Child, B. (2000) Making Wildlife Pay: Converting Wildlife’s Comparative Advantage into Real Incentives for Having Wildlife in African Savannas, Case Studies from Zimbabwe and Zambia. In: Prins, H.H.T., Grootenhuis, J.G. and Dolan, T.T., Eds., Wildlife Conservation by Sustainable Use, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston, 335-387. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-4012-6_17

has been cited by the following article:

• TITLE: Population Dynamics of Large Herbivores and the Framing of Wildlife Conservation in Zimbabwe

  AUTHORS: Edson Gandiwa

  KEYWORDS: Bottom-Up Control, Illegal Hunting, Law Enforcement, Media Framing, Top-Down Control

  JOURNAL NAME: Open Journal of Ecology, Vol.4 No.7, May 27, 2014

  ABSTRACT: This article reviews: 1) The role of natural and human-induced controls in influencing large herbivore populations; 2) how human controls (i.e., policy instruments, incentives and provisions) influence human activities and wildlife conservation; and 3) media framing of wildlife conservation using Zimbabwe as a case study, in particular Gonarezhou National Park and adjacent areas. The review shows that droughts are important in influencing large herbivore populations in semi-arid ecosystems; political instability and economic collapse does not necessarily lead to increased illegal hunting in situations where policy instruments, such as laws, are enforced. A higher perceived effectiveness of Communal Areas Management Programme for Indigenous Resources was partly associated with a decline in human-wildlife conflicts and there was a spill-over effect of frames from the political domain into wildlife conservation following Zimbabwe’s land reforms in 2000. It is concluded that natural bottom-up processes (e.g., droughts) influence large herbivore population dynamics whereas policy instruments, incentives, provisions and societal frames mainly have a top-down effect on wild large herbivore populations in savanna ecosystems.