Degradation Rate Assessment of Biodegradable Magnesium Alloys

Abstract

Biodegradable magnesium alloys have been widely used in medical implants. But safety concerns were put forward for the high degradation rate of biodegradable magnesium alloy. The optimal biodegradable magnesium alloys that give rise to the desired degradation rate hasn’t yet to be defined. Assessing the degradation rate of biodegradable magnesium alloys involves in vitro testing, in vivo testing, numerical modeling, understanding the factors influencing their degradation in physiological environments, biocompatibility testing, and clinical studies. It is important to standardize analytical tools aimed at assessing the degradation rate of biodegradable magnesium alloys. It is advisable to identify the threshold for safe degradation rate of biodegradable magnesium alloys in biomedical applications.

Share and Cite:

Cao, B. , Cao, L. and Kallmes, D. (2024) Degradation Rate Assessment of Biodegradable Magnesium Alloys. Materials Sciences and Applications, 15, 245-252. doi: 10.4236/msa.2024.158017.

1. Introduction

Biodegradable magnesium (Mg) and its alloys have been applied to making bone screws and pins, bone filling, dental implants, and sutures [1]. Compared with other biodegradable implant materials, such as polymers and bioglass, Mg-based alloys show unique advantages, such as their close density with bone, light weight and MRI compatibility [2]. Magnesium alloys do not interfere with magnetic resonance imaging. Due to lower artefact production, Jonathan et al suggested that Mg-based implant material should be promoted for future orthopaedic solutions [3]. Biodegradable (absorbable) magnesium alloys are designed to degrade in vivo via an electrochemical mechanism (corrosion or degradation) and then metabolized or assimilated by cells and tissue [4]. Assessing the degradation rate of biodegradable magnesium alloys is crucial for understanding their performance in various applications, especially in biomedical implants. Analysis through characterization of the magnesium alloy, including its chemical composition, microstructure, surface morphology, and so on, will provide insights into how the magnesium alloys might degrade over time.

Several factors can influence the degradation rate of magnesium alloy, including the material composition [5], microstructure [6], surface treatment [7], molecular weight [8], sterilization method [9], environmental conditions (such as temperature and pH) [10], and the presence of enzymes or other catalysts [11]. The precise application of magnesium alloys will also play a role in its biodegradability [12].

During biomedical application, magnesium and its alloys were reported to show relatively high degradation rates that can affect human cells and cause infection [13]. The corrosion products, released from magnesium alloys may form a hostile environment. Biocompatibility testing is essential for the safety evaluation of degradation rate of magnesium alloys in biomedical applications. It is advisable to identify the threshold for safe degradation rate of biodegradable magnesium alloys.

Regulatory agencies may require comprehensive evaluation of the degradation properties of biodegradable magnesium alloy as part of the approval process for medical devices. Manufacturers must demonstrate that the magnesium alloys medical device degrades at an appropriate rate, matching the healing timeline of tissues, and does not cause adverse effects.

Understanding the degradation rate of biodegradable magnesium alloy is essential for determining their clinical performance and safety. If the degradation rate is too slow, the magnesium alloy may remain in the body longer than necessary, potentially causing adverse reactions or interfering with tissue healing. If the degradation rate is too fast, it may compromise the mechanical integrity prematurely.

Quality control tests are useful tools for standardized workflows. Practically, when workflows are being developed and optimized, it is beneficial to use multiple quality controls when analyzing samples with standardized protocols. The degradation rate assessment of biodegradable magnesium alloy is critical for ensuring the reliability, safety, and efficacy of these biodegradable magnesium alloys in biomedical applications. Here’s a comprehensive approach to evaluating the degradation rate.

2. Experimental Assessment

2.1. In Vitro Testing

There are several testing methods. Researchers conduct in vitro degradation studies under controlled laboratory conditions to simulate the physiological environment. Samples are immersed in buffered aqueous solutions at physiological temperature and pH value. According to ASTM G31-72 [14], the degradation process is monitored over time through measurements of mass loss, changes in mechanical properties, and analysis of degradation byproducts. Electrochemical measurements use techniques such as potentiodynamic polarization and electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) to evaluate corrosion behavior. Table 1 shows the degradation rate of some magnesium alloys in simulated body fluid (SBF). Surface analyses use scanning electron microscopy (SEM), energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS), and X-ray diffraction (XRD) to analyze surface morphology and composition changes over time. Spectroscopic techniques such as Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) or nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy can be used to analyze chemical changes.

Table 1. Degradation rate of some Mg alloys in simulated body fluid (SBF).

Alloy

Immersion Corrosion Rate (mm/yr)

Icorr (µA/cm2)

References

Mg-1Zn-2.9Y

13

-

[15]

Mg-2Zn

0.4

-

[16]

Mg-Zn-Ca-Mn

-

6.59

[17]

2.2. In Vivo Testing

In addition to in vitro studies, in vivo degradation studies involve implanting biodegradable magnesium alloy in animal models or human subjects. Degradation rates obtained via in vitro experiments are not necessarily the same as in the in vivo case, however, experiments in vivo will help define what the degradation rate should be. In vivo studies provide insights into how degradation occurs within a biological environment and how it may affect tissue response and long-term outcomes. ASTM F 763-04 [18] can be referenced in vivo test. Imaging techniques, such as X-rays, micro-computed tomography (micro-CT), or MRI to monitor the degradation process and structural integrity over time. Histological analysis is conducted to examine tissue samples around the implantation site to assess biocompatibility and inflammatory response.

3. Analytical and Computational Modeling

In vivo and in vitro tests are usually lengthy and costly. Computational modeling can effectively predict the degradation behaviors of medical implants in the living body. Numerical models have been researched to predict the degradation kinetics based on experimental data [19]. Many relevant parameters need to be optimized when analyzing the degradation rate of biodegradable magnesium alloys. The available analytical modeling still needs to be improved.

3.1. Degradation Modeling

A useful degradation model should account for the underlying biological environment. Empirical models can be developed based on experimental data to predict degradation rates under various conditions. For kinetic models, kinetic equations are used to describe the rate of magnesium dissolution and formation of corrosion products. Finite Element analysis (FEA) can simulate the degradation process to predict how the alloy will degrade over time in different environments.

3.2. Machine Learning Models

High-quality data are the precondition for analyzing. Data are first collected from experimental studies, including composition, processing parameters, and degradation rates. Key features influencing degradation are identified, such as alloy composition, microstructure, and environmental factors. Then machine learning algorithms e.g., regression models, are used to develop predictive models of degradation rates. The models should be validated with independent datasets to ensure accuracy and generalization.

4. Factors Influencing Degradation Rate

4.1. Alloy Composition

Alloying with different elements shows various degradation rates for Mg alloys in biomedical applications [20]. Alloying elements like calcium, zinc, and rare earth elements can influence the degradation rate and mechanical properties. Trace impurities can significantly affect degradation behavior.

4.2. Microstructure

Fine-grained structures generally exhibit different degradation rates compared to coarse-grained ones. The degradation of a porous magnesian sample in the biological environment is remarkable as porosity on the sample increases the total surface area and increases the risks of metal ion leaching [21]. In addition, the surface oxides’ possible chemical reactions with the physiological fluids significantly influence the applicability of the porous structure. Secondary phases Mg alloys [22] and intermetallic compounds can act as galvanic cells, affecting degradation.

4.3. Surface Treatment

Biodegradable coatings or surface modifications can be applied to control degradation rates. Some studies developed coatings and surface treatments to regulate the degradation rate [23] [24]. Anodized layers can provide initial protection but must degrade synchronously with the underlying alloy. Figure 1 [25] schematically illustrated the coating methods potentially suitable for Mg alloys.

4.4. Environmental Factors

Varying pH levels and ion concentrations in the physiological environment can accelerate or decelerate degradation rate. Cyclic loading and mechanical stress can influence degradation rate through mechanisms like stress corrosion cracking and fatigue. Inorganic ions and cyclic loading may accelerate the degradation rate of magnesium alloys. While organic substances could decrease the degradation rate of Mg alloys [26].

Figure 1. Coating methods applicable for Mg alloys [25].

5. Biocompatibility and Clinical Considerations

The degradation rate of Mg-based alloys is often required to match the level of tissue-healing progress in order to maintain biological stability surrounding the implant. Through biocompatibility assays and clinical studies, the threshold for safe degradation rate of biodegradable magnesium alloys in biomedical applications may be identified.

5.1. Biocompatibility Testing

Cytotoxicity tests are useful steps to determine the potential toxicity of a test substance. Cytotoxicity assays can be developed according to ISO 10993-5 [27] to assess the toxicity of biomedical Mg-alloys degradation products on cell cultures.

Referring to ISO 10993-6 [28], histological analysis can examine tissue responses to implanted materials, including inflammation and fibrosis. And it is used to monitor the degradation products in vivo that dissolved into the surrounding tissue.

5.2. Clinical Translation

Clinical translation should ensure compliance with regulatory standards for biomedical implants. The degradation behavior of magnesium alloys should be continuously monitored over extended periods to capture any unexpected phenomena or late-stage degradation mechanisms. Artefact production may be used as an alternative approach for degradation tracking to determine the degradation rates of Mg alloys implants [3]. Long-term in vivo studies can be conducted to assess the performance and safety of the magnesium alloys over the intended lifespan of the medical implants.

6. Conclusion

Combining experimental methods with advanced modeling techniques, including AI and machine learning, provides a robust framework for assessing the degradation rate of biodegradable magnesium alloys. This integrated approach enables the development of reliable and safe biodegradable implants for medical applications. Precise tests and qualitative data analysis should be established as a powerful tool for quality control and then facilitating the implementation of cost-effective and standardized analytical workflows into clinical practice. It is advisable to identify the threshold for safe degradation rate of biodegradable magnesium alloys in biomedical applications.

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank the involved organizations for providing the platform for this research to take place.

NOTES

*These authors contributed equally to the work.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this paper.

References

[1] Chen, J., Xu, Y., Kolawole, S.K., Wang, J., Su, X., Tan, L., et al. (2022) Systems, Properties, Surface Modification and Applications of Biodegradable Magnesium-Based Alloys: A Review. Materials, 15, Article 5031.
https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15145031
[2] Nouri, A., Rohani Shirvan, A., Li, Y. and Wen, C. (2023) Biodegradable Metallic Suture Anchors: A Review. Smart Materials in Manufacturing, 1, Article 100005.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.smmf.2022.100005
[3] Espiritu, J., Berangi, M., Yiannakou, C., Silva, E., Francischello, R., Kuehne, A., et al. (2022) Evaluating Metallic Artefact of Biodegradable Magnesium-Based Implants in Magnetic Resonance Imaging. Bioactive Materials, 15, 382-391.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bioactmat.2021.11.035
[4] ASTM International (2016) ASTM F3160-16: Standard Guide for Metallurgical Characterization of Absorbable Metallic Materials for Medical Implants.
[5] Wang, J., Xu, J., Hopkins, C., Chow, D.H. and Qin, L. (2020) Biodegradable Magnesium‐based Implants in Orthopedics—A General Review and Perspectives. Advanced Science, 7, Article 1902443.
https://doi.org/10.1002/advs.201902443
[6] Krüger, D., Zeller-Plumhoff, B., Wiese, B., Yi, S., Zuber, M., Wieland, D.C.F., et al. (2021) Assessing the Microstructure and in Vitro Degradation Behavior of Mg-xGd Screw Implants Using μct. Journal of Magnesium and Alloys, 9, 2207-2222.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jma.2021.07.029
[7] Benn, F., Kröger, N., Zinser, M., van Gaalen, K., Vaughan, T.J., Yan, M., et al. (2021) Influence of Surface Condition on the Degradation Behaviour and Biocompatibility of Additively Manufactured WE43. Materials Science and Engineering: C, 124, Article 112016.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2021.112016
[8] Imani, A., Rahimi, E., Lekka, M., Andreatta, F., Magnan, M., Gonzalez-Garcia, Y., et al. (2023) Albumin Protein Impact on Early-Stage in Vitro Biodegradation of Magnesium Alloy (WE43). ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces, 16, 1659-1674.
https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.3c12381
[9] Park, J., Jang, G.H., Jung, Y.W., Seo, H., Han, H., Lee, J., et al. (2020) Tailoring H2O2 Generation Kinetics with Magnesium Alloys for Efficient Disinfection on Titanium Surface. Scientific Reports, 10, Article No. 6536.
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-63007-6
[10] Zohdy, K.M., El-Sherif, R.M. and El-Shamy, A.M. (2022) Effect of pH Fluctuations on the Biodegradability of Nanocomposite Mg-Alloy in Simulated Bodily Fluids. Chemical Papers, 77, 1317-1337.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11696-022-02544-y
[11] Zhang, Y., Cao, J., Wang, X., Liu, H., Shao, Y., Chu, C., et al. (2022) The Effect of Enzymes on the in Vitro Degradation Behavior of Mg-Alloy Wires in Simulated Gastric Fluid and Intestinal Fluid. Bioactive Materials, 7, 217-226.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bioactmat.2021.05.047
[12] Lin, X., Saijilafu,, Wu, X., Wu, K., Chen, J., Tan, L., et al. (2022) Biodegradable Mg-Based Alloys: Biological Implications and Restorative Opportunities. International Materials Reviews, 68, 365-403.
https://doi.org/10.1080/09506608.2022.2079367
[13] Sefa, S., Wieland, D.C.F., Helmholz, H., Zeller-Plumhoff, B., Wennerberg, A., Moosmann, J., et al. (2022) Assessing the Long-Term in Vivo Degradation Behavior of Magnesium Alloys—A High Resolution Synchrotron Radiation Micro Computed Tomography Study. Frontiers in Biomaterials Science, 1.
[14] ASTM International (2004) ASTM G31-72: Standard Practice for Laboratory Immersion Corrosion Testing.
[15] Merson, D., Brilevsky, A., Myagkikh, P., Tarkova, A., Prokhorikhin, A., Kretov, E., et al. (2020) The Functional Properties of Mg–Zn–X Biodegradable Magnesium Alloys. Materials, 13, Article 544.
https://doi.org/10.3390/ma13030544
[16] Wang, W., Blawert, C., Zan, R., Sun, Y., Peng, H., Ni, J., et al. (2021) A Novel Lean Alloy of Biodegradable Mg–2Zn with Nanograins. Bioactive Materials, 6, 4333-4341.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bioactmat.2021.04.020
[17] Kavyani, M., Ebrahimi, G.R., Ezatpour, H.R. and Jahazi, M. (2022) Microstructure Refinement, Mechanical and Biocorrosion Properties of Mg–Zn–Ca–Mn Alloy Improved by a New Severe Plastic Deformation Process. Journal of Magnesium and Alloys, 10, 1640-1662.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jma.2020.11.013
[18] ASTM International (2016) ASTM F 763-04: Standard Practice for Short-Term Screening of Implant Materials.
[19] Sun, Y., Helmholz, H. and Willumeit-Römer, R. (2024) Systemic Modulation of Skeletal Mineralization by Magnesium Implant Promoting Fracture Healing: Radiological Exploration Enhanced with PCA-Based Machine Learning in a Rat Femoral Model. Journal of Magnesium and Alloys, 12, 1009-1020.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jma.2024.01.012
[20] Jamel, M.M., Jamel, M.M. and Lopez, H.F. (2022) Designing Advanced Biomedical Biodegradable Mg Alloys: A Review. Metals, 12, Article 85.
https://doi.org/10.3390/met12010085
[21] Bandyopadhyay, A., Mitra, I., Goodman, S.B., Kumar, M. and Bose, S. (2023) Improving Biocompatibility for Next Generation of Metallic Implants. Progress in Materials Science, 133, Article 101053.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmatsci.2022.101053
[22] Du, B., Hu, Z., Wang, J., Sheng, L., Zhao, H., Zheng, Y., et al. (2020) Effect of Extrusion Process on the Mechanical and in Vitro Degradation Performance of a Biomedical Mg-Zn-Y-Nd Alloy. Bioactive Materials, 5, 219-227.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bioactmat.2020.02.002
[23] Khalili, M.A. and Tamjid, E. (2021) Controlled Biodegradation of Magnesium Alloy in Physiological Environment by Metal Organic Framework Nanocomposite Coatings. Scientific Reports, 11, Article No. 8645.
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-87783-x
[24] Yavuzyegit, B., Karali, A., De Mori, A., Smith, N., Usov, S., Shashkov, P., et al. (2024) Evaluation of Corrosion Performance of AZ31 Mg Alloy in Physiological and Highly Corrosive Solutions. ACS Applied Bio Materials, 7, 1735-1747.
https://doi.org/10.1021/acsabm.3c01169
[25] Sarian, M.N., Iqbal, N., Sotoudehbagha, P., Razavi, M., Ahmed, Q.U., Sukotjo, C., et al. (2022) Potential Bioactive Coating System for High-Performance Absorbable Magnesium Bone Implants. Bioactive Materials, 12, 42-63.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bioactmat.2021.10.034
[26] Liu, G., Han, J., Li, Y., Guo, Y., Yu, X., Yuan, S., et al. (2023) Effects of Inorganic Ions, Organic Particles, Blood Cells, and Cyclic Loading on in Vitro Corrosion of Mg Al Alloys. Journal of Magnesium and Alloys, 11, 2429-2441.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jma.2021.08.034
[27] International Organization for Standardization (2009) ISO 10993-5: Biological Evaluation of Medical Devices: Part 5: Tests for in Vitro Cytotoxicity.
[28] International Organization for Standardization (2016) ISO 10993-6: Biological Evaluation of Medical Devices—Part 6: Tests for Local Effects after Implantation.

Copyright © 2025 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

Creative Commons License

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.