Everaerts, J., Salvati, E., Uzun, F., Brandt, L.R., Zhang, H. and Korsunsky, A.M. (2018) Separating Macro-(Type I) and Micro-(Type II + III) Residual Stresses by Ring-Core FIB-DIC Milling and Eigenstrain Modelling of a Plastically Bent Titanium Alloy Bar. Acta Materialia, 156, 43-51.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2018.06.035

has been cited by the following article:

• TITLE: An Overview of Techniques for Measuring Residual Stress in Metal Matrix Composites

  AUTHORS: Qingping Wang, Pakeeza Maryum, Yuxin Liu

  KEYWORDS: Residual Stress, Destructive Methods, Compressive Residual Stress, Tensile Residual Stress, Non-Destructive Methods

  JOURNAL NAME: Journal of Materials Science and Chemical Engineering, Vol.10 No.10, October 31, 2022

  ABSTRACT: Measurement of residual stress is significant to ensure safety, reliability and the life of composites, and currently has been a hot issue in scientific research. The fabrication processes such as machining, and heat treatment inherit either kind of residual stress which had either positive consequences or negative ones, for example, the fatigue limit of a component enhances by compressive stress, whereas corrosion resistance gets reduced by tensile stress. This study is aimed at a brief overview of the recent advancement in this field to help researchers in the in-depth study of measuring residual stress. It helps them in selecting the most appropriate techniques among destructive methods i.e., mainly Contour, ring core, deep hole-drilling method, and non-destructive techniques i.e., diffraction, ultrasonic method, depending on their requirements and applications. For each available technique, working methodology, physical limitations, and applications are discussed. At the end of this paper, future trends regarding an assessment of residual stress have been forecasted.