Chen, Y.G., Lai, K.Y., Lee, Y.H., Suppe, J., Chen, W.S., Lin, Y.N.N., Wang, Y., Hung, J.H. and Kuo, Y.T. (2007) Coseismic Fold 315 Scarps and Their Kinematic Behavior in the 1999 Chi-Chi Earthquake Taiwan Region. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 112, B03S02.
https://doi.org/10.1029/2006JB004388

has been cited by the following article:

• TITLE: Estimation of Displacement and Extension due to Reverse Drag of Normal Faults: Forward Method

  AUTHORS: Shunshan Xu, Angel Francisco Nieto-Samaniego, Huilong Xu, Susana Alicia Alaniz-Álvarez

  KEYWORDS: Fault Rotation, Fault Drag, Fault Displacement, Extension, Forward Model

  JOURNAL NAME: International Journal of Geosciences, Vol.15 No.1, January 31, 2024

  ABSTRACT: In the case of reverse drag of normal faulting, the displacement and horizontal extension are determined based on the established equations for the three mechanisms: rigid body, vertical shear and inclined shear. There are three sub-cases of basal detachment for the rigid body model: horizontal detachment, antithetic detachment and synthetic detachment. For the rigid body model, the established equations indicate that the total displacement on the synthetic base (Dt2) is the largest, that on the horizontal base (Dt1) is moderate, and that on the antithetic base (Dt3) is the smallest. On the other hand, the value of (Dt1) is larger than the displacement for the vertical shear (Dt4). The value of (Dt1) is larger than or less than the displacement for the inclined shear (Dt5) depending on the original fault dip δ0, bedding angle θ, and the angle of shear direction β. For all original parameters, the value of Dt5 is less than the value of Dt4. Also, by comparing three rotation mechanisms, we find that the inclined shear produces largest extension, the rigid body model with horizontal detachment produces the smallest extension, and the vertical shear model produces moderate extension.