TITLE:
Do Exam Policies Matter in College?
AUTHORS:
L. Chukwudi Ikwueze
KEYWORDS:
Examination Policies; Student Learning Outcomes; College Education in New York State, United States of America
JOURNAL NAME:
Creative Education,
Vol.5 No.4,
March
12,
2014
ABSTRACT:
This paper uses the binary logistic regression
to show how exam policies affect students’ learning outcomes. Types of examinations
employed by instructors are divided broadly into three, namely traditional, nontraditional,
and project. Using data from an undergraduate business program, the study develops
a binary logistic regression model predicting the effects of the three types of
examinations on students’ learning outcomes. The results showed that the traditional
(in-class) examinationhad the largest predictive powers on students’ learning outcomes.
Nontraditional examination and project had significantly lesser predictive powers
than traditional examination, with project having the least powers. The findings
suggest, first, that instructors’ examination policies may be less
impactful or have negative effects on learning outcomes; second, there can be a
particular combination of traditional, nontraditional, and project examinations,
which can most effectively boost students’ learning outcomes; third, students who
participate in academic program with higher correctly classified estimates would
be expected to acquire higher learning outcomes than students who participate in
an academic program with significantly lower correctly classified estimates; fourth,
examination policies can be deployed as a critical tool for students’ learning outcomes;
and, fifth, a periodic evaluation of examination policies in an academic program
may be useful.