W. C. Reeves, B. M. Gurbaxani, J. S. Lin and E. R. Unger, “A Response to Jason et al., ‘Evaluating the Centers for Disease Control’s Empirical Chronic Fatigue Syndrome Case Definition,” Journal of Disability Policy Studies Online First, 2009. http://dps.sagepub.com/cgi/ rapidpdf/1044207309346310v1.pdf

has been cited by the following article:

• TITLE: Sensitivity and Specificity of the CDC Empirical Chronic Fatigue Syndrome Case Definition

  AUTHORS: Leonard A. Jason, Meredyth Evans, Abigail Brown, Molly Brown, Nicole Porter, Jessica Hunnell, Valerie Anderson, Athena Lerch

  KEYWORDS: Chronic Fatigue Syndrome, Empirical Case Definition, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Fukuda Criteria

  JOURNAL NAME: Psychology, Vol.1 No.1, April 29, 2010

  ABSTRACT: In an effort to bring more standardization to the chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS) Fukuda et al. case definition [1], the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) has developed an empirical case definition [2] that specifies crite-ria and instruments to diagnose CFS. The present study investigated the sensitivity and specificity of this CFS em-pirical case definition with diagnosed individuals with CFS from a community based study that were compared to non-CFS cases. All participants completed questionnaires measuring disability (Medical Outcome Survey Short-Form-36) [3], fatigue (the Multidimensional Fatigue Inventory) [4], and symptoms (CDC Symptom Inventory) [5]. Findings of the present study indicated sensitivity and specificity problems with the CDC empirical CFS case defi-nition.