Luyckx, K., Goossens, L., Soenens, B., Beyers, W. and Vansteenkiste, M. (2005) Identity Statuses Based on 4 Rather than 2 Identity Dimensions: Extending and Refining Marcia’s Paradigm. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 34, 605-618.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-005-8949-x

has been cited by the following article:

• TITLE: The Relationship between Learning Styles and Students’ Identity Styles

  AUTHORS: Sara Alavi, Hassan Toozandehjani

  KEYWORDS: Concrete Experience, Reflective Observation, Abstract Conceptualization, Successful Identity, Confusion, Active Experimentation, Learning Style, Identity Style

  JOURNAL NAME: Open Journal of Psychiatry, Vol.7 No.2, April 30, 2017

  ABSTRACT: The aim of this study was to investigate the relationship between learning styles and identity styles Students. The study consisted of all high school students and community solidarity (second period) in the 2014-2015 school year resident of the city of Sabzevar that 100 people were selected by multistage random cluster sampling. Kolb’s Learning Styles Inventory Tool questionnaire identity styles Bennion-Adams used the results showed that successful identity styles between style concrete experience, reflective observation, abstract conceptualization and active experimentation students have a significant relationship. Among the components of a successful style only concrete experience, reflective observation and active experimentation to predict and successful identity and disoriented style of abstract conceptualization learning style to predict. Also a significant relationship between the identities of the student field does not exist. Among the students, there is significant gender identity style making.