G. F. Pang, C. L. Fan, Y. M. Liu, Y. Z. Cao, J. J. Zhang, B. L. Fu, X. M. Li, Z. Y. Li and Y. P. Wu, “Multi-Resi- due Method for the Determination of 450 Pesticide Resi- dues in Honey, Fruit Juice and Wine by Double-Cartridge Solid-Phase Extraction/Gas Chromatogra-phy-Mass Spectrometry and Liquid Chromatography-Tandem Mass Spec- trometry,” Food Additives & Contaminants: Part A, Vol. 23, No. 8, 2006, pp. 777-810. doi:10.1080/02652030600657997

has been cited by the following article:

• TITLE: Fast Determination of 22 Pesticides in Rice Wine by Dispersive Solid-Phase Extraction in Combination with GC-MS

  AUTHORS: Nannan Chen, Hongbo Gao, Nengsheng Ye, Qiding Zhong, Zhenghe Xiong, Xuexin Gu

  KEYWORDS: d-SPE; Rice Wine; Pesticide; GC-MS; Matrix Effect

  JOURNAL NAME: American Journal of Analytical Chemistry, Vol.3 No.1, January 5, 2012

  ABSTRACT: A rapid method was developed for the determination of 22 pesticides in rice wine. The procedure involved an extraction with acetonitrile and a cleanup step using dispersive solid-phase extraction (d-SPE), and primary-secondary amine (PSA) and octadecylsilane (ODS) were used as sorbents. D-SPE had some advantages over some traditional prepara- tions, especially in time and cost. Both the extraction and cleanup only cost about 15 min per a sample. Then the GC-MS was used for quantitative and qualitative analysis. Matrix-matched standards solution and analyte protectant were compared to decrease the matrix effect, and the former showed a better efficacy. Acceptable linearity was achieved in the range of 0.05 - 0.30 mg/L. After matrix-matched standards calibration, recoveries were between 60 and 140%. For the most of pesticides, precision and repeatability were less than 10% and 16%, respectively. The result indicated that the developed method was suitable for the determination of the multi-pesticides in rice wine.