Schoofs, H., Heamans, D., & Raes, F. (2010). Brooding and Reflection as Subtypes of Rumination: Evidence from Confirmatory Factor Analysis in Nonclinical Samples Using the Dutch Ruminative Responses Scale. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 32, 609-617.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10862-010-9182-9

has been cited by the following article:

• TITLE: Factor Structure of the Ruminative Response Scale and Measurement Invariance across Gender and Age among Chinese Adolescents

  AUTHORS: Lijuan Liang, Yung-Hsing Lee

  KEYWORDS: Ruminative Response Scale, Factor Structure, Measurement Invariance, Gender and Age, Chinese Adolescents

  JOURNAL NAME: Advances in Applied Sociology, Vol.9 No.6, June 19, 2019

  ABSTRACT: Methods: Participants included 1103 adolescents from Hunan Province and Hainan Province in China. A confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) was conducted to determine the structure of the RRS on a large scale. Multiple CFAs were utilized to test the measurement invariance of the three subscales included in the RRS, across gender and age. Results: The RRS exhibited strong internal consistency (overall Cronbach’s alpha coefficient = 0.927) and internal reliability (0.362 - 0.864). The CFA showed a valid three-factor model. Measurement invariance of the model across gender and age was fully supported. Conclusions: Total RRS and sub-scales have accepted validity and reliability. Three-factor model of the RRS across gender and age was established. Measurement equivalence of the RRS across gender and age was established among Chinese adolescents. These findings suggest that the use of the RRS in comparing samples across gender and age is valid.