism beyond the State (pp. 74-102). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
|
[60]
|
Sabel, C. F., & Zeitlin, J. (2008). Learning from difference: The new architecture of experimentalist governance in the EU. European Law Journal, 14, 271-327. doi:10.1111/j.1468-0386.2008.00415.x
|
[61]
|
Scott, C. (2000). Accountability in the regulatory state. Journal of Law and Society, 27, 38-60. doi:10.1111/1467-6478.00146
|
[62]
|
Scott, J. (1998). Law, Legitimacy and EC governance: Prospects for “partnership”. Journal of Common Market Studies, 36, 175-194.
|
[63]
|
Scott, J. (1998). Law, legitimacy and EC governance: Prospects for “partnership”. Journal of Common Market Studies, 36, 175-194.
|
[64]
|
Scott, J., & Sturm S. (2007). Courts as catalysts: Rethinking the judicial role in new governance. Columbia Journal of European Law, 13, 565-594.
|
[65]
|
Scott, J., & Trubek D. (2002). Mind the gap: Law and new approaches to governance in the European Union. European Law Journal, 8, 1-18. doi:10.1111/1468-0386.00139
|
[66]
|
Shaw, J. (1996). European Union legal studies in crisis? Towards a new dynamic. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, 16, 231-253.
doi:10.1093/ojls/16.2.231
|
[67]
|
Shaw, J. (2000). Constitutionalism and flexibility in the EU: Developing a relational approach. In G. de Búrca, & J. Scott (Eds.), Constitutional change in the EU: From uniformity to flexibility? (pp. 331-358). Oxford: Hart Publishing.
|
[68]
|
Shaw, J., & Wiener, A. (2000). The paradox of the European polity. In M. G. Cowles, & M. Smith (Eds.), The state of the European Union Vol. 5: Risks, reform, resistance and revival. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
|
[69]
|
Simon, W. (2004). Solving problems vs. claiming rights: The pragmatist challenge to legal liberalism. William and Mary Law Review, 46, 127-212.
|
[70]
|
Smismans, S. (2007). New governance—The solution for active European citizenship, or the end of citizenship. Columbia Journal of European Law, 13, 595-622.
|
[71]
|
Stewart, B. R. (1986). Reconstitutive law. Maryland Law Review, 46, 86-114.
|
[72]
|
Szyszczak, E. (2006). Experimental governance: The open method of coordination. European Law Journal, 12, 486-502.
doi:10.1111/j.1468-0386.2006.00329.x
|
[73]
|
Szyszczak, E. (2012). Soft law and safe havens. In U. Neergaard, E. Szyszczak, & J. W. van de Gronden (Eds.), Social services of general interest in the EU (pp. 317-345). The Hague: TMC Asser Press.
|
[74]
|
Teubner, G. (1988). Introduction to autopoietic law. In G. Teubner (Ed.) Autopoietic law: A new approach to law and society (p. 1), Berlin, New York: De Gruyter.
|
[75]
|
Tully, J. (2002). The unfreedom of the moderns in comparison to their ideals of constitutionalism and democracy. Modern Law Review, 65, 204-228. doi:10.1111/1468-2230.00375
|
[76]
|
Trubek, L., & Hervey, T. (2007). freedom to provide health care services within the EU: An opportunity for “hybrid governance”. In G. de Búrca, & J. Scott (Eds.), Narrowing the gap? Law and new approaches to governance in the European Union. Columbia Journal of European Law, 13, 623-648.
|
[77]
|
Trubek, D., & Trubek, L. (2007). New governance and legal regulation: Complementarity, rivalry and transformation. In G. de Búrca, & J. Scott (Eds.), Narrowing the gap? Law and new approaches to governance in the European Union. Columbia Journal of European Law, 13, 539-564.
|
[78]
|
Velluti, S. (2007). What European Union strategy for integrating migrants? The Role of OMC soft mechanisms in the development of an EU immigration policy. European Journal of Migration and Law, 9, 53-82. doi:10.1163/138836407X179300
|
[79]
|
Walker, N. (1999). Flexibility within a metaconstitutional frame: Reflections on the future of legal authority in Europe. Harvard Jean Monnet Working Paper 12/99, Harvard Law School. URL (last checked 20 December 2012).
www.jeanmonnetprogram.org/papers/99/991201.html
|
[80]
|
Walker, N. (2000). Flexibility within a metaconstitutional frame: Reflections on the future of legal authority in Europe. In G. de Búrca, & J. Scott (Eds.), Constitutional change in the EU: From uniformity to flexibility? (pp. 9-30). Oxford: Hart Publishing.
|
[81]
|
Walker, N. (2000). Flexibility within a metaconstitutional frame: Reflections on the future of legal authority in Europe. In G. de Búrca, & J. Scott (Eds.), Constitutional change in the EU: From uniformity to flexibility? (pp. 9-30). Oxford: Hart Publishing.
|
[82]
|
Walker, N. (2002). The idea of constitutional pluralism. Modern Law Review, 65, 317-359. doi:10.1111/1468-2230.00383
|
[83]
|
Walker, N., & de Bùrca, G. (2007). Reconceiving law and new governance. Columbia Journal of European Law, 13, 519-537.
|
[84]
|
Wallace, H. (1998). Differentiated integration. In D. Dinan (Ed.), Encyclopedia of the European Union (p. 137). Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner Publishers.
|
[85]
|
Weiler, J. H. H. (1995). Does Europe need a constitution? Reflections on Demos, Telos and the German maastricht decision. European Law Journal, 1, 219-258. doi:10.1111/j.1468-0386.1995.tb00030.x
|
[86]
|
Wilkinson, M. (2010). Three conceptions of law: Towards a jurisprudence of democratic experimentalism. Wisconsin Law Review Symposium Issue on New Governance and the Transformation of Law, 2, 673-718.
|
[87]
|
Zeitlin, J. (2005). Social Europe and experimentalist governance: Towards a new constitutional compromise? In G. de Búrca (Ed.), EU law and the welfare state: In search of solidarity (pp. 224-225). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
|