Migrating Foreign Body Bronchus: An Unusual Case of Foreign Body Aspiration ()
1. Introduction
Foreign bodies [FB] in the bronchus are important causes of morbidity and mortality in paediatric age group and pose diagnostic and therapeutic challenges [1] [2] . The list of foreign bodies aspirated is endless from nuts, seeds to sharp, metallic objects such as needles, toothpicks [3] . The clinical presentation depends on site, nature, age of patient and duration [4] . Herein we report a case of foreign body aspiration presenting with unusual presentation and complicated management.
2. Case
A 4-year-old boy was presented with recurrent cough and fever for 3 months. There was no history of weight loss and night sweats. The child had received multiple courses of antibiotic therapy with the diagnosis of bacterial pneumonia. The symptoms had become much worse over the period of the last one month before she attended to our hospital. On physical examination, child was tachypnic with respiratory rate 34/min, right side chest movement was restricted with decreased breath sounds and fine crepts. Rest of systemic examination was unremarkable. Roentgenograms of the chest (Postero-anterior and lateral view) showed presence of electric bulb with filament in the right bronchus (Figure 1). Intravenous Amoxicillin-clavulunate (100 mg/kg/day in three divided doses), Amikacin (15 mg/kg/per dose in two divided doses) and metronidazole (7.5 mg/kg/dose, three doses per day) were started and child was taken up for rigid bronchoscopy. On bronchoscopy there was significant mucus accumulation and inflammation on right side but no foreign body was visualised. On examination of left bronchus electric bulb body was found in left lower lobe bronchus (Figure 2).
3. Discussion
Foreign body inhalation is common worldwide [1] . Children aged between 1 and 5 years of age are commonly affected [2] [3] . Overactive nature of male babies as compared to the females may be attributed to male preponderance [5] . X-ray evaluation is indicated for all patients in whom an esophageal FB is suspected [6] . However, a negative radiographic result does not exclude the presence of foreign bodies in the aerodigestive tract as radio-lucent objects like rubber materials, groundnuts and bolus of meat are not easily detected by plain radiography. Chest radiographs are commonly performed in children with suspected FBA. Chest radiographs may show unilateral lobar hyperlucency, localized atelectasis, and localized pulmonary infiltrate. However, a normal radiograph cannot exclude FBA [7] . In undetected cases, computed tomography (CT) scanning should be done [7] . Foreign body migration has been previously reported [8] . The mechanism of migration is due to high flow generated by coughing [9] . Inorganic and smooth foreign bodies are more likely to migrate [8] -[10] . Our case was
Figure 1. Radiograph showing electric bulb in right bronchus.
Figure 2. Electric bulb in left bronchus.
an electric bulb with smooth surface which predisposed its migration. Endoscopic removal of foreign bodies in the aerodigestive tract using rigid scopes under general anaesthesia has been reported to be a golden standard procedure [11] . This is both a diagnostic and a management method and is generally recommended for most patients with history of FB ingestion. Rigid endoscopy, as compared to flexible endoscopy is a useful method to diagnose and remove foreign bodies in the aerodigestive tract as it has a large lumen and allows better visualization of the potential anatomic sites of foreign body impaction in the aerodigestive tract [12] . Foreign body aspiration is a common medical emergency with serious airway obstruction and sudden respiratory distress occurs immediately in complete obstruction. If the obstruction is incomplete foreign body becomes lodged, progressive respiratory symptoms such as chronic cough, wheezing, hemoptysis, pneumonia and atelectasis can develop and the diagnosis is usually delayed.
4. Conclusion
We hypothesise that inert and smooth foreign bodies in the bronchus are prone for migration from one side to other due to minimal inflammatory process and easy mobility. A high index of suspicion of migration is required if foreign body is not localised intraoperatively.
NOTES
*Corresponding author.