Gillath, O., Shaver, P.R., Mikulincer, M., Nitzberg, R.E., Erez, A. and Van Ijzendoorn, M.H. (2005) Attachment, Caregiving and Volunteering: Placing Volunteerism in an Attachment-Theoretical Framework. Personal Relationships, 12, 425-446.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6811.2005.00124.x

has been cited by the following article:

• TITLE: The Relationships between Family Support, Attachment Types in Adulthood and Attitudes towards Filial Responsibility among Three Generations of Arab and Jewish Men

  AUTHORS: Pnina Ron

  KEYWORDS: Filial Responsibility, Familyism and Communalism, Types of Attachment, Attitudes and Perceptions, Intergenerational Transmission

  JOURNAL NAME: Advances in Aging Research, Vol.8 No.5, September 12, 2019

  ABSTRACT: The aim of the current study was to compare between three generations groups of Arab and Jewish male’s attitudes towards filial responsibility. 121 university students, their fathers (116) and their grandfathers (114), answered a self-report questionnaire, which measured filial responsibility attitudes, type of attachment; self-esteem; sense of mastery and, family support. Results revealed ethnicity and religiosity differences as well as between-generations differences regarding filial responsibility. An additional finding brought to light the cross-generational differences in the relationship between the attachment style in adulthood and the attitudes regarding filial responsibility. The most important finding shows that the Arab male, especially in the youngest generation, finds himself in a socio-psychological-internal conflict between tradition and modernization regarding the family norms. Arab society, in attitudes towards filial responsibility, is still traditional in terms of its approach to the institutions of clan and, the men status within the family. Thus, mostly among the elderly Arab Muslims.