R. Hoffmann, S. von Bardeleben, F. ten Cate, A. C. Borges, J. Kasprzak, C. Firschke, S. Lafitte, N. Al-Saadi, S. Kuntz-Hehner, M. Engelhardt, H. Becher and J. L. Vanoverschelde, “Assessment of Systolic Left Ventricular Function: A Multi-Centre Comparison of Cineventriculography, Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Unenhanced and Contrast-Enhanced Echocardiography,” European Heart Journal, Vol. 26, No. 6, 2005, pp. 607-616. doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehi083

has been cited by the following article:

• TITLE: Systematic Evaluation of Current Possibilities to Determine Left Ventricular Volumes by Echocardiography in Patients after Myocardial Infarction

  AUTHORS: Stephan Stoebe, Adrienn Tarr, Tudor Trache, Jens-Gerrit Kluge, Dietrich Pfeiffer

  KEYWORDS: Contrast Echocardiography; Left Ventricular Systolic Function; Left Ventricular Volumes; Remodeling; Myocardial Infarction; LVO Imaging

  JOURNAL NAME: Open Journal of Medical Imaging, Vol.2 No.2, June 13, 2012

  ABSTRACT: Purpose: The aim of the present study was to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy for quantification of left ventricular (LV) volumes and LV ejection fraction (LVEF) with current echocardiographic methods of planimetry for analysis of LV remodeling after myocardial infarction in daily clinical routine. Methods: 26 patients were investigated directly after interventional therapy at hospital pre-discharge and at 6 month follow-up. Standardized 2D transthoracic native and contrast echocardiography were performed in all patients. Due to methodological aspects the results of LV volumes and LVEF using native echocardiography were compared to the results of LV opacification (LVO) imaging for analysis in mono-, bi- and triplane data sets using the Simpson’s rule. In addition corresponding multidimensional data sets were analyzed. Results: The assessment of LV volumes and LVEF is more accurate with contrast echocardiography. The comparison of LV volumes and LVEF shows significant increases using contrast echocardiography (p