Gilbeau, L., Octave-Prignot, M., Loncol, T., Renard, L., Scalliet, P. and Gregoire, V. (2001) Comparison of Setup Accuracy of Three Different Thermoplastic Masks for the Treatment of Brain and Head and Neck Tumors. Radiotherapy and Oncology, 58, 155-162.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-8140(00)00280-2

has been cited by the following article:

• TITLE: Dosimetric Effects of Thermoplastic Immobilizing Devices on Surface Dose

  AUTHORS: Olivia Adu-Poku, Eric Kotei Addison, Cyril Schandorf, Francis Hasford, Stephen Inkoom, Joseph Adom, Akosah Kingsley, Eunice Arthur, Linus Owusu-Agyapong

  KEYWORDS: Thermoplastic Mask, Percentage Depth Dose, Equivalent Thickness of Water, Skin Dose

  JOURNAL NAME: International Journal of Medical Physics, Clinical Engineering and Radiation Oncology, Vol.11 No.1, January 24, 2022

  ABSTRACT: Thermoplastic immobilizing masks have dosimetric effects on the patient’s skin dose. The thermoplastic percentage depth dose (PDD), equivalent thickness of water for the masks and surface doses were determined. The surface dose factors due to the thermoplastic mask was found to be 1.7949, 1.9456, 2.0563, 2.1967, 2.3827, 2.5459 and 2.6565 for field sizes of 5 × 5, 8 × 8, 10 × 10, 12 × 12, 15 × 15, 18 × 18 and 20 × 20 cm2 respectively which shifted the percentage depth dose curve to lower values. The physical thermoplastic thickness was measured to be between 2.30 and 1.80 mm, and the equivalent thicknesses of water, de, were determined to be between 1.2 and 1.00 mm. This meant that, as the mask thickness decreased, its water equivalent thickness also decreased. The presence of the mask material increased the skin dose to a factor of 1%. The thermoplastic mask factor was also found to be 0.99.