X. Lin and C. Fang, “Study on the Non-Coal High-Energy-Consumption Chlor-Alkali Industry Layout in China Based on the Development of the Non-Grid-Connected Wind Power Industry,” 2009 World Non-Grid-Connected Wind Power and Energy Conference 2009 (WNWEC 2009), pp. 501-506.

has been cited by the following article:

• TITLE: Power as Resource-Power as Discourse: An Overview Evaluation of the Key-Factors of “Wind Farms” and “Riparian Rights” as Sources of Power

  AUTHORS: Grigorios L. Kyriakopoulos

  KEYWORDS: Resources, Discourses, Riparian Rights, Wind Power, Socioeconomic Environment

  JOURNAL NAME: Engineering, Vol.3 No.1, January 29, 2011

  ABSTRACT: Nowadays, the concept of power can illuminate the nature of contestation. Indeed, it is apparent that discourse coalitions exist both within the wind sector and the riparian corridors management. In the present study, a theoretical framework for policy power analysis is presented, while a balanced European and national energy policies representation reveals the positive and negative impacts, towards which both the above two power sources may be attributed. The “power” holistic approach is mainly determined in a wider social-economic, political, and environmental framework. This multidimensional and holistic approach is considered invaluable for humans/consumers, in order them to determine their capacities, priorities and perspectives for viable use of power within the above complex-structured framework. Finally, the study adopts a balanced reassessment of the existing policies, offering tentative proposals for reducing conflicts.